Okay, so it appears Sydney FC are looking for a more modest approach to the way they go about things this season, and ‘about time’ I hear you say. But ultimately the success of their upcoming season will be judged by how they fair on the pitch, and the start has certainly been encouraging.
Played eight, won eight, 20 goals for, zero against.
Any way you look at it and against any opposition, it’s an impressive record.
So what have been the hallmarks of their pre-season and what might we might we have learnt for the season proper? Here are some early observations;
1. Sydney have been flogged by Vitezslav Lavicka and strength/condition coach Craig Duncan, having upwards of eight sessions a week, including field, gym, recovery, yoga, swim and all forms of cross-training.
Couple that with the game-a-week calendar and it’s easy to see why FC has been finishing games so strongly. Against Sydney United they were full of running in the final 15 minutes, while they have scored seven goals in the second half in their past three games. It’s all about building one the fittest A-League teams, and it’s clear that hard work and honesty are the Lavicka way.
2. This increased fitness has laid a platform for the way Sydney wish to play, which is a high tempo and high octane style.
And this is as much about their work without the ball as it is with it. What has struck me has been their excellent work in transition from attack to defence, and how quickly they suffocate the opposition and win the ball back. This defending starts as soon as they cough it up, with the strikers setting the tempo.
3. The other encouraging thing about their defensive structure, and the reason they haven’t coughed up too many chances, is their higher position up the pitch.
When they lose the ball, the back four keep a fairly high line, not dropping to their 18 yard box. The compact shape gives the opposition little space to play and really does make the back fours job easier.
4. One thing that has impressed me about Lavicka is his rotation and use of the entire squad. It’s about building mileage, familiarity and experience in his young squad, and hitherto they have shown they can really do a job for the Czech.
The squad is young, and Lavicka admitted in our chat last week he will be relying on the kids to come through. The signs are looking good they can.
Gan and Grant have been the stand-outs and appear to be right in the first 11 mix, while Danning, Payne, Jurman, Cairncross and Casey haven’t been too far behind. A sign of any good manager is an ability to develop his players and get the absolute best out of them, and the early signs from Lavicka are good.
5. Casey has been interesting case, and the evidence is Lavicka wants to utilise his pace from deep, using him as a right back.
Cole has often occupied the left back spot and it clear Lavicka doesn’t see him as a wide midfielder. I sense that’s because of a lack of pace. In any case, Cole’s minutes look limited if Byun is any good.
6. Going the other way is Grant, who was used by Kosmina as a right back, but is getting plenty of time in an advanced central midfield role. Meanwhile Gan, used centrally by Kosmina, is being deployed on the flanks, with excellent effect.
7. While the kids have been adding the depth, the real stars of the pre-season have been Brosque and McFlynn.
Brosque looks electric in the front third, and has often been found tracking back to help the midfield and defence, getting a vital foot in. He has been Sydney’s everywhere man. Meanwhile McFlynn is the absolute boss of the midfield, dictating Sydney’s high tempo game with his ball-winning and efficient use. Musialik has work to do to get in the 11.
8. If Brosque and McFlynn have been the bosses of the front two thirds, the boss at the back has been Colosimo, who looks the fittest and sharpest I’ve seen him for at least five years.
9. Lavicka has nursed the other veterans, Corica and Aloisi. Corica has looked his usual assured self, however Aloisi still appears to be feeling his way in, and these days appears more of a back-to-goal target-man than a predator running angles, playing off the shoulder of the last man and looking to get in behind defences. However, no-one can fault his workrate.
10. Interestingly, against Sydney United, Lavicka used Kisel in a three-man central midfield. It proved the Slovak is adaptable and could provide some drive, getting into the box for a few chances. The width came from the likes of Brosque and Gan.
11. Ironically, despite scoring goals for fun, I sense Lavicka is looking for more fluidity in the front third. When I asked him if he was happy with how his front third was functioning, he stopped short and emphasised he was happy with how hard they were all working.
12. While 4-4-2 looks his preferred template, Lavicka has also used various forms of a 4-3-3.
Recommend this story.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA

June 29th 2009 @ 2:11pm
Vicentin said | June 29th 2009 @ 2:11pm | Report comment
There was an article about Sydney’s fitness training in the SMH on 21/6. Here’s the link …
http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/football/a-league/blood-sweat-science/2009/06/20/1244918232758.html
I’ll let others discuss whether this is old technology or whatever (they’ve been doing that in AFL for years ….) but I have to say that they looked great at the one pre-season game I saw them play and they played at a pretty high tempo for the full-ninety, with plenty of skill and invention to boot. Kissel is quality.
I also remember reading a lot of quotes from the players saying that they were doing a lot more ball work than usual in training – so it sounds like they’re both doing a lot more ball related fitness activities – good, why run when you can run and kick a ball, and it just seems like they are really putting the hours in. No premature ejaculation here, but I’m really looking forward to the coming season, and I’m usually pretty sceptical about Sydney’s chances.
