All Blacks retain Bledisloe in thriller
By David Beniuk, 23 Aug 2009 David Beniuk is a Roar Pro
100 Have your say
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news
- Wallabies v All Blacks news
The Bledisloe Cup is gone again for the Wallabies after All Blacks five-eighth Dan Carter kicked a 79th minute penalty goal to give his side a heartstopping 19-18 Tri Nations Test victory at ANZ Stadium.
Carter, making his return to international rugby after six months out with a snapped Achilles tendon, lined up the difficult kick after Australia had run into trouble near their own line, and kicked home to grab the one-point advantage in a thrilling match.
Australia launched a late attacking raid in a bid to snatch a win after leading for most of the match, but were unable to handle when it counted, signalling the beginning of the celebrations for the New Zealanders.
The Wallabies now head into a seventh year without the Bledisloe Cup, with holders NZ leading the four-match series 2-0, and the defeat also virtually means the end of their Tri Nations chances.
But a spirited performance may save the scalps of several players who were reportedly under pressure heading into the game, something coach Robbie Deans could also be expected to be feeling.
“I’m not going to go belly-up … we do this because we love the contest,” Deans told Saturday night’s press conference.
“It was there for us but still it’s not quite there.
“They’re masters at getting home and we’re working hard at acquiring that art. We’re making headway but we haven’t acquired it yet. I’m pretty confident we will.”
Five-eighth Matt Giteau said the side still believed they could pull a victory out of the fire after Carter’s crucial kick.
“We were quite composed in what we wanted to do, how we thought we ‘d get the ball back and hopefully try and kick a penalty or get some points,” he said.
“There was always that belief … I think that’s why everyone is as disappointed as we are.”
The All Blacks scored the only try of the match, through Ma’a Nonu in the 64th minute, but predictions of a boring kick-fest were wide of the mark as the crowd of 80,228 were kept enthralled.
After a first half in which Australia kicked four penalty goals to one despite not dominating territory, to lead 12-3 at the break, the Wallabies needed to hang on for dear live against a second half onslaught from the Kiwis.
The All Blacks were denied two tries in less than two minutes by referee Jonathan Kaplan but a massive weight of possession in the second half had to give and it did in the 64th when, after a Giteau clearance had been charged down, Nonu handled twice in a sublime movement to score.
Carter’s conversion gave the All Blacks their first lead since the fourth minute at 16-15.
That was shortlived, however, as Australia finally raided NZ territory and came away with another Giteau penalty goal and an 18-16 lead.
Discipline was again an issue for Australia, with No.8 Richard Brown sinbinned for his second straight Test, in the 43rd minute for a lifting tackle on All Blacks prop Owen Franks and prop Al Baxter hooked in the first half after a scrum penalty.
“I don’t imagine his teammates would have been very excited,” Deans said of Brown’s yellow card.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Frank O'Keeffe said | August 23rd 2009 @ 6:31am | Report comment
I’m in a bad mood today.
I’m bloody sick of seeing New Zealand retain the Bledisloe Cup.
Nah that’s it, I’m too mad.
sheek said | August 23rd 2009 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Frank,
We ought to be ‘conditioned’ by now. After all, historically the ABs tend to win 4 out of every 5 BC matches!
g man said | August 23rd 2009 @ 10:52pm | Report comment
I’m with Frank….I’m mad as hell….and here’s why:
- kaplan had a shocker. that’s right..don’t be fooled by the gloss…the saffer sent a wallaby to the bin for a marginal infringement, yet let jimmy cowan obstruct a certain try and escape with a warning. whatever!
- in the final minutes, turner gets caught with the ball, which is sitting at the back of the wallaby ruck yet is penalised for not releasing. whatever!
