Springboks’ formula looks sound enough to take Tri Nations
By James Mortimer, 29 Jul 2009 James Mortimer is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Peter de Villiers, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
In what was one of the better displays from the World Champions, Peter De Villiers’ men put the squeeze on the All Blacks early, before withstanding the New Zealanders’ now trademark second half blitzkrieg.
The South Africans not only avenged their 0-19 defeat in Newlands last year, but fired an immense broadside at their Tri Nations opponents showing they have the arsenal to take their third title since the competition began in 1996.
De Villiers has made plenty of noise about transforming the Springboks into an expansive running side, but quite simply, why would he want to?
These Springboks are not flashy. In fact when comparing what the All Blacks, Wallabies or the British and Irish Lions before them could produce in regard to tactical diversity, the World Champions would probably pale in comparison.
After all, even De Villiers himself would happily admit that he is not yet the coaching genius of a Graham Henry, Robbie Deans or Ian McGeechan.
Then again, the eccentric former scrumhalf for Boland and Griquas probably wouldn’t.
But as it was shown magnificently in Bloemfontein, all the tricks or fancy plays in the world count for little if you put your opposition under pressure physically.
In the Lions series, man for man the tourists in the backline looked more skillful and more creative than the Springboks, but the South Africans laid a platform of ferocious intimidation in the first 20 minutes of the first test that, for all intents and purposes, won them the series.
Importantly, the Springboks are building ironclad facets of play.
To be a truly great team, to go alongside a truism that you must contain three to four world class players, you also need to have certain facets of your play that can be counted on to dominate an opponent.
South Africa has long had one, with a lineout unequalled anywhere on the planet. This first phase of possession is all but guaranteed for the Springboks.
With an average of 20-25 line outs per match, it is an abundant platform to base your playing strategies from.
This is, of course, a bit easier when your opponents are unwilling to dispute this area of the game.
Now, however, it seems that South Africa has responded quickly and efficiently to the changing laws and rules of the sport.
The rolling maul has become an “allowable” weapon again, and the Springboks utilised this to devastating effect against the All Blacks.
When considering that this Panzer army often forms at the lineout, then the Springboks have two warheads of such apparent power that both New Zealand and Australia look vulnerable.
Especially when – with the greatest respect to the other Tri Nations teams – it doesn’t appear apparent that either the All Blacks or Wallabies have such indomitable facets to their play.
There was also the slightest of evolutions from the home team, moving to a different hybrid of defence by using an upper body collision technique that caused the All Blacks numerous issues at the tackle area.
The South Africans had planned ahead. It is no secret that the All Blacks are ball players, enjoying the natural freedom of looking for an offload, and the Springboks were ready for it.
Could these be indicators, despite popular opinion, that the World Champions are actually being well coached?
This of course, remains to be seen.
Sport is a fickle beast, and rugby is no different. But 24 hours from the match, local fans are proclaiming their team, now the IRB’s number one ranked side to go alongside their World Cup, are the unchallengeable best in the business.
On this display, to not add a Tri Nations trophy to this collection would be an unforgivable failure.
This was a cold, methodical and well disciplined beast. It seems that the furore of both Bakkies Botha and Schalk Burger’s ban may have struck a resonant tune for the South Africans.
While they were their typically uncompromising selves, there was little off the ball play and a remarkable sense of control.
So much in fact, that it was the All Blacks that earned the fury of the referee’s whistle.
As this now intriguing Tri Nations continues, there are only two simple questions to be answered.
Will the Springboks keep to their basic patterns, or will they try and open up their play. If they stick to what they are doing, one feels that this 2009 title is theirs for the taking. But as their opponents showed last night, it can be too easy to get “a little cute” and over force your hand if put under pressure.
Heinrich Brussow deserved man of the match.
The most pure open side that South Africa has produced in some time now appears to be essential to the team.
Will he give way to a returning Burger later in the tournament?
