Manchester City: Los Celeste Galacticos
By Ryan Steele, 15 Jul 2009 Ryan Steele is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Galacticos, Mark Hughes, Real Madrid, Robinho, Tevez
With a squad containing the likes of Robinho, Nigel de Jong, and Gareth Barry, the recently-announced signing of Carlos Tevez, and reports of John Terry, Emmanuel Adebayor, Maicon, and David Beckham potentially joining the club, Manchester City gaffer Mark Hughes looks set to create a squad of Real Madrid and Gold Coast United proportions.
But will it work?
Last year’s big-money ventures, thanks to multi-billionaire owner Sheikh Mansour, saw them struggling for cohesion throughout the domestic season, finishing 10th on the league table, and failing to earn any silverware.
Their biggest signing – also the current British record fee for an incoming transfer – 25-year-old Brazilian superstar Robinho, sparked various controversies in mere months of his signing, such as his regular disappearances from training, unexpectedly departing to Brazil without prior notice to the club, and even an arrest over rape allegations.
Despite finishing the season as the team’s overall top scorer with 15 goals across all competitions, his year was relatively underwhelming, and he was known to go unnoticed during matches.
This could very much be down to the team formula, and the lack of understanding Robinho had of the team’s style of play, and the team’s lack of understanding of how Robinho plays. Robinho arrived with a different pre-season to that of his counterparts, and was expected by most to slot into the squad without problem.
Without the knowledge of team tactics and the abilities of your fellow teammates, even the greatest players will have problems finding their feet, in a new environment.
With what seems at times like a large influx of new players joining the Citizens’ ranks, the team cohesion required of a title contender could be difficult to see, in the upcoming season.
I’ve been a long-time advocate of what I’ve come to call, “Finding the formula for the team, not the team for the formula.” This basically entails the requirement to decide what is required to make your team a success, and getting the most of the players you already have at your disposal. It then allows you, in a transfer window, to focus only on finding players that can fill the gaps that need filling.
Current Schalke 04 coach Felix Magath proved that this can be a success, leading Wolfsburg to their first ever Bundesliga title. Real Madrid have shown with the Galacticos that, despite containing some of the world’s biggest names of the time, doing the opposite can easily cause grief for all involved, and little silverware over an extended period.
Former Real Madrid Galactico Zinedine Zidane put the era’s failures down to the name ‘Galacticos.’
Their hindrance was far from just a branding error.
Big-money stars are regularly labelled as divas, are known to fall out with teammates, and criticised for losing the interest in playing to win.
While a lot (if not all) of the recent signings have been due to the money at their disposal, Mark Hughes and the staff at Manchester City must still be applauded for their success in bringing names like Robinho and Carlos Tevez to a lesser-known club, and adding extra excitement to the spectacle that is the mid-year transfer window.
The team’s cohesion is likely to cause a lot of problems, in the upcoming season, but like Robinho’s 08/09 season, we will only see glimpses of the magic we should expect from such a lineup.
Thankfully, managing a club is a constant learning experience, and Mark Hughes will no doubt learn a lot from this experiment.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (27) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Socceroos vs Japan in Brisbane is a masterstroke (130)
- Fans want a club, not a name, that fills them with Pride (129)
- The war that’s not a war (128)
- Western Sydney’s new A-League team: What’s in a name? (101)
- Too many doubts over new A-League club (101)
- Magic EPL finish as Manchester City triumph in tightest of title races (93)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Oman the Socceroos’ focus, says Kennedy (4)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (15)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (17)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (13)
- Abbas wants A-League excitement at Sydney FC (16)
- Axed coach takes Adelaide United to court (9)
- Milicic yet to sign say west Sydney
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (15)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (17)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (13)
- Oh my god! They’ve killed Kenny (12)
- Is Chelsea’s Abramovic finally satisfied? (15)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Supporting a loser will make you love sport (27)
- Explore:
- Galacticos, Mark Hughes, Real Madrid, Robinho, Tevez

July 17th 2009 @ 7:59am
Infarction said | July 17th 2009 @ 7:59am | Report comment
Knives Out. Hammers came from out of the relegation zone, changed managers and players and tied with Spurs. Hardly means they will break into the top tier this season.
Spurs have a habit of promising so much and delivering so little. Can’t see this changing in the new season.