June 29th 2009 @ 2:21pm
Towser said | June 29th 2009 @ 2:21pm | Report comment
Art Sapphire
RE SFC & premature ejaculation.
Depends on whether Lavicka has them performing consistently as an 18 year old or not. The team is ready to go from the start,drops a gear for a second, & starts again without missing a beat. Whereas if performing like an OAP, hard to warm up the team ,shaky when on top & quickly shrinks into the background never to recover till the next match,hoping its more than a week away.
June 29th 2009 @ 3:01pm
md said | June 29th 2009 @ 3:01pm | Report comment
MVDave – the tard’s “success” (comprising 2 good years and 2 shite ones) is mostly founded on a penchant for violence, with such flair as you do have being entirely imported (lets face it, Alsopp and Thompson are embarrassing at national team level). That you have mostly got away with it, is largely the fault of clubs that have employed Kosmina and continue to pay for it.
Cheers
md
June 29th 2009 @ 3:10pm
MVDave said | June 29th 2009 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
md
The fact that other teams havent performed to MVs level, basically in all areas on and off the field is not MVs problem. Not too many football clubs that have had to move to a new stadium because they have too many supporters and now having a new stadium built for them. Next they’ll have to get a bigger trophy cabinet!
Last time l looked Archie had the world record for most goals in a WC qualifyer!
Seriously though playing a 4-5-1 formation tell me any Oz striker that has done well? McDonald…no, Jesus…just ok, any others?
June 29th 2009 @ 3:18pm
md said | June 29th 2009 @ 3:18pm | Report comment
Yeah – fair play. Good on MV for getting away with it
. Pretty sure we lost to Kuwait because Archie couldn’t hit a barn with a brick, not because of formation.
Cheers
md
June 29th 2009 @ 3:30pm
Pippinu said | June 29th 2009 @ 3:30pm | Report comment
Let’s see if I understand md.
The Victory have only won 50% of all the silverware on offer in the A-League’s short history because the other teams weren’t quite good enough.
I guess that’s one way of looking at it.
I now I understand why Arch and Danny are the two biggest scorers in the history of the A-League (by some margin I might add).
Because of the opposition defenders!!!
I’m now starting to understand how it all works!!
If the opposition isn’t quite good enough, they will allow you to score more goals than them and you win games!!
If you win enough games, you win silverware!!
How is it possible that no one has ever worked out how easy it is??!!
Get me IP Australia on the phone – I need to patent this idea now before someone steals it!!!
June 29th 2009 @ 3:49pm
md said | June 29th 2009 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
No – you won the titles you did because Kosmina was coaching your main opponents. It’s all his fault. All of it, I tell you. There is no other rational explanation as to why Sydney did not win the league last year, or Adelaide in V2.
Tony – I am sorry for doing this to your excellent blog.
Cheers
md
June 29th 2009 @ 4:15pm
GeneralAshnak said | June 29th 2009 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
MVDave – Viduka (though he couldn’t score goals playing that way).
md – you have it Kosmina is the curse! hopefully AUFC have gotten him totally out of their system now and the Pissants can take home the toilet seat!
June 29th 2009 @ 4:57pm
Pippinu said | June 29th 2009 @ 4:57pm | Report comment
Vicentin
on that article – Ernie has a VIS background and I’m pretty sure he brought that sort of technology with him to MV (but I honestly don’t know anything more than that).
If the uptake has been slow in the A-League, I’d say it’s as much a question of resources as anything else.
All clubs are relatively equal when it comes to the salary cap – but move into areas such as player welfare, coaching, use of technology, facilities, etc – and a club like Melbourne (who generates decent revenue), and a club like GCU (with Fat Boy Slim and his deep pockets), and maybe even SFC (where owners don’t mind throwing good money after bad), can get a bit of an advantage on the rest.
To change topics slightly, I’ve had a theory for about a decade that the US NT has been able to improve steadily over the last 15 years or so because of access to superior sports science (that their other wealthy sports would have pioneered).
It’s just a hunch, but I liken it to the Australian wine industry turning some old-world traditions on their head to produce a superior product at a lesser cost via technology.
I’ve always felt that Australia should be in that space as well (and we’ve gone in that direction at least to some extent).
You can imagine that if you can combine the sports science (in which Australia is quite strong in world terms) with top shelf coaching expertise, well, you can see where I’m heading.
June 29th 2009 @ 5:18pm
Art Sapphire said | June 29th 2009 @ 5:18pm | Report comment
Millster – I have long advicated the introduction of foreign coaches to the A-League as a good manager will always be more important than a marquee player. Sydney learnt the hard way after they got rid of Littbarski.
Sydney FC and Carlton should become sister clubs.
They think they are bling, like Sydney FC they breach salary caps and think they are more important than what they really are in the grand scheme of things. . Watching my AFL team, Essendon demolish the pompous Blueboys on Friday night in front of 83k brought back all those good feelings I get when I watch MVFC defeat Sydney.
Bring on the the A-League season!!