Springboks need to be off their game for a Wallaby win
By James Mortimer, 29 Aug 2009 James Mortimer is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- South Africa Springboks news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news
Two very different sides comes into Perth: the Springboks making a deserved amount of noise, the Wallabies sneaking in trying to avoid any attention whatsoever.
Luckily for the home team, other events have taken some attention away from this clash.
For Australian rugby, there have been the final permutations of the Lote Tuqiri affair, and the early stirrings that the Victorian Rugby Union may be completely overlooked for the Melbourne Super 15 bid.
In Subiaco itself, many regard the flagship clash over the weekend to be Friday night’s AFL clash between the West Coast Eagles and Richmond.
While this may seem unfair, no local media like to give much attention when one of their teams is due to lose, and most parties, from the fans to the bookmakers to most experts, believe it a certainty that Australia will fall to their fourth consecutive loss, something that has not occurred since 2005.
It would also be Robbie Dean’s ninth defeat, making his winning percentage worse than any other Australian coach (John Connelly, Eddie Jones, Rod McQueen or Greg Smith) in the professional era.
For their opponents, one cannot help but feel that they are in a special place, as they look to win their third Tri Nations title and cement what has already been a vintage year.
Peter De Villiers has rolled into town with a confidence that would be infuriating, if it were not for the fact that he has the troops and the record to back it up.
While purists of the north will try to point out that the South Africans were not as impressive against their Lions as they have been against their Tri Nations opponents, history books remember only results.
The Springboks are full strength, with so much class that returning World Cup winner Schalk Burger cannot force his way into the team, and that outstanding full back Frans Steyn has made way for Ruan Pienaar.
While some believe that the son of Gysie is a contentious selection, Pienaar is highly regarded for his rugby nous and while he may not possess the thundering boot of Steyn, he brings far more balance to a solid, if not widely unused backline.
Steyn’s selection was always in doubt regardless, considering his move to Racing in France.
The South Africans have initiated that the All Blacks and Wallabies are playing catch up and are emulating the World Cup holders, and while this is a matter of opinion, their style – labelled by some as a detriment to the entertainment value of the game – is a winning one.
Most importantly, they are fresh and confident (too much so?)
While they may not know how to exactly win a match via an attacking approach, they have the fine art of preventing their opposition from doing so down to a tee.
Add to this the final touch of knowing that certain aspects of their game, such as their lineout, are untouchable, and it will take a titanic improvement across the board for the Wallabies to win.
One doesn’t want to usher consistent pessimism unto Australia, and there are some positives.
Their defence has been sound, and they still have class in key positions. They have also shown within the last 12 months that they can compete at the highest level.
They performed a clean sweep in their early season home tests (Barbarians, France and Italy back to back), and lest we forget evidenced a 2-1 record against South Africa last year. They also have beaten the All Blacks in four straight first halves, but unfortunately comprehensively lost the second stanzas.
This is the Wallabies’ problem.
They are lacking the mental fortitude to win against top class opposition, and unfortunately for them, the pedigree of South Africa is further than that of their traditional black clad foes.
The same black clad demons that inflicted a tremendous amount of physical and mental anguish on the Wallabies; that a mere week may not be enough to heal.
Add to this the loss of their most experienced lineout forward, Nathan Sharpe, and their best performed back of the 2009 Test series, Berrick Barnes, and it shows that this match may even be beyond the classic fighting Australian spirit.
All in all, the Springboks will need to be off their game for the Wallabies to win this one.
Or the key men for Australia, mainstays like George Smith, Rocky Elsom and Matt Giteau, will need to put in mammoth performances to record their first win in two months.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (27)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (18)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies

ohtani's jacket said | August 29th 2009 @ 2:30am | Report comment
How about some late night optimism?
Despite the fact that Robbie Deans refuses to change a losing side, they must surely be due for a win. Giteau can’t have four bad games in a row, can he? Deans can’t be that bad a coach, can he?
The Boks are usually ugly as sin in Australia, despite all of Australia’s injuries they’ve got to have a home win in them somewhere. As far as I’m aware, the only time the Wallabies went winless at home in the Tri-Nations was in 2005 during their seven Test losing streak.
They need to take the attitude that they’ve only had one home loss and by a single point. And show some fight.
Armchair-critic said | August 29th 2009 @ 8:39am | Report comment
I don’t think it would be the correct move to be making more changes than have already been made
From the side that competed the first TN game in auckland there have already been changes made (admittedly most through injury) at 3, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15. That is almost half the run on side so to be calling for more changes seems to be asking abit much of a side that already lacks continuity
Knives Out said | August 29th 2009 @ 4:41am | Report comment
I’m going to go out on a limb here, well.. to an extent, anyway. SA hasn’t played in a while, Australia are hurting and should be furious and I like the look of AAC and Cross as penetrating midfield runners. I think Australia will win and pick up a few tries. I’m not going to bet on that, however.
pothale said | August 29th 2009 @ 6:03am | Report comment
And perversely I am. If I find the right odds.
Must call on my friend, Mr Paddy Power, to check….
pothale said | August 29th 2009 @ 6:14am | Report comment
Hmmm match odds were pretty poor, considering the Wallabies recent form. So nix to that.
However, couldn’t resist the urge to back the chance of a couple of tries being scored. Messrs Habana and Giteau will have my undivided attention and support tomorrow to cross the line first.
Knives Out said | August 29th 2009 @ 7:22am | Report comment
I noted that Australia was 11/8. Not great but worth a punt with an accumulator. Here’s my nap: Arsenal (5/2), Australia (6/4), Wolves (11/10), Stoke v Sunderland DRAW (21/10), Tottenham (1/3) & Rotherham (19/20). A tenner brings back 1500 knicker. However, SA might well smash the pants off Australia and the day is over before it has even begun.
pothale said | August 29th 2009 @ 7:52am | Report comment
11/8? Jaysus – I could only get 5/4.
