All Blacks need to re-think their attack
By ohtani's jacket, 4 Jul 2009 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, International Rugby, Italy Rugby, Rugby Union
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- International Rugby Union - Six Nations, Heineken Cup, Rugby Championship news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
Rugby can be a frustrating game to watch. Teams spend an age fighting for the ball, only to lose it on their first possession. And even the most promising of movements can end in a penalty or turnover.
Yet, nothing grates quite as much as inept attack, and in the Test against Italy, the All Blacks showed once again that without line breaks, they have no teeth.
The Italian defence was nothing out of the ordinary.
It was a less aggressive version of the rush defence used by the French in Dunedin, a defence which is fast becoming the norm at Test match level.
It’s a defence that’s designed to keep play trapped in the midfield and prevent the opposition from getting quick ball out wide.
The idea is to “sack” the ball carrier before he can get over the advantage line, similar to how a linebacker targets the quarterback behind the line of scrimmage. The difference being that a quarterback has protection from his offensive line, whereas the first receiver in rugby is a sitting duck.
The All Blacks tried to counter this with a short passing game.
In theory, this creates holes in the defensive line, but in a real game situation, passing under pressure leads to a litany of mistakes, such as near intercepts, passes to no-one, and in the case of the Christchurch Test, a bizarre number of obstruction calls.
It’s more or less proof that you can only use a short passing game once you’ve broken through the defensive line. If you’re too flat, as the All Blacks were in Christchurch, then you can’t hit the ball at pace and wind up playing a static offload game.
This wasn’t entirely the backs’ fault, however.
The All Black forwards didn’t play over the ball and barely contested the rucks, allowing the Italians a huge amount of territory and failing to get the type of turnover ball that’s probably the All Blacks’ best attack against a rush defence.
The overall performance reminded me of the Hurricanes or Chiefs when they came up against the tougher defensive sides in the Super 14.
Guys would look to batter their way through the defensive line, but without any sort of go forward, the countdown was on to the inevitable turnover.
In short, we didn’t play enough rugby.
The good news is that these things are fixable, but it raises the question of why these players need the basics drilled into them.
The first instinct is to blame the coaches. But if those were the tactics, then Henry and his assistants sold the players down the river with their post match comments.
While it’s true that Wayne Smith has never fully abandoned his flat backline strategy, I’m not convinced that flick passes are what he had in mind.
During the game, you could see Muliaina trying to enter the line and give the All Blacks some direction, and it wasn’t until the substitutes came on (and Ross went out into the backline) that we started playing with purpose.
Too often people act as if the coaches pull all the strings and players are merely pawns to be moved around the field.
While it’s important to play the right players in the right positions, Test selections are only half the equation.
Perhaps the All Blacks thought the Italians would fall off some tackles and leave some holes. Perhaps they didn’t expect Italy to last the full eighty minutes. Or maybe the All Black forwards didn’t want to take a battering for the third straight week.
It could even be that the All Blacks, not being great proponents of the rush defence, aren’t that au fait with how it works.
Or perhaps they’re simply tired, stretched too thin and on the wane.
Whatever the case, Graham Henry needs to take stock of what he has: a backline that’s missing any sort of nucleus. For that reason, I’d suggest a pragmatic approach to the Test at Eden Park.
The All Blacks need to spend time in the opposition half and look to convert territory and possession into points by constructing our attack in a simpler fashion.
As disappointing as it sounds, we no longer have the backs to play running rugby from anywhere on the field.
Whoever plays first five eight, and I imagine it will be Donald and McAlister in tandem, the coaches have to tell those players that we don’t need them to be Dan Carter.
We simply need them to relieve pressure, kick for touch, look for territorial gains and be judicious with their running and passing. In other words, solid play from the five eight position.
There’s no need to set the world on fire. The All Blacks have always been at their best when they’ve played clinically.
So let’s try to get into a groove and actually outflank opponents instead of attacking the line with an endless series of pick and goes.
If Piri Weepu moves the ball quicker, then Henry needs to forgo his “impact” strategy and play Weepu from the start.
The All Blacks don’t have the luxury of playing their best players off the bench and can’t afford to wait until the final quarter to play rugby.
