Resting players is just flirting with form
By simonjzw, 18 Aug 2009 simonjzw is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- AFL, Geelong Cats, St Kilda Saints
Most media commentators believe Geelong and St. Kilda have been smart to give key players some time off in the lead up to the finals. But is there any evidence to support this idea?
It’s difficult to recall any premiers in the last 20 years who have used this policy to advantage.
In fact, Malcolm Blight tried it one year with Geelong (and was lauded at the time in the media for being “smart” and “innovative”) and it famously backfired on him.
He was subsequently quoted as saying he would never do it again.
When the Swans won the premiership in 2005, they went through the last half of the season making only one change. They went into the finals with a settled line up that had confidence in its own “battle hardness”. This was never more evident than when they ran over St. Kilda in the Preliminary Final.
And while it’s true only club insiders will know how many of the changes Geelong and St. Kilda made were truly necessary, the wisdom of yesteryear shouldn’t be disregarded just because it comes from yesteryear.
One truism every old time player will tell you is “never flirt with your form”.
The unsettling nature of having large groups of players moving in and out of a team must have some impact on form. So it’s no coincidence that Geelong isn’t playing anywhere near as well now as they have in the last 60 odd games.
This was also a factor in St. Kilda’s loss to Essendon.
Just how big a factor is impossible to quantify but given the final result was only two points it’s not fanciful to suppose a different result if St. Kilda had retained its settled line up.
The superficial view is that a loss (or 2) won’t effect the ladder positions and there’s plenty of time to regain form before the finals begin but those same old timers will also tell you that you can’t turn your form on and off like a tap.
And to the rest of the competition St. Kilda and Geelong are no longer bullet proof and have lost the significant psychological advantage they held earlier in the season.
For St. Kilda the problem is magnified by the fact that Essendon made them look ordinary at times and it’s possible they have cracked the code to beating St. Kilda.
St. Kilda’s never been quick through the midfield and to get around this deficiency they’ve employed a very smart full court press and focussed on winning the contested ball. Before yesterday’s match St. Kilda were winning an average of 108 contested possessions to their opponents 100. Yesterday they won 96 to Essendon’s 124.
The message is clear. If you can win the contested ball and move it quickly (with run and carry or precision disposal) you’ll expose St. Kilda’s lack of midfield pace and they’ll be vulnerable.
As to Geelong, they haven’t been able to get their midfield functioning as well since they rested their players against Brisbane. The lack of frequency and quality of forward 50 entries has highlighted their brittle forward line and opposition midfields have been able to put Geelong’s defence under pressure. It’s much harder for Geelong defenders to sag off opponents and pick off errant passes when the opposition midfield is allowed to play better.
None of this would be as obvious if Geelong and St. Kilda had stayed with their settled line ups and held their form better.
And while it makes for a more interesting finals series I doubt it helps either side in its quest for a premiership.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- More rugby league players to defect to the AFL? (159)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- Foxtel’s AFL coverage is nirvana for footy fans (88)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (84)
- Israel Folau now ready for AFL (75)
- AFL’s most hated club turns 120 years old (75)
- Optus ruling actually a good thing for AFL fans (52)
- Giants inspired to prove doubters wrong (30)
- Malthouse not fazed by assistant issue
- Richo says look out for the Tigers in AFL
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (14)
- Who’s to blame for the Majak Daw beat-up? (32)
- AFL Tigers need to step up, says Cotchin
- Riewoldt wants new Saints captain in 2013
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (14)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (97)
- Crows changing, but will this AFL preview change your life? (2)
- Is Heath Shaw the right leader for Collingwood? (11)
- Could a female coach succeed in the AFL? (35)
- Demons’ two captain Jacks the right leadership choice (5)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- Explore:
- AFL, Geelong Cats, St Kilda Saints

Searly said | August 18th 2009 @ 11:34am | Report comment
I have to say I’m not convinced. The vast majority of Geelong’s omissions were genuine injuries, which they would definitely have preferred to do without. The absence of Steve Johnson and Paul Chapman for a couple of weeks exposed their otherwise dysfunctional forward line and to lose Scarlett and others from the backline at the same time meant they were exposed at both ends of the ground. Their midfield was also depleted at the same time, so the defeats they incurred were almost inevitable and not the result of poor tactical decisions to rest players.
St Kilda was slightly different, but I’d still say that their omissions were largely based on player fitness. Sure, most of the 8 or so players who missed the game against Hawthorn would have played were it the Grand Final, but I’d struggle to argue that they should have pushed them all through with injections and risk of further injury for a game that meant nothing in terms of ladder position. If anything, their success so far this season has given them the luxury of avoiding the risk of longer term injury to players who will be key to their chances in September.
Redb said | August 18th 2009 @ 11:46am | Report comment
Agree with the comments on their midfield but it comes down to who wants the ball more and that is about intensity. Who comes to play on the day.
It is time to acknowledge the height advantage St Kilda has around the ground they have the best talls who can take a contested grab in the game and this wins them the 50:50 contests. This is the distinct difference to Geelong who lack quality talls and are handicapped by having Ottens in the VFL still and Mooney who is out of form. Blake is a just joke around the ground compared to say Gardiner.
Redb
Pippinu said | August 18th 2009 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
What about our talls?
Do Aker and Johnno count as talls????
Redb said | August 18th 2009 @ 2:29pm | Report comment
Bulldogs gone Pip, wont make the granny. Barry Hall for 2010?
Redb
Olrac said | August 18th 2009 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
As AFL becomes more proffesional and the speed of the game increases you will see more rotations of players between games. Looking at other professional sports like Football and Basketball they have a list that they rotate through the playing group on a game to game basis. This will allow a higher intensity to be maintained by the team for longer in the season.
You will start to see the best 30 players or the best 10 in each third of the ground rotating from game to game. This will require players to be drilled on playing multiple positions in their third.
The coaches are not coaching this way yet but it will get to that point in the next 10 years, collingwood are probably the best example of a team who could pull this type of rotation off with a very even list.