FFA should sanction Cahill for belittling McLaughlin
By Jesse Fink, 19 Jun 2009 Jesse Fink is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- football, Fox Sports, Melanie McLaughlin, Socceroos, Tim Cahill
185 Have your say
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- Tim Cahill news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news

Australia's Tim Cahill celebrates after scoring the first goal for Australia during the World Cup qualifying soccer match between Australia and Qatar at the Brisbane stadium in Brisbane, Australia, Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2008. AP Photo/Tertius Pickard
Over at The Finktank, my column for SBS, I’ve leapt to the defence of Tim Cahill after he was smeared last weekend by the Sunday Telegraph for a nightclub incident it appears never happened.
But after his embarrassing performance in front of the cameras after Wednesday night’s Australia Vs Japan World Cup Qualifier, in which he scored two goals, he’s deserving of some rebuke.
Melanie McLaughlin has come along in leaps and bounds as a broadcaster with Fox Sports and she is a great asset for that company to have: telegenic with brains and something useful to say about the game she covers.
The same cannot be said for all of of her stablemates, male and female, at the pay-TV station. (For the record, let me state I’m a big fan of the work of Simon Hill and Mark Bosnich, both of whom call a spade a spade, and Paul Trimboli, whose enthusiasm for the game is infectious and who is turning into a great game analyst.)
So McLaughlin deserved much more respect than she got from Cahill, who chose to ignore the questions she asked of him in her now-obligatory post-match on-field interview and didn’t even doing her the basic courtesy of looking at her when she spoke.
Standoffish, his tongue rolling around in his cheeks, it was a disgraceful display from Cahill, who has every right to nurse a grievance with the way he was treated by the Sunday Telegraph but should have no issue with a bright, pleasant young woman just trying to do her job.
The opening question she asked of him was hardly threatening, a joke about how popular he now is in Japan.
But instead of smiling or offering a laugh, Cahill just turned away to look at nothing and muttered, “I’d just like to thank the crowd, the lads, a great turnout in Melbourne. I’m so proud to be here, so proud to play tonight so I think the credit just goes to the crowd, you were brilliant.“
She tried again.
Same response, after which Cahill scampered off without so much as even acknowledging her presence.
Cahill was deserving of sympathy for the way the Sunday Telegraph handled the nightclub story but in his exchange with McLaughlin he managed in one fell swoop to come across both as arrogant and self-regarding, and certainly undeserving of anyone’s compassion.
It is worthy of sanction by the FFA, especially considering Fox Sports is an official partner of the federation.
Fox Sports, which is owned by Premier Media Group, deserves better for the millions it puts into the game and which keeps the FFA in the black.
What happened in Kings Cross, meanwhile, is not and has never been worthy of sanction.
The problem for Fox is PMG itself is part-owned by News Limited, the publishers of the Sunday Telegraph.
So Cahill was making his own statement, albeit a misguided one. His beef should be with Neil Breen, the embattled editor of the Sunday Telegraph, not poor old McLaughlin or her bosses at Fox, who had nothing to do with that Tele story and who wouldn’t have known anything about it.
As most of you well know, I’ve worked at Fox myself, so I know intimately how various parts of the News Limited organisation function in splendid isolation.
“Synergy“ is the mantra but it’s not the reality on the floor.
So Cahill must be called to account by the FFA for this performance.
Short of that, McLaughlin and Fox deserve a contrite apology. He might have scored two goals and won his team the game, but Cahill also spoiled a great night by behaving like a petulant six-year-old.
Everyone loves a winner, but no one likes an ungracious one.
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- football, Fox Sports, Melanie McLaughlin, Socceroos, Tim Cahill

June 19th 2009 @ 8:43am
Limpet #7 said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:43am | Report comment
Before the Sunday Telegraph smear campaign kicked in to gear, a certain loud mouthed blogger had already layed the boot into Cahill for no apparent reason, with this strongly worded ticking off from TWG:
“Tim Cahill has been mouthing off in Dubai, telling Marco Monteverde of the Courier-Mail: “I don’t read what’s said in Australia.” Well he should, the ungrateful sod. Especially when the Australian media took up the cudgel to champion and publicise his bid to play for the Socceroos when, as a 14-year-old, he stupidly chose to play for Western Samoa. The local press has also been very supportive of his charitable/football academy concerns and contributed in no small way to making him the celebrity he is today. He can get off his soapbox, too, and put to rest the suggestion the Australian media has it in for his boss.”
It is simply unbelievable that he would continue to support the campaign against Cahill by this article today. Especially when his precious Nicky Carle got his first ever start in a world cup qualifier – a dream come true, surely. I would have thought there were far better, far more positive topics to discuss after such a successful qualifying campaign.
