Channel Ten commentator Kelli Underwood must have known that taking a seat in the box on game day would cause a stir. As the first female to commentate an AFL game on television, she was likely to be scrutinised closely.
How objective that scrutiny may be is questionable. In a move as controversial as this, debate is always going to be heated and not without bias.
One look at the Channel Ten forums online shows an overwhelmingly negative response.
Underwood is labelled ‘boring,’ her voice like ‘nails on a chalk board.’ Some even go so far, even in this increasingly politically correct climate, to say that a woman doesn’t belong in the commentary box.
In the interests of being taken seriously, surely this is exactly the type of comment you would avoid.
Consider this: how objective can an opinion of her worth be when her status as the first female in her role in a man’s sport overshadows her actual ability?
Surely any comment made about Underwood is clouded to some extent by her gender, no matter how much you claim to be objective. Either the feminists laud her for her ground-breaking role because she is a woman, or men rubbish her because as a woman her knowledge of the sport will never be as sound as a man’s.
Or you err on the side of caution and follow your opinion with “but it’s not because she’s a woman, I just don’t like her voice, comments, style …”
Each commentator’s ability should be assessed on their knowledge of the game, their ability to perform live, the suitability of their voice for the task and that special X-factor that gives them an edge and makes them interesting to listen to. Personal preferences will no doubt differ on just which of the above criteria is most important.
On match day in my household, my football-literate father is frustrated with too many obvious statements, my mother can’t stand some commentators’ smarmy attempts at humour and my sister just wants the commentators to reel off the players’ names so she can tell who is who.
Unfortunately in Underwood’s case, her gender will interfere with opinions on her ability even from those with the best of intentions, and there is little she can do about it.
No one will ever agree on who makes a good commentator.
Each has their faults and strengths, and have been hired by a network because for the most part, their strengths outweigh their shortcomings, and not just for their gender, whether they are male or female.
One would hope.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (48) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- Giants prepare to christen new AFL home (197)
- Could an AFL player make it in the NRL? (82)
- My colleagues are wrong: AFL State of Origin is a terrible idea (81)
- What AFL can learn from other sports (72)
- GWS Giants deserves more credit (71)
- The most even AFL season in years (61)
- The brain may be the AFL’s greatest enemy (55)
- Wagga residents furious about GWS grant (0)
- 2012 has to be Geelong’s season of youth (0)
- Neeld needs time to find his halo (1)
- AFL pundits need to start biting their tongues (3)
- Melbourne Demons’s problem is a lack of effort (26)
- What AFL can learn from other sports (72)
- Carlton and Melbourne: don’t believe the hype (4)
- Explore:
- AFL, Kelli Underwood

July 29th 2009 @ 10:42am
Kick2Kick said | July 29th 2009 @ 10:42am | Report comment
I am no fan of hers and neither is my wife, so its not just me being anti-feminist.
Her voice just drills into your head and gives you a headache. I am sure she is a nice person but maybe if they ‘deapen’ her voice it may be ok.
and the ABC do have umpires helping out with “special comments” and it is indeed a good insight.
July 29th 2009 @ 11:32am
glocko87 said | July 29th 2009 @ 11:32am | Report comment
Tom,
I think you have hit the nail on the head! I do notice the difference when she commentates, the sound is so different to anything we are used to that it naturally distracts us from the match.
Pippinu,
I agree with that too! Just like with the players themselves, officials and commentators need time to prove themselves.
July 29th 2009 @ 11:47am
Paton said | July 29th 2009 @ 11:47am | Report comment
Football should be written about, spoken about and scrutinized by the people with first hand knowledge.
Players, ex players, coaches, other sporting identities and so forth.
July 29th 2009 @ 12:38pm
Jack said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
Paton
“Football should be written about, spoken about and scrutinized by the people with first hand knowledge” Sorry, censorship went out with Noah’s Ark…..you clearly consider yourself the ultimate expert and have no time for anyone who wishes to post an opinion in a forum that is expressly set up for that purpose. And whats with the personal attack on someones talents? There is a thing called “Bex”, better take one and lie down for a while.
