Will Deans’ bubble burst as first real Test looms?
By James Mortimer, 24 Jun 2009 James Mortimer is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, French rugby, Marc Lievremont, robbie deans, Rugby Union, wallabies
108 Have your say
Related coverage
The Wallabies have named what appears to be their full strength team for their first big assessment of the season, facing only the fifth team to win in New Zealand since 2000.
On this result, expectations are high that the French will provide a stern test for Deans, who remains firmly entrenched as the darling of the Australian media.
One only has to look at the team that was rolled out to play the Italians in the second test in Melbourne.
Here was an opponent outside the top ten nations of the world. It is early into the fifteen match international season, you want to try your less experienced players, and some of the big names such as captain Stirling Mortlock needed a rest.
So why not make 16 changes to your match day squad, and wield out probably the weakest – in terms of experience – Australian test team in modern history.
Only 20,280 souls turned up, and there were a host of reasons that were not rugby related that could explain what the ARU said was a poor crowd.
The Socceroo’s had just played in Melbourne and Victoria is in the middle of a pandemic, are just two.
Most indicative though, according to most theorists, including the ARU, was that Italy, who were soundly beaten in Canberra, was not going to draw a crowd. In comparison to, say, the 2010 Bledisloe Test in Melbourne.
This is a moot point, as on pure numbers an All Black-Wallaby clash guarantees “full house” signs.
But no one mentioned the fact that Deans himself had actually treated the Italians with a small measure of contempt by happily rolling out the second tier Wallabies (Australia A should be playing in the Pacific Nations, not in a Test match), and in essence, did what his boss John O’Neill had said last year must never happen again.
A mid-year Test with under strength test teams But didn’t Deans do this? Could some of Melbourne have stayed away because it was a weak Wallaby team?
So France will try to pull off an unlikely Test triumph against the Wallabies. They are at the end of a long season, have been on the road for over a month, and have just toured statistically the most difficult rugby country to play in.
Les Bleus clearly hold the Australians in high regard, and if you believe French assistant Emile Ntamack, claim that the Wallabies are a better team that the All Blacks.
But any French rugby aficionado will tell you that there is no team they would rather beat than the men in black.
So the questions going into the Sydney Test are simple:
Will the French repeat their documented history, and arrive on the turf on ANZ stadium with no mental edge after performing in a big match? Have they already exceeded their expectations on this tour? Will the sight of gold jerseys opposite them inspire them as does the grim pallor of black?
For all and sundry, we hope that the same France that tore into New Zealand executes the same ferocity on the Wallabies.
It will benefit all parties if this is the case.
Les Bleus will, if they win, return home with an Australasian slam, something very few if any Northern teams could ever hope to achieve.
It will also be the turning of the proverbial corner for Marc Lievremont, who has still to convince as a saviour of French running rugby.
The Wallabies though, whatever the result, will be able to be far more thoroughly assessed by all concerned. They have been untested in three matches so far, plain and simple.
Even the All Blacks, who have had vulnerability revealed in the last month, may destroy any debate about their mixed form if their under strength team defeats Italy more handsomely than the Wallabies did.
Yet for no apparent reason, many are claiming that this Australian team is on the verge of greatness. Perhaps they are, but results are the final caveat on such a statement.
In 2009, as things stand, at least two out of the Tri Nations, Bledisloe or Grand Slam must be won.
Otherwise the bubble may well and truly burst.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A (2)
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Chiefs continue to wait for SBW (7)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (202)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, French rugby, Marc Lievremont, robbie deans, Rugby Union, wallabies

Knives out said | June 24th 2009 @ 2:41am | Report comment
I’ve said that France would get a good bashing in the past two games. They didn’t, but I suspect this is a game too far for many of the Frenchmen. Surely they must all be past exhaustion. This game is tailor made for the Wallabies.
onside said | June 24th 2009 @ 6:51am | Report comment
French dogfight for 55 mins then capitulation.
No fresh men like All Blacks and Wallabies.
Sam Taulelei said | June 24th 2009 @ 7:08am | Report comment
Knives, history supports your comment. I can’t recall any NH team that has played two tests in NZ and then a third in Australia in consective weeks and recorded a win in Aus. Ireland came close and should have beaten Australia (as well as NZ in one test) in 2006.
