Do Springboks deserve mantle of greatness?
By James Mortimer, 21 Aug 2009 James Mortimer is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news

Springboks Bryan Habana looks to get a pass away as the Wallabies Matt Giteau tackles him to the ground during the Australia v South Africa Rugby test at Telstra Stadium, Sydney, Saturday, August 5, 2006. AAP Image/Dean Lewins
This is a very good South African team. You could not defeat the All Blacks and Wallabies on consecutive weeks and not have a certain essence of quality. But there is evidence in the last year that they still have a lot to do
And there are other indicators that need to be achieved.
If they are indeed a great team, then the winning of the Tri Nations must be a fait accompli.
It certainly is a heady mix of experience and rising talent that the Boks wield, with the challenge for Peter De Villiers in the coming years on whether the evolution of their team from the 2007 World Cup winning vintage can be maintained through to the first ever successful Rugby World Cup title defence.
While some soothsayers would say that victories over two mixed All Black and Wallaby teams may not prove much, especially while basking in the comfort of their daunting coliseums in South Africa, there is no such thing as weak SANZAR teams.
And they were convincing wins. Maybe not so convincing for fans of the game as a spectacle.
But the reality is that the Springboks are playing the game to win, adjusting to the laws of the game better than their Tri Nations opponents, and playing to the strengths that they have in abundance.
But are they truly great?
They boast some of the best players in world rugby, with Victor Matfield and Fourie Du Preez unchallenged as the preeminent players in their positions, and John Smit, Bryan Habana, Bakkies Botha and Jean De Villiers candidates for a World XV.
They have a squadron of flankers, with new caps such as Morne Steyn and Heinrich Brussow making dramatic impacts.
The cattle is there, and for now, so is the game plan.
However, De Villiers is hardly the most humble of coaches, and while winning is the greatest feeling, the sweet smell of success can breed complacency and comfort of a routine.
For all of their success against their Tri Nations opponents, the series against the Lions showed that their brutally pragmatic game-plan can be countered. While the Springboks have been coy, almost suggestive that they will eventually play an expansive style, there is nothing in evidence to suggest that they can easily make that adaptation.
As for their reputation as bully boys on the field, it has been their opponents that have struggled with their discipline whereas the Springboks have conceded fewer penalties in their last three matches than any other run in modern history.
While there may be the ordinary and almost expected off the ball niggle from the Springboks, it occurs from any international side.
The South Africans tactical approach is itself pressure building. But sooner or later the question will come whether they can win a match without kicking penalties.
However, it is the Springboks off-field demeanour that may be the only hindrance to their tag of greatness, although this may be somewhat moot.
After all, history books remember winners above all other things.
But the South Africans blatant and almost arrogant protesting of Botha’s ban – in which the Springboks wore “Justice for Bakkies” armbands – was not becoming of a team that has the opportunity, as World Cup holders and currently the IRB’s number one side, of being the leading ambassadors for the game.
Whether Botha’s act was worth a ban, or that the ban was unfair, isn’t relevant to the final act of protest.
This is not a political piece, and for some South African rugby or sporting supporters to believe that they are sufferers of victimisation isn’t germane or unique to their mighty rugby team.
Negativity, insults, dislike or even the hating of a team is common to all sporting psychology. The Springboks must act the part of a team that, like it or not, is currently the best rugby team on the planet.
This, for mine, is what will cement their status as a truly great side.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (67) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (1)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (0)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (2)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (18)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (75)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (110)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (21)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies

August 21st 2009 @ 9:37am
Rickety Knees said | August 21st 2009 @ 9:37am | Report comment
It depends on how greatness is measured. IMHO mastering one dimensional Rugby does not attract the greatness tag.
Good article James.
August 23rd 2009 @ 6:14pm
Ozsaffer said | August 23rd 2009 @ 6:14pm | Report comment
Talk about one dimensional. Suppose Rugby League with all it’s running is three dimensional – crap. Absolute crap. Learn to appreciate Union and all the complexities it has to offer. After all if rugby were board games
– Union would be chess and league would be checkers!
August 24th 2009 @ 5:50pm
Darryl SA said | August 24th 2009 @ 5:50pm | Report comment
“After all if rugby were board games union would be chess and league would be checkers!”
Now that’s a classic line. I must remember that one.
August 21st 2009 @ 9:43am
Temba said | August 21st 2009 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Totaly off the topic but in the lines of greatness, has anyone watched District 9… the greatest movie to come out of South Africa.
August 21st 2009 @ 10:08am
Mitch O said | August 21st 2009 @ 10:08am | Report comment
Definitely not.
August 21st 2009 @ 10:42am
Mark said | August 21st 2009 @ 10:42am | Report comment
I’m with Temba – greatness takes time i.e. more than just one home season. If they win this years TN by beating NZ & Oz away, then repeat that next year they’re in the running for greatness. Then again the great sides tended to have more of a dynasty feel to them e.g. 87 & 95 All Blacks who were worlds best teams for 2 or 3 years at a time (except for that little glitch in SA in 95 %-).
