It’ll be the All Blacks by eight in a Bledisloe epic
By James Mortimer, 22 Aug 2009 James Mortimer is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Bledisloe Cup, Rugby Union, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- Wallabies v All Blacks news

New Zealand's All Blacks players pose with the trophy after defeating Australia Wallabies to win the Bledisloe Cup in Hong Kong Saturday, Nov. 1, 2008. All Blacks won 19-14. AP Photo/Vincent Yu
As the two somewhat dazed sides come into Bledisloe two, in the long run they may actually benefit from their recent losses in the build up to the 2011 World Cup.
Any particular comfort that either Graham Henry or Robbie Deans had regarding the status of their team has been erased in their recent matches. While a loss for either man unleashes the wolves, there will be cold comfort in the fact that it is better to have such problems now and not in two years time.
For Deans, this Tri Nations has been an awakening as to his side’s pedigree.
After going through their home tests on cruise control, with Australian media trumpeting their quality, back to back losses have revealed some glaring deficiencies in the side.
Of these, it would be the lack of composure that would be infuriating Deans. Not only is this uncharacteristic to Australian teams, it would be the last thing anyone would say about a Crusaders side.
Other aspects seem almost confusing, with the once vaunted Wallaby lineout having malfunctioned shockingly of late. But in the same breath, their once laughed at pack has been able to repeatedly shunt back a Springbok scrum.
Some have said that Dean’s philosophies may be the problem, and the above certainly backs this if there is an identity crisis. But equally, this is somewhat irrelevant as the Wallabies are forgetting the basic tenets of rugby, which would not be a gaffe by Deans.
Two of which are fundamental: win the collision, and play for eighty minutes.
The Wallabies principle of low commitment to numbers in the ruck is disrupting their rhythm, but their inability to play an entire match is a cardinal offence. It’s a sin that has haunted them against the All Blacks.
And of the visitors, it is almost a case of how the mighty have fallen.
At the beginning of June, New Zealand was undoubtedly the best team in the world. They had won everything on offer in 2008, were ranked number one in the world, and had supplied three teams to the Super 14 semi finals.
They then lost to France, outhustled by a passionate Les Bleus side, and now have suffered back to back losses against the Springboks.
While injuries served a legitimate excuse early in the season, the worst feature now is that it is difficult to say what is wrong with the All Blacks.
Clearly their patterns have been altered by their coaching staff, playing a far more up tempo style than we witnessed last year. But key features of the All Blacks game, evidenced by over a hundred years of benchmark rugby, have gone alarmingly quiet.
They are not dominating at the ruck and impact areas, are rarely offloading in the tackles, and often when players make breaks, there are precious few players looming in support.
A feature of the All Blacks in the modern era is that sometimes they become too cute. Try too many fancy moves and overcomplicated structures. Sometimes, the best thing for any team is to remember the fundamentals, and remember who does what.
A feature of Henry’s teams is to have forwards stationed in the backline as ball carriers, but are they forgetting that in open play, their key role is to secure possession?
The famous All Black forwards of yesteryear worked as a cohesive unit, with one able to throw a blanket over their pack.
As Henry has reportedly dished out some harsh truths to his players, maybe the best approach would be to go back to schoolboy basics.
But beyond anything else, few All Blacks have shined, with form deserting even their superstars.
On paper, both teams appear well matched. The Wallabies boast 547 caps in their starting XV, to the All Blacks 544.
Dan Carter’s return will lift the side, irrespective of the camps comments to the contrary. There are still question marks, and this match must be won for the future of many All Blacks. The last time Henry lost a Tri Nations, glittering careers were ended, and already both Kieran Read and Luke McAlister have been elevated to the starting XV.
Read offers more options in the air and the Canterbury captain is known for his leadership qualities. McAlister hardly deserves the position on form, but restores a traditional first/second five playing bloc for the All Blacks, as well as more kicking options.
As for the Wallabies, the return of Rocky Elsom should revitalise them in the loose, but whereas the bulk of the All Blacks questions are aimed at their men, for the Wallabies it really is a question of attitude.
They are in the comfort of Stadium Australia, and must win or the Bledisloe is gone for the seventh consecutive year.
And for the All Blacks, it is that statistic that will give them comfort, knowing that in the last 12 matches against Australia they have won ten, and may have a greater psychological edge on the Wallabies than Dean’s men would care to admit.
Tight match, but the All Blacks don’t go six matches without firing.
New Zealand by eight.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (36) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (1)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (0)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (2)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (18)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (75)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (110)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (21)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Bledisloe Cup, Rugby Union, Tri Nations, wallabies

August 22nd 2009 @ 7:14pm
ohtani's jacket said | August 22nd 2009 @ 7:14pm | Report comment
Tony Woodcock to score a hat trick.
August 22nd 2009 @ 10:12pm
Harry said | August 22nd 2009 @ 10:12pm | Report comment
Better team won.
We have well and truly forgotten how to win.
August 22nd 2009 @ 10:22pm
Paul Costello said | August 22nd 2009 @ 10:22pm | Report comment
I thought it was a good and insitful peice. And WooHoo!!!! Go the All Blacks.