That’s a heft acc, KO. Arsenal – yeah possibly. Man U are patchy. Wolves – ok. I reckon Sunderland might be on a bit of a whirl and could take that – but the away form has to be tested. Spurs will break a 50 year record if they win tomorrow so that’s a sparkle. Rotherham – don’t have a clue.
Still it’s a good tenner’s punt.
I did the same amount on either Giteau or Habana doing the needful first. 14s on Matt and 9s on Habana. It’ll add nicely to the summer pot, if it comes through. Shrug of the shoulders if not.
Looking forward to the morning. Down to the local for the full Irish, then sit back and enjoy the game.
Knives Out said | August 29th 2009 @ 8:50am | Report comment
I have a friend down the pub (Good ol’ Patricks) who is a top, top forensic guy at the Metropolitan Po Po. Anyway, he used to be a bookmaker and he is always quids in. He really does know his stuff. His biggest tip of the season is Rotherham.
Giteau isn’t a bad call for first try scorer, but I gave up on specific rugby bets a long time ago (Around WC 07, I think). The money is always there to be made on the handicap.
pothale said | August 29th 2009 @ 9:02am | Report comment
Hmmm…. he said getting impressed and interested in the creds of the Top Cop Tipper…. what’s he tipping Rotherham for? Topping League Two/promotion?
Has he any other tips?
Knives Out said | August 29th 2009 @ 7:36pm | Report comment
Promotion as well as weekly wins. They did very well last season despite a points deduction.
Every week he and his friend put a tenner on Lampard as 1st scorer. They won £700 from that last season.
GPR-SA said | August 29th 2009 @ 6:30am | Report comment
Nice article – with some honest opinions about the Boks thrown in. Always nice to hear reasonable fair comment.
My head says SA are bound to win – yet this is the first leg of the road trip for the Boks and we all know how weak they are away from home in Australasia. I think that despite all the pessimism, the Wallabies have the ability to win and I am not writing them off. Agree with KO about AAC and Coss – expect to see some tries there! I think we will see more running rugby in this match than one is expecting. Pienaar at FB also suggests that the Boks have another plan afoot.
Of course I would love SA to clinch the 3N, but I think it would be fantastic for the series if the Wallabies win. It would keep the competition alive – it would boost the confidence of the Wallabies ( I don’t believe they deserve all the criticism and lowly current position) making the AB match in NZ a much more interesting prospect, it would hopefully keep the Boks “humble”, but above all it would give all the anti-Bok squad something to crow about for a day and and an end!
So Go Wallabies – Ozzie, Ozzie Oi oi Oi
Knives Out said | August 29th 2009 @ 7:24am | Report comment
Interesting stat for tomorrow: SA has 8 players in the starting xv with 50+ caps whereas Australia only has 2.
G-Rilla said | August 29th 2009 @ 8:11am | Report comment
Tomorrow is going to be an interesting encounter.
Australia with their back against the wall is always a danger. My gut says SA, yet with no real conviction.
The Boks have been playing percentage rugby, and have a tight game plan. Yet, we do look extremely weak when spread wide. The text book lines that Australia and AB run, when they click, can be unstoppable at times.
I have always thought of Pienaar as a 9 or 15, so be interesting to see if he fills the playmaker tag.
Good luck to the guys on the other side of the pond, should be a great game tomorrow. Win or lose I think this may be the game to set the tri-nations alight.
Who Needs Melon said | August 29th 2009 @ 8:23am | Report comment
Jeez here we go again. The game is approaching and we all start to talk like maybe this is one we should win. One we expect to win. Despite all signs pointing to the opposite.
I’m DESPERATELY HOPING that we can pull a rabbit out of the hat, that Giteau doesn’t have his 4th bad game in a row, that some of the new combinations fire, that we’re p*d off enough to play with some fire in the belly, etc… and WIN.
Not EXPECTING it though.
pothale said | August 29th 2009 @ 8:50am | Report comment
It’s okay Melon. I’ve borrowed Mrs Pothale’s crystal ball (hasn’t been wrong so far this 3N), and it tells me the men in yellow will win a mighty contest tomorrow.
Sounds like you can break out the drinks now. Mine’s a pint of whatever you’re having.
craigb said | August 29th 2009 @ 11:34am | Report comment
thats GOLD Pothale! – not yellow
Who Needs Melon said | August 29th 2009 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Freudian slip perhaps.
Knives Out said | August 29th 2009 @ 7:38pm | Report comment
That reminds me of when a British reporter turned up for a weeks exclusive training with the Springboks. He excitedly told the gathering South Africans that he had bought a special gumshield in the Bok colours – green and yellow. Unfortunately Mark Andrews wasn’t too pleased to hear this school boy mistake, and more unfortunately the poor reporter had been paired up with Andrews for tackle practice.
sheek said | August 29th 2009 @ 9:14am | Report comment
I’m not expecting a Wallabies win. But typically of the Aussies, they might just pull out a win when desperation is all around.
This is an uninspiring Wallabies team. While there are some promising signs, collectively the team leaves me luke-warm in appreciation.
In any case, a Wallaby victory won’t change the many problems facing the team & the game in Australia. If anything, it’ll only temporarily mask those failings.
Australian rugby is like space travel. The problems we find with the game today may have started over 10 years ago. Even if we started to correct the problems today, it might take another 10 years before we see the benefits.
So the longer we continue to pretend everything is okay with Australian rugby, the longer it will take for us to climb out of the hole we find ourselves in.