For, as a pack with a scavenger (something not fielded by the Springboks in many years), this South African eight looks to be the best forward unit in world rugby.
They have passed the first hurdle but not the first test. In the Tri Nations, that is winning away from home.
Recommend this story.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (154)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (16)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (72)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (109)
- RATHBONE: Whatever you do, don’t choke! (13)
- Captain Warburton lifting Wales, says Halfpenny (5)
- Precocious Brumbies eye conference crown
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (16)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (72)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (109)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (21)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- When should a game plan change and who makes the call? (4)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 1) (31)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Peter de Villiers, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations

July 29th 2009 @ 3:13am
jools said | July 29th 2009 @ 3:13am | Report comment
James,
You said it about needing one or two world-class players.
Boks have best second row in rugby, best #8 ,one best prop, best scrum half, one of best wingers, and now with Brussow a candidate to join MacCaw & Smith as #6.
Jools-USA
July 29th 2009 @ 3:17am
Knives Out said | July 29th 2009 @ 3:17am | Report comment
‘one best prop’
Who could that be, Jools?
July 29th 2009 @ 4:39am
Knives Out said | July 29th 2009 @ 4:39am | Report comment
I think you’ve caught a case of Spiro-itis, James. Hope you get better soon.
July 29th 2009 @ 9:14am
Vincent said | July 29th 2009 @ 9:14am | Report comment
welll..SA are world champions, have disposed of the British lions, ticked off the all blacks… knives you are a hard man to convince : ) they seem to be ticking all the boxes…so far..
July 29th 2009 @ 10:55pm
Knives Out said | July 29th 2009 @ 10:55pm | Report comment
I don’t think beating the Lions equates to greatness, Vincent. Everything is stacked against the Lions and a SH victory SHOULD be a natural adjunct. That SA were meant to absolutely destroy the plodding NH players and win 3-0, yet only managed to scrape the series doesn’t particularly convince me. With regards to the WC a teams greatness is qualififed by their results prior and post. The 99-01 Wallabies were a great team, the 01-03 English were a great team and so the 05-07 All Blacks were a great team. This Springbok side has achieved nothing to parallel those teams.
July 29th 2009 @ 9:22am
Grandpabhaile said | July 29th 2009 @ 9:22am | Report comment
The Boks barely beat the B&I Lions over the first two tests. Let’s face it, a last minute penalty got them the second match. Hardly overwhelming victories for a team that said it was going to whitewash the Lions 3-0.
The Lions series pointed up plenty of weaknesses and lack of strength in depth of the Boks. There were plenty of pointers for NZ and Australia to pick up on. NZ don’t seem to have done their homework – unusual for someone like Henry. The second test will tell us more about where NZ are I believe. And Australia then have it all to do. The Boks are likely to win the TriNations by default, if the other two countries don’t improve. If that happens, then you have to question whether Aus and NZ should even be occupying the Top 3 IRB places. On the strength of the matches so far, the quality of SH rugby has fallen considerably in the last year.
July 29th 2009 @ 6:02pm
Ben J said | July 29th 2009 @ 6:02pm | Report comment
According to many detractors the Boks won the World Cup by default as they did not get the chance to play the Kiwis and Australians, surely this is a sad indictment on the same teams if they can’t get their act together. Sadly, with some posters, it seems the Boks will always get the short end of the stick.
July 29th 2009 @ 9:46am
CronullaKiwi said | July 29th 2009 @ 9:46am | Report comment
best 8 and best prop – turn it up mate… and btw McCaw and Smith dont play #6…
July 29th 2009 @ 10:24am
Rusty said | July 29th 2009 @ 10:24am | Report comment
dont agree on the prop comment – he didnt even mention which side but neither the Beast or Smit to me are the stand out players in their positions in the world. As for 8′s – again I think there is a sea of the sameness and on that basis you could maybe pick Spies as he brings something different.
