Wallabies crumble in Capetown
By Andrew Logan, 9 Aug 2009 Andrew Logan is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Berrick Barnes, Drew Mitchell, Francois Steyn, John Smit, Luke Burgess, Rugby Union, Stirling Mortlock, The Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
217 Have your say

South Africa's Victor Matfield, right, tackles Australia Will Genia, center, during their Tri Nations rugby match in Cape Town, South Africa, Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009. (AP Photo/Schalk van Zuydam)
The Wallabies had two enemies on the field – themselves and the referee. The actual opposition, the Springboks, came in a distant third.
As one of my co-viewers mentioned at the time, it is a blight on the game that the Springboks can be described as the best team in the world when they don’t actually play any rugby.
While the Wallabies once again crumbled under the pressure of their lack of self belief, the referee, the crowd, the occasion and the history, the Boks simply sat back, kicked the ball in the air, waited for mistakes and kicked the points.
A telling moment was the 78th minute close up shot of centre Jacques Fourie, because it was at that point where one realised that he had been on the field for the whole game, but not once had been sighted with that ball in hand.
Against any other team, the early exit of Stirling Mortlock would have had alarm bells ringing, but against the Boks, it meant nothing, because their centres were never going to take the Wallabies on.
Morne Steyn, Francois Steyn and Ruan Pienaar, simply kicked, kicked and kicked again. And you can’t blame them. The IRB have encouraged this style of rugby through their incessant tampering with the laws, and they are now reaping the horrible harvest.
Test rugby has regressed to a kickfest – a contest of which team has the best kicker – and a complete guessing game about how the referee might decide to interpret the various infringements. If this is rugby’s showpiece, then we are in dire straits.
In terms of playing attractive rugby, the Boks were dreadful, and so were the Wallabies. In terms of playing percentage rugby likely to win them matches and eventually the Tri-Nations, the Boks were excellent, and the Wallabies were, again, dreadful.
Sadly for the Wallaby tight five, they have worked hard to get to a point where their scrum is a dominant weapon, only to find that their backs are prepared to squander the ball that they have worked so hard to win.
Matt Giteau must be removed from five-eighth sooner rather than later. He has long been touted as the equal of Dan Carter in the world flyhalf ranks, but tonight this was proven to be a sham.
Luke Burgess didn’t help with his scatterbrained passing and some of Giteau’s poor composure must be put down to his halfback creating massive doubt in his mind as to where the ball would arrive, or if indeed it would arrive at all.
Berrick Barnes on the other hand, stepped up to the plate while Giteau was serving his ten in the bin, and kicked with aplomb. With quick ball delivered by Genia after Burgess had been hooked, Barnes settled the Australians to the point where they looked like they might pull it off, but then Giteau rejoined the fray and spoiled it all.
Coach Deans’ first order of business should be to swap these two, to utilize Barnes’ composure and accurate kicking game, and to free Giteau up to take on the line and loop in support of his outside backs.
Ultimately though, it will mean little if the Wallabies aren’t prepared to take on their opposition and seize some chances to attack.
The Wallabies took a step back in time to the old days where they were so locked into a game plan, that they couldn’t get out of it, even when the occasion demanded. So much so, that we saw Drew Mitchell, with 6 minutes to go, and a 10 point margin, kicking the ball back to the Boks from the brokenest of broken play. The idea of running it back supported by Turner, O’Connor et al didn’t appear to have occurred to him.
I haven’t yet mentioned the referee.
Mr Rolland was horrendous and the only redeeming feature was that the Wallabies were bad enough to lose it on their own, so there is no need to blame him.
He penalized the Wallabies in their first scrum for a crooked feed, only to let both sides continue to feed like that for the rest of the match.
He penalized both sides for killing the ball while they were hard on attack. He missed several forward passes, and penalized some that weren’t.
His ruck interpretation was inexplicable and he also allowed himself to be bullied by John Smit. You can’t blame Smit by the way – any good captain should try it on, and it’s the ref’s fault if he succeeds, but it was rubbish of the first degree from Rolland, and any momentum that either side may have developed was completely destroyed by his histrionics.
While all this was going on, the Boks did what they do best and piled up points. They didn’t play rugby, but they didn’t need to.
They played the game plan which basically removes the chance of them making errors and gives them every chance to accumulate points. In the Test arena, you have to admire the application of a team who can be so single minded about their approach, even if you don’t actually enjoy it.
