Luke Burgess is not a Test halfback
By Milton Cockburn, 20 Jul 2009 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Bledisloe Cup, Luke Burgess, Rugby Union, Tri Nations, wallabies, Will Genia
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news
- Wallabies v All Blacks news
Don’t expect this to be written by our rugby commentators but Luke Burgess is not a Test halfback.
Having spent years bemoaning the fact that George Gregan would not retire, Burgess (on the basis of very little evidence) was hailed by the commentators as the ‘next big thing’.
There is now a ‘conspiracy of silence’ from these commentators about Burgess’s rugby abilities. Expect all the post-match commentary, instead, to concentrate on Al Baxter’s scrummaging.
Someone has to bell the cat; the major weakness in the Test team at the moment is not Al Baxter but Luke Burgess.
The normally perceptive Rod Kafer, recently analysing Burgess’s game on television, said, almost as an after thought: “He needs to work on his passing.”
This suggests that Burgess’s passing is the only weakness in his game and, then, only a slight imperfection. In fact, Burgess’s passing, the most critical aspect of a halfback’s game, is not even club standard, let alone Test quality.
Burgess has the world’s second-best 10 outside him yet Giteau (or Barnes, when he occasionally swaps with Giteau) rarely gets good service from his 9.
The critical charge down in the last 10 minutes on Saturday was the result (as usual) of Giteau having to pluck a Burgess pass from the heavens before being able to think about his clearing kick.
Burgess’s performance on Saturday night was one of the worst from an Australian half and not just because his passing is so disastrous. He gets badly flustered when put under pressure at the ruck and inevitably this leads to wrong options. His kicking (particularly with his right foot; and into the box) is poor.
One of the most puzzling aspects of Saturday’s test is why it took Robbie Deans until the 74th minute before he replaced Burgess. Deans must have a very poor opinion of Will Genia!
Everyone has bad games but Burgess has yet to put in a great performance in a Test. His lacklustre Super 14 season this year casts doubts about whether he should even be in the Test squad, let alone ranked as Australia’s No. 1 half.
Sniping, a positive element in Burgess’s game, is never going to be much of an option against a New Zealand (or South African) team.
In the late 1960s, a friend of mine (a fullback) was selected in a Newcastle representative side.
On his first night at rep training, the Newcastle halfback, one John Hipwell, interrogated him at length on where he wanted the ball when passed to him for a clearing kick: what side of his body? what height? how hard? etc. It’s hard to imagine such a conversation taking place between Burgess and Adam Ashley-Cooper at training!
Being dropped from the squad last year did wonders for Nathan Sharpe’s test career when he was eventually restored.
It’s time for Deans to administer the same ‘tough love’ to Luke Burgess.
He could usefully spend some time with a John Hipwell, Ken Catchpole or Chris Whitaker learning how to pass. And, if he hasn’t gone back to Japan, he could do well to ask Nick Farr-Jones or George Gregan for some advice about his kicking game and composure behind the ruck.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Queensland ready for Super challenge
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage
- Foley excited about Samoan rugby challenge
- Force rugby coach praises his pack
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (9)
- Wales’ Davies banned for ‘tip tackle’ (3)
- Graham Henry’s rugby future confirmed (14)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (21)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (16)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- Bledisloe Cup, Luke Burgess, Rugby Union, Tri Nations, wallabies, Will Genia

LeftArmSpinner said | July 20th 2009 @ 8:35am | Report comment
milton, wrong. Burgess is very much a test half. He is very quick in attack with ball in hand, and adds an almost unique addition to the attacking options for every team he plays for. He is both very brave and effective in the tackle. Just ask SBW. He is made of stern stuff and finally he is an excellent team man. Yes, his bread and butter is his pass and it needs to improve. No doubt. I dont understand, given all the above, why it hasn’t.
Something was different about him on satruday evening. From the first play, he was off his game. his face told a story. was it illness, I dont know but something was wrong. Its not like he hasnt been there before. I pretty sure that he played the equivalent game last year. (‘tho he did get injured at training during last season and missed a few games.)
He has been very good in the games of the 2009 season. Dont underestimate him. Every player has a bad game. every player has things to work on. Equally, his pass needs to be 100% every time. it is a core skill. Genia looked to have avery good pass in the brief time he was on the field. All good. depth, depth depth.
DT said | July 20th 2009 @ 8:40am | Report comment
I’ve been waiting hopefully for Burgess to mature into a top-class halfback, but the more I see, the more I tend to think that it’s not going to happen, at least for the time being. He’s clearly a talented player, but his pass is a weak link. This became obvious on Saturday night when Will Genia came on and started throwing bullets.
Virgil said | July 20th 2009 @ 9:00am | Report comment
Totally agree Milton. Great article. Burgess is clearly not up to standard and we in Australia are settling for second best by having him in the team. It has been over 5 years since the Wallabies had a test standard halfback (when Gregan was playing well).
reds fan said | July 20th 2009 @ 9:07am | Report comment
Left arm. He looked good in previous tests because there was no pressure. His “bread and butter” fails under pressure…. under the pressure of real Test rugby. Ergo, he is not Test class. All the snipes in the world dont make up for slowing down the backline all night with head high looping passes.
Genia showed in his last couple of games for the Reds that he has the pass and the running, and has the courage and defence. If he is given a go it will be on the same limited evidence Burgess was selected.
We need a better option.
Justin said | July 20th 2009 @ 9:15am | Report comment
I recall the commentators saying that Genia was warming up at the 48th minute mark. There must have been another break in play for 25 plus minutes
Burgess fails, and quite badly, in the most important skill of a 9 therefore should not be in the side at all until his passing is swift and accurate 95% of the time.
Genia looked all class with his passing and it was his first Test, a Bledisloe on foreign soil no less. I thought he could challenge for the starting spot having watched him play for QLD this year and after Saturday he most certainly can.
Justin said | July 20th 2009 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Must “not” have been another break for 25mins
JamesB said | July 20th 2009 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Bring back Gregan!
ohtani's jacket, said | July 20th 2009 @ 9:39am | Report comment
Was Genia really that good? As soon as he came on, the Wallabies started moving laterally and were easier to pick off in defence.
Mushi said | July 20th 2009 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Left Arm. How can some be a test class scrum half if he can’t pass? What’s next goal kickers who can’t kick, number 7s that can’t tackle, front rowers that can’t scrummage (whoops we’ve already got that).
The primary function of the position is to pass the ball and this is definitely not the first match I’ve seen where he’s failed to perform that function.
Farmer said | July 20th 2009 @ 10:21am | Report comment
I agree Burgess has failed to deliver. He has now had 18 mths and about 15 Tests. His passing is sub standard for Test rugby. They are rarely at chest height and in front of the player. They are all over the shop. Long loopy ( ie slow) passes, over their heads, on the ground, over the side line.
It is not good enough. His kicking is not up to scratch. Out on the full, charged down, too long, too short…. At this level players should be aiming to make errors / mistakes rarely. Burgess racks several up every match and they usually end up costing his side dearly eg kicking it out on the full on Saturday eventually leading to AB try.
Sure he runs well with the ball but the fundamental, No 1 priority for a 9 is that he can pass. Burgess cannot pass well.
Holmes has not progressed since he left NSW and he is not the answer.
Genia looks the goods, he has a very good pass and is non stop.
We have a good backline, it needs to be able to get the ball early and going forward. Not waiting for the movement to start after Giteau catcheds the ball.
I look forward to the day when we see the Wallaby backline getting fast ball, going forward. Think how much better Giteau / Barnes could be if they receive d the ball in front of them and quickly.