All Blacks must heed lessons of past defeats
By James Mortimer, 27 Jul 2009 James Mortimer is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Graham Henry, Richie McCaw, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
And again the inquisitions begin! As Graham Henry suffered just his tenth defeat as coach of New Zealand, the team that had just defied their critics again will have the hounds baying at their door.
This is the caveat of being an All Black team.
Suffering just their 98th (not including losses to the Barbarians and Rhodesia) defeat in 106 years of international rugby isn’t what will have the masses asking questions about their team.
Unfortunately for New Zealand, despite being against a very good Springbok unit – Henry believes this is the best South African side he has ever seen – and being outplayed at key areas, the All Blacks still could have won this match.
Even worse is the fact that at times it was not so much Springbok dominance that had the All Blacks on the back foot, as much as the All Blacks themselves.
To call them arrogant would not be fitting. If anything this New Zealand side, despite being one of the best teams consistently in world rugby, is humble to the point of being disarming.
But on the field, there is condescension to their play.
One cannot help but admire Graham Henry and his coaching team; year after year they have tried specific formulas or techniques that have by and large allowed them to overshadow other sides.
However, components of their play is unbecoming of a team that still can lay claim to being the best side on the planet at the end of this Tri Nations, their pet tournament if there was one.
Certainly a team with the record of Henry’s troops should give more respect, especially to such vaunted opponents as the World Champions. The South Africans are the only team throughout history to consistently challenge the All Blacks for global supremacy.
Hail back to the 2nd September, 2006.
The All Blacks had won the Lions series the year before, a Grand Slam, and had just won their second consecutive Tri Nations (at the time their seventh), whitewashed the Bledisloe Cup 3-0, and were sitting on a 15 match winning streak.
They entered the Royal Bafokeng Stadium indisputably the best team in the world.
South Africa would not bring a complex game plan to the table, but would rely on simple pillars to their game, committing rolling maul after rolling maul, and using the boots of Butch James and Andre Pretorius to enable them to launch their lineout.
While these aspects then, as seemingly now, appeared to rattle the All Blacks, these factors alone would not conspire to defeat them.
Henry’s men would try to be too clever, a mix perhaps of confessed superiority or a coaching team that knew they had the tournament wrapped up so thought they would try a few new features to their play.
They would take short 22 kick offs, instead of committing the traditional “clearing of lines” and kicking the ball long.
They would take an inordinate time to get into position after securing the ruck; ignoring the classic doctrine that quick phase ball is the best offence against modern defensive walls.
They would, with possession secured, kick the ball high into a Garryowen even if within the oppositions half. Ironically, they would not do this if near the opponents try line.
The All Blacks would lose despite being overwhelming favourites, 20-21.
They tried these plays against South Africa in the second match of the 2009 Tri Nations.
New Zealand captain Richie McCaw would remark that the All Blacks would put pressure on themselves, and consistently try to play too much rugby in their own half.
Often throughout McCaw’s and Henry’s reign, these tactics have worked.
But South Africa showed that for all its complexities, rugby is a marvellously simple game, and that you don’t need to be elaborate to win a match, no matter how decorated the enemy.
Thankfully, it is far from a lost cause for the All Blacks. Equally, it is no shame to lose on the Highveld to arguably the best South African team in history.
Despite being on the back foot early with both possession and territory heavily against them, they showed a fair amount of class to come back against a team that was truly throwing the proverbial kitchen sink against them.
And, for as long or as short as the list of negatives is, it is a list that can be overcome.
There will be no jet lag or altitude in Durban.
They now know what to expect from South Africa.
They should now know that they will have to grind, as they did against the Wallabies at Eden Park, to beat this impressive South African team.
For despite all the plaudits being showed on the World Champions now, lose to this All Blacks team next week, and with an away win on the register, suddenly the defending champions will be in the box seat again.
Recommend this story.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (154)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (16)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (72)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (109)
- RATHBONE: Whatever you do, don’t choke! (13)
- Captain Warburton lifting Wales, says Halfpenny (5)
- Precocious Brumbies eye conference crown
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (16)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (72)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (109)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (21)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- When should a game plan change and who makes the call? (4)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 1) (31)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Graham Henry, Richie McCaw, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations

July 27th 2009 @ 9:42am
pothale said | July 27th 2009 @ 9:42am | Report comment
I lost you at the point you entered the conditional tense, James
Al blacks would do this, Boks would do that….
What was wrong with using the good old past tense?
July 27th 2009 @ 9:50am
Hammer said | July 27th 2009 @ 9:50am | Report comment
Good analysis – still plenty of improvement in NZ and now with a week to prepare properly this weekend will be the true test of where boths sides are …
July 27th 2009 @ 10:07am
LeftArmSpinner said | July 27th 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
From an Aussie perspective, lets hope that they dont heed anything. James, are the current Boks really “arguably the best South African team in history.” Phew, thats a big call. I didnt see the game but ………. lets just wait for a while before deciding.
