Super League might not work in European football, but perhaps it’s the answer for Asia.
The Europeans Champions League (ECL) is the pinnacle of club football. The prestige and prize money is unmatched by any of the other continental club competitions and it’s this tournament that the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) is trying to replicate in Asia’s with the revamped Asian Champions League.
There are significant funds pouring from Asia into European Football for both the Premier League and the ECL and only by creating a competition with similar allure will the money pouring out of our confederation find a home inside the AFC borders.
Such a need to combat this is growing as Europe clearly has its eyes on more Asian cash if the proposed 39th round of the English Premier League is anything to judge by.
Tellingly Thaksin Shinawatra didn’t spend his money in Thailand when he invested in football, he spent it on Manchester City. Despite it being half a world away it wasn’t a very surprising move (even ignoring the fact he was exiled at the time).
The progress made from the significant changes to the Asian Champions League introduced this year is promising and the AFC has improved the standard of the competition and its marketability.
The prize money has been buffed up and instead of admitting the champions of each nation, there has been much more focus on spots in the competition given to the stronger domestic leagues. This is a similar change to what now happens in Europe through the effects of the UEFA coefficient.
While I am glad the competition has improved I don’t think this is the competition format which is the best way of tackling Europe and winning Asian hearts and money.
If the competition does work it will come at the expense of the region’s national leagues.
We have seen how much of an advantage Champions League money is in Europe and how it has reshaped their club football. Such a case where the top teams are irreproachable might be ok for European leagues which have been around for a hundred plus years and are woven into the fabric of the land but would severely hurt spectator interest in developing football countries.
As it stands now, because of their lack of power on the pitch, teams from Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore are nearly frozen out of the Asian Champions League (playing off for 2 spots between them) despite being huge commercial markets for football. The crowds that greeted Manchester United dwarf that of support for any Malaysian domestic team
I am going to suggest a different plan for Asian football.
I am happy for the ACL to keep going and progressing but propose a new competition not tied to the current domestic clubs. A super league is something which has often been met with derision in Europe when proposed and rightly so. Often the proposal includes the big clubs leaving behind their domestic comp or treating it as second best, something which goes against the heart and soul of the game and years of successful tradition.
An East Asian Super league however could be different. It wouldn’t have to cause Armageddon on the existing domestic competitions and there is much less to lose and much more to gain if it is successful.
Set up in a similar way to the Super 14 (and I suppose familiar to cricket’s IPL) – if a space for it in the calendar could be made, easier said than done – Asia could have it’s own teams that are playing high quality football in front of huge crowds and TV audiences.
As an example of how the competition could work:
Eleven teams playing ten matches with the top four going to the final series. Five games at home, five games away, all taking place over two months.
It’s a tight schedule but it has to be a small season in order to cause as little disruption to the existing Asian competitions as possible.
The teams could have an unlimited amount of Asian players in their squad with the only rule being that they must have two players on the field in the team from the nation where the team is based.
That would need the AFC to throw it’s weight around with FIFA but defending a European monopoly on top quality football isn’t in Fifa’s mandate so it’s possible.
The early recruitment could be done in much the same way that the Super 12 was done. Those in strong domestic leagues like Korea and China would likely have mainly local players drafted in from their own domestic clubs with an opportunity to bump up their salary and bring in perhaps a player or two in certain positions from West Asia. While teams in Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand would have to attract players from all over Asia and assemble something more multicultural.
It would attempt to capture the glamour of the Premier League’s East Asian tours but with a meaningful competition.
There would be three spots for foreign (non AFC players) which is where the emphasis of the competition’s recruitment will have to be in that first year to capture the region’s imagination (Beckham, Juan Veron, Owen, Donovan and Figo would all be great targets).
For a maximum 12 games work, a million dollar pay day plus massive sponsorship potential would hopefully attract a cream of quality players for a short stint who could then return to Europe/North America/South America to complete their domestic season.
There could be two teams in Japan, a team in Seoul, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Jakarta, Bangkok, Kula Lumpur, Singapore and one in Australia (dependent on time of year the competition would be played).
Suddenly the fans in Thailand and Malaysia would have a quality team of their own to support. You can’t replicate years of tradition overnight but hopefully the buzz of having a world class team in your own backyard will make up for it and eventually the competition will generate it’s own history and heroes.
In a country like Japan where their own league is already internationally recognised, the two franchises could be based on existing teams with Urawa supplying their team aided by a few more Japanese or international stars.
As for Australia’s role I wouldn’t be sure. Perhaps it would have to be a team from North Queensland or Perth because of travel, but it would depend on logistics. Certainly a team in Sydney or Melbourne would be preferred.
