AFL’s first female commentator under fire
By glocko87, 29 Jul 2009 glocko87 is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- AFL, Kelli Underwood
Channel Ten commentator Kelli Underwood must have known that taking a seat in the box on game day would cause a stir. As the first female to commentate an AFL game on television, she was likely to be scrutinised closely.
How objective that scrutiny may be is questionable. In a move as controversial as this, debate is always going to be heated and not without bias.
One look at the Channel Ten forums online shows an overwhelmingly negative response.
Underwood is labelled ‘boring,’ her voice like ‘nails on a chalk board.’ Some even go so far, even in this increasingly politically correct climate, to say that a woman doesn’t belong in the commentary box.
In the interests of being taken seriously, surely this is exactly the type of comment you would avoid.
Consider this: how objective can an opinion of her worth be when her status as the first female in her role in a man’s sport overshadows her actual ability?
Surely any comment made about Underwood is clouded to some extent by her gender, no matter how much you claim to be objective. Either the feminists laud her for her ground-breaking role because she is a woman, or men rubbish her because as a woman her knowledge of the sport will never be as sound as a man’s.
Or you err on the side of caution and follow your opinion with “but it’s not because she’s a woman, I just don’t like her voice, comments, style …”
Each commentator’s ability should be assessed on their knowledge of the game, their ability to perform live, the suitability of their voice for the task and that special X-factor that gives them an edge and makes them interesting to listen to. Personal preferences will no doubt differ on just which of the above criteria is most important.
On match day in my household, my football-literate father is frustrated with too many obvious statements, my mother can’t stand some commentators’ smarmy attempts at humour and my sister just wants the commentators to reel off the players’ names so she can tell who is who.
Unfortunately in Underwood’s case, her gender will interfere with opinions on her ability even from those with the best of intentions, and there is little she can do about it.
No one will ever agree on who makes a good commentator.
Each has their faults and strengths, and have been hired by a network because for the most part, their strengths outweigh their shortcomings, and not just for their gender, whether they are male or female.
One would hope.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- More rugby league players to defect to the AFL? (159)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- Foxtel’s AFL coverage is nirvana for footy fans (88)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (84)
- Israel Folau now ready for AFL (75)
- AFL’s most hated club turns 120 years old (75)
- Optus ruling actually a good thing for AFL fans (52)
- Andrew Krakouer given four weeks leave from Collingwood
- Giants inspired to prove doubters wrong (32)
- Malthouse not fazed by assistant issue
- Richo says look out for the Tigers in AFL
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- Who’s to blame for the Majak Daw beat-up? (32)
- AFL Tigers need to step up, says Cotchin
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (103)
- Crows changing, but will this AFL preview change your life? (2)
- Is Heath Shaw the right leader for Collingwood? (11)
- Could a female coach succeed in the AFL? (35)
- Demons’ two captain Jacks the right leadership choice (5)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- Explore:
- AFL, Kelli Underwood

megatron said | July 29th 2009 @ 1:18am | Report comment
I thought she did well. Big game with a tight finish and she passed with flying colours.
Wayne said | August 2nd 2009 @ 4:37pm | Report comment
She is a shocker, I’d rather watch the TV turned down with the radio turned up. It has nothing to do with Kelli being a female, she just cant commentate. Its the AFLs equality attempt, a female commentator for the sake of having a female commentator. Boring and painful to listen to.
Ben W said | July 29th 2009 @ 8:35am | Report comment
I think that she can make the grade, but probably needs to be herself and create her own commentating identity. Listening to her call she seemed to use too many old football clichés.
Michael C said | July 29th 2009 @ 8:38am | Report comment
First couple of games in, she’s okay. She needs the chance to develop a ‘style’, and some mannerisms of her own……not quite as far as Rex Hunt goes though.
She needs her own ‘special’, or ‘like a cork in the ocean’, or ‘centimetre perfect’………get that, and she’ll be half way there.
Andystath said | July 29th 2009 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Good luck to Kelli,her style will develop with experience.For those that don’t like gender equality in commentry,simply turn the volume off.
MattRusty said | July 29th 2009 @ 9:22am | Report comment
Ex-players and coaches in any code make the best commentators because they can engage and provide insight better than anyone else. All commentators, male or female, who haven’t played that code at the top level is making comments based on opinion not experience, so is always in a weaker position and will be criticized.
Justin Langer on ABC radio was an absolute joy to listen to during summer last year. I hope he is back again this year.
And Rickety Knees comment about getting a referee in the commentary box is simply brilliant. Let’s see if any code has the courage (there is a female umpire in the AFL…assessing points, not running around, but still prefer to hear from here than a female or male that hasn’t had experience on the turf ever).
http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/07/29/demystifying-rugby/#comment-180012
Tom said | July 29th 2009 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Commentators are generally best when you’re not thinking about them or focussing on them. I think having a woman commentate on the footy is so different and so distracting that it grates a bit. Once it loses its novelty value I think people will be fine with it.
Bruce Walkley said | July 29th 2009 @ 9:40am | Report comment
I find Kelli’s style very acceptable. She’s obviously trying to avoid the annoying trap into which most TV commentators still fall – calling it blow-by-blow as though they’re on radio – and reminds me a bit of Tony Charlton. Stick with her, Ten, she’ll be worth it.
Pippinu said | July 29th 2009 @ 9:53am | Report comment
On the back of the Age sporting lift out, either Leaping Larry or the Punter (or someone like that) covered Kelli’s first couple of calls.
He concluded: ask any current commentator whether they think they had it nailed inside their first three calls. None of us should be surprised by the answer.
In other words, she’s done as well as anyone debuting.
Michael C said | July 29th 2009 @ 9:58am | Report comment
So, it looks like Karmichael Hunt really IS going to join GC17.
What was less likely? Kelli Underwood being a 10 yr AFL commentator,
or Karmichael Hunt being a 10 yr AFL player?
Hansie said | July 29th 2009 @ 10:28am | Report comment
Kelli is doing a great job, especially for a debutant. Let’s give her a break and enjoy the refreshing change.