Where to from here for the Wallabies?
It has to be results. There can be no more talk of “development”, of “learning”, of “going in the right direction”. They have now lost to an All Blacks side which is one of the worst since Taine Randell’s All Blacks, and then to a Springbok side which is simply a one-trick pony, albeit a thoroughbred.
That said, both of these teams have something the Wallabies don’t, and that is steadfastness and application. The ability to hang around, remaining there or thereabouts on the scoreboard, and give themselves a chance to win at the death.
With Berrick Barnes’ field goal, it seemed early that the Wallabies may have heeded this lesson. But it wasn’t to be. The Tri-Nations is won and lost on the road. The Wallabies have squandered their chances thus far, and now instead of having a chance to win, will be fighting simply to remain in the contest.
It would be nice to be optimistic, but there’s little reason for optimism. So Wallabies supporters – brace yourselves. This Tri-Nations could actually get worse.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (217) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (0)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (0)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (1)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (17)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (75)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (110)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (21)
- Explore:
- Berrick Barnes, Drew Mitchell, Francois Steyn, John Smit, Luke Burgess, Rugby Union, Stirling Mortlock, The Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies

August 9th 2009 @ 11:27am
GreenandGold said | August 9th 2009 @ 11:27am | Report comment
Absolute Rubbish!! Two words that still fall short of describing this morning’s spectacle. It was Auckland all over again but the pain was x 10 worse.
Question marks over players heads:
- Palu? What the hell is he doing? A clear example of someone who is BIG but useless. One would think he could have the same impact as Spies but he finds a way to hide behind our pack.
- Burgess? Time is up mate, we cannot go on with your hot & cold performances. It is time to give the next Gregan a go. That’s right, enter Will Genia! He looks sharp and does the basics well.
- Turner? Sorry but Hynes was one of the reasons the Wallabies flourished in parts last year and he has to be reinstated.
SA can laugh & smile all they want right now…..Now its your turn to come to our backyard and see how good you really are away from home.
August 9th 2009 @ 11:28am
ozsupporter said | August 9th 2009 @ 11:28am | Report comment
I think what’s surprising is no one has commented on why Gits lost the plot. I’ve been following the game long enough and have never seen him do anything malicious. Maybe he’s also frustrated with the way the games evolving, no need for someone with quick footwork.
August 9th 2009 @ 4:03pm
joeb said | August 9th 2009 @ 4:03pm | Report comment
Like Beale he’s more effective one position further out, as Andrew and others have said here.
August 9th 2009 @ 11:37am
Working Class Rugger said | August 9th 2009 @ 11:37am | Report comment
GreenandGold
Turner was given no real opportunities to do anything once again. Your summation of him is a little harsh. I doubt Hynes would be able to make much of a difference. What the Wallabies are desperately missing is leadership, direction and most importantly mongrel. What was displayed last night wasn’t either. Stupidity yes, but that’s about it. We don’t necessarily need a new Captiain but a leader would be nice.
August 9th 2009 @ 11:58am
ohtani's jacket said | August 9th 2009 @ 11:58am | Report comment
When the same thing happens three weeks in a row, I think it’s a little unwise to say Henry & Co. are bad coaches, Deans is a bad coach or that the All Blacks and Wallabies lack mongrel or leadership. They were actually quite fast paced games for matches that were full of penalties and turnovers. The pace, scoreboard, referree, pressure and lack of possession got to both the Wallabies and All Blacks. I dont believe this makes them bad teams.
Tactically, I think it makes more sense to counter attack than kick long, but the Boks are destroying any kind of platform the sides have to attack from. They don’t allow clean lineout ball, the scrums are always a mess and they disrupt anything that comes out of the ruck. In a sense, this is the South African attack. So, I think the way to beat the Boks is to stretch then like JOC did. If the Bok defenders are always advancing to stick a toe to the ball or chase a kick, it leaves a hole in the defensive line and both the Wallabies and All Blacks need to punish them for that.
August 9th 2009 @ 11:48am
Guy Smiley said | August 9th 2009 @ 11:48am | Report comment
Andrew that is pretty much a pitch-perfect summation. Pothale I don’t believe he’s having his cake and eating it – the point is that the ref was appalling and got lost and confused but refused to realise it. However this is running second to the general ineptitude of Australia – they deserved nothing from this game.