- in the final play of the match, nonu is caught lazily lying about the back of the wallaby ruck obstructing play yet kaplan doesn’t blow this up. what is his problem?!!!! the wallabies should have had the penalty and gits should have kicked the team to victory.
bribery, corruption or just flat out racism is behind it………get rid of kaplan – he is a blight on the game and a disgrace to referees worldwide. and while you’re at it, launch the IRB into oblivion and bring back the free kicks rather than penalties. it’s time for the sanzar nations to free themselves of the IRB and return the game to the spectators….not everyone wants to see crap kickathons like the tri-nations have been so far…..and by the way, the all blacks should be ashamed of themselves for last nights victory…..how much did they pay that dirty little saffer?
Rusty said | August 24th 2009 @ 10:02am | Report comment
tell us what you really think
Tumekeheke said | August 24th 2009 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
All blacks were the better team, don’t blame the ref!?!?! another ref probably would have awarded at least one of the 2 dissalowed tries.
But I agree with you on the penalties, it has ruined the tri nations this year.
Matt0931 said | August 23rd 2009 @ 6:39am | Report comment
As much as I hate them, that final play of the game was the exect time a team should be trying to execute a drop goal.
We had the position and we had the players there to be able to defend the line and have Gits drop back in the pocket for an easy kick in front of the posts.
It’s easy oppurtunities like these that the wallabies must start to recognise and exploit. Other than that it was a decent performance from both sides with lots of running with the ball.
Probably the best tri-nations game this season.
Darryl said | August 23rd 2009 @ 8:12am | Report comment
The Wallabies either lack basic rugby thinking or Deans hasn’t coached simple strategies for certain situations. Where was the planned drop goal strategy at the end? No doubt Spiro will find an excuse for him though. An Australian coach would have all sorts of heat on him by now.
Mitch O said | August 23rd 2009 @ 8:24am | Report comment
I see according to Deans the Wallabies are “getting close to [winning]”
I mean the law of averages says the Wallabies will eventually win one. But jeez how long is this guys side going to take?
Matt0931, agreed. Easily the best game this tri nations despite just the one try. Reason? So much ball in hand from both sides.
Frank, I assume you’re not feeling half as bad as Baxter is today after his public shaming. Dean’s didn’t even wait until halftime!
pothale said | August 23rd 2009 @ 8:31am | Report comment
“I see according to Deans the Wallabies are “getting close to [winning]”
I mean the law of averages says the Wallabies will eventually win one. But jeez how long is this guys side going to take?”
Probably when they go on their Grand Slam tour and beat all of the NH teams in a bout of wild abandon cos the NH teams won’t know how to play a kicking game and will try to run the ball instead.
Rusty said | August 24th 2009 @ 10:03am | Report comment
stillmissit said | August 23rd 2009 @ 8:41am | Report comment
A great game to watch with what I hoped would not be the result. Easily the most watch-able game in a fair while.
When are our forwards going to commit both effort and men to the breakdown? We were outplayed there again and the result of the turnovers and the AB’s holding on to the ball meant we were always in a hard place in this game. Our line out was a bit of a shambles and the kicking game was mostly rubbish with few chasers again. You cant win big games with this poor a performance.
Rocky went well and Carter went better. Giteau must go to inside centre and Sharpe must be given the shove although the commentators both praised his efforts, cant imagine why, in a beaten pack he was below average. Rocky was clearly the best of the forwards.
BTW – Kaplan had his best game ever in my book an outstanding effort.
pothale said | August 23rd 2009 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Thriller?
Who was thrillered?
Rabbitz said | August 23rd 2009 @ 6:04pm | Report comment
I am with you, after reading this thread I was beginning to think I watched a different game – BORING BORING RUGBY.
albatross said | August 23rd 2009 @ 10:03pm | Report comment
They can;t have more than one try per game these days. The leather patch brigade are getting on a bit and too many would cause their pacemakers to implode.
QC said | August 23rd 2009 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Did anyone notice the difference Kaplans style of reffing made, he in a way helped both teams to play running rugby.
He wasn’t pedantic and trying to stamp his authority on the game.
Reason being in my eyes he has earned the respect from these teams over time, so there is no need for him to go on a power trip.