There would be a lot of organizational hurdles to overcome but I think cricket and rugby have shown it could work in sports with already crowded calendars and the Curie Cup and the NPC are still alive and well.
Sorry if this was a bit rough and reads like a draft. I did lose my focus a bit at the end but I was keen to get some input so I could apply some polish to the idea.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Phoenix need more than flash in the pan crowds (133)
- ‘New football’ fans may help save the game in Australia (124)
- Does Tasmania have a case for A-League inclusion? (119)
- What happened in Port Said was not a football riot (118)
- Magilton struggling to make a mark (68)
- Socceroos screwed over by FIFA, again (41)
- Gulf influence cripples the FFA again (40)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (4)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (7)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (13)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess
- Redknapp tight-lipped over England job
- Departing Lavicka has players’ respect
- Victory gain Spanish recruit for Mariners
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (4)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (7)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (0)
- Melbourne derby reveals tale of two journeys (2)
- O’ so close for John: How JON almost landed the biggest job in sport (16)
- Capello ‘walks’ from England’s top job (13)
- Why Manchester United are never really beaten (15)

Ben Somerford said | July 21st 2009 @ 8:16am | Report comment
It’s a bold idea AndyRoo, but I just don’t see it working in a region like that.
Towser said | July 21st 2009 @ 9:39am | Report comment
The European model works in Europe because as mentioned in this article it has evolved over a long period. No instant fix in Asia for the ACL it will evolve similar to Europe with big leagues & smaller leagues. The better players from nations like Singapore,Thailand,Malaysia will graduate to Japan,China,Korea ,Australia,maybe a middle East super league. Dont see many other nations capable of stepping up, simply because the majority of Asian nations will never have economies capable of supporting viable professional leagues.
Better for the rich Asians to invest in clubs in the region where they can get value for their dollar. Wouldnt mind one at the Roar. We could then compete with the “Big Clive Show” down the road. An International “marquee player in his twenties wouldnt go astray to complement Socceroo marquee Craig Moore. If these guys start throwing their money around at the big leagues throughout the region,the clubs will have better playing rosters,which will raise the standard of teams competing in the ACL anyway. Needs the AFC to persuade these Asian tycoons that their bread is buttered in Asia not Europe as far as football goes. Lets develop football in Asia(therefore Australia) slowly according to the dynamics that naturally exist in the region. Logistically the proposal above anyway would be a nightmare in recruitement given the crowded football calendar. Better to have top quality players permanently on a clubs playing roster anyway. MBH & his offsiders need to start bending the ears to direct cash our way rather than Europe’s.
Midfielder said | July 21st 2009 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Andy
Throught provoking article… I am not sure it would work as you see it…. but it does give rise to maybe regional play off’s for ACL places… say SEA, Middle East etc are each allocated 4 places and lets say we divide Asioa into 4 zones… the top four from each country could play off for the top 4 places in the ACL..
Pippinu said | July 21st 2009 @ 9:50am | Report comment
Hmmm, it’s a novel idea – but I’m trying to work out why the ACL would never work.
I can see that the idea might be good for minnows like Malaysia and Singapore – but I can’t see why it would be the least bit attractive for countries like Japan (booming league, half a dozen top notch clubs) or even Australia.
In fact, let’s look at Australia. Let us suppose we plonk a team in to play out of Sydney (because it’s Australia’s largest city, etc).
What does that mean for the rest of the A-League?
Are any Melburnians going to give a damn about a team playing out of Sydney (I wouldn’t).
Do you end up with the double whammy that a team like Victory ends up losing out on fan and corporate interest, while at the same time the fans lost switch off this brand new super team (and maybe the game altogether)?
Sorry – I actually can’t see what good it would bring Australia.
Pippinu said | July 21st 2009 @ 9:52am | Report comment
Mid
one could argue that something similar exists already (split between East and West Asia), with the two only coming together in the knock out stages.
But yeh – any number of variations on that theme are possible, and I agree that in terms of helping out minnows like Malaysia and Singapore, it might just mean more play offs amongst themselves to make the big time.
AndyRoo said | July 21st 2009 @ 10:17am | Report comment
I have little doubt it wouldn’t work as above because there would be so many hurdles, but I think something like a super league would be the only way to engage the Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam and Singapore markets because there so far away from being able to produce a club team good enough to attract fans away from the EPL.
There are similar countries in the Middle East and Africa where they love European football.
I think Towser is spot on in how the existing ACL will develop, that is how I imagine it slowly occurring. My proposal is more a circus idea that burns bright for a short time each year. I guess the target market is euro snobs of which there are a lot in Sth East Asia.
