How Australia will win its bid for the World Cup
By Con Stamocostas, 27 Jun 2009 Con Stamocostas is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- 2010 World Cup, 2018 World Cup, football, Frank Lowy, Socceroos, World Football
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- World Football - EPL, Champions League & Europe news

FIFA President Sepp Blatter, left, talks with Football Australia chairman Frank Lowy as they arrive at the opening ceremony for the 58th FIFA congress in Sydney, Thursday, May 29, 2008. AP Photo/Mark Baker
During a speech at the Press Club gallery, FFA Chairman Frank Lowy said that Australia had embarked on a Herculean task in trying to win the right to host the 2018 or 2022 World Cups.
Victory, he said, would fulfill the countries’ wildest dreams.
There is another eighteen months for the FFA and the rest of Australia to inform, impress, influence and inspire the members of the FIFA Executive Committee.
Frank Lowy says that the philosophy that underpinned the revival of football at a local level is the same that motivates the World Cup bid.
The economic impact of hosting a World Cup will be huge.
The FFA commissioned Price Waterhouse Coopers to undertake an economic impact analysis of hosting the World Cup and the Confederations Cup.
A joint PWC/Monash University study estimated the impact as a $5.3 billion increase in GDP and a cumulative employment effect of 74,000 jobs.
The decision on the 2018 and 2022 World Cups will be made in December this year.
This is the first time that a decision for two World Cups will be made at the same time.
The bidders Australia will have face are favourites England; a strong Iberian bid by Spain and Portugal; a resource rich Russian bid; other Asian bidders Qatar, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea; and North America’s Mexico and the United States.
To win it, the Australian bid require 13 votes. There are 24 members in the FIFA executive who will decide.
The nine bidding associations go into a ballot. Each member of the 24 member executive including FIFA boss Sepp Blatter, vote for one country.
What happens then is the country that has the lowest number of votes will be eliminated. The same process of elimination begins again until finally there is one country remaining.
There are four members from Africa, four members from Asia, three from Central and North America, eight from Europe, and three from South America and one from Oceania.
So how will Australia get those 13 votes needed during the first round of voting?
You would suspect that the members from the bidding countries on the FIFA executive that vote Japan, United States, Belgium, England, Russia and Spain will vote for themselves.
Oceania has stated on the World Game TV programme that they will vote for Australia. So count one to the Aussies there.
So how will the rest of Australia inform, impress, influence and inspire the members of the FIFA Executive Committee?
The bid and TV ad slogan Come Play was one way of doing it. As well as the website where ordinary fans can sign up and interact with Socceroos.
A Facebook site has also gone up with up-to-date information about the bid.
Why choose Asia?
First, the FFA has to convince the world to choose Asia ahead of Europe or North America. The World Cup has only been in Asia once during its 80 year history.
During the speech, Frank Lowy spoke about the might of Asia’s political and economic power, and how it was rising around the world.
The wealth of Asia continues to grow, he said in his speech. “It is where the customers are for goods and services, and for football.”
He added that the biggest television audience for the World Cup, by far, lies in Asia, not Europe or America.
According to IATA, in 2014 there will be more people flying in Asia than in Europe or America.
Lowy outlined why Australia is a better choice that Europe, saying it was: “Like putting a cherry on top of a gigantic chocolate cake.” He added “Europe is a mature market – it is already overflowing with the highest quality football on a weekly basis.”
Of the United States, he said: “Even under the rosiest scenarios, (it) will remain problematic for football given the unique characteristics of that market and the entrenched competition from other sports.”
So the FFA has convinced the Wworld to go with Asia, why then choose Australia?
Frank Lowy outlined six points:
1) The first was Australia’s record of Safety, Organisation, Friendliness at major events
2) The Australian bid has support from all levels of government to mount a genuine national bid. Frank Lowy has said: “From the outset the Prime Minister has provided unequivocal support, and his personal involvement, including a direct appeal to delegates at last year’s FIFA Congress in Sydney, has made a huge impact.”