And the point about Fourie? Just what I thought, the first time his name was mentioned by the commentators was right at the death. Let’s not forget the Boks’ outside backs are extremely talented – Habana, Pietersen, Fourie, de Villiers, Steyn – what a waste not to use them! As for the much vaunted du Preez? Kick, kick, kick, kick. Good kicks but increasingly he offers nothing more, which is a waste of his sublime talent.
Ozsuppoter, good point about Giteau – I have never seen him play this bad or engage in such a dirty act before – not sure what he was on but he’d rather forget this game.
Ozsaffer you are delusional if you think this is not the Boks gameplan – it is executed to a tee and predicated on pressuring the opposition into making mistakes and giving away penalties. They do it superbly.
In summary – a dreadful game. Poor ref, abject opposition, a winning team playing with all the flair of the Comatose Accountants XV.
.
August 9th 2009 @ 12:01pm
pothale said | August 9th 2009 @ 12:01pm | Report comment
Guy – re your assertion that the ref was appalling, I do not agree.
However, let’s stick with that you think he was.
What’s the specific evidence for this?
Moreover, if a ref was appalling then clearly his decision-making had an effect on the game and its outcome.
So if he was appalling as you assert, then was this to the disadvantage of Australia? And if so, to such an extent to affect the outcome of the game?
August 9th 2009 @ 12:09pm
ohtani's jacket said | August 9th 2009 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
Of course you don’t agree, the ref was Irish!
Seriously, though, Rolland was correct in many of his rulings. There are times when it would be better for everyone if they just played on, but obviously Rolland doesn’t share that philosophy. His positioning is crap, but that doesn’t make him special. Most refs have crap positioning these days.
August 10th 2009 @ 2:04am
Knives Out said | August 10th 2009 @ 2:04am | Report comment
It seriously irritated me the way Rolland penalised one or two crooked scrum feeds but ignored countless others. The same thing happened last week with Owens. Where is the consistency?
August 10th 2009 @ 4:23am
The Edinburgh Pilgrim said | August 10th 2009 @ 4:23am | Report comment
Sorry KO but I don’t understand yourcomment??
August 10th 2009 @ 4:37am
pothale said | August 10th 2009 @ 4:37am | Report comment
As in if refs are going to start calling crooked feeds (which they should one presumes) then they need to do it consistently. People feel that Owens and Rolland missed a few in the matches.
August 9th 2009 @ 7:06pm
Ozsaffer said | August 9th 2009 @ 7:06pm | Report comment
Guy Smiley!
I am not delusional, I realise very well that it is the Boks game plan, but as I said in a reply elsewhere.
Pressurise the opponents with calculated % rugby and 1 of 2 things will happen:
a) Try scoring opportunities
or
b) Poor disciplined negative play by the opponents resulting in 3 pointer opportunities.
Wallabies and AB’s have been choosing the latter and paid for it.
August 9th 2009 @ 11:54am
GreenandGold said | August 9th 2009 @ 11:54am | Report comment
working class rugger
I suppose so, but then again he hasn’t gone looking for the ball for a few games now. He was non existent against the Kiwis as well.
What about Burgess? Surely it would be valid to bench him and give Will the start.
Stirlo is an ‘okay’ captain but he tends to get injured quite a bit these days and if he isn’t injured he seems to vanish in some of these games.
One of the few bright spots was J O’Connor – He responded well and will continue to improve as the competition moves ahead.
August 9th 2009 @ 11:56am
onside said | August 9th 2009 @ 11:56am | Report comment
Andrew Logans piece is spot on.To me it reads more like utter frustration than a complaint.
And if it was a complaint then it was evenly spread over both teams and the ref. Put aside
winning for a moment,this sort of rugby ,at this level, is truly dreadful. Where South African
fans are concerned it seems the end justifies the means .Style is irrelevant so long as we
win. Maybe in the professional era they are right. Players are paid plenty of money to win
regardless of how it is achieved.But professional rugby has a very limited future if teams
develop a strategy based soley on winning using negative tactics.I take nothing away from
South Africas victory.They won Australia lost.Next. South Africans are very passionate
about their rugby.What do supporters think of the Springbok style. Are they happy with it.
