The British and Irish Lions roared but did not make the kill and so the series against the Springboks is already lost 2 – 0. Big sport is all about momentum and driving home the advantage so that the opposition cannot come back to snatch away a victory.
The Lions played superbly against the Springboks for the first 60 minutes of one of rugby’s great Tests.
The lead of 16 – 8 should have been enough to finish off the Springboks.
But the altitude and injuries got to the Lions. Right on time a nerveless Morne Steyn booted over a huge penalty from 55m out. The ball sailed well over the crossbar and virtually from the time it left his book Steyn was jumping around with joy.
South Africans have a word ‘Isiphiwo’, a Zulu word for destiny which was invoked by the spin doctors in 1995 during the Rugby World Cup tournament to sell the Springboks and the notion of the Rainbow Coalition to a deeply divided nation.
That sense of destiny, it was once explained to me by Bryce Courtenay (who played on the wing as a youngster for the Transvaal Colts), goes hand-in-hand with the Afrikaner notion of a ‘sacred covenant’ between the nation and the Springboks that Tests must be won as a gesture of collective self-assertion against a hostile and unsympathetic world.
Often in their quest for the necessary victory to fulfill their destiny, the Springboks (and their referees up to the 1980s) do anything necessary to win. This almost religious fanaticism can be the only explanation for the blatant and vicious eye-gouging by Shalk Burger on Luke Fitzgerald in the opening maul of the Test.
The match had been in progress 55 seconds. Bryce Lawrence the New Zealand touch tried to coach the referee, Cristophe Berdos, into giving Burger a red card by saying ‘it is at least a yellow card’ offence. Burger deserved to be given a red card, for seeing red seemingly.
Berdos did not take this option. Perhaps there was something of a square off when Ronan O’Gara was penalised right on time for taking out Fourie du Preez in the air.
As for Burger he should be out of rugby for the rest of the year.
Eye-gouging is a cardinal rugby offence against a defenceless player for obvious reasons. It is also a potential criminal offence.
Burger’s cause has not been helped by the inane comments by the Springbok coach Peter de Villiers: ‘It’s sport, man … I don’t think it was a card at all. There was a lot of needle and, if you dissect the whole game, you will see yellow cards that were missed.’
At the kick-off I wrote in my note-book a comment to the effect that I wondered if Ian McGeechan would revert to the nasty, vicious, player-baiting tactics of the Lions against Australia in the second Test in 1989 after they’d lost the first Test. The Lions won the Test and the series.
But I was wrong to even think this. The Lions played with ferocity. But it was fair aggression.
Their scrum lifted the Springboks. Their lineout was secure.
And the backs, led by Stephen Jones who was magnificent, continued on from the last 20 minutes of the first Test to make great breaks against a tough Springboks defence.
So let it be recorded: Ian McGeechan is a great coach.
The Lions played a style of expansive and dangerous rugby that was beyond the capabilities of the Springboks. The alignment of the backs and the cleverness of the attacking ploys were a credit to McGeechan’s coaching.
This was modern rugby at its best.
With the scoreline of 16 – 8 and only 20 minutes of play left, it looked all over for the Springboks. But then the props Geithin Jenkins and Adam Jones were injured in the same movement. The game was reduced to uncontested scrums.
Later on, Brian O’Driscoll and Jamie Roberts, the two Lions destroyers in mid-field were injured. This saw O’Gara, a pathetic tackler, come on. While these injuries were taking the star players from the field, the altitude was tiring the Lions players.
Isiphiwo. A terrific move from an uncontested scrum saw the great du Preez run wide and pass the ball to Bryan Habana, on his outside and on the burst. The flying winger was over the tryline in a flash. 19 – 15 to the Lions.
Isiphiwo. After an exchange of penalties from Steyn and Jones the Springboks mounted an attack, from another uncontested scrum, that saw Jacque Fourie, admittedly a big player, run over O’Gara and plant the ball over the try line while somehow not going into touch in a crash of bodies near the corner post.