August 22nd 2009 @ 10:33pm
Glenn Condell said | August 22nd 2009 @ 10:33pm | Report comment
Bossed at the breakdown, boneheaded kicking, poor handling and passing, a seeming lack of confidence when an opportunity knocks…. still, we nearly won it. Game of 2 halves; we weren’t that flash in the first but the Blacks were terrible. We were terrible in the second and they just kept cranking it up. We cannot sustain anything for any length of time in attack, certainly not with Barnes off the paddock. Giteau was awful tonight and hasn’t really been above mediocre since the real season began. Barnes should play 10 and Giteau compete for 12, or 9. Burgess was better but Genia again looked good. Generally well reffed game and the pick of the comp so far.
August 22nd 2009 @ 11:01pm
QC said | August 22nd 2009 @ 11:01pm | Report comment
Well when you are playing the best 10 in the world it’s certainly going to put the s#@ts up ya, and this is exactly what happened to Giteau I believe. So much has been made about how good he is but the Tri-Nations has proven just how regular he is when compared to Carter.
August 22nd 2009 @ 11:12pm
ohtani's jacket said | August 22nd 2009 @ 11:12pm | Report comment
I wouldn’t go that far. Carter wasn’t in top form aside from his goal kicking from the left.
August 22nd 2009 @ 11:20pm
QC said | August 22nd 2009 @ 11:20pm | Report comment
I didn’t say he was in top form so please don’t insinuate that I did.
Lets get real here OJ the simple fact Carter was on the park is going to give any number ten in the world the s@#ts.
Even though he didn’t play at his best he still played are far more intelligent game than Giteau and definately helped direct the ABs much better than Gits did the Wallabies.
Giteau is so over rated it’s funny, he went missing in action at Eden Park and resorted to cynical play in SA. Tonight the pressure showed.
I look forward to Dan at 100%
August 22nd 2009 @ 11:26pm
ohtani's jacket said | August 22nd 2009 @ 11:26pm | Report comment
Fair enough. I didn’t think anyone played outstandingly well for us. It was just a team effort.
Barnes went off injured, so they had no choice but to play Giteau at 10.
August 23rd 2009 @ 12:49am
Grandpabhaile said | August 23rd 2009 @ 12:49am | Report comment
Carter was plain ordinary in this match in my view. Neither 10 was up to much, bar trying to be as good as Steyn in the kicking stakes. He’s still ahead of them.
August 23rd 2009 @ 4:16am
Knives Out said | August 23rd 2009 @ 4:16am | Report comment
‘Lets get real here OJ the simple fact Carter was on the park is going to give any number ten in the world the s@#ts.’
You think? I wouldn’t imagine that test rugby works like that. Perhaps for the front or back row, but not a 10.
August 22nd 2009 @ 10:38pm
Glenn Condell said | August 22nd 2009 @ 10:38pm | Report comment
I should have said how much I admired the All Black comeback. They haven’t the arsenal of days gone by perhaps but they have cool customers in key positions, technical know-how in loose and tight, a good line-kicking game, and endless patience. Plus a bit of tradition.
Congrats to the Kiwis.
August 22nd 2009 @ 11:52pm
Sam Taulelei said | August 22nd 2009 @ 11:52pm | Report comment
Glenn nice comment and if you don’t mind, I’m going to keep a copy and use it as a rebuttal against criticisms, usually in a world cup year that the All Blacks don’t know how to win close games.
August 22nd 2009 @ 10:49pm
ThelmaWrites said | August 22nd 2009 @ 10:49pm | Report comment
Time to get tough.
August 22nd 2009 @ 11:23pm
Justin said | August 22nd 2009 @ 11:23pm | Report comment
The 9, 10, 12 trio hasn’t worked all year. Mainly due to poor service. Now we say Burgess passes well if he doesn’t throw a howler but you have to be better than that. You need passes over the kickers boot not on the wrong side of his body or too high et etc.
Why does Gits try and smash it low from a shallow position? Always a chane for a rebound or charge down, poor technique and execution .
Thought Mitcjell was excellent until the usual massive mistakes he always seems to make.
August 22nd 2009 @ 11:24pm
Benny said | August 22nd 2009 @ 11:24pm | Report comment
Burgess was Australia’s best easily – giteau is gutless, way to not take a shot at drop goal
August 22nd 2009 @ 11:46pm
Frank said | August 22nd 2009 @ 11:46pm | Report comment
Gee whiz, that was depressing. 2nd phase possession? Any composure at all? Kicking game? Backline movement? That was gormless.
August 23rd 2009 @ 12:18am
westy said | August 23rd 2009 @ 12:18am | Report comment
You see Justin that is the bullshit of play what is in front of you in this instance all talk not the substance . From my position Mitchell was already in reasonable field position and had another ten or so metres before contact and yet he does not have the confidence to go on despite being at near full pace and having two /three players behind him . He is coached to pin the opposition down and so he resorts to the worst arnament in his battery his overblown kicking. It cost us the game.
We went into the game with dour field position and defensive game. I do not have a problem with this if this is because of the limitations and depth of our squad.
The Blacks were trying to play some constructive rugby in the first half but their timing and vision were badly astray leading to scrappy play. the game was exciting because it was close not because it was great rugby.
Australia should be proud of our defensive display in the second half. The problem is this predates Deans.
It is Australian rugby’s continuing refusal to acknowledge that our real problem is our depth of quality playing talent. Say giteau was dropped the names to replace him just immedistely come to mind. He really was that bad. Two in a row.