Related coverage
- Football news
- A-League news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news

Newcastle Jets coach Gary Van Egmond (centre) celebrates with his players after the Melbourne Victory v Newcastle Jets A League game at the Telstradome in Mellbourne, Sunday, Nov. 26, 2006. Newcastle won the game 1-0. AAP Image/Martin Philbey
To be fair to Con Constantine, the great ogre of Australian club football, he does make a good point about the propriety or lack thereof in Football Federation Australia’s role in poaching Gary van Egmond from the Jets to the AIS and the national under-17s.
“This has hurt me, the club, the players and the fans,” he told Ray Gatt on Tuesday. “The worst thing is that FFA is supposed to be the policeman of the game, but they are not doing their job properly. This wouldn’t happen anywhere else in the world. I am a businessman and I would never dream of conducting my business this way. If the FFA want to fine me, well, it would be like fining Jesus Christ because of the treachery of Judas.”
A good line, and bang on the money.
How can the FFA, an organisation that tosses out fines and suspensions like a bag lady feeding pigeons, effectively “tap up” one of the coaches of a competition it runs without seeking permission from the club’s owner first and without so much as a hint of self-restraint or self-censure?
It is pretty shameless. But who’s policing the police?
Technically you would imagine the AFC or FIFA would be the cop for such matters, but historically both have shown scant interest in getting involved in neighbourhood scuffles, leaving them to be sorted out by the national federations involved.
It serves a president’s political interests of course, to keep as many federations as he can onside. Mohamed, Frank and Sepp are certainly pally enough. How could Con hope to get anyone’s ear among all the backslapping?
No chance. But he was right to speak up and give the FFA a piece of his mind.
They can be a law unto themselves, clearly.
As for Van Egmond himself, one can hardly blame him for wanting out when such a better off was made and after what has been such an annus horribilis at a clearly dysfunctional club, but he did sign a four-year contract of his own volition, Constantine did give him a break when he was “selling Pepsi” and he did have a duty of care to his players, whom he has more or less abandoned just a month out from the start of the season.
He doesn’t come out of this with his reputation enhanced.
It’s quite an irony, too, for Van Egmond to entrusted with such responsibility over our country’s best young players when he has such a chequered record handling young players at the Jets.
As a shrewd blogger named Krones remarked on my Half-Time Orange column for TWG on Monday: “How could he possibly be considered for this position after his comments about the young player [Jesse Pinto] he played for 5min last year and tore off the pitch and his treatment of Kaz [Patafta]? Hardly the sort of thing you would expect from a development coach. Short memory the FFA have.”
I completely agree. I thought Van Egmond’s hooking of Pinto earlier this year after just coming on against Adelaide was one of the worst examples of coaching I’ve ever seen.
We can only hope Dutchy recognises his own mistakes, personal and professional, and can pass on those lessons to his charges so they can be both better people and footballers.
Everyone is entitled to make a mistake. It appears Dutchy’s quota, though, was filled some time ago.
Recommend this story.

July 3rd 2009 @ 11:00am
Koala Bear said | July 3rd 2009 @ 11:00am | Report comment
I think Con Constantine has good reason to be upset with GVE after giving him a 4 year contract to coach the Jets… It was GVE who had sought such a long term agreement with the Jets…
It was Sonny Bill Williams who was made to compensate the Bulldogs for his breach of contract with the Bulldogs based on his terms, so then why not GVE…? If the reverse had happened and the Jets sacked GVE, he would be paid out for the remainder of his contract…
Yes Con has a good point for some sort of compensation that should be paid to the Jets by the FFA or GVE himself for breaking his contract… A contract is a binding legal document that binds two parties together… If either one breaks his commitment to the other, then it’s only fair for the other party to seek compensation… I would have thought it would be a reasonable action by either or other party to take…
~~~~~~~
KB
July 3rd 2009 @ 11:34am
Kazama said | July 3rd 2009 @ 11:34am | Report comment
Agree KB – the Jets should get some compensation as the termination of contract was clearly not mutual. In Europe I think a player bought out his contract so that he could be transferred, yet here for some reason GvE is allowed to simply walk away. I know there are no certainties in life, as my father told me after being coldly sacked from an organisation he’d been with for over 30 years, but a contract is as you say binding and surely must be honoured regardless of who is involved.