Isiphiwo. Steyn, who replaced Rian Pienaar who missed a number of penalty attempts, belts the conversion from the sideline right over the middle of the crossbar. 25 – 22 to the Springboks.
Then the Lions get a penalty which Jones kicks. 25 -25.
And then O’Gara puts up a bomb from outside his 22 and charges at the catcher, du Preez …
For drama, excitement, brilliant play, shocking play, for confrontations, for huge tackling, brilliant running, for controversy and for the heart-ache and the exhilaration of the finish, this Test had everything.
In four years time, we should be so lucky to see a similar sort of Test here when the Lions tour Australia in search of their first series win in the 21th century.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Darryl said | June 29th 2009 @ 8:06am | Report comment
Nice read Spiro. The lions should feel proud of their effort, they were a pleasure to watch. But like the AB’s and Wallabies in the WC, there comes a moment when a team has to take control and drive the final few nails into the coffin, but this didn’t happen. Pity.
Brett McKay said | June 29th 2009 @ 8:59am | Report comment
I haven’t seen any highlights of this game Spiro, but I feel you’ve covered events beautifully. It’ll be interesting to see what sort of penalty (if any, as much as I hope that’s not the case) Burger gets, becuase he certainly has form in this department.
Brett McKay said | June 29th 2009 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Just read that Sergio Parisse was suspended for 8 weeks for eye-gouging in the NZ Test, so maybe Burger is looking at a similar break..
Jerry said | June 29th 2009 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Burger’s was worse than Parisse. I think he’s looking at 12 weeks minimum (which is too little for the offence, but judiciaries are fairly lenient in my opinion). Won’t hurt the Boks for the TN, Broussow is in far better form and is a proper openside, unlike Burger.
Colin N said | June 29th 2009 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Burger’s got eight weeks. I haven’t seen the Parisse one, but Comparing it to Quinlan’s (who got 12 weeks), Burger’s was far worse. The ‘penalty’ is far too lenient in my opinion.
“Bryce Lawrence the New Zealand touch tried to coach the referee, Cristophe Berdos, into giving Burger a red card by saying ‘it is at least a yellow card’ offence. Burger deserved to be given a red card, for seeing red seemingly.”
If Lawrence believed it was a red then he should have said so. Why say ‘at least a yellow,’ when deep down you know it’s a sending off offence? It’s ludicrous. Or Lawrence and Berdos didn’t fully know the rules.
Contrary to many people ‘up north,’ I thought the ref had a decent game, and handled the niggle quite well.
Would the Lions have won with Burger gone? We’ll never know, but it would have helped our cause significantly. When Burger was off the field, the Lions scored 10 points, which says quite a lot.
mattamkII said | June 29th 2009 @ 9:39am | Report comment
Jesus, harsh on Bryce lads.
Maybe its lost in translation to you lot up north but I read it as him telling the ref to be harsh.
van der Merwe said | June 29th 2009 @ 9:47am | Report comment
“At the kick-off I wrote in my note-book a comment to the effect that I wondered if Ian McGeechan would revert to the nasty, vicious, player-baiting tactics of the Lions against Australia in the second Test in 1989 after they’d lost the first Test. The Lions won the Test and the series.
But I was wrong to even think this. The Lions played with ferocity. But it was fair aggression.”
Sure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHy7QGNlKW0
Colin N said | June 29th 2009 @ 10:00am | Report comment
“Maybe its lost in translation to you lot up north but I read it as him telling the ref to be harsh.”
He probably was, but why not say it was a red card, rather than imply that it was. It would have been much easier.
Ruputts said | June 29th 2009 @ 10:08am | Report comment
The ban handed to Burger is about as outrageous as the act itself. It warranted a much more severe punishment.
Hammer said | June 29th 2009 @ 10:17am | Report comment
So he’s copped 8 weeks … how many games does that equate to ..the 3rd test and a couple of at the start of the tri-nations … and ditto for Botha whose 2 weeks really means the 3rd test … why impose an 8 week ban when a fair chunk of those weeks will mean he’s not incurring any real penalty – surely they need to change the process and ban him for x number of games or make it a ban that encompasses a requisite number of games