Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- International Rugby Union - Six Nations, Heineken Cup, Rugby Championship news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
Les Bleus will be looking to become just sixth team to win a Test series on New Zealand soil, and the first in the professional era, when a confident Tri Colours march on Wellington.
In fact, in the last 23 years, only Les Bleus have downed the All Blacks in a series, with the last team achieving this holy grail of rugby achievements being the Wallabies.
The first team to accomplish this was Phillip Nel’s and the late Danie Craven’s 1937 Springboks.
In 1949, the Wallabies under Trevor Allan and Colin Windon, won the series and became the first Australian team to wrestle the Bledisloe Cup off the All Blacks in New Zealand.
In 1971, arguably the greatest ever Lions team under John Dawes would also record a series triumph.
In 1986, during the “Cavalier tours,” the Wallabies would win a second series. And, of course, in 1994, Phillipe Saint Andre’s exalted Les Bleus team would achieve the unthinkable.
Marc Lievremont’s team stand on the precipice of history, not only claiming the series and knocking New Zealand off the top of the IRB rankings (they will drop to second) should they win, but completing what assistant coach Emile Ntamack describes as a test run for France’s assault on the 2011 World Cup.
The second match of the year, and already the All Blacks are under pressure. They are missing a host of front liners, who boast more tests than the actual starting XV itself.
But, to play devil’s advocate, that acquittal was used last week.
The injury curse struck again in Carisbrook, with Andrew Hore and Adam Thomson ruled out, but this was balanced by the return of two incumbents.
Looking at this Test XV, with 404 Test caps in the line-up (sans the bench), it is not only more experienced than the side that fell 22-27 to the French last week, but one that looks more balanced.
The inclusion of the classy Conrad Smith not only adds to the backline, but to the dreadlocked Ma’a Nonu inside of him. Otherwise the backline is unchanged, a pleasing vote of confidence to the players.
However, man for man, one feels that the French back division is easily the equal of the All Black three quarters.
The Stade Toulousain back three remain from last week. The Biarritz dreadnought Damien Traille caused immense problems for the All Black defensive patterns. Despite the hype, Mathieu Bastareaud had little impact last week and drops to the bench.
He is replaced by Perpignan’s Top 14 winning centre Maxime Mermoz, who offers far more tactical nous to the Les Bleus backline.
In the halves, Stephen Donald remains, with Highlanders captain Jimmy Cowan, who is perhaps lucky not to lose his place to the robust Piri Weepu, who added so much to the All Blacks with his injection last week.
Donald himself was outplayed by outstanding Montpellier number 10, Francois Trinh-Duc, last week, and will need to play the role of a backline general more, rather than forcing play too much on his own.
For mine, this is the second most crucial element – the first being the physical clash – of the game in Wellington.
In the forwards, the All Blacks have allegedly been terrorising each other in training, simulating the trench warfare in which they comprehensively lost in Dunedin, despite fielding a record 907kg pack.
Heralding the need to play a unearth a specialist open side to replace All Black kingpin Richie McCaw, Adam Thomson – a natural blind side – was played in the number seven spot last week, and was found wanting.
The All Blacks played three blindside flankers in the first Test, and it failed spectacularly. More so when considering rugby doctrine prescribes that two of the basic roles of a number six is to defend and to clear out the ruck.
Neither of these was achieved.
The selection of Te Puke born flank Tanerau Latimer sees the All Black paradigm of carrying a fetcher restored, and Jerome Kaino – the 2008 incumbent blindside – returns from injury, and hopefully the Blues flanker will add the necessary mongrel lacking from the first Test.
If anything, the key for New Zealand is to halt the influence of defensive maestro and Captain Thierry Dusautoir, whose brilliant guerrilla tactics, as in 2007, caused immense woe for the home side.
Kieran Read is moved to number eight, based on his statistics from the first Test, despite being a specialist blindside. He must combat Montpellier number eight Louis Picamoles, one of France’s best players last week.
The tight five on paper looks to favour New Zealand, but a few days ago it counted for nothing.
