Don’t believe the hype, the code war is a myth
By Steve Kaless, 28 Aug 2009 Steve Kaless is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- A-League, AFL, football, NRL, Rugby League, Rugby Union
102 Have your say
Related coverage
- Football news
- A-League news
- Rugby Union news
- Rugby League news
- NRL news
- AFL news
- Toyota Premiership news

Dallas Johnson from the Storm is spear tackled in the NRL by Gold Coast Titans players AAP Image/Action Photographics/Jeff Crow
I don’t want to be the one who tells you that Santa Claus may not be who you think he is, but all this talk of code wars is about as close to reality as a bloke who breaks into your house and leaves you iPods instead of taking them. There I’ve said it.
I’ve read a lot about the apparent code wars that are occurring on my doorstep, but never heard a lot of concrete proof.
In fact, the only things I’ve heard which are apparently proof actually make me even more convinced it is a lot of hype, whipped up by media types who are fighting their own losing battle against dwindling ad revenues and circulations.
Sure, people are protective of their favourite codes. They don’t like them being bagged, or worse still, told they won’t be around in 30 years. But in the end, it is just an extension of the age old art of naval gazing.
Here’s why:
1. “People I know”
Surely the most commonly used phrase in the code war. One conversation with one particular punter is apparently enough to write the death certificate of any particular sport or confirm its dominance. That this particular punter may be wearing a Bulldogs, Waratahs, Mariners or Dockers jersey is rarely seen as any bias, as we agree with them.
Importantly, we see comments that reinforce our own bias as unheralded pieces of wisdom.
An opinion piece we agree with is ‘great journalism’ one that we don’t is ‘terrible, lazy journalism’. We ignore the fact that just because we don’t agree with something, doesn’t make it a good piece of writing.
Another example, a certain columnist attends a nameless charity lunch in Melbourne. He speaks with an unnamed member of the basketball world and apparently a number of unnamed people from AFL.
The columnist returns from his lunch convinced that others now share his view of the sporting world, because they may or may not have agreed with him over a few wines on a few points.
A compelling piece of social research? No. A piece of hype in a Sunday paper to get the blood boiling? Yes.
But let’s return to all that later.
2. Mutual exclusivity
The only time a “code war” actually exists is when you are forced to choose spending on one sport over another. In reality, this occurs very rarely.
The A-League shares largely a different calendar to the rest of the football codes, so is not really any form of direct competition.
A spectator who turns up in July to Energy Australia Stadium in Newcastle to watch the Knights is not then banned from doing so in February to watch the Jets.
Even when the time frames are shorter (in relation to the other football codes), people can still choose to spread their income across sports. The fact that matches are largely played across four days gives the organisers plenty to work with and they largely look to avoid a conflict which would harm their own gate.
3. The GFC
The Global Financial Crisis has added pressure to some household budgets and was meant to intensify the code war.
The reality was different.
Australia is apparently already on the road to recovery. Unemployment may have risen slightly, but people are hardly choosing the soup kitchen over attending a sporting match.
More than 90 percent of the workforce remains employed, their income unchanged. This is not the dire scenario predicted by our beloved media and therefore should not alter our sporting landscape in the slightest.
4. No code stands still
The biggest problem with people who espouse a code war is that they always do so from their own code’s development perspective. It’s naïve.
For argument’s sake, let’s take Craig Foster again.
Foster argues that in 20 years, football will be number one. This is by imagining his particular code with 20 years of development.
But Foster, like so many before, think that all other sports will, in 20 years, be in the same place they are today.
This is wrong
Every football code in this country will have made significant advances on where they are today. Of course, some may do it better than others. Which code does it best will be decided … in 20 years time.
5. The dual enemies
I’d argue that sporting codes have two real enemies: the concept of nothing and the enemy within.
First the concept of nothing.
The real enemy for footballing codes isn’t other footballing codes. It’s things like shopping, dining and other forms of entertainment.
Hen pecked ‘men’ choosing to spend their weekends wandering around large shopping malls with their partners looking for cushions and crockery and the many variations of the Stepford Husband is what will kill sporting clubs.
Rugby League hasn’t been blown away by AFL on the box, AFL hasn’t been blown away by the NRL. They were both slammed dunked by shows like Australian Masterchef, Packed to the Rafters and The Biggest Loser.
Live sport is up against shows that play on people’s competitive instincts (like sport) but also their vanity, greed … or stupidity.
It is similar with the battle for juniors.
Turn away from the sports pages and you don’t get stories about Australian society being filled with exhausted kids who have been flat out playing four different football codes in an effort to make one final grand decision.
No, you hear about Australian children, playing less sport and being some of the fattest in the world.
If there is a war going on for the hearts and minds, the football codes are getting hammered by PlayStations and junk food (another industry which seems content with multiple providers).
The other enemy is within themselves: The fair-weather fan.
