Rugby politics threaten Melbourne Super 15
By Bay35Pablo, 9 Jul 2009 Bay35Pablo is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- ARU, melbourne rugby, Rugby Union, Super 15, vru, Wayne Smith, western Sydney
The Australian’s Wayne Smith wrote an article yesterday that gives cause for concern that Melbourne and the VRU may not gain the fifth Australian franchise from 2011.
If correct, it begs the question as to what’s going on at the ARU.
While questions might be asked about Gary Gray as VRU President, it beggars belief that any people at the ARU would choose to place the franchise elsewhere simply for reasons of getting square.
With union lacking a presence in Australia’s second biggest city and arguably biggest sporting city, the game cannot claim to be truly national. However, if the VRU and Melbourne lose out due to internal grudges against one man, correct or not, is the ARU really looking at the big picture and the best interests of the game as a whole?
One would think that even if some had issues with Gray, they would hold their noses, close their eyes and think of the game. But perhaps not.
Instead, the prospect of sending the franchise to the already congested Gold Coast (with a likely adverse effect on the Reds), or the potentially unreceptive western Sydney, simply to deny it to Gray, appears to be acceptable to some.
The ARU, and rugby union in general, has a poor image as a hot bed of politics and personalities, although this perhaps applies to all sports.
However, with the NSL gone, rugby seems intent on usurping its position as the Australian sport with an image of the biggest blockheads playing political games to the detriment of their sport.
In an age when people decry sport becoming a business, and commercial concerns winning out over traditions and sportsmanship, the certainty of the almighty dollar has some solace. After all, at least if its being run as a business, we all know if it will make money it will get support rather than being dependent on who has a grudge for who.
If this is true, then the ARU cannot move to independent directors and a board soon enough, to get rid of the amateur Machiavellis souring the game. If not, then the fact it is all too easy to believe doesn’t bode to well for the regard in which the game’s administrators are held.
Fourteen years after the game went professional, have the administrators caught up to the players and coaches and become professionals themselves?
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Victory beat Mariners with Kewell winner
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (202)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- ARU, melbourne rugby, Rugby Union, Super 15, vru, Wayne Smith, western Sydney

Brett McKay said | July 9th 2009 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Pablo, I read the same article yesterday and nearly fell over. Why is it that the ARU seem to make even the most logical decisions difficult for themselves?? There should only be one bid being put forwad by the ARU, not three!!
wallythefly said | July 9th 2009 @ 9:54am | Report comment
Yikes, can’t believe this might not happen for Melbourne.
Surely, surely surely common sense will prevail.
mtngry said | July 9th 2009 @ 9:55am | Report comment
If the NSWRU wants a bigger presence outside of Sydney’s North-East ( or QLD outside of Their equivelent) Maybe they should get the NEW SOUTH WALES Waratahs to play games in THE REST OF NEW SOUTH WALES!
Not giving Victoria a team is madness.
Spiro Zavos said | July 9th 2009 @ 10:18am | Report comment
There are two teams in NSW, the Waratahs and the Brumbies. I agree that Melbourne is the logical place for the 5th Australian Super Rugby side. Players from NSW and Queensland would have fewerr qualms and difficulties shifting to Melbourne for the rugby season than they do going to Perth. Melbourne is the second biggest market in Australia. It is the home of a number of major companies like Ford and so on who could sponsor the Victorian team, presumably.
Melbourne also has a small rugby culture with the game being played there for decades.
Pippinu said | July 9th 2009 @ 10:19am | Report comment
You mean an Australian sporting organisation is about to usurp the former ASF as the biggest blockheads since Charlie Brown coached an U6 baseball team???
Justin said | July 9th 2009 @ 10:42am | Report comment
I read the article and know the people involved.
It made me laugh reading that Curnow is so worried about the local competition. He has been trying to get his club Moorabbin to play in the ACT club competition which would be to the obvious detriment of the Melbourne club comp.
He has also set up a rugby league team which is advertised on the Moorabbin Rugby Club website.
I think that says it all really. A very poor story from Wayne Smith, lacking any research but grabbed a headline and ran with it. The only part he got right is that the VRU Club Presidents are behind Gray 18-0.
Pippinu said | July 9th 2009 @ 10:56am | Report comment
I would think that a Melbourne club in the ACT comp would get smacked about a bit.
sheek said | July 9th 2009 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Groan… groan… groan.
Say it ain’t so. Sometimes I’m convinced Australian rugby union DOESN’T want to be a big time player.
‘Three steps forward, one step back’ was replaced by ‘two steps forward, one step back’. Now we’re looking at ‘one step forward, two steps back’!
A potentially great game being hamstrung by petty, petty, petty, petty people at the ARU & elsewhere.
mattamkII said | July 9th 2009 @ 11:19am | Report comment
Pippinu – not as much as you think. A strong Vic 1st Grade would be as good as the lower 1st Grade ACT club sides. Sure, They’d get belted by Tuggas etc but the gap isnt as much as most people think……
As for Moorabbin, that club has always had a chip on it shoulder and the suggestion they could even afford the costs to play in ACT comp is laughable.
Pippinu said | July 9th 2009 @ 11:25am | Report comment
Fair call matt – that sounds about right.