July 29th 2009 @ 12:03pm
Fred Magee said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
When the footy came on and I heard Keili Underwood start to commentate, I purposely made sure that I sat and listened to the first quarter to see what it was like. I was also online too so I went to the Ten website and I couldnt believe the negativity in the comments about her commentary – which was only after the NAB game that she did.
I could be drawing a large generalisation but it is very different to hear a female voice calling football but I stress different – not bad, worse, better etc. Most people dont like change and it is a drastic change to hear a female voice call any code of football.
Personally, I thought she did a great job in the first quarter and I hope that Ten continue to give her a go. From reading her bio, she has experience following and reporting on football. It will be tougher on her than anyone else but fingers crossed she will get the support from her fellow commentators and management….as well as the fans. We are supposed to be about giving everyone a go arent we?
July 29th 2009 @ 12:21pm
glocko87 said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
Paton,
Why must you insist on reading my articles then if it is such torture for you to read?
July 29th 2009 @ 12:40pm
Jack said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
Glocko
Well said, Paton must be drooling waiting for the next instalment……..
July 29th 2009 @ 12:22pm
Gibbo said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:22pm | Report comment
she needs experience at the top level to be a servicable commentator?
I dont remember Drew Morphett running around for anyone at all and his flat, mono-tone vocals have been on the airwaves longer than i’ve been wiping my own bum. Same with Sandy Roberts.
July 29th 2009 @ 12:23pm
Malibu77 said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
Come on Paton, you cannot be serious.
Ex-players and coaches are great at analysis and adding colour, but not at play-by-play commentary. Take the examples of Tim Lane, Bruce McAvaney, Ray Warren, Gordon Bray, Jim Maxwell, Glenn Mitchell, the late Clinton Grybas, Dennis Cometti and internationally Martin Tyler and numerous American sports commentators (Brent Musburger comes to mind).
They are at the forefront of their professions and to my knowledge never competed on the sporting fields, courts and tracks at the highest levels.
Do horse racing callers all need to be ex-jockeys or trainers? I think not.
The “problem” with Kelli is that she is tarnished by previous efforts to involve females in sports broadcasting. What an actor Kate Fitzpatrick was doing calling cricket some years ago is anyones guess.
Kelli appears to really know her stuff and love the game, so good luck to her.
July 29th 2009 @ 12:48pm
Tifosi said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
Malibu is right, previous attempts to have women injected into mens sports have usually ended up poorly. When Stephanie Brantz was introduced to the cricket it didnt go down well at all.
At the moment women are generally used as sideline reporters which seems to work well, Mel Mclaughlin from fox sports is a good example. I think she could make the jump to commentary for soccer games.
So good on Channel 10 to try something new.
July 29th 2009 @ 12:29pm
Kick2Kick said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
@Malibu77 – Dennis Cometti played and coached at WAFL level
July 29th 2009 @ 12:45pm
Hoy said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
Tough Paton.
I took great interest in how she went through the game. I am no AFL afficianado, however the following occurred to me:
It was like she was copying the male commentators in their sayings and almost her voice mannerisms.
It was like the game was too fast for her, or that she tried to speed the game up, even in slow periods. Almost like she tried too hard to make it exciting.
It is definitely different having a woman commentate, and definitely draws your attention to the voice rather than the game.
I noticed that the blokes put in the anecdotes almost as a way to slow her down and let her draw her breath.
She sounded very aggressive with the commentary.
Just some thoughts. I think if anyone is good enough, then put them on. I remember when Andrew Johns first started with his comments at the NRL games. Atrocious comes to mind. Almost like someone had to write down what to say for him, and he really did read from a script.
July 29th 2009 @ 12:45pm
JF said | July 29th 2009 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
Like the presence of the ethnic minority character in every Australian TV drama, Kelli Underwood’s appointment smacks of tokenism.
July 29th 2009 @ 2:35pm
AndyRoo said | July 29th 2009 @ 2:35pm | Report comment
Well it has to start somewhere. A freind from Canada was amazed at how white Australian TV is.