Perpignan prop Nicholas Mas replaces Sylvain Marconnet, who caused the All Black front row issues last week.
The only other change in the tight is at lock, with Sebastien Chabel starting.
No doubt his inclusion is indicative of the reality that the All Blacks were bullied last week – and Chabel ranks among world rugby’s elite enforcers.
Despite all this, there is no more horrifying rugby beast than a wounded All Black team.
The French will not catch New Zealand on the hop again and the All Blacks will prevail in Wellington by 8.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Queensland ready for Super challenge
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (2)
- Foley excited about Samoan rugby challenge
- Force rugby coach praises his pack
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (11)
- Wales’ Davies banned for ‘tip tackle’ (3)
- Graham Henry’s rugby future confirmed (14)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (21)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (16)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- 2011 World Cup, All Blacks, French rugby, International Rugby, Les bleus, Rugby Union

katzilla said | June 19th 2009 @ 1:57am | Report comment
I wish i could be as Positive James.
Unfortunately i think History is about to be made, and with the way the Lions are building nicely it could be a good Winter in the south for the Northeners.
Mururoa Nukers by 10
Mungehead said | June 19th 2009 @ 2:58am | Report comment
Going to be a nice close game. I expect the ABs to improve more than the French though, so all in all I agree with you James. Smith will be much more reliable in the backline than Toeava, which will give confidence to Nonu, and Latimer showed potential that I think will be visible this week. The new junior forwards will be itching to make up for the last game. No problem with Cowan, but I thought Weepu deserved to start after last week – not sure what’s going on there. And McAlister is still capable of either making or breaking (like he did last week) the game.
Most importantly though, the ABs will have studied hard to relearn this awkward NH game they have forgotten while trialling short arm penalties, and I’m tipping that they will be ready to play it with a decent game plan this time. I’ll be very surprised if they don’t improve substantially. That’s not to say the French haven’t a chance, they have a good one, but they’ll have to pull their socks up. The scoreline was far closer last week than it should have been considering that the French outclassed the ABs all over the park.
Colin N said | June 19th 2009 @ 5:30am | Report comment
Well Henry has might the right calls this time, playing a natural openside bringing back Smith (coming back from injury). For France, the selection of Chabal could be a disaster, even though he had an excellent impact last week. On a positive note, he will add a bit of pace and probably a bit more balance to the pack, but as a Sale fan, I’ve seen him have a pretty average season this year. I’ve never actually seen Mermoz play, so I’m looking forward to seeing him play, as I’ve heard that he’s quite an exciting talent, apparently.
I think the All Blacks will be a lot better than last week, so I’m going for a New Zealand win by 5.
Knives Out said | June 19th 2009 @ 6:03am | Report comment
I can’t fathom why Henry hasn’t selected Messam at 6 to play alongside Latimer, just for their relationship if anything. Granted Kaino is a long-term All Black (in theory) but if Read is unlikely to play 8 for NZ in the future, why not play Kaino at 8? Granted he wasn’t a great success there last season, but neither has his form been that great at 8 this season – so why select him at all? Clearly, Henry wants him involved but why switch Read? The back row seems confused again. That said, NZ didn’t lose because they fielded 3 blindsides, because France didn’t have any traditional scavengers either, they lost because they didn’t attack the French lineout, struggled to break the rush defence and simply didn’t appear to want the game enough. More worrying is the fact that despite the core experience of Woodcock, Mealamu, Thorn, Nonu and Muliania, there wasn’t much leadership evident on the field.
It was interesting, mid-week, to note that Hansen mentioned a lack of physicality, which strikes me as utter rubbish because a) the Super 14 is often lauded in SH quarters as being commensurate with test rugby and b) NZ were easily on a par with, if not better, physically than their European counterparts a few months ago. I don’t see why he couldn’t just admit the selection and tactics were wrong.