Nothing the All Blacks did in the past is working right now, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing.
The New Zealand rugby public seem a little edgy about another team passing us, but it’s a good chance to test our mettle.
This was the challenge Henry took on when he sought his reappointment.
Even last year it was obvious that we couldn’t keep winning playing the same style of rugby. What worked in 2005 and 2006 can’t work forever.
Unfortunately, the New Zealand rugby public don’t really think like that and thus the pressure is squarely on the shoulders of Henry and his players.
Personally, I think that’s ridiculous after four straight Tri-Nation titles. Painful though it may be, I look forward to the coming challenge.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Chiefs continue to wait for SBW
- Nathan Sharpe to retire at end of 2012
- Queensland ready for Super challenge (2)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (42)
- Foley excited about Samoan rugby challenge
- Force rugby coach praises his pack
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (48)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (25)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (18)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, International Rugby, Italy Rugby, Rugby Union

Jolly Jupes said | July 4th 2009 @ 7:27am | Report comment
The All Blacks are playing the same style of rugby they played last season (under different rules) that is effectively a 15 man version of Sevens. The concept of playing what is in front of you is fine but you need to go forward first – shovelling the ball laterally against good defences does little. You need to use a more strategic approach to manipulate the defence, get accross the advantage line and then use your skill/speed/power. I note the odds for the AB’s in the tri nations are better than Australia which I cannot see – the style of All Black rugby will see them finish third. They may well adapt but you would question their intelligence as they have been out coached in the early games of this season and last season
hammer said | July 4th 2009 @ 7:41am | Report comment
who out coached them last season ?
Jerry said | July 4th 2009 @ 8:46am | Report comment
Jolly Jupes – what All Blacks were you actually watching last season? After the loss in Sydney (Hammer – this was the time they were ‘outcoached’ all year, probably the only time) they adopted a much more conservative game plan, a lot of tactical kicks to pin the opposition back into their own half.
hammer said | July 4th 2009 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Jerry – i know – but also that was the first time they’d come up against a team coached by the only international coach schooled in the ELV’s .. after that they certainly proved themselves to be a very good coaching team
Fuzz said | July 4th 2009 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
Did the All Blacks not win the Tri-Nations / Bledisloe and achieve a Grand Slam last year after being written off by the scribes?
Hmmm if this is the result of being outcoached I look forward to the All Blacks being coached positively
Jolly Jupes said | July 4th 2009 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
The point I make is that they have been out-coached in two consecutive years at the start of each season – I also said they may well adapt as they did last year by using a “more conservative game plan, a lot of tactical kicks to pin the opposition back into their own half” (your words Jerry). This is in fact how the Wallabies are playing this year so it was a surpirse to me that the AB’s forgot what worked last year and got caught by the frogs. No matter – I can only assume that you dont agree with my prediction so we will just have to wait and see. If you were betting your house on it you would be nervous backing this AB’s team this season.
Hammer – i am not sure what you are saying – If Deans had experience coaching under the ELV’s then what were the kiwi players doing the first half of the season (many of them coached by Deans). Secondly what were the 3 AB coaches doing in the first half of the year as they watch all the games, have coaches conference and all provincial coaches are on the NZRU payroll so there should be no secrets being held back – A lame argument from my point of view
bennalong said | July 4th 2009 @ 7:28pm | Report comment
A good piece OJ
IMO The return of Richie McCaw and Soialo will do a lot to improve things, a helluva lot. As I said earlier in the season the AB’s have lacked leaders and leadership. That changes, at least in the forewards.
Without Carter your stakes have fallen, but Donald /McCalister behind a solid pack with go-foreward may workout fine.
It will depend how much pressure the Wallabies can exert. Certainly the balance of confidence is with the Wallabies going into this game. We’ll have to see if the AB’s can find theirs.
How good will Richie be?
ohtani's jacket, said | July 5th 2009 @ 8:46am | Report comment
I don’t think the team is balanced enough to win the Tri-Nations, but it depends on the openings the other sides give us.