The codes’ biggest battle is not converting others to follow their game, but convincing those who already do to get out to grounds and support their side.
The A-League provides the best example of this, but it affects every sport.
Quickly again to Foster who argued that every goal by Lyon convinces an Australian that football was a beautiful game. Maybe, but Australians watching Ligue One is the last thing the FFA wants.
They want people being convinced that football is the beautiful game, but by watching Sydney FC or anyone else in the A-League. There are enough football fans in Australia to fill most grounds a number of times over.
But A-League crowds suffer because people follow teams from European towns they have never visited and look down their noses at the local product.
Perhaps the best question for Foster is: How many Lyon backheels and scissor kicks will it take to fill Dairy Farmers Stadium?
But if every goal by Lyon or Barcelona convinces people of value in the beautiful game, wouldn’t every mark from Buddy Franklin do the same for AFL? Wouldn’t a Jaryd Hayne chip ‘n chase do it for the greatest game of all?
Wouldn’t a flick pass from Berrick Barnes do it for the game they play in heaven?
6. Population
How can the Gold Coast support three football codes when they previously couldn’t support one? That is a question I’ve heard many times. The answer is simple, it can because it has changed.
The Gold Coast is no longer just some tourist strip and a few hungover schoolies. It is the fastest growing area of Australia, in terms of population.
Codes are flocking there, not because they are looking for a fight, but they see a market that can support professional sport. Sure they will have to work hard to get people to back their team, but more to get them to turn off the plasma rather than turn up because they already own one type of jersey.
Public Enemy were right all those years ago. Don’t believe the hype.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- A-League, AFL, football, NRL, Rugby League, Rugby Union

Kurt said | August 28th 2009 @ 4:05am | Report comment
This may well be the most sensible, articulate, well balanced, reasonable piece of writing in the history of The Roar. As such I demand that it be deleted immediately and the writer horse-whipped to within an inch of his life. Sorry Steve, but there’s just no place for this sort of writing in modern sports journalism.
Mind you, “…you don’t get stories about Australian society being filled with exhausted kids who have been flat out playing four different football codes in an effort to make one final grand decision.” may be one of the better lines I have heard in a while.
AndyRoo said | August 28th 2009 @ 9:00am | Report comment
I also thought that line was a classic.
tifosi said | August 28th 2009 @ 6:11am | Report comment
oh man not another code war article………….
But like kurt said, this was a good read.
Lets get kids playing sport no matter what code or game they prefer.
Robbos said | August 28th 2009 @ 8:12am | Report comment
Here we go again Steve, as fit we already haven’t spent enough time on this, especially me…..
While I agree with the comments about the kids & that they should have the opportunity to play as many sports as possible to see which games fits them best, but most of your other comments are coming from a Rugby League fan.
Mutual exclusivity.
The A-League doesn’t compete with the other codes but RL & RU & now AFL all share the same timezones in that sense, they are in direct competition with each other for sponsorship, TV ratings & media space. Iin RL & RU’s case they are in direct competition for players. For years RL plundered RU for players & now the shoe is on the foot.
The media hype & fans alike on the Sonny Bill Williams episode was an example of this. Sure I don’t condone people reneging on their contact but hey Public Enemy No 1 when there was others who glassed their own girlfriend was a bit rich.
Why because he changed from RL to RU & funny enough to a country where you could watch every a Lyon goal live, so maybe Lyon is not really that far away. No code war here? I think so.
Foster’s article was an opinion piece on football (not A-League) growing this country, his opinion was that in 20 years, football would be the dominant sport, no different to Phil Gould’s article on the hottest player in RL at present & his throwaway line that he is the best footballer of any code at present in Australia. His opinion, not sure how much research was done to come up with this assumption? A piece of hype in a Sunday paper to get the blood boiling? Yes.
Why was the Gould article not taken to task by our esteem ‘The Great Australian Game’ followers & yourself?
BTW you article also had a opinion piece that could get the blood boiling. ‘Wouldn’t a Jaryd Hayne chip ‘n chase do it for the GREATEST GAME OF ALL?’ in the code war. This is your opinion & you are entiltled to it, but I’m not sure how much research was done to come to this conclusion..
mitzter said | August 28th 2009 @ 8:42am | Report comment
“the greatest game of all” is a catch phrase used for rugby league, just like “the game they play in heaven” for rugby union and “the beautiful game” for soccer.
Don’t know what they use for afl but they do try and push the whole ‘ only australian indiginous game”
Redb said | August 28th 2009 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Well at least in AFL’s case it’s true!
Actually we prefer the Great Australian game.
Too good to let that one by
Redb
Sim0n said | May 8th 2011 @ 4:23pm | Report comment
What’s wrong with both of them at all? AFL may well look like the favourite game at the moment, but there is one or EVEN two things things the game of NRL out – does the game of AFL.