France are suddenly being acclaimed as a serious team despite playing a very simple game plan. What happens if they are thrashed this weekend? Frankly, I don’t rate them and I suspect that NZ will do a real number on them. Although, I did suspect that last weekend. It’s interesting to note that the odds have shifted from 1-10 last week (for an All Black victory) to 1/4. Not much value there but I cannot see France winning again. I’d fancy them to take Australia, but not NZ.
N.B. James, I thought the Australia v Baa Baas game proved Chris Jack’s statement about European to be right?
Sam Taulelei said | June 19th 2009 @ 6:39am | Report comment
If the All Blacks had won last week I would have gone into this test expecting the French to win. Now that the roles are reversed an All Blacks win is expected but I’m not so confident, if this side was named last week as expected they would have still got rolled. The loss will certainly change attitudes and desire in the All Blacks camp but there is no disguising the lack of cohesiveness and experience in the loose trio and 9-10 axis which will again come under pressure. The tight five were outplayed badly and if they can’t control the ball and get across the advantage line then the changes to the loose forwards and midfield will make no difference at all.
Jerry said | June 19th 2009 @ 6:54am | Report comment
Knives – you’ve partially answered your own question with this “they lost because they didn’t attack the French lineout, struggled to break the rush defence”.
Kaino is very good at attacking the opposition throw to the lineout and is better at creating go forward ball in the tight exchanges – he is substantially better in both these areas to Messam.
onside said | June 19th 2009 @ 10:12am | Report comment
This is the ‘real’ Test this weekend,the one worth watching.Melbournians are shunning Australia v Italy .
They know the ARU is trying to sell them a pup.The Italian Job .Another ARU heist.Why take a faux Test
match to a new market and then blame the locals for not filling the stadium. Thank goodness for TV.
True Tah said | June 19th 2009 @ 10:18am | Report comment
onside
so maybe they should have taken the Italy game to another smaller rugby-deprived area? Darwin/Adelaide/Newcastle?
onside said | June 19th 2009 @ 11:04am | Report comment
True Tah
yeah I know;look, Melbourne are sports savvy.This game would have been better off held
in a mature rugby market , because it is a work in progress exercise. Nothing wrong with
that,but whereas rugby buffs relate to what Deans is trying to accomplish, Melbourne needs
to see the real deal. Newcasle might work ,because its almost a suburb of Sydney and just
up the road for many fans that live in Sydney.What niggles away at me is this deep seated
obsession with the RWC, and that one game every four years.This Test match against Italy
is played against the backdrop of tomorrows dreams.Its a means to an end , but it should be
a stand alone end in itself. End of rant.
Dean Pantio said | June 19th 2009 @ 11:23am | Report comment
Knives Out: Messam played like he didn’t expect everyone else at Test level is just as good, if not better than him. He deserves to be dropped. Kaino is a known quality at blindside. He played some great rugby there last year and will provide much improved physicality. Reed managed to be less visible than Reuben at 6. At least he has played at 8 for some games during the S14. With a natural openside in Latimer, the backrow has better balance for this test.
The statement “they didn’t attack the French lineout” is specious nonsense. They won lineouts off the French. They lost because they didn’t win the collision and hence found it extremely difficult to get forward momentum to provide their backline with time and space. When they did challeneg in this area they drew level and the game was in the balance up until McAlister decided to show us all just how much playing up North has improved his skills.
His selection smacks of desperation by the coaching staff, but with such an injury list I can see what they were thinking. As for the mauling aspect, that will be fixed. The All Blacks coaching staff have shown themselves to be remarkably capable of learning lessons quickly. What needs to happen is the tight five showing up and getting stuck in.
I rate the French. They are competitive and did the simple things well. I also expect the All Black coaches will be concentrating on shoring up those elements they were well short in matching Les Blues last weekend. With Kaino and Smith back on the field, the introduction of a genuine openside I expect the All Blacks won’t be walking off the field having lost a series in New Zealand. That said, I do expect it to be a tight one.
BTW, to the OP: The series loss to Australia in 1949 must rank as a complete joke. The Wallabies were touring whilst the All Blacks were in South Africa. That it has Test recognition is incomprehensible.