The reason he mentioned #6 is that for some reason we in SA play with the numbers the other way. So Juan wears 7 in the Boks squad even though his blindside.
July 29th 2009 @ 10:21am
Stash said | July 29th 2009 @ 10:21am | Report comment
SH rugby has not been the best spectacle or example this year. We have had 2 years of playing Super 14 rules that differ substantially for internationals…. this makes a big difference. Fortunately there should be consistency to the rules going forward.
It is bewildering that the 2009 Boks are being talked up so much (by their supporters mostly) – before they have actually done anything (Lions test aside – which was completely unconvincing). A win at home on the back of a dreadful AB performance is hardly worthy of victory laps – The Tri Nations has only just begun!!
SA can celebrate IF they actually win… until then, it would be wise to tone down the self trumpeting… otherwise it may end up as embarrassing as last year when Bok supporters crawled under a rock after wooden spooning… at the time the Boks were the best ever on their way to demolishing everyone to claim their TN title…Didn’t happen.
Walk the talk….win the TN… at the moment ABs are holders of this cup (and have been for years)
July 29th 2009 @ 10:25am
van der Merwe said | July 29th 2009 @ 10:25am | Report comment
South Africa also has the best hooker, no doubt about it. Both Jaque and Jean are immense players and I would not snicker if someone put those two in a World 15.
July 29th 2009 @ 10:56pm
Knives Out said | July 29th 2009 @ 10:56pm | Report comment
Du Plessis has fantastic potential but has improved how over the past two years? Jaque and Jean got shown up by Roberts, O’Driscoll and Bowe. Case closed.
July 30th 2009 @ 9:18am
van der Merwe said | July 30th 2009 @ 9:18am | Report comment
The Law has spoken! Bismarck has improved tremendously over the last two years – this is obvious to those who follow Southern Hemisphere rugby. He’s cut down on giving away silly penalties, perfected his line out skills and is a far bigger threat at the breakdown. The Euro centres sliced Adrian Jacobs, a quota player, in half, big deal. Truth is, BOD’s best days are far behind him and I’ve always thought he was undersized. Fourie running through three Euros and getting over the whitewash was a better center play than anything BOD or that flash in the pan Roberts have ever done.
July 31st 2009 @ 3:24am
Knives Out said | July 31st 2009 @ 3:24am | Report comment
…
Du Plessis has made none of his trademark runs for quite a few tests, and as we saw from his idiotic posturing during the 1st Lions test he is still the stereotypical low-IQ Springbok forward. He’s no Stephen Moore, that’s for sure.. or Matthew Rees come to think of it.
Erm… the Euro centres sliced JdV and Fourie in half, unless you have forgotten what happened in the third test where Bowe absolutely demolished Fourie. The same Bowe who had played less than 10 games at 13 by that point, and regardless of whether O’Driscoll’s best days are behind him he is still by far the best 13 operating in world rugby. Also, that Jacobs is a ‘quota’ player is completely irrelevant, and your implication that he is a poor rugby player because he is black is utterly deplorable, so tone it down asap.
Look, here is my van der Merwe impression..
Fourie running through Shane Williams and Ronan O’Gara, the best two tacklers in world rugby, was a better centre play than anything BOD or that flash in the pan (who smashed our great Springboks and provincial players to bits time and time again) Roberts have ever done.
July 31st 2009 @ 11:53am
van der Merwe said | July 31st 2009 @ 11:53am | Report comment
I highly doubt even the most ardent Welsh and Australian rugby supporters would agree with you there. Judging a hookers’ play on “runs” seems a little ridiculous to this rugby fan. If we’re going to judge a front rower solely on the amount of “runs” he makes then Beast is hands down the most dominant prop in rugby history. If you think Du Plessis’ “runs” and “intellect” are the reasons why he’s considered by many to be the best hooker, then you’re missing the point.
I am bemused you are reading so much into the third test. That’s almost as fantastic as you calling me a racist. Keep it up, champ.