Is this the type of rugby that wins the Currie Cup.Do South African supporters enjoy the
kickfests, punctuated occaissionally by an infrequent try.Some overseas subscribers to
this blog infer Australians are always bellyaching about results.The truth is Australians
arc up about the style. Super 14 rugby in Australia will not draw crowds to watch negative
rugby.even if their team is victorious.They simply will not pay good money to watch dud
rugby.Furthermore, as an appendage to last nights Test match, limited viewers watch the
replay on television.If the rugby is attractive to watch,win or loose ,rugby people will look
at the replay. But after last nights presentation there is more interest Sunday morning in
replays of the Dapto dogs ,than watching two top nations play negative rugby.Despite all
this International rugby needs to standardise its refereeing.Its a disgrace.That one man can
loosely interpret the rules according to his whim is plainly absurd. Rugby is a billion dollar
sport officiated by incompetant ex school house masters .To put it in perspective its a bit
like going back to using hand held stop watches to judge an Olympic race.Tell me another
professional sport in the world where the referees interpret the rules on the run. It is the
dark ages. And once again this is not a complaint in lieu of Australia loosing a game.It is
a fact.No two referees are the same.Each has a different idea in his head of how the rules
will be interpreted in his head.And that can change from one match to the next.The RWC
showcases rugby once every four years. But the teams that contest the finals do not
determine how the game will be played,the referees do. A final refereed by an official
from Australia or New Zealand will be an entirely different game than if it was refereed
by somebody from the UK. That is an undeniable fact .The cornerstone of all rugbys ills.
A friend of mine ,an international business ,man had four seasons tickets to all Springbok
games in South Africa .He spent a lot of time in the country and used the opportunity to
take clients to the games.The Australian Taxation Office questioned his claiming the cost
of the tickets as a business expense ,saying in its opinion the tickets instead should be
listed under pleasure. My friend increduously responded, pleasure? PLEASURE?, have
you ever seen the bastards play?
August 9th 2009 @ 1:20pm
Even looser said | August 9th 2009 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
onside – I’ve been thinking very similar things to your comments on Rugby in Sth Africa. Like ‘what the hell are the fans getting so excited over’? One gets the feeling that for reasons beyond my comprehension they would cheer anything if it resulted in an increase on the score board.
I’ve seen some tremendous Sth African rugby in their Currie Cup but then when it comes to the International level and they dish up complete dross. Yes it wins the game but it doesn’t win the fans outside of Sth Africa. So I’m wondering why the Boks don’t play winning Rugby that is also exciting and attractive at the same time.
Case in point Boks pressuring Wallaby try line & George Smith has his brain explosion, gets pinged and sent off. Boks are miles ahead on the score board and the game is well and truelly sewn-up. Why opt for a penalty? Why not please the fans with a scrum and score a team try? But no another kick and the fans go nuts.
August 9th 2009 @ 1:47pm
JustinB said | August 9th 2009 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
winning it what excites the fans. Watching your team play entertaining footy, throwing the ball all over the park, and losing by 20 points – that doesn’t excite the fans (except the opposition fans)
August 10th 2009 @ 10:25am
Rusty said | August 10th 2009 @ 10:25am | Report comment
You will see more running rugby in the Currie cup and other comps but the nationl physche is tied to the Boks. We only care that they win
As for you case in point – the additional 3 pointer put the game out reach and limited chances for a losing bonus point. Good strategic captaincy plus at that point the Bok scrum was on the rack
August 9th 2009 @ 11:59am
The Other Reds Fan. said | August 9th 2009 @ 11:59am | Report comment
We were never going to win last night. A bonus point loss would have been, well, a bonus.
Knowing we would lose I didn’t watch the game at that hour. In fact I haven’t seen South Africa play this year, so I am relying on results and media and blog reports many of which suggest that SA has now got the greates team ever.
The media and blog reports don’t seem to match the scoreboard results.
The scoreboards tell me this:
1. An after the siren penalty saved them in the second match of the Lions series;
2. They didn’t exactly slaughter the Lions on the scoreboard in any games, losing the third;
3. The All Blacks played really badly and are down on form, but were in the games until about 3/4 time (so I am told);
4. The Australians also played poorly apparently – I would be more concerned if reports said that they had played well and were simply beaten by a better side;
5. SA rarely score more than one try per game.
World’s greater team ever? I don’t think so. In fact far from it especially when all of those results are home games.
I also know the following:
1. The Springboks haven’t set foot outside their country this year to play a single test and I believe that the Springboks as much as (if not more than) any other international team gains tremendous advantage from playing at home;
3. Every match they have played so far has had great weather – no wind or rain to challenge a goal kicker;
2. South Africa will not get any 4 try bonus points.
They seem to rely on one guy for their points. What if he has an off night, can’t handle the jeers, or there is heavy rain? I wonder if they have a plan B.