July 3rd 2009 @ 12:21pm
whiskeymac said | July 3rd 2009 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
not all contracts are binding =)
anyhoots, the point is if Con is entitled to compensation then he can seek compensation under contract law. the organisation that enfoces contractual rights is the courts, or in some cases tribunals. just as it is for the rest of us. so of course the FFA is accountable for its actions. Con crying about the “injustice” seems a bit hypocritical seeing he has terminated plenty of peoples contracts early himself. Undoubtedly he wld just call it good business sense if the shoe was on the other foot and he poached a player or admin staff for himself.
all this legal talk and football reminds me of belgiums new boss. does anyone know if the FFA ever got compensation out of Dick Advocaat or if Felip is being held accountable for his breach with NQ?
July 3rd 2009 @ 1:27pm
Kazama said | July 3rd 2009 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
I could be wrong but I think the FFA did get compensation from Dick. As for Felipe – NQF CEO Dean Hassall: “North Queensland Fury FC and Felipe’s management have agreed on compensation for the split.”
http://au.fourfourtwo.com/news/105638,fury-blast-felipe-exit-betrayal.aspx
July 3rd 2009 @ 1:29pm
DiCanio said | July 3rd 2009 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
I think Advocaat had to pony up some cash. Not sure if NQ has followed up on Felipe yet but they certainly could
July 3rd 2009 @ 1:35pm
Kazama said | July 3rd 2009 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
Actually it was Zenit who had to pay, not Dick – http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,22801587-23215,00.html
July 3rd 2009 @ 10:33pm
jimbo said | July 3rd 2009 @ 10:33pm | Report comment
The FFA didn’t steal GVE.
He sought a new job because he wasn’t happy where he was and was stabbed in the back by NJ management many times.
Did the NJ management ask his opinion when they sold off nine of his best players.
I don’t think so and yet they still expected him to do well in the A-League.
The FFA chose the best candidate for the job.
Neither the FFA or GVE acted improperly and the NJ legal action against FFA will be unsuccessful.
July 6th 2009 @ 4:07pm
md said | July 6th 2009 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
So does anyone other than @fakebenbuckley have any idea about today’s talks?
Cheers
md
July 7th 2009 @ 3:24pm
Ben of Phnom Penh said | July 7th 2009 @ 3:24pm | Report comment
It probably is not worth mentioning contracts if the contract has a short notice termination clause. As Whiskeymac noted there certainly seems to be an ability for the employee to terminate employment on short notice so chances are the terms are reciprocal. As we do not know the terms of the contract any such talk is mere idle speculation.
What is not idle speculation is the ethics of the issue. The question is, did anyone act unethically? What I suspect is that the AIS have been given control of the recruitment process and have been given a set of criteria for the u-17′s coach. Van Egmond came in as the best canidate and they followed the process through, probably ensuring that there were no contractual issues. The FFA would then have been informed after the selection process had been completed. An email to someone at the FFA informing them of the outcome of a process doesn’t constitute collusion.
This isn’t unethical. What is problematic is that the FFA didn’t put as a parameter on the recruitment process that “no current sitting A-League coaches will be considered.” Yet shoud they? Legally can they? Hence FFA tried to remian removed from the process which always ran the risk of damaging their premium domestic product, the A-League.
Hence the main issue here may be the timing of the recruitment. This is something that should have been done well before the A-League season commenced or after the start of the season once coaches are already committed to the A-League season. One can only hope that the FFA learn from the process and hence improve their corporate management practices.
The issue for Van Egmond is more one of appearances. He needs to be seen, as do all coaches, as someone that clubs can place some faith in and do business with. He may have undermined his reputation in this regard and hence will need a successful stint at the u-17′s to placate some of the less trusting in the game.
July 7th 2009 @ 5:07pm
md said | July 7th 2009 @ 5:07pm | Report comment
It’s a pretty basic tenant that you cannot enforce a contract for personal services; i.e. an employee can always quit. You might get some compo or forced delay if he was poached by a competitor, but that is about it. The AIS isnt a competitor.
Nevertheless, I reckon there will be a sop to Con here somewhere. Maybe expect to see “AusComePlay” on the front of NUJ shirts or something like that. (Of course, that would have been worth much more if they hadn’t sucked so much in the ACL).
Ultimately though, the NUJ will be trapped in groundhog day until Con realises that the club isn’t all about him – in fact the less NUJ fans see of him, the more they will like the club. As everyone from Alan Sugar to the Glazers know, you don’t buy a football club to be popular and you will never win a battle with the fans, the media or the FA.
Cheers
md.