July 27th 2009 @ 10:20am
fred said | July 27th 2009 @ 10:20am | Report comment
who accepted the ab draw;big ask.
cape town will bring other pressures on winning ;altitude will have little bearing directly on lineout proficiency.
bok will have parity at scrum
better tactics at kick offs —-how dumb were the abs straight to matfield;did they not see the pressure habana placed on kickoff chase.
bok goalkicking will surely be better
bok backs have many individual flaws to exploit
bok are the ones who played within their abilities.a confident player does not attempt things he hasnt practiced or proficient at
lombardi kept it brilliant on the basics
commentators who plead superior knowledge and donate advice as their team struggles against opponents are merely seeing life thru their own lens .some are still upset the bok beat the lions.
the wallabies like the abs could have won their last games,but didnt and didnt deserve to no matter how many times one reviews the game
July 27th 2009 @ 10:37am
ohtani's jacket, said | July 27th 2009 @ 10:37am | Report comment
Fred, just because one team won doesn’t mean everything they did is praise worthy. The Boks could’ve done a lot of things better, and they’ll know that, because they have ambitions to win this Tri-Nations title.
You don’t have to win 6 straight games to win the title, which works for and against the All Blacks (the latter when it comes to the seven games needed to win the WC). The All Blacks will be searching for one away win. They can play better than that, but so too can the Springboks I imagine.
It’s quite an open Tri-Nations this year, unfortunately the quality of the rugby is as poor as it’s ever been. The same was true of the Super 14.
July 27th 2009 @ 10:28am
ohtani's jacket, said | July 27th 2009 @ 10:28am | Report comment
Henry needs to field his best XV, because we’re just not starting well enough. I can understand his reluctance to bring guys like Cowan and Hore on in the second half, but Weepu and Mealamu can play close to the full 80 minutes. Weepu has always been the best halfback to play against the Boks and Henry used to rotate him to do so in the past.
The All Blacks wanted to play some rugby and you can tell the backs are frustrated with the lack of try scoring opportunities, but again they played from inside their own 22 and again they were forced to play catch-up. You can’t play running rugby on the back foot. There is a pattern emerging this year that the best All Black performances (second Test against France and Eden Park Test against Australia) were won in the tight. We should’ve seen this performance coming last week when the backs started talking about running in South African conditions. Well, the Boks have a good backrow this year and we’re lacking a tighthead.
There’s a couple of guys who shouldn’t be in this squad — Leonard is one of them and Hore is another. Hore would be OK if he didn’t have to throw into the lineout, but he didn’t play enough Super 14 to have the right mechanics at the moment. Leonard just hasn’t had any game time in recent weeks and looked bad against Italy too.
There’s a couple of other guys who’s form is a worry — forget about Rokocoko, the same thing that happened to him happened to Sivivatu. I’m more worried about Mils, whose form is dropping by the week. There’s a lot of pressure for our back three to create something out of thin air, but the entire backline is failing to link up. Individually, they make a number of strong runs, but the support is weak and there’s not enough offloading.
All told it wasn’t the end of the world. We threw away the game like the Boks did last year in Newlands. We even managed the same comedy of errors try that JdV did last year. I would’ve felt worse if the Boks had smashed us.
.
July 27th 2009 @ 11:34am
Sam Taulelei said | July 27th 2009 @ 11:34am | Report comment
OJ agree with comment about Mils loss of form. Don’t know if his confidence is down, or if he’s carrying an unreported injury but he’s made more errors in the five tests so far than he would normally do in an entire test season. He’s the most senior back in the team and after an outstanding season as skipper for the Chiefs I expected his good form to continue with the All Blacks. I’ve resigned myself to not expecting any exhilarating backplay or counterattacks from the All Blacks this year. Their tactics are conservative and designed to minimise errors (although that was an abject failure last Saturday) rather than force the play and create.
Once we controlled the ball better and gained continuity then we were able to put pressure on the Boks but we couldn’t sustain it nor were we able to really bring the midfield and back three into the game apart from Smith’s well taken try. We stand quite flat in attack and with Weepu and Leonard taking a step or two before passing the ball, it doesn’t leave a lof of time and space to execute any moves unless your handling is crisp and accurate which it isn’t.
The scoreline flattered us and we were well beaten, no excuses.
July 27th 2009 @ 10:49am
True Tah said | July 27th 2009 @ 10:49am | Report comment
OJ
what did you think of Tialata’s performance?
July 27th 2009 @ 11:00am
ohtani's jacket, said | July 27th 2009 @ 11:00am | Report comment
I thought it was wonderful, especially his 22 metre restart. Perhaps he should leave the kicking duties to Issac Ross.