I have said it on this site before and I will say it again. Last night will be the Springboks’ last win for the 2009 Tri-Nations series. That doesn’t mean they won’t win the series, but I wouldn’t rule out Australia who still have a great chance of winning it if we play well and don’t get injuries.
I would swap Giteau and Barnes and I would start with Genia and have Phelps as my backup half, dropping Burgess altogether. Once he’s fit, replace Mitchell with Ioane.
If there was anyone, I would also dump Baxter even if it just because he (unfairly?) attracts suspicion and taints the whole pack and the whole team get penailsed. Besides, he isn’t that good anyway.
August 9th 2009 @ 12:04pm
ohtani's jacket said | August 9th 2009 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
The Other Reds Fan, the weather wasn’t great in Durban (started raining in the second half) and conditions underfoot weren’t that good in Newlands. Steyn is just a fantastic kicker.
August 9th 2009 @ 10:13pm
TommyM said | August 9th 2009 @ 10:13pm | Report comment
ORF- Agre with most every thing you say. But jeez, for someone who posts on here quite a lot about rugby, you don’t seem to actually watch any!!!
BTW- Our scrum went from dominant to AWESOME (one of the few positives) when Ben Alexander and Polota-Nau came on for Baxter and Moore. Not sure if anyone has sugggestede it elsewhere, but what about getting Smith to throw the ball in so? TPN would be good at the back as he’s played a lot of back row.
August 10th 2009 @ 1:27pm
The Other Reds Fan. said | August 10th 2009 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
Tommy,
My wife won’t let me get Foxtel. I have spent too many Sundays waking up after only four hours sleep after staying up in great anticipation only to watch the Wallabies put in yet another inept performance. I see Ben Alexander as our hope for the scrum. I wonder what we could have done with Rodzilla and if he’s coimng back. I wish TPN could throw straight.
August 10th 2009 @ 4:53pm
TommyM said | August 10th 2009 @ 4:53pm | Report comment
ORF- I feel for ya buddy!! If you can’t get down the pub, I’d highly recommend changing your internet company to iinet- they stream all the Aussie S14 games (as well as ANZ Cup and Currie Cup games) for free on their website if you’re with them
August 9th 2009 @ 12:07pm
Working Class Rugger said | August 9th 2009 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
I have defended Burgess so far this year but its just not clicking. Give Genia a shot. Yes, J’OC was showing something promising. The only solace I can take is at the youngest in the squad are showing good signals for the future.
August 9th 2009 @ 12:07pm
GreenandGold said | August 9th 2009 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
Just a bit off track here but how poor was FoxSports last night. I am an aussie supporter but it seemed as though Kearns and Clarky were sitting at home and commentating after a few beers. Sure it was great to see Cooper score in the first 3mins but they were screaming like we had won the world cup.
Further to this, we could not hear the crowd at all.
I admire their passion for the Wallabies but I think some of their comments were a bit too much last night. Oh well it provides for some entertainment I suppose.
August 9th 2009 @ 12:27pm
Peter K said | August 9th 2009 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
I thought by and large the referee did a reasonable job. Far far better than Joubert and a bit better than Owen. All 3 yellow cards were deserved, very cynical or dangerous play.
Most penalties he gave were correct.
He missed forward passes. He also was not consistent inblocking runners to kickers, we got penalised but ignored Turner getting blocked time and again. He got us for a crooked scrum feed once but ignored them from both sides the rest of the game. The Touch Judges were inconsistent too TPN was called for not in straight and at least 2 from the BOKS were as bad as his first one and no call made.
He allowed players to not roll away, and wrong side of the ruck and looked first for holding on, typical and foreseeable NH refereeing. Not one penalty for not rolling away despite blatant holding down and trapping but many for holding on to the ball.
August 9th 2009 @ 12:30pm
Peter K said | August 9th 2009 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
I forgot to add and only 1 scrum penalty that was wrong, Robinson when SMit was boring in. Just 1 error is quite good for refs against the Wallabies.
August 9th 2009 @ 10:16pm
TommyM said | August 9th 2009 @ 10:16pm | Report comment
I though Brown’s yellow card was very harsh. That was not a professional foul- he was the tackler and didn’t realise the ruck had sort of) formed, so not deliberate.
I think TPN may be getting a reputation like Baxter (but for his throwing). See above suggestion…