3) Australia has the infrastructure. FIFA technical requirements for the 2018 and 2022 bids state that the bids should have:
* A minimum of 12 stadia, at least two of which must hold 80,000 fans
• 10 stadia which must hold a minimum of 45,000 fans
• Training facilities for 32 teams; and,
• Five-star accommodation for a minimum of four teams, the FIFA organisation and match officials in every host city.
4) The World Cup in South Africa will be in winter. So the far from being a problem, the FFA believes that the weather, distance and time zones and the Australian climate delivers a situation for perfect football weather in June and July.
Speaking about the weather and time zones, Mr Lowy said: “Too much was made of Australia’s so-called geographic isolation and time zone differences” He went on to say that the the 1 billion viewers in China, and the billions in India, Japan, Korea, and South East Asia, would appreciate being close to Australia’s time zone.”
5) Australia has generated enormous goodwill in world football over the past few years, especially during the last World Cup in Germany. The Socceroos excited everyone. And it’s worth noting that in terms of ticket sales to the 2006 World Cup, Australians ranked fifth in the world and Australia’s group games for the World Cup in South Africa have already sold out.
6) Lowy also spoke about how the FFA was being recognised in FIFA and the AFC. The chairman of the FFA said: “It was no coincidence that senior Members of the FFA had been recognised and are now serving on key Committees of regional and world football.”
So the other bidders have famous heads of state, famous sports stars and celebrities. Australia secret weapon is you and me.
The FFA say they will have to inform, impress, influence and inspire the members of the FIFA Executive Committee. There is eighteen months before the decision.
Do you think we can do it?
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Phoenix need more than flash in the pan crowds (133)
- ‘New football’ fans may help save the game in Australia (124)
- Does Tasmania have a case for A-League inclusion? (119)
- What happened in Port Said was not a football riot (118)
- Magilton struggling to make a mark (68)
- Socceroos screwed over by FIFA, again (41)
- Gulf influence cripples the FFA again (40)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (3)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour?
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess
- Redknapp tight-lipped over England job
- Departing Lavicka has players’ respect
- Victory gain Spanish recruit for Mariners
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (3)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (0)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (0)
- Melbourne derby reveals tale of two journeys (1)
- O’ so close for John: How JON almost landed the biggest job in sport (16)
- Capello ‘walks’ from England’s top job (13)
- Why Manchester United are never really beaten (15)
- Explore:
- 2010 World Cup, 2018 World Cup, football, Frank Lowy, Socceroos, World Football

andrewMc said | June 27th 2009 @ 6:55am | Report comment
There is a big issue that no one has really been discussing lately and that is what will happen if only one bid gets put forward from Asia.
Ok, yes Australia would have the strongest bid, but we have to ask the question, do we have the political support in Asia. I don’t know the exact system for how Asia would chose its sole bidder, but consider the scenario that each member state gets one vote. So, all the Middle Eastern countries would vote for Qatar, all the ASEAN countries would vote for Indonesia. That leaves Australia, South Korea and Japan scrapping it out to get the votes from the countries that lay between India, the former Soviet states and Mongolia. Would we have the political weight in Asia to pull that off, regardless of how good our bid, or how bad someone else’s bid would be??
I just hope that the FFA are aware of this possibilty and are saving money to also impress some of the AFC delegates and not spending it all on Uncle Sepp and friends.
Any thoughts?
mattbeks said | June 27th 2009 @ 7:53am | Report comment
Lets do it . Let’s get the world cup to Australia, not just because we want it here but to prove to the elitest snobs from UEFA that we are just as good as them if not better.
Winds me up over in the UK when people talk about the Socceroos in a derogatory fashion. Let’s prove to the world we’re awesome!
We won’t just get the world cup, it’ll be the best World Cup the world has seen!