Grandpabhaile said | August 23rd 2009 @ 9:10am | Report comment
No I didn’t. I noticed that he penalised both teams sufficiently that they racked up 10 kicks between them.
And maybe, just maybe both teams might have started to learn not to give away so many penalties.
sheek said | August 23rd 2009 @ 9:17am | Report comment
Yeah, I agree Kaplan actually reffed well, but some of the laws still suck.
And some of the penalties were difficult to fathom. You wonder if conceding 3 points is really worth the crime at times.
In rugby, it’s difficult to concentrate on a ball in hand type of game, when you’re constantly worried about conceding penalties.
Stillmissit,
It may have been one of the more watchable games of rugby recently, but still largely tedious apart from the closeness of scores.
The Parra-Wests game the previous night was a far superior spectacle & exhibition of ball handling skills.
MW said | August 23rd 2009 @ 10:51am | Report comment
Sheek
No comparison between the games any more. League is a game of constant ball movement and running and rugby is a game of constant contest for the ball hence much tougher. I for one would rather see a contest for the ball than touch football.
Tom said | August 23rd 2009 @ 11:59am | Report comment
Couldn’t agree more with Sheek, mentioned to a friend who will always blindly follow union and ignore league that no sane person could watch the Bledisloe and the Parra – Tigers game and come to the conclusion that the union was a more entertaining game. The skill levels in the NRL game where just so far in front of what was shown last night it was embarrassing.
And just as an aside, I went to a GPS school and played rugby every winter.
MW said | August 23rd 2009 @ 7:35pm | Report comment
Tom
My point is that league has made changes to its game that emphasises these running & ball movement features. I spent my youth at North Sydney Oval watching rugby league and apart from the fact that the Bears don’t have a place anymore I miss the toughness the game had then. League scrums are an embarassment but the fast and open game is attractive. For me though rugby replaces the game I don’t have anymore.
sheek said | August 23rd 2009 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
Fair enough MV,
But the ability of a player to contort himself between sideline & tryline, & score a try before being bundled into the corner post, is a skill required in both codes.
So is the ability to set up a try with a behind the back pass. Or a run, chip, regather & score. The ability to leap high & either secure or intercept a bomb is another common skill. I would say these types of skills are superior in league than union.
Barry said | August 23rd 2009 @ 11:33am | Report comment
Anyone who thinks Kaplan had a good game needs assesment. He was terrible…at times totally divorced from what was appearing in front of him. He was indicisive and incorrect…as to the touch judges….God help them…they seemed frightened to intervene and offer their input…some indiscretions happening only metres away.
Kaplan was a few years ago the best in the world…that seems like an age now…he has gone backward. I fear the game is too quick for him…I’m not suggesting he is cheating like the commentary team from 7, just he is inept with his decisions.
Oh….and I’m an All Blacks supporter too…wow, even winners can be objective in the wash up! The AB’s are penalised heavily by all refs for killing the ball when blind Freddy can see that momentum at the ruck determines at times the tacklers are propelled forward and lose their feet…it is not with intent….it may help if some of these officials actually played the game [in the forwards] to realise what actually happens….go figure….thats my view and I wear it.
johno said | August 24th 2009 @ 7:36am | Report comment
have to dissagree with you there sport, the AB’s were pinged at least twice for going off their feet at the ruck blatantly. RM blatantly offends by binding on a player and then falling on the wrong side, but it seems those days may be over at last!
Yikes said | August 23rd 2009 @ 8:59am | Report comment
I think the issue was that the Wallabies had the ascendency at the breakdown in the first half.
This changed in the second half. Game over.
JustinB said | August 23rd 2009 @ 9:04am | Report comment
I thought that while it was exciting, it was a crap game. The skill level of both teams was laughable – how many kicks did Gits kick straight into the body of a Kiwi? The number of times the Kiwis passed behind the player, over the player or just a plain forward pass? The aimless kicking with no chasing, no pressure?
Yes the ball was kept in hand more than previous games, but when it is being executed so poorly it hardly makes great viewing.