Match of the Century? It’s happened before
By Savvas Tzionis, 1 Jul 2009 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- AFL, Geelong Cats, St Kilda Saints
This week sees the situation where the top two teams in the AFL – Geelong and St Kilda – meet each other without having lost any of their previous games.
This has happened before (as a Carlton supporter I recall it happening in 1979 against North Melbourne in Round 6 – this was one of the greatest games in history – and again two years later against Collingwood in Round 7).
However, it has never happened so late in the season.
But a similiar situation has occured before and it may provide some food for thought for both teams as they proceed beyond this week’s game.
Back in 1975, Hawhorn and Carlton were first and second respectively leading into their Round 17 clash at the home ground they shared at Princes Park.
Similiar to the current situation, both teams were five games clear of their nearest rival. They had played each other earlier in the season, when Carlton had defeated them.
However, Carlton had lost two other games throughout the year: to Essendon at VFL park in front of a then record crowd of 75,000 and just recently (and ominously) to North Melbourne.
Hawthorn and Carlton were STREETS ahead of everyone and the ensuing game proved beyond doubt to everyone that the premiership for 1975 would be in the hands of one of these teams.
In a see sawing affair, Hawthorn kicked the winning goal in time on to win 15.15.105 to 15.11.101.
But, as you can guess, neither team was able to win the premiership.
North Melbourne, who had started the season with four straight losses, ended the season in third spot, which earned them the double chance (under the then Final Five system).
They eventually made it to the Grand Final against Hawthorn and thrashed them by ten goals.
The key factor here is that it was North’s FIRST EVER PREMIERSHIP!
They were the last team to win their first premiership (prior to AFL expansion) and it was a magic day for the whole VFL (apart from Hawthorn).
So why did Hawthorn and Carlton fall away so dramatically?
It appears that the result in the Round 17 match may have had some effect.
Hawthorn went a game clear of Carlton (plus a hefty percentage advantage) and the final five rounds had no real meaning for either team as they were well and truly entrenched in their positions.
As a result BOTH teams lost more games than they won over the next five weeks and carried that form into the finals, where they fell away.
Such a dramatic collapse in form would have been talked about more often had it not been for North Melbourne winning their first ever Premiership.
Whether or not St Kilda or Geelong will similarly collapse, we do not know (yet!)
No doubt Aussie Rules has changed a lot over the last 35 years and the factors that were at play back then may have no relevance to this week’s game.
But the ensuing weeks may tell us more.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- More rugby league players to defect to the AFL? (160)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (106)
- Foxtel’s AFL coverage is nirvana for footy fans (89)
- AFL’s most hated club turns 120 years old (78)
- Israel Folau now ready for AFL (76)
- Optus ruling actually a good thing for AFL fans (52)
- Ling holds hope for club loyalty in AFL
- Andrew Krakouer given four weeks leave from Collingwood
- Giants inspired to prove doubters wrong (32)
- Malthouse not fazed by assistant issue
- Richo says look out for the Tigers in AFL
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- Who’s to blame for the Majak Daw beat-up? (32)
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (107)
- Crows changing, but will this AFL preview change your life? (2)
- Is Heath Shaw the right leader for Collingwood? (11)
- Could a female coach succeed in the AFL? (36)
- Demons’ two captain Jacks the right leadership choice (5)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- Explore:
- AFL, Geelong Cats, St Kilda Saints

LK said | July 1st 2009 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Sorry, this is slightly off topic but I can’t think of where else to post. Why is the “match of the century” being played on Sunday arvo? I know the fixture schedule is locked in yada, yada yada. But surely some flexibility would be sensible. In Canberra on Sunday the Swans v Roos game is televised. I’m looking forward to watching it but how often do two teams 13-0 come up against each other? I would like to watch both games. I could be wrong but isn’t the NRL fixture list more flexible? Rant over…
Redb said | July 1st 2009 @ 8:46am | Report comment
If you have Foxtel and IQ I’d record it (it’s on mainevent i beleive) or conversely watch it live and tape the Swans game.
Redb
Tom said | July 1st 2009 @ 9:07am | Report comment
The AFL and the NRL have different fixturing policies. The NRL move their games around to maximise commercial appeal whereas the AFL keep theirs, in theory at least, permanent.
Of course, the AFL went and pushed the start time for this game back an hour so it could be broadcast live in Melbourne, so obviously its not all that permanent.
Pippinu said | July 1st 2009 @ 9:21am | Report comment
What Tom says is pretty spot on – the AFL fixture is a bit more fixed than the NRL’s.
There’ no doubting that the bidders for the next TV rights deal will make a bit of noise about this, and it’s just one reason why TV experts are pretty sure the next deal will exceed $780 mill (if the AFL agree to such requests that is).
Michael C said | July 1st 2009 @ 9:43am | Report comment
LK -
flexibility – - remember, the AFL was trying to transfer the game to the MCG and because of the inflexibility of the Docklands stadium management – that was made just too hard.
In the past, the AFL had their own stadium (Waverley) to assist with switching around games – the sooner the AFL has full ownership of Docklands – the greater the opportunity (presumably) to switch best fit venues at least – - – however, the underlying pledge for AFL fixturing is that people know well in advance what time they are playing on what day and that (other than the Geel v StKil game which has been pushed back an hour) is generally 100% locked in. It makes a big difference to know for sure, as families can plan ahead their travel/accomodation knowing that a given game is a day game or kid friendly time etc. Tom – one wonders, with the slightly later start time – are there any folk who were planning to come from the bush who had to cancel because they wouldn’t make the train/bus back home?? (ah, the memories of the rush back to either Spencer St or Flinders St to catch the 6pm train back to Gippsland).
Anyway – that’s why it’s so ironic that people go on about the AFL having the most contrived fixtures….obviously only people say that who discount or don’t know the NRL fixturing policy.
Knives Out said | July 1st 2009 @ 10:40pm | Report comment
-