June 19th 2009 @ 8:49am
NUFCMVFC said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Have to say I disagree Fink
It’s worth remembering that Fox Sports stream the Daily Telegraph stories through their websites, and Cahill was protesting at the media in general, which would have been the case regardless of who was asking the questions, whether that is someone you consider to be half decent or one of the people at the Pay TV station you don’t, if he had committed to snubbing the News Ltd media who had derided him, there is no argument to suggest that he should withdraw from that commitment merely because it is Mel Mclaughlin talking
It is generally good to see a few more News reporters coming through etc into the Football media, but I disagree with you Jesse and am dissapointed in the patronising stance, considering I thought it was quite heroic, as football fans have had to put up with the same patronising treatment from the same publications and criticised by the FFA in conjunction with this to boot, so far from “letting fans down” as the Daily Telgraph suggests, for me it was exactly the opposite
Sadly, this article can even be used as justification by the Daily Telegraph for their baseless assertions in an articel the following day
June 19th 2009 @ 8:54am
True Tah said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Jesse
maybe that just Cahill’s personal style and he wasn’t being rude.
I think you’re building a mountain out of a molehill here.
June 19th 2009 @ 8:55am
Mick of Newie said | June 19th 2009 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Jesse, I disagree on two levels, First, sporting bodies generally try to control too much of what players say and in advocating FFA sanctioning a player you are in my view doing the media and the public a dis-service. The public can decide what they think of Tim’s interview, the thought police should not seek to prevent it occurring. Secondly, as many posters above have identified, you may draw a distinction between various arms of the Murdoch empire but I don’t and I think Tim is entitled to come to the same conclusion.
June 19th 2009 @ 9:01am
Tom said | June 19th 2009 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Christ this is a patronising article. The implication seems to be that poor little Melanie McLaughlin is bawling her eyes out somewhere and Cahill needs to personally apologise and maybe offer her a tissue and a cup of Nescafe.
I’m sure she’s tough enough to deal with it, and smart enough to realise it wasn’t a personal slight.
The patronising description of McLaughlin as ‘telegenic with brains and something useful to say about the game she covers.’ is unbelievable. Something useful? Oh well done! Nobody would ever describe a male broadcaster in that way. Nor should the reference to fox journalists ‘male and female’ be necessary.
Nobody has suggested that Cahill’s treatment of the interview had anything to do with McLaughlin’s gender. But this article seems to treat her like some fragile china doll needing protection. I’m sure she can deal with this without needing the FFA to step in.
June 19th 2009 @ 9:08am
Kurt said | June 19th 2009 @ 9:08am | Report comment
I really hope some of you appreciate the wonderful irony of all of this. For years soccer fans in Aust have been bleating “no one pays us enough attention, give us some more attention!’. Now you actually have a few players with a reasonable public profile and surprise surprise they are being subject to same overblown, ridiculous half truths and innuendo that league and AFL players have been putting up with for years. And do you show any appreciation? Thank the media for their interest and attention? No, just more of the same whinging. Here’s the deal guys and you may as well just accept it: With the good bits of fame come the bad bits of fame. Britany knows it, Lindsay knows it, rugby league players know it, AFL players know it and now you know it.
June 19th 2009 @ 9:11am
Chop said | June 19th 2009 @ 9:11am | Report comment
What a fuss about nothing.
So Tim Cahill has some issues with the media, big deal? The Teledrama beating up a nothing incident (who’d have thought?)
I did feel sorry for Mel McLaughlin but to her credit handled the situation very well, not like the poor damsel in distress Jesse makes her out to be.
June 19th 2009 @ 9:15am
hammered said | June 19th 2009 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Cahill’s attitude during his interview had absolutely nothing to do with McLaughlin. She was just collateral damage in a war between News Limited and football. Wrong place at the wrong time.
The Sunday Telegraph’s poor attempt to smear the game of football in Australia backfired and also put Cahill offside, so to speak.
All football fans know the Daily Telegraph, Sunday Telegraph and its brother/sister publications around the country are anti-football due to News Limited’s big stake in rugby league.
Cahill was making a stance against all News Limited properties, of which, as Jesse alludes to, Fox Sports falls under.
I disagree with you here Jesse. I say good on Cahill for sticking it to those who have stuck it to football for so long.
June 19th 2009 @ 9:20am
Arundel James said | June 19th 2009 @ 9:20am | Report comment
I think you’ve missed the mark Jesse — Foxsports streamed David Riccio’s poorly written article straight onto its website:
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,25633590-5014539,00.html
It would be very difficult to ‘sanction’ Cahill for thanking the fans and I agree with Tom that your post treats Mel McLaughlin in a patronising way – it shouldn’t matter who the broadcast journo is.
June 19th 2009 @ 9:24am
AGO74 said | June 19th 2009 @ 9:24am | Report comment
agree with you jesse. whist i understand his point at being angry, it was the wrong time to ‘take a stand’ so to speak. sure there is a relationship in parent company between foxtel and the sunday tele but what has been reported has nothing to do with foxtel the fox sports crew covering the game the other night and who incidentally put in a substantial amount of cash to the ffa’s – and by extension – tim cahill’s wallet. unfortunately by taking such a public stance he has thrown more fuel onto the fire which i’m sure (in the daily tele’s warped opinion) contributed to them pursuing it further and coming up with more trash on their back page today. almost unbackable odds that our old friend rebecca “convicted twice for drink driving” wilson will take the moral high ground in her piece tomorrow. i also agree with jesse that simon hill, bozza and trimmers are a class apart from anything else on the fox sports football panel. bozza is fantastic. articulate, insightful and forthright with his opinion which have substance to them. hopefully he has a long career ahead of him in football commentary.