How many people get hurt when they play NRL compared to AFL? I’d say AFL has the higher number for sure!
Also, which of the two games has a more fair yearly fixture / draw? Looking at this most recent topic; every team plays all other teams twice in NRL but AFL shifts to a draw from the bucket principal as to who you need to play every year twice or only once!
Steve Kaless said | August 28th 2009 @ 11:41pm | Report comment
Robbos,
I was merely pointing out that while a spectacular goal can have people proclaiming football as “the beautiful game”, so can a can a spectacular try have the fans of the rugby codes have them reaching for their catch phrases and an Aussie Rules goal or mark also wins people over.
Your point about Gould’s piece being hype to whip up the masses is probably right. I’ll admit I didn’t read it (probably for that stated reason), hence it wasn’t referred to.
JF said | August 28th 2009 @ 8:55am | Report comment
“Hen pecked ‘men’ choosing to spend their weekends wandering around large shopping malls with their partners looking for cushions and crockery and the many variations of the Stepford Husband is what will kill sporting clubs.”
- Great stuff Steve !
Pippinu said | August 28th 2009 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Yeh – great line – agree with most, terrific piece.
Robbos
not sure what your problem is exactly – Steve’s reference to the greatest game of all was more for a bit of comic relief, a reminder to us as to who the author is, and that we are all subject to human frailties.
But I do believe that a bit of a consensus is emerging in the Roar:
League = the greatest game of all
Rugby = the game they play in heaven
Australian Football = the Great Australian game
Soccer = the World Game
There – who could possibly argue with that?
Robbos said | August 28th 2009 @ 10:02am | Report comment
No problem Pip. Just getting in abit of comic relief in between work.
Brett McKay said | August 28th 2009 @ 9:17am | Report comment
Steve, I agree with almost everything here, AND this is a great piece of writing…
simonjzw said | August 28th 2009 @ 9:19am | Report comment
What is it about football that creates so much passion? (and when I use the term football I’m using it in the generic sense – an out door team game played in mostly winter that involves kicking a ball for some of the time).
Wherever in the world you are people go crazy over the predominant code – in Europe, Asia, South America and greater Africa that code is Soccer, in the USA it’s Gridiron, in New Zealand and South Africa it’s Rugby Union, in Ireland it’s Gaelic Football and here in Australia it’s the AFL & NRL (with Rugby Union and Soccer alsom showing strong support).
Sure we like our cricket, baseball, tennis, swimming, athletics etc.
But we LOVE our football… why is it so?
whiskeymac said | August 28th 2009 @ 9:20am | Report comment
yup good article. well reasoned and good examples and balanced. nice one.
onside said | August 28th 2009 @ 9:27am | Report comment
But the next rugby Super franchise has been given to Western Sydney ,
instead of Melbourne , to offset the proposed new AFL team.Coincidence?
TammyS said | August 28th 2009 @ 9:50am | Report comment
I thought they give it to melbourne?
onside said | August 28th 2009 @ 10:54am | Report comment
Melbourne has been defrocked.Western Sydney has the nod.
Pippinu said | August 28th 2009 @ 11:10am | Report comment
The ARU has awarded the license to a Sydney-based consortium:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25990737-5015651,00.html
I don’t think that means that the team will now be based in West Sydney – althought this article is silent on that point.
AndyRoo said | August 28th 2009 @ 11:16am | Report comment
The name of their bid has the words Vic in it
it will be based out of Melbourne….but without the VRU support.
Michael C said | August 28th 2009 @ 9:50am | Report comment
re the battle for juniors -
it needn’t so much be the ‘hen pecked men’, but, certain codes have had cause for concern with ‘hen pecked kids’, apparently over protective mums and the whole (contrived or otherwise) “soccer mum”, seemingly sending her only child or only son to a ‘safer option’ sport.
How true or otherwise that is?
Smaller family units? More later age marriages, and many more late age parents with 1 or 2 child families.
These sorts of demography changes can see attitudes change. Apart from anything, mum and day as older age parents are going to struggle to ‘lead by example’, compared to a 20 something yr old dad who might have 10 years of playing left in him for his oldest kids to witness.
To me, I thought this WAS an area where there’s been some real change that has required actions within sports. (see part 2)
Allen said | August 28th 2009 @ 10:14am | Report comment
Great read!
NEWSFLASH:
Dimetriou, Gallop, O’Neill and Buckley hold unprecidented joint press conference to put an end to the code war and declare a new war against masterchef, fair weather fans and fat kids!
AndyRoo said | August 28th 2009 @ 10:23am | Report comment
Actually there are quite a few cross code ventures that are aimed at increasing participation and fitness.
Michael C said | August 28th 2009 @ 10:36am | Report comment
AFL, Netball and Cricket have been working an unholy alliance – - on that 1Seven campaign, (Move well, Eat well).