Timmypig said | June 27th 2009 @ 7:59am | Report comment
QUOTE: Of the United States, he said: “Even under the rosiest scenarios, (it) will remain problematic for football given the unique characteristics of that market and the entrenched competition from other sports.”
One would say the same about this country, but I think it’s irrelevant in this debate. It’s not the challenge (it wasn’t for USA 94).
Our challenges are the European bias in world football’s power, and the Iberian bid in particular will be the front runner. Then I see Russia as the primary challenge. Russia’s economy is in free fall at the moment, but that will pick up as soon as the global economy does (and the commodity prices start climbing again).
To be frank I don’t care what effect hosting a World Cup might have on football in this country; I’m more interested in having the world’s biggest sporting circus in town. I went skiing in NZ in 2000 to avoid the Olympics; I’ll stay in Australia for the World Cpu!
Joe FC said | June 27th 2009 @ 8:25am | Report comment
It’s not going to be an easy task Con but nothing worthwhile ever is.
VootballKid said | June 27th 2009 @ 10:21am | Report comment
I think we have an excellent chance due to the whole expanding Asian market thing. You know what? I think that Blatter already has it in his mind to award 2018 or 2022 to Australia. And it’s all down to Lowy’s political influence which seems to have no bound. Furthermore, while Lowy may not have an iron-clad assurance from Blatter, and it comes down to the FIFA committee, I think that Lowy has taken the positive signs and used it to produce that very remarkable bipartisan support from our political leaders in Australia’s bid.
Midfielder said | June 27th 2009 @ 10:26am | Report comment
Timmypig
Disagree with comparing the US sporting position to that of Australia in relation to football.
First Gridiron is by way the number one code in the US … whereas AFL is kinda first among equals shared with RL, RU & Football. Second in the US football is much for a middle class game and struggles for support from the working class… in Australia football is very much a working class game. Thirdly football enjoys the second sport choice of many RL / AFL & RU folk.. Finally being in Asia and wanting to connect with Asian business will in time (look no further than Clive Palmer) bring a lot of business / government & media support… The business & government is already there and building… the media will follow…
Midfielder said | June 27th 2009 @ 10:26am | Report comment
Con Excellent article.
Mr Grumpy said | June 27th 2009 @ 10:29am | Report comment
The 24-member committee vote in December 2010.
More importantly, what will the $45.6 million from taxpayers be used for? For altruistic means or trying to gain favours with FIFA executive members such as Jack Warner from Concacaf?
The economic benefits from hosting the biggest sporting event on the planet are massive, even considering the upgrade or building of new stadia. At least new stadia would receive more use than some facilities from the 2000 Olympic Summer Games.
But given the lack of accountability within FIFA, can we be guaranteed the federal govenment’s cash will not be placed into Swiss bank accounts of FIFA members?
The odds are against us winning 2018 due to Europe, the centre of world football, having last held the tournament in 2006. Australian officials will benefit from learning the political ropes of international football. Remember, Sydney was Australia’s third consecutive bid to host the Olympic Games, following the failures of Brisbane (1992) ad Melbourne (1996).
If Asia does not win the right to host either in 2018 or 2022, then the elephant in the region looms for subsequent bids, China.
Frank Lowy was pleased when China decided not to bid for either tournament.
Pippinu said | June 27th 2009 @ 11:18am | Report comment
Con
good article.
It’s all about the 24 blokes on the FIFA Executive. To talk about anything else is neither here or there, it’s about the 24 blokes (amongst whom we will find the most corrupt men on Earth and for whom it is impossible to find a big enough trough for their collective snouts).
You started analysing the breakdown, but stopped short – this is an area worth exploring.
By the way, can you or anyone confirm whether a couple of the bidders are only going after 2022 and not 2018 (most are going for both).
Macs.football said | June 27th 2009 @ 11:43am | Report comment
Qatar and Korea are only bidding for 2022.