By the way, it was Bowe (the “demolisher”), not Williams, and the oversized scrum half who failed to bring down Jaque.
July 29th 2009 @ 11:51am
Stash said | July 29th 2009 @ 11:51am | Report comment
Van der Merwe,
Jean is a quality player – and has been class for a number of years – he would be in many people’s World 15 (i just wouldn’t put the ENTIRE SpringBok team in there – like some punters here…ha).
July 29th 2009 @ 12:27pm
Rusty said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
Its odd but I was just thinking about the how the composition of team in relation to world class players is a barometer to sucess. This was in part to Sam T’s comment in another thread about the AB team a couple years ago having Hayman, Carter, McCaw and Umaga – all would be considered 1st choice in a world 15 by a majority of people. On that basis, I started trying to put together a current world 15 based on players currently playing the International season so no Carter, Elsom etc. Here is what I have so far – and yes its a little “green’ and not just in one colour but here it is.
1. Benn Robinson (Aus) – who would have thought an Ozzie frontrower but for me he has been the most consistent LH around
2. Bismarck du Plessis (Boks) – tough and incredibly strong in the scrum and around the park. He also can throw into the lineout
3. Euan Murray (Scot) – tough choice around this due to lack of standouts but most destructive TH I have seen in awhile
4. Bakkies (Boks) – Another tough call between him and Thorn with honourable mentions to Shaw. Went on the basis of last weekend and the fact he partners Matfield so well
5. Matfield (Boks) – Not everyones cup of tea but does the setpiece basics so well. His name alone has opposition lineouts quaking
6. McCaw (NZ) – Still the best fetcher in the world and my Captain for the world 15
7. J Smith (Boks) – Struggled on this one but went for Juan on the basis of his massive work rate and lack of other standouts
8. Spies (Boks) – Controversial but these lists always are. Power and pace, he seems to be hitting the tight phases a lot better
9. du Preez (Boks) – Philips fans may say otherwise but for me is the more complete player
10. Giteau (Aus) – no comparison
11. C Heymans (Fra) – Why are all the best wingers on the left? Too many options here but the memory of his score down the flank against the ABs was truly something
12. J Roberts (Wal) – Sensational form for the Lions. We will see more of him in the future
13. BOD (Ire) – Had a renaissance season with Ireland and then the Lions.
14. ? – struggling to think of a player who put his hand up for this….
15. Kearney (Ire) – With Mils dropping off of late this guy is the real deal. Very impressive in every outing I have seen him
So there we have it. By nation
Boks – 6
Aus -2
Ire – 2
NZ – 1
Fra – 1
Wal – 1
So grab your pitchforks and flaming torches and let the burning at the stake begin! Only ask that you back up your roasting with some constructive argument
July 29th 2009 @ 12:52pm
ohtani's jacket, said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
All I have to say about your World XV is that it’s awfully weak side, which is probably indicative of why the Test match rugby has been so poor this year.
July 29th 2009 @ 2:13pm
Rusty said | July 29th 2009 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
there does seem to be a lack of standout performers in most positions
July 30th 2009 @ 2:46am
Knives Out said | July 30th 2009 @ 2:46am | Report comment
Rodrigo Roncero, Tony Woodcock, Andrew Sheridan, Stephen Moore, Carl Hayman, Sylvain Marconnet, Martin Castrogiovanni, Adam Jones, Brad Thorn, Patricio Albacete, Simon Shaw, Rocky Elsom, Jerome Kaino, Fulgence Ouedraogo, Imanol Harinordoquy, Mike Phillips, Siti Sivivatu, Felipe Contepomi, Conrad Smith, Tommy Bowe, Napolini Nalaga, Maxime Medard, Juan Martin Hernandez…
There’s no disguising the fact that you’re a Bok, Rusty..
I think there’s some fantastic talent out there, Ohtani. If the majority of test games haven’t been great then I’m sure there is a reason for that, and not because players are generally poorer than they were years before.