August 21st 2009 @ 11:27am
Neville Howard said | August 21st 2009 @ 11:27am | Report comment
I agree…to a degree. There’s definitely room for improvement in the Boks team. They don’t attack with the back line at all, and a lot of mumblings pointed to Morne Steyn kicking the ball, though if you look at the Bulls game plan and strategy, this will prove that the lack of backline play is not because of Monre Steyn at 10, but rather because that’s the strategy the boks are opting for.
The kicking and chase gameplan has been effective up to now, but sooner or later the cunning Aussies, or tough Kiwis will come up with the perfect counter. It’s too one dimensional, and it’s also cancelling out the attacking ability of Fourie, De Villiers, Habana, Frans Steyn! We’re wasting their talents by not getting the ball to them going forward. Once we can incorporate a multiphase attacking game into our kick and chase strategy. Spread the ball out wide on turn overs, the Boks will definitely be the best team in the world.
August 21st 2009 @ 11:48am
Knives Out said | August 21st 2009 @ 11:48am | Report comment
I actually think the point is that when presented with ball during the past handful of tests the SA backline has looked bad, not simply a case of them being ignored.
August 21st 2009 @ 11:57am
Neville Howard said | August 21st 2009 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Ahhh, good point, but possibly ,cause they’re not used to receiving the ball, and weren’t expecting it! hehe. I counted at least 3 knocks from Petersen (Note his name was not part of my ‘dynamic back line’ comment) Ndugane should be there on form.
August 21st 2009 @ 12:05pm
Knives Out said | August 21st 2009 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
Maybe, but good players don’t become bad over night. It’s all a bit strange if you ask me. Nobody could say that JdV and Fourie aren’t capable, but between them in the past few tests they have struggled to throw accurate and quick passes. It can’t be rust given the Lions series has just taken place. Maybe it’s just a short-term rut?! I wonder if Fourie’s transfer dealings are weighing on his mind.
Yes, Pietersen hasn’t been up to much recently. On the European tour he seemed much more assertive and aggressive than he had previously and now he seems to have retreated back into his shell.
August 21st 2009 @ 1:03pm
van der Merwe said | August 21st 2009 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
Pietersen, when on form, is a much better wing than any of the twins (who aren’t really anything more than solid). Unfortunately, he has a nasty tendency to rest on his laurels, which is a shame.
August 21st 2009 @ 11:49am
Brett McKay said | August 21st 2009 @ 11:49am | Report comment
yep, nice piece James, all very valid points. South Africa are certainly a great team in the Republic, as you point out, and if they start winning on the road consistently, well then yeah, this probably is a great side.
Which is ironic considering the irrational ramblings of their coach at times!! They’re sometime suceeding despite de Villiers..
August 21st 2009 @ 11:51am
Cracker said | August 21st 2009 @ 11:51am | Report comment
What is District 9 Temba?
August 21st 2009 @ 11:58am
Neville Howard said | August 21st 2009 @ 11:58am | Report comment
South African movie plays off in Joburg. Peter Jackson is involved in it too. Currently nr1 at the box office. Not bad for a saffer effort!
August 21st 2009 @ 12:04pm
Temba said | August 21st 2009 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
dont read any reviews they spoil it a bit, just go and see the film. It really is worth it. No rugby in the film tough
August 21st 2009 @ 12:08pm
Taniwha said | August 21st 2009 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
Good article. As earlier mentioned, a great team must be great in every aspect of the game, for the whole game. Not 60 mins. Not just Kicking. Not just defending. Not just attacking. It’s an all round game in which we are still waiting to see from the Boks. But either way, their current style has them coming out better off after 80 mins.
August 21st 2009 @ 12:13pm
Temba said | August 21st 2009 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
Agreed with this KO, I find that the lack of competition in the wings has made them a bit complacent. Even the speedster Habanna has not looked that impressive of late. It might be lack of ball and slow passing often means he gets the ball with no space.
Habanna is extremely good in defence an area that JP is not as strong in. Jp also lacks a kicking game… I have long said there are better wingers.
August 21st 2009 @ 9:58pm
Knives Out said | August 21st 2009 @ 9:58pm | Report comment
What wingers would they be, Temba?
I had a conversation with a South African a few weeks ago and we were discussing the various merits and player depth of various countries. We came to the conclusion that England had a surplus of good scrum halves but a real deficit of centres. Likewise, we decided that, in our opinion, SA had an excess of good back rowers and scrum halves but lacked locks and wingers. What would you say to that?
August 21st 2009 @ 12:20pm
Temba said | August 21st 2009 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
Let’s try and see this one dimensional bok game as a foundation that they can build the rest of their game from. In today’s game there is no time to mess around while losing games, coaches won’t last. So find and areas you are good at, make sure you are better then the rest and then when its safe start focusing in other areas.