Comments on: Aussies back into Ashes contention

By: Jameswm

Jameswm — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:15:23 +0000

That’s quite funny – because VC you don’t regret saying that at all. It’s an ongoing theme of yours.

By: hazey.the.bear

hazey.the.bear — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 04:02:35 +0000

Yes, Viscount, let’s put this “bully-boy tactics” problem squarely on the shoulders on the Australians, and forget that Bodyline ever existed…You want a precedent? Try that one.

By: Viscount Crouchback

Viscount Crouchback — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:55:08 +0000

Quite so, PP. And it is the gentlemanly aura that we need to restore to Test match cricket. I regret to say that the Australians are to blame. The frightfully aggressive behaviour of Allan Border’s team – commented on by Mike Atherton during this series – set a precedent which every aspiring cricketing nation now seeks to emulate.

The lesson that has gone out to the world is this: You can only win if you act like a bully and behave barbarously.

It is to Australia’s – and Border’s and Waugh’s – shame that they instigated this disgraceful turn of events.

By: prowling panther

prowling panther — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:37:34 +0000

the glaring and the sledging and the crowd v Ponting really show the bad feeling between these two old rivals
It does detract from the gentlemanly aura of test cricket but its great theatre

By: vinay verma

vinay verma — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:19:27 +0000

Toughening up in technique,VC, The only way to get respect in Grade cricket is to bowl or bat well. I have found Australia loves a competitor and you cant compete if your technique is wanting. Talent is one thing but hours spent in the sun practicing soon stop you bowling half trackers.

By: Viscount Crouchback

Viscount Crouchback — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:09:04 +0000

Not sure about that, Vinay. I hear that a stint in Oz toughens a chap up. But I’m not sure Broad needs toughening up. It’s his basic bowling technique and ability that I worry about.

The odd thing about Broad is that he was a batsman until the age of 17. He’s therefore relatively new to bowling. England are taking the view that he’s bound to come good eventually. Whilst I admire their forbearance, I should jolly well like to see the chap dropped for The Oval and replaced by someone who can do the business in the here and now. Step forward Mr Sidebottom.

By: JohnB

JohnB — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 02:52:48 +0000

VC – pretty good hair also. Broad is a bit of an enigma’s enigma – he looked taller than Harmison when they stood next to each other at one point, and if the speed gun is to be believed his pace touches 90mph at times, so he has the basic tools to be a more than decent bowler. On the other hand, his pace slips down to the low 80′s much of the time, and he doesn’t seem to get people hopping about. Yesterday he bowled short and unthreateningly a lot and spent a lot of time bowling 2 feet wide of off with a 7/2 field to try to keep the scoring down – but couldn’t do so consistently enough to actually stop the scoring. He was also getting stroppy with fielders, umpires, and the world in general from time to time. Two of his wickets yesterday were catches on the midwicket fence (Johnson and North), and a third was Clark chopping on while swinging the bat, so while they all count in the record books you could argue Broad shouldn’t get full credit for them. His other wicket yesterday, Siddle bowled neck and crop, looked a very good ball. Didn’t see his 2 wickets day one so can’t comment on them. Is it fair to say his bowling is a bit like Shane Watson’s (at least when Watson has a patch of full fitness) – good pace, but no X factor and not the consistency to get good players out on good wickets?

By: vinay verma

vinay verma — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 02:43:18 +0000

Viscount, you may find this an anathema to you but a stint in Sydney Grade cricket would complete the man’s education, broadly speaking of course. It has hitherto proved beneficial to Strauss, Boycott, Greig,Gatting et al.

By: Colin N

Colin N — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 01:48:58 +0000

Vinay, it depends where Broad will improve though. In the County Championship, he reguarly picks up good hauls and the standard simply isn’t good enough.

What do you do? Send him back to his county to work on his action or consistancy perhaps? And then test it out in the domestic arena? Or persist with him at test match level and get Otis Gibson working closely with him?

Maybe the best answer is not to select him for the winter tour(s) and let him work on his bowling?

By: Viscount Crouchback

Viscount Crouchback — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 01:06:37 +0000

Broad has certain attributes – a strong mind, a clever brain, good batting skills, gorgeous skin – but he’s patently inadequate as a Test match bowler. It’s remarkable that he continues to be picked whilst men like Sidebottom – who on form is one of the most threatening bowlers in world cricket (just ask New Zealand) – languish in County cricket.

Vinay is right. Broad probably will be terrific in two years. But this is an Ashes series. You pick for the here and now.

By: vinay verma

vinay verma — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:47:55 +0000

Colin..Broad bowled terribly and was put to the sword by Clark(not Clarke) hitting him for two sixes. However I think Broad is one for the future and in two years could well be an improved Test match bowler.

By: Colin N

Colin N — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:29:56 +0000

Another great day for Australia. Mitchell Johnson is a man reborn, the delivery to get rid of Cook was excellent (that considering it’s the only wicket I’ve seen so far in today’s play, and I can’t particularly take myself to watch the highlights).

One thing that struck me though was Broad’s figures of 6-91. Did he actually bowl well? He had a good spell yesterday and seemed to back it up.

It’s a matter of earning a bit of pride now for England and I’m sure we’ll look forward with excitement to the final test match of the Ashes at the Oval, locked at 1-1.

By: megatron

megatron — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 22:27:41 +0000

What a turn around in the series! Welcome back Mitchell. Wonder if the GF and Mum sorted out their differences