July 17th 2009 @ 8:26am
Knives Out said | July 17th 2009 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Of course it doesn’t, but it is obvious that Tottenham have a roster of talent, just as they have for the past four seasons, hence the three consecutive seasons of European football. It took Redknapp to realise that, just as Jol had, and just as Ramos had not. West Ham does not have that roster of talent and nor does it have wealth commensurate with Tottenham, nor the recent pedigree. Incidentally, you forget to mention that West Ham spent far longer than Tottenham did in the top half of the table, and far less in the relegation area. Regardless, if a team manages two 5th consecutive 5th placed finishes and two consecutive Carling Cup finals interrupted by one poor showing from a clueless manager it would take a pessimistic character to write that team off.
July 17th 2009 @ 8:31am
Infarction said | July 17th 2009 @ 8:31am | Report comment
You just proved my point, in your own worlds they have a roster of talent, money and so called “pedigree”, yet could only finish a tie with West Ham.
Promising so much and delivering so little.
July 17th 2009 @ 8:36am
Knives Out said | July 17th 2009 @ 8:36am | Report comment
That’s preposterous logic. Tottenham Hotspurs isn’t a monstrous, erratic, free-thinking entity who plays football. Tottenham Hotpurs is a football club managed (Note the word ‘managed’.) by a manager. Hence Martin Jol and Harry Redknapp produced good results. Juande Ramos did not. You seem to conveniently forget the fact that it was mismanagement by Ramos that took the club so low, and that it was good management by Redknapp that brought the club so high. As it stands Spurs were fantastically unlucky not to qualify for Europe. They are a well run, rich club.
July 17th 2009 @ 8:39am
Infarction said | July 17th 2009 @ 8:39am | Report comment
How they deliver so little is irrelevant. Fantastically unlucky? Haha.
We will see what this season brings. Their only chance of Europe will once again be through the mickey mouse cup playing against the top teams youth squads.
July 17th 2009 @ 8:46am
Knives Out said | July 17th 2009 @ 8:46am | Report comment
I don’t think you grasp the concept of football, nor football management. It is a sustainable argument that had Redknapp managed Spurs from the beginning of the season that they would have qualified for Europe which would have meant three very good seasons out of four – which allied to two finals and consistent high European placing does not quite ring true as ‘delivering little’ – which logic dictates is a pattern. In that context an 11th placed season under Ramos is clearly an aberration.
A ‘mickey mouse’ cup?! What a deeply profound comment. Do you think Chelsea would have agreed last season, do you think that Ferguson would agree as his season gradually fizzled out? I doubt it. I also doubt that you understand the breadth of your ‘deliver so little’ ‘argument’. Following that logic I could argue that the only clubs to do well last season were Fulham and Stoke. I suggest you read up your football history.
July 17th 2009 @ 8:59am
Infarction said | July 17th 2009 @ 8:59am | Report comment
You can’t seriously begin to know what would have happened over the course of a year if harry was manager, what a silly argument.
Spurs fans seem to have this image of grandeur in their minds regarding their club that fails to match the reality of the situation.
The passion of the fans is what makes Football fun, i look forward to hearing your thoughts as the season progresses.
July 17th 2009 @ 9:07am
Knives Out said | July 17th 2009 @ 9:07am | Report comment
‘You can’t seriously begin to know what would have happened over the course of a year if harry was manager, what a silly argument.’
It isn’t a silly argument, it is very sustainable. Logic dictates that if he were capable of rising from the bottom to the near top, then I would presume he could do better over an entire season.
‘Spurs fans seem to have this image of grandeur in their minds regarding their club that fails to match the reality of the situation.’
No, that is a corruption that you are forcing onto the matter. The fact of the matter is that the record of Tottenham over the past four seasons is a good one. Case closed.
July 17th 2009 @ 9:16am
Infarction said | July 17th 2009 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Have you never seen a new manager come into a club and make a massive difference? It happens all the time, it in no way means that the club would have played as well all season if he was there from the start.
Tottenham have done ok all things considered. They never live up to expectations though.. There will be no top tier finish and they won’t even live up to your expectations of a top 6 this season.
That’s what i am talking about, Spurs fans think the club is so much better than it is.
We get told they are going to achieve things they don’t seem to be able to. Hence promise so much deliver so little.
Best you got is to hang your hat on Carling Cup results.
July 17th 2009 @ 9:20am
pothale said | July 17th 2009 @ 9:20am | Report comment
Gosh I can’t get an edge in wordways in this topic about Manchester City.