A strange silence from the Tuqiri camp
By Spiro Zavos, 7 Jul 2009 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Greg Growden, James OConnor, John ONeill, Josh Valentine, Lote Tuqiri, Quade Cooper, robbie deans, Rugby Union, wallabies
Related coverage

Australian rugby union player Lote Tuqiri stretches at a team practice session in Sydney on Tuesday, June 23, 2009. AAP Image/Paul Miller)
The Sunday Telegraph ran a self-serving editorial lambasting the ARU for not revealing the details of Lote Tuqiri’s sacking and which concluded, rather unconvincingly, that this perceived lack of transparency would result in rugby union becoming a diminished code in Australia.
The point of the editorial, a criticism of the ARU’s silence on the sacking, was a major issue in most of the other media commentary on the sacking up to Sunday.
The CEO of the ARU, John O’Neill, a lawyer, tried to deflect this criticism by suggesting that he went into the sacking with his “eyes wide open”, that as Tuqiri has threatened legal action against the ARU, it is unable to disclose its reasons for the sacking, and that there is nothing to stop Tuqiri’s camp from providing the media with the relevant details of the matter.
On Monday, the commentary shifted from finding fault with O’Neill to now criticising Tuqiri’s camp for its silence on the matter.
We had a column by Greg Growden in the SMH that summed up this shift with its headline: Lote’s Silence Has Rumour Mill Roaring.
The Daily Telegraph’s on-line edition published an article by Jim Ticker (surely Jim Tucker) with a publication time of 12am on Sunday which pointed out two of the Wallabies’ private team rules under Robbie Deans: “the alcohol breath-testing of randomly selected players the morning after Test matches and a tight code on just who is allowed to enter the hotel rooms of players in Test week.”
The article went on to suggest that the Tuqiri incident happened before the first Test against Italy at Canberra.
Growden’s article in the SMH suggests that what happened in Tuqiri’s hotel room is the key to the dispute: “Monday Maul understands there was a recent breach of player protocol following an incident at the team hotel. We understand it is not a trivial matter and certainly more serious than a food fight in Canberra that recently resulted in three other Wallabies – James O’Connor, Quade Cooper and Josh Valentine – being fined.”
According to Growden ‘the real Tuqiri story’ is known to only a small group of people: “Even senior Wallabies players and several members of the team management are unaware of the full details.”
On the next page of the SMH, Growden has another story titled: Right Decision – Deans backs ARU move to dump Tuqiri.
The story quotes Deans as saying that he was consulted throughout the process and that “I completely support the ARU’s decesion … I am unable to discuss Lote’s actual termination but I have been concerned about how some have seized on this issue and may have attempted to use this to their advantage.”
Who can these ‘some’ be?
Growden has also revealed that Tuqiri was told of his sacking after an hour-long meeting with O’Neill on Monday. The sacking/termination of the contract was announced on Wednesday.
This time gap is interesting.
As Growden points out, the rumour mills have been roaring in the absence of either of the parties providing the media and supporters with relevant details.
For what it is worth, one of the rumours is that O’Neill offered the ARU’s silence to Tuqiri, which was initially accepted, and honoured. Then, later, Tuqiri told the media that he had hired some legal guns and was going to fight the legality of the sacking.
Again, for what it is worth, like Growden, I have heard of an allegation which is not trivial and certainly serious enough, if true, to warrant Tuqiri’s contract being ripped up.
It’s time that the air is cleared on this matter.
The best way for this to be done is for the strange silence from the Lote Tuqiri camp to be lifted.
Spiro Zavos, a founding writer on The Roar, was long time editorial writer on the Sydney Morning Herald, where he started a rugby column that has run for nearly 30 years. Spiro has written 12 books: fiction, biography, politics and histories of Australian, New Zealand, British and South African rugby. He is regarded as one of the foremost writers on rugby throughout the world.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!


July 7th 2009 @ 4:16am
Jim said | July 7th 2009 @ 4:16am | Report comment
This is a nice summary of the situation, Greg Growden’s piece also made some very salient points. It will be very interesting to see how this all plays out…
July 7th 2009 @ 8:34am
Brett McKay said | July 7th 2009 @ 8:34am | Report comment
Agree Jim, and I thought it was interesting that O’Neill said at last week’s Tri Nations squad announcement that that ARU wouldn’t be making comment, but had no problem if Tuqiri decided to comment. It seemed to me like a comment made from a confident position in a delicate matter..
July 7th 2009 @ 8:44am
El Capitan said | July 7th 2009 @ 8:44am | Report comment
The only vultures that will win from this will be the Lawyers.
I’d say it was a breach of team procedures, and really we will just wait and see what comes out in the wash.
July 7th 2009 @ 8:57am
Harry said | July 7th 2009 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Well I’m quite a distance from Insider status but my circle got what is now looking more and more like a fairly accurate assessment of the reasons for the sacking on Thursday last week, so I presume the likes of Tucker, Smith, Growden – and Zavos – also knew. 100% agree with cutting him, but its my opinion that O’Neill was unnecessarily vindictive in waiting till July 1, and the situation could have been handled a lot better in many ways. But its a fine example of the way business is done in this town.
July 7th 2009 @ 9:01am
Arky said | July 7th 2009 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Ball is clearly in Lote’s court and I suspect he has held back as revealing anything will probably work against him…
July 7th 2009 @ 9:04am
fox said | July 7th 2009 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Ooh! Ooh! Tell us, Spiro. Tellllll us!
July 7th 2009 @ 9:14am
Vincent said | July 7th 2009 @ 9:14am | Report comment
LOL…fox..
as always well written Spiro..
As all of us at the roar have speculated and debated, I still feel that nobody terminates a 1 million dollar contract without seating with all their legal team and finally coming to the conclusion that it is the way to go ie ‘eyes wide open’… The Waratahs were consulted and seemed to be ok with the unknown reasons for the sacking as Deans was consulted too….if it was a trivial issue then some fine or suspension would have been in order (recommended even)..my view is that the issue cannot be a trivial one…as Spiro says, the silence from the Tiquri camp is puzzling…somethings just not right! But all we can do is wait and see what unfolds.
July 7th 2009 @ 9:20am
Al said | July 7th 2009 @ 9:20am | Report comment
It’s an extraordinary set of circumstances. Usually we see either defensive or self-serving statements from the Players Association or from the Code itself. Silence is almost shocking and raises alarms of something more serious than breach of protocol. If we’re looking at something worse than a food fight, then I’m pleased that we’re not just ploughing through the carefully crafted statements of spin-doctors. Usually when a significant public issue unfolds, the ultimate truth bears little resemblance to the initial posturing – whether starting trivial and finishing otherwise AND VICE VERSA.
July 7th 2009 @ 9:22am
sheek said | July 7th 2009 @ 9:22am | Report comment
By now many of us have probably heard a “reliable source” story.
My reliable source story appears to be vindicated by both Tucker’s & Growden’s articles yesterday. Specifically the ‘unauthorised persons’ entering your room angle.
If the story I’ve heard is true & accurate, then it was definitely a serious matter.
July 7th 2009 @ 9:28am
johnno42 said | July 7th 2009 @ 9:28am | Report comment
th mungo has excreted in the nest again. he was on his last warning…. its over. end of story… move on.
i personally don’t care about “just who doesn’t want to say what”