Maxxy said | June 24th 2009 @ 8:18am | Report comment
The French rested Marconnet, Pape, Guiarado, Chouly, the other No.8 (cant remember his name), Beauxis who is fresh and can kick goals and drop goals from 50m and have some very good players they can rotate from the bench including Martin, Yachvilli, Szarzweski, etc. Despite the players that have left there are in fact enough players left to put on a good show. It will be a mental test but the recent results suggest the French are enjoying their competitiveness – They have young players across the team with the same RWC ambitions. They will not play again until November and they will also know that if they perform Lievremont will not forget
Bonza said | June 24th 2009 @ 8:57am | Report comment
James you make an excellent, and largely unnoticed, point. If the matches are to have credibility then it must be encumbent on both teams to field near their best combos otherwise why expect the crowd to turn up. The Wallabies left all their names on the bench and then did not even put 4 of them on the field. I note Spiros article in the SMH supporting JO’N call for full strength touring teams but then it was the Wallabies who announced their rotation for the second test and effectively a less then full stength team. The Italians followed suit. My impression was that there was going to be a stand by the ARU about using the best players but in fact it was stated that there would be an attempt to use 30 players in the first month (only Lote missed out). Spiro also offered the opinion that the second stringers did not take their opportunity so there is disappointment all round.
Even looser said | June 24th 2009 @ 9:26am | Report comment
I’ll be interested to watch the beat-up about ‘French flare’ and so on. Facts are that the Froggies, despite losing a number of players to injury, will be brave but won’t last the full 80. Wallabies will be too fresh & enthusiastic.
Still it’s one I’ll be tuning in to watch. That’s for sure. It will have it’s moments.
ohtani's jacket, said | June 24th 2009 @ 9:28am | Report comment
I expect the Wallabies to win, but it’ll be interesting to see whether France bring the same intensity to the contact area. If they don’t, I imagine Deans will be a bit disappointed. The conditions ought to be better in Sydney and that might cause France to play looser, and besides very few teams win in Sydney.
Jameswm said | June 24th 2009 @ 9:51am | Report comment
It’s funny because the French don’t do as well against the Wallabies as they do against the All Blacks. Not for about the last 10 years, anyway.
The Aussies are largely untested and will they be able to withstand the onslaught that will inevitably come?
Will Burgess’s questionable passing be put under huge pressure?
Will Mumm, Brown, Moore, Sharpe and Baxter be shown up as soft?
Or will the Aussies show that their backs are the best in the world, with their speed and precision passing dismantling the French backs?
It’ll be fun, and then the Lions-Boks the next morning (on tape).
For the record I think Deans did the right thing playing some of his 2nd stringers. They play so many tests now you can’t simply play your best team every match. You need to rest them. You need to give others the chance to see if they’re up to it. What if a main player in a crucial position gets injured in and no backup has had any experience?
I’m afraid it’s a squad mentality these days and you need good backup players who need game time.
chris, syd Aust said | June 24th 2009 @ 10:01am | Report comment
can the tri nations be won without winning the bledisloe? A grand slam is a mighty feat – but its a great opportunity to do it this year as the NH countries will be in a regrouping phase due to the lions tour. When was the last time we beat Ireland at home? I can recall victories at the other 3N home grounds.
what do you reckon the odds are of putting a beat down at the TAB for wallabies to win all 3 trophies? Those springboks looked the real goods in the first half against the lions.
LeftArmSpinner said | June 24th 2009 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Knives, I agree but for different reasons. The Wallabies are better than the AB’s. There, I have said it. Do I really believe it and do the players really believe it?
Hmmm, not completely and when it comes down to the critical play, when the Bledisloe or the Tri Nations is at stake, we will discover reality. But the gap is not very big. One think is for sure, the Wallabies will be capable of beating the AB’s, if they believe they can. Deans is doing a great job of building skills, belief and depth.
20,000 in Melbourne to such a game is a good sign, and enough indication that a Super 15 team can blossom there. Rugby taps into the international audience of every big city. In melbourne, the rugby support will come from the local rugby fans, islanders, Europeans, Brits, Argentinians, Kiwis and Aussies from interstate. When AFL comes to NSW, it can only rely on local AFL fans and aussies from interstate.
James, there is nothing to be fraid of with a squad. it is all about depth in case key players in key positions, like Giteau, get injured. Remember RWC 2007, and Larkham’s sad demise. Who was the replacement, dirt tracker Barnes, the last player selected for the tour.