The more I think about it the getting players for only 2 months seems harder to manage and makes you more inflexible in dates. Perhaps signing a core of 33 marquees and then using them as the drawcards for the circus which could go in 3 stages.
East asian stage with it’s 11 teams 2 month comp in east asia, then the circus moves to west asia where there are 11 teams in the Arab regions. Most of the players from the east asian comp go back to there local leagues but the marquees continue on.
Finally at the conclusion of the West Asian end of the circus you go to Africa.
So by the end of that you have got between 30 to 36 games out of your marquees and you could pay enough for guys like Recoba or Figo to justify this being there only football for the year.
There are Euro snobs in Nth America but I think the MLS and the Mexican League are far enough advanced that this concept wouldn’t appeal.
Very bold because too many nations and federations involved, but if MBH ever is looking for an idea to try and keep that money in the AFC he is free to take it.
The Roar upon qualifying for the ACL buying Singapores best Player and then selling Roar Shirts and Broadcasting the games in Singapore sounds much more realistic though and something that could happen now.
Or grabbing Park from Man Utd in a couple of years, I know that would add a lot of bums to seats in Brisbane.
nath said | July 21st 2009 @ 10:30am | Report comment
I think the AFC should reintroduce a home and away knockout cup. Allowing the champions of the smaller nations who fail to qualify for the AFC Champions league to play against a higher caliber of teams. It could also allow teams to enter who place well in their domestic comps. For example the entrants in the comp could look like this.
In the East
A League 2nd, 3rd & 4th Place teams enter the comp 5th place team enters playoff
J League the next 3 teams outside of the automatic ACL spots. 4th team outside of ACL spot enter playoff
Chinese SL the next 3 teams outside of the automatic ACL spots. 4th team outside of ACL spot enter playoff
K League the next 3 teams outside of the automatic ACL spots. 4th team outside of ACL spot enter playoff
The 2 teams that don’t qualify out of Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore & Vietnam = 2 teams qualify
Total 16 Teams
In the West
Iranian League the next 3 teams outside of the automatic ACL spots. 4th team outside of ACL spot enter playoff
Saudi Arabia the next 3 teams outside of the automatic ACL spots. 4th team outside of ACL spot enter playoff
Qatar the next 2 teams outside of the automatic ACL spots. 3rd team outside of ACL spot enter playoff
UAE the next 3 teams outside of the automatic ACL spots. 4th team outside of ACL spot enter playoff
Uzbekistan the next team outside of the automatic ACL spots
Bahrain, India, Syria and Turkmenistan would all get 1 playoff place each. = 2 teams qualify
Total 16 Teams
The winner would play at the ACL winners home ground in an Asian Super Cup match and would qualify for next years ACL’s qualifying rounds.
Buy allowing more teams to experience a home and away style comp this will increase the professionalism and interest across asia before any Super league would imo.
This would give another option to the sponsors who might not be able to afford the sponsorship cost of the ACL.
AndyRoo said | July 21st 2009 @ 10:32am | Report comment
Ah Pip, your a dream crusher, but what you say makes sense.
Perhaps the leagues that now get 4 teams into the ACL (China, Japan, Sth Korea) and Australia wouldn’t nessesarily benefit and they should be left out. But then you would have to operate on a lot smaller budget. SE Asian Super League doesn’t sound as sexy but might be a way for these nations to compete but seems much harder to get up politically though.
Pippinu said | July 21st 2009 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Sorry Andy!!! but I did enjoy the reading the article!!
I will say that the Malaysian situation (where fans prefer the EPL in massive numbers over the local product), is something that is reflected throughout East Asia, and I actually agree that it could potentially hold back the ACL for decades.
Towser said | July 21st 2009 @ 10:45am | Report comment
“The Roar upon qualifying for the ACL buying Singapores best Player and then selling Roar Shirts and Broadcasting the games in Singapore sounds much more realistic though and something that could happen now.
Or grabbing Park from Man Utd in a couple of years, I know that would add a lot of bums to seats in Brisbane.”
AndyRoo your above statement is more likely one of the ways football will pan out in Asia. Also a way of increasing TV revenue maybe. Ie Singapore/ Thai TV companies.
Regarding countries like Singapore & Malaysias long term future in the greater scheme of Asian football. Well maybe a short term circus would create interest for a brief period,but then its back to bread un drippin instead of caviar. Better in my book to gradually get them to look up to Urawa Reds or The Roar(yes the Roar all you other club A-League fans) than ManU. Long road but better for football in the region in the future.