Ponting’s lament as Ashes loom
By vinay verma, 29 Jun 2009 Vinay Verma is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Cricket, Nathan Hauritz, Ricky Ponting, The Ashes
Ricky Ponting is suffering from PMT which for the uninitiated is Post McGrath Tension. Throw in Hauritz as a replacement for Warne and it becomes a full blown migraine.
In 1993 Border instructed Warne to bowl pies in the lead up matches. He then unleashed the legspinner on an unsuspecting opponent. The bemused look on Mike Gattings face said it all. The rest is history.
I do not believe Ponting has asked Hauritz to do the same.
English batsmen have been fed a diet of offspinners since Laker. They have had, over the years, off spinners ranging from Titmus to Emburey and now Swann.
The selection of Hauritz was ill conceived and Bryce McGain would have been a better option. McGain was dumped after one bad Test foray. He had just come back from a shoulder operation and in hindsight was rushed back.
Unless the Cardiff pitch is turning square I would not contemplate playing Hauritz. And after contemplating briefly I would still not play him.
Marcus North can impersonate Hauritz and also improve on him. Michael Clarke and Katich will have to start earning some of the guaranteed $1.5 million promised to Australia’s elite cricketers.
Siddle continues to excel at every opportunity and has already been “locked” in to partner Mitchell Johnson.
Brett Lee’s profligacy with no balls should ensure his omission from the starting XI. The Australians bowled 37 no balls in this practice match. They have become proficient in this art form. Lee bowled 14 and Hilfenhaus 11.
Even Hauritz bowled 8 no balls. Inexcusable for a spinner. Siddle and Clark rectified this in the second innings but not the other three.
Lee had a caught behind denied because of a no ball. So the importance of staying behind the line cannot be overstated.
Siddle and Johnson can both bowl in the 150 plus range and the English batsmen will be wearing extra protection. Johnson will have the same effect on the English that Warne had in 1993. In partnership with Siddle this looks the most potent new ball attack since the halcyon days of Lillee and Thommo. I smell the blood of an Englishman!
The last bowling spot appears to be between Lee and Hilfenhaus and I expect a four man pace attack with the option of using Clarke, North and Katich.
The Australian batting looks steady and Philip Hughes was assured in the second dig.
This is finally Ponting’s team and his leadership qualities will be tested.
He has established his credentials as a batsman and is one of the Modern Greats. How he leads this side will determine his standing in the hierarchy of Australian captains.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (12) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Mitchell Johnson back in Ashes frame (54)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (37)
- Craig McDermott resigns as wayward Johnson returns (26)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (26)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (13)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (38)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (38)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)
- Explore:
- Cricket, Nathan Hauritz, Ricky Ponting, The Ashes

June 29th 2009 @ 7:33pm
vinay verma said | June 29th 2009 @ 7:33pm | Report comment
Ok .Katzilla,lets take your supposition to its logical conclusion. Punter is foxing. So he doesn’t play Hauritz against England Lions. The Poms think Hauritz is out of the reckoning. Come Cardiff and Ponting picks Hauritz. He better have been foxing because if hauritz bowls the same pies England will want him bowling from both ends.
On the other hand if hauritz can actually bowl and do the job I will applaud the tactical nous of Australia’s think tank. Somehow I dont think Hauritz is anywhere approximating the serial texter.
June 29th 2009 @ 7:43pm
vinay verma said | June 29th 2009 @ 7:43pm | Report comment
Viscount. I just think Siddle is a country lad untouched by the “bling” that surrounds someone like a Michael Clark. If MC would go back to being a simple lad playing on instinct he would surprise himself. He has innate talent and is blessed with “feel” He should forget the colour coordinated gloves and bat and concentrate on the next ball. His innings of 150 odd in Bangalore was the best debut innings I have seen since Greg Chappell. He has to go back to that.
Pietersen and MC are similar. In Pietersen’s case his ego is gbigger than his undoubted talent. He should be easy meat for Clark and Johnson.