Here’s a run down of the squad:
Aled de Malmanche — finally got a cap against Italy; opportunity beckons on the away leg
Andrew Hore — short on form and playing time, which is hurting the All Blacks badly
Keven Mealamu — solid vet, but can’t put in a barn burner every Test out.
John Afoa — blew his audition for the starting tighthead gig; the fight’s on to keep his bench role
Wyatt Crockett — has a chance to impress in training
Owen Franks — ditto, but even a bench role seems unlikely
Neemia Tialata — first Tri-Nations in a while without a Hayman or Somerville. Tighhead looks like a weak point.
Tony Woodcock — hasn’t regained his fitness yet.
Jason Eaton — reeks of Henry going back to someone who has Test experience
Bryn Evans — didn’t disappoint in his brief cameos, particularly in the restarts
Isaac Ross — should be in the All Blacks on form; wouldn’t be if Williams weren’t injured. Blessing in disguise
Brad Thorn — workhorse, but he’s starting to pace himself
Tanerau Latimer — was a huge disappointment against Italy, but a big improvement over Thomson
Richie McCaw — hasn’t played much rugby this year and there’s question marks over his form and the chances of him staying healthy
Jerome Kaino — the right choice at blindside. Hopefully he gets stuck into the tight stuff
Kieran Read — needs to prove that he’s not just another Crusader and has the skills at Test match level
Rodney So’oialo — have to wonder if the rest did him any good. Make or break campaign for him.
Jimmy Cowan — needs to play like a halfback and stop acting like Justin Marshall
Brendon Leonard — looked rusty to me against Italy; could be crucial in helping Donald settle at Test level
Piri Weepu — one of the only real leaders in the backline (along with Mils). Why not start him?
Stephen Donald — needs to stop listening to the critics and simplify his game
Luke McAlister — shouldn’t be in the All Blacks and his only advantage over Donald is that he’s a better goalkicker. Not his fault he was rushed back too soon.
Ma’a Nonu — will have every rush defender targeting him. Needs to beat some tackles.
Conrad Smith — crucial linkman, but his presence alone won’t help the backline function
Isaia Toeava — the selectors love this kid, but when is enough enough?
Hosea Gear — I don’t get this one. Masaga was pulled from the Junior All Blacks and given a single opportunity against Italy. Gear plays for the Juniors and gets a recall? Go figure.
Josevata Rokocoko — may have entered the stage where he’s more of a finisher than a genuine threat.
Sitiveni Sivivatu — hope he can rekindle his Super 14 form, because he’s the only real line breaker in the All Black backline
Cory Jane — another guy like Ross who’s actually having a good Test season. Very much a fullback, however.
Mils Muliaina — still the best fullback in the world
Aside from Carter, Williams and Kahui, it’s not that far off a full strength All Blacks squad. We’re just well and truly in a rebuilding stage, which is a nice way of saying on the decline.
I would’ve liked to have seen Whitelock in the squad.
mother teresa said | July 5th 2009 @ 8:37pm | Report comment
OJ
brilliant assessment and the reason i support joly jupes intelligent predictions;time for the “tucked up trio” of AB coaches to rouse and wayne smith might look for the exit.
LeftArmSpinner said | July 6th 2009 @ 4:38pm | Report comment
OJ, short pasing game only works once you have broken through the defensive line. I must first admit to being an OJ fan, but not this time. Short passing is designed and has worked at all levels of rugby, to make the hole by short, easier to throw passes and lots of support play, a la the Ella era.
It works.
Firstly, it compresses the defence laterally, leaving more space out wide. The shorter passes are easier to throw accurately and make midfield moves at the gain line easier to make stick. Inside players in support dont have to travel so far and are deep enough and close to take the next short pass. All done at pace and with the liberal use of extra men, not telegraphed blind side wingers or fullbacks, but “out of the blue” players at pace creating overlaps and holes to run into.
I didnt see the games but it sounds like the AB’s didnt implement very well. it takes some time but produces the desired results. it goes on at the gian line so when it comes off, the ball carrier is through and into space with support to finish off the break.
For me, pro players have the time and abilty to learn different attacking alignments, wide sweeping backlines or short, sharp passes. Mix them up and force the defence to adjust but without prior notice.