Tialata, to me, seems like he’s being picked to be an All Black but doesn’t have the heart for it. The coaches can’t seem to rev him up. He has a lot of potential because of his size, but Franks seems like the better option right now. The problem is as soon as Franks has a howler, Henry will get twitchy about his lack of Test experience.
They need to bring Hayman back and put him in the Crusaders or something. Tighthead was always going to be a problem this year with Somerville heading up North. The scrum looks reasonably OK, but Hayman and to a far lesser extent Somerville were a big part of Henry’s mobile pack theory. Somerville was good for one knock on a game, but Tialata has only really gotten stuck in against the French in Wellington.
I think he’s injured, though. He always seems to be injured. I dunno. Maybe he’s a gentile giant.
July 27th 2009 @ 11:32am
katzilla said | July 27th 2009 @ 11:32am | Report comment
Tialata needs to go. With a little more game time Franks will show us is the place holder until Hayman returns.
)
I can’t see what it is that Henry sees in him. His discipline is poor, his ball handling skills are poor, he cost the Canes so many times during the year its not even funny. The only things hes good at (scrums) he doesn’t even dominate in like Hayman used to. Franks has got the mongrel we need and him and Read make a great 1 2 off the bench. But i’d like to see him get the start. That probably won’t happen until the Northern tour (probably when Cruden will come off the bench
Good analysis James. The Boks have never been fancy in the big games, and its always worked for em.
Fred is correct to a degree, although the Boks will improve in areas, so will the Blacks, and they have now have had a week to recover in SA climes. Altitude may not affect lineouts but it will affect the kick distance which is great for the ABs. The basic kick long and win lineouts won’t be as effective, and Penalties from 55m won’t be such a shoe in either.
Like OJ im also worried about our back three. They just don’t seem to have the pace anymore. Not one of them.
Mils should be left at home on the Northern Tour. He needs the break that almost all of the other senior players have had. He has a new child he should be spending time with and looks like he could use some RnR. Jane will do just fine and Sivi can always cover FB. Roks was solid without being Spectacular but like Sivi doesn’t have that pace. SIvivatu can make the breaks but can’t finish like he used to. Most of his tries come from fringe of the ruck runs within the opposition 22. Make a break and fall over the line stuff. Nothing medium range like he used to.
At this point in time i’d play Gear, Jane and Sivivatu.
But on the end of year tour I’d be giving Ranger and Masaga a chance to show their stuff.
July 27th 2009 @ 11:49am
Sam Taulelei said | July 27th 2009 @ 11:49am | Report comment
I’ts always easier to single out individuals following a loss to try and explain why. I can’t verify if either of the All Black wings has lost pace and so far they have not been put in space and a position where they can stretch their legs and pin their ears back. I daresay that all the pace and elusiveness of Masaga, Hosea Gear or Rene Ranger would count for nothing under the current gameplan as the ball rarely travels along the backline to the wings. Neither Pietersen nor Habana received many attacking opportunities either.
If a player like McCaw is struggling to find his best form after an injury layoff then I’m not surprised to see Hore, Sivivatu and So’oialo off the pace as well.
Tialata’s inconsistency is only matched by Rocokoko’s so we’ll see how much faith the coaches and Mike Cron has in the big guy but they would have noticed how well Owen Franks is performing in his appearances so far as well as how much he’s contributing around the field.
July 27th 2009 @ 12:31pm
katzilla said | July 27th 2009 @ 12:31pm | Report comment
There was a spot just towards the end of the first half Sam where Sivi was put into space down the left flank.
Habana managed to come from the other side of the field to not just cover/shadow Sivi but be waiting infront of him as he hit the 22m line. He tried to step inside and was shut down.
Im not saying Roks and Sivi should be replaced. Merely that the others should be getting a go to settle into the position should these guys require a break or lose too much form.
July 27th 2009 @ 4:02pm
ohtani's jacket, said | July 27th 2009 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
I actually thought the All Blacks creating that space down the left was a promising sign. It wasn’t done at pace and Sivivatu was never through to the try line, but it was much better than one off runners through the middle.
July 27th 2009 @ 7:28pm
katzilla said | July 27th 2009 @ 7:28pm | Report comment
I agree oj the play was good. But there was a time when sivivatu in that much space was a guaranteed 5 pointer. That’s the point I was trying to make
July 27th 2009 @ 12:05pm
Hammer said | July 27th 2009 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
Katz – Cruden may well be left to develop at his own pace and given a S14 campaign to assess how he’s coming along … given Carter is well on his way back and may feature to the end of this campaign and Donald’s finding his feet and performing well … they’ll go and then McAllister will be a backup … can’t se them squeezing Cruden in as well … unless of course he has a stella NPC (which I’m hoping for) …