The myth of the mobile forward pack
By Mushi, 26 Jun 2009 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- NRL, NSW Blues, Queensland Maroons, Rugby League, State Of Origin
I’m a Queenslander so feel free to take this with a grain of salt, but I think for NSW to be competitive, their mobile forward pack theory needs to be addressed.
Yes, NSW had success in the past with this, but it needs to be remembered that was during a period when they were the clearly dominant team, talent wise.
Without a halves combination that can operate behind a beaten pack, or two clearly dominant high work rate frontrowers, the mobility strategy is doomed for failure.
Let’s take a look at game two, where NSW chose to go with three props, none of whom average more than 51 minutes per game at NRL level, and five second rowers, all of whom were either true backrowers or backrow playmakers.
So what happened on the park as a result?
NSW got a combined 99 minutes out of their frontrowers, which for those counting at home is 61 minutes shy of a complete game for two positions, and a paltry 17 hit ups for 124 metres.
Their entire forward pack ended up with 53 hit ups for 386 metres, meaning that the Blues asked their mobile back rowers for two-thirds of their grunt work.
It is very tough for mobile backrowers to run wide of the ruck and provide the backbone to the defensive line if they are being asked to expend energy getting into the trenches and doing a job they aren’t suited to.
To put in perspective how little the NSW pack gave their backs, Petro Civoniceva on his lonesome contributed more in the trenches than the sky blue frontrow, with 17 hit ups for 133 metres.
As a team Queensland were able to get 160 minutes from their four props and 40 hit ups for 270 metres, with 75 and 457 metres from the pack as a whole.
This meant the props allowed their backrowers to focus on what they are supposed to do best, keep their energy for defence and fringe of the ruck running.
It is important to understand the job each player has when picking a side rather than falling in love with gifts unusual to a position. I think NSW selectors need to remember the job of the forwards is first and foremost to go forward.
Otherwise, you are simply asking your completely outmatched backline to also play on the back foot.
Though, as a Queenslander, I hope they never figure it out.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- Rugby league’s new era: where to now? (18)
- New dawn for rugby league gets underway (11)
- Rugby league commission ushers in new era (3)
- Ennis confident about his NRL fitness
- Why sporting seasons should never cross paths (35)
- Independent Commission four years in the making, but worth the wait (27)
- Kearney still to choose Eels kicker
- Rugby league’s new era: where to now? (18)
- Federal Court has it wrong on sports broadcast copyright (48)
- An open letter to Channel Nine (107)
- The NRL’s scariest players (56)
- Is the All Stars match increasing the divide? (25)
- Channel Nine needs NRL-cricket ODI compromise (36)
- The NRL needs a vision (52)
- Explore:
- NRL, NSW Blues, Queensland Maroons, Rugby League, State Of Origin

sheek said | June 26th 2009 @ 8:47am | Report comment
There’s an old rugby union saying, which I also think can be applied to rugby league, that goes something like this.
The pace of your backs is measured by the slowest back. The pace of your forwards is measured by the fastest forward.
Basically, backs can’t afford o be slow, while forwards aren’t required to be fast, except for one fetcher (openside flanker).
Back in the old days, slow backs were easily picked up in attack, & easily exposed in defence. In the forwards, one fast man, like Bob McCarthy, was very handy.
Today, whether it is as relevant with the interchange, is open to debate. Queensland State-of-Origin seem to have a simple structure. The forwards take the ball up & mash the opposition’s strength & will to resist. The backs score the points. Like it was originally intended in both rugby codes.
Another rugby union saying also relevant to rugby league is the one about a team’s capabilities starting in the front row. Nothing’s changed there either.
Brett McKay said | June 26th 2009 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
Mushi, I couldn’t agree more, I’ve always said there’s no point having a mobile pack if they can’t go forward. NSW have tried this theory for years, and I don’t think it’s that unfair to ask “how’s that working out for you?”