Clueless Wallabies lose again
By Jim Morton, 30 Aug 2009
- Tagged:
- Bryan Habana, John Smit, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
269 Have your say
Related coverage
A clueless Australia has slumped to a record 32-25 Tri-Nations loss to South Africa on home soil to virtually hand the Springboks the 2009 Tri-Nations title.
The Wallabies were blown away from the opening whistle at Subiaco Oval as they suffered a fourth straight loss this series, and a sixth successive Tri-Nations defeat dating back to last August.
The rampant world champions ran in four tries for a bonus point which puts them nine points clear of New Zealand with two matches each to play.
Australia scored two consolation tries to Matt Giteau and Lachie Turner in the last five minutes to add some respectability to the scoreline but nothing could hide the fact they were completely outmuscled and outplayed.
The unbeaten Springboks shelved their effective kick-chase game to run the ball and dominate the first half with quick phase play and set up their fourth straight win with a 22-6 halftime lead.
South Africa were simply too quick, too strong, too smart and far more precise and clinical than the home team.
By contrast the Wallabies willing game was mistake-ridden, particularly at the key moments inside both 22s.
A solid scrummaging effort – reaping three penalties – was well and truly offset by more turmoil in the lineouts.
Three times Australia paid dearly for poor throws to the back within a five minute period early in the second half after a jinking Giteau try had put them back into the contest at 22-13 down.
Hooker Stephen Moore paid the price for two bad throws which eventually resulted in Bryan Habana crossing for his second try and the Springboks securing a four-try bonus point.
It gave them a 16-point advantage and sealed just their third win from 17 matches in Australia since the Tri-Nations kicked off in 1996.
Their 32 points was their biggest score away to the Wallabies, eclipsing the 28-9 win in 1921.
Rookie fullback James O’Connor stood up to the pressure of the challenge while Rocky Elsom and Benn Robinson were also strong for Australia and replacement five-eighth Quade Cooper added spark in the last 15 minutes.
Springboks halfback Fourie du Preeze, who opened the scoring by taking a quick tap and catching Luke Burgess napping, was a deserved man of the match.
No.8 Richard Brown set the tone for the Wallabies by dropping South Africa’s first kick over the touch line. From the lineout, centre Jean de Villiers broke the defensive line.
The Springboks shot to a 12-0 lead after just 10 minutes when Jaque Fourie crossed untouched after Giteau was terribly exposed in defence from a midfield scrum.
Making matters worse for the Australians, five-eighth Giteau also missed two penalty goal attempts before finally landing one in the 28th minute for a 15-3 deficit.
Giteau finished with a personal haul of 20 points but the Australian attack looked more dangerous when he moved to inside centre and the elusive Cooper was injected into the playmaking role.
South Africa need one more point on the competition table to ensure they win the Tri-Nations but it will take a gargantuan effort by the All Blacks to sneak to a fifth straight title.
Wallabies coach Robbie Deans denied he was surprised by the Springboks’ effective change of tactics.
“They’ve always been a side that’s been capable of playing any which way they choose but their first priority is to win the Tri-Nations and they have done it and they have done it convincingly,” he said.
Deans defended some of his team’s basic errors due to the pressure brought onto to them by South Africa.
“Springboks don’t make it easy … and they punish you when you turn it over.”
Deans was particularly upset the Wallabies conceded two tries from scrums and blamed poor talk in defence.
“It shouldn’t happen.”
While Deans was disturbed at conceding the tries to Fourie and Habana’s second, both from Du Preeze passes after scooting off the scrum, the Springboks were baffled why they were often penalised at the set piece.
Captain John Smit described the treatment they received from referee Bryce Lawrence, who awarded Australia 15 to just four for the Spiringboks, as “bizarre”.
“It was a bit of a lottery out there to be honest and sadly the numbers weren’t coming up for us,” Smit said.
© AAP 2012Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Bryan Habana, John Smit, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies

August 30th 2009 @ 8:19am
Darryl said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:19am | Report comment
Sack Deans and employ and Australian who knows how to inspire Australians.
Is Spiro finally going to have the courage to criticise him this week?
August 30th 2009 @ 8:20am
bruski said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:20am | Report comment
I think that we have finally hit the bottom, how long are we going to stay there? Last night showed a few things I think.
1. Brown needs to go back to club ruby and work on his skills, not being able to catch a ball above the head is shocking.
2. Genia is a better half than Burgess but he is still a little raw and inexperienced so perhaps we stick with him for the rest of the series and European tour or ear-mark him for the test team next season and not wreck him in a loosing team.
3. Alexander was very good.
4. We need a hooker that can throw!!! Perhaps we should look to club rugby.
5. Robinson is a good prop but we need some intimidation out there. Bring Kepu in!!!
I think all our problems are in the forwards and half, if we get that right we will win everything in front of us. Look at all the great teams, they have a intimidating big bad forward pack. Our boys are just too clean, we need a lot of mongrel, what i would give to have a Botha in our pack!!
As it stands now, I think we have to start looking to next year, find some boys from club rugby and bring them on, particularly in the end of season trip.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:26am
sheek said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Bruski,
Australian rugby will continue to remain at the bottom while enough people continue to argue everything is okay with our domestic structural set-up. Mediocre is as mediocre does.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:47am
QC said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:47am | Report comment
And Australia think they deserve a fifth Super team.
Yeah right!!!
August 30th 2009 @ 3:04pm
couchnorm said | August 30th 2009 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
Yes we do. Just don’t let the ARU have anything to do with it.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:33am
anopinion said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:33am | Report comment
Well said, I agree with all your points bar one. At this level players do not get intimidated. Not one player on the field had a moment of fear. Kepu wold do well but I doubt seriously if the opposition would be worried who they had to face. The Wallaby scrum had the power last night, hope they work on the wheel for next week. How often did we drive them backwards to find they had they advantage due to superior wheeling tactics?
August 30th 2009 @ 8:41am
bruski said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:41am | Report comment
I agree anopinion, let me put it an other way. We need a pack that is going to go out and smash the other pack, we need some boys that are going to make the other team hang on for dear life. Raw boned aggression is a fundamental in Rugby and we lack that.
The boks do it well, they have got some big boys who do their jobs really well and that is it. We don’t need tight five players that are great athletes, we need tight five players who like the tight battle and will make their opposite number aware of their presence.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:55am
anopinion said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Agree. Where are we going to find them though? The Brissy comp? Has already been cleaned out of much of its talent. Well done to those clubs that keep producing good players despite losing many good players and doing so on a budget provided by selling hamburgers and pies. The Sydney comp? Has been forced to cop similar treatment to Brissy I expect.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:23am
QC said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:23am | Report comment
The Wallabies were so incompetent it was hysterical, the Boks played very well but once again I have to ask the question Were they made to look good because of the oppositions ineptness?
The first try to the Boks was so ridiculously easy Giteau was made to look like an absolute chump. Their 4th was so predictable to everyone bar the Wallabies seriously what is up with this team?
It was clear with the game in the bag the Boks took their foot off the throat and the last twoAustralian tries were rather sympathetic if you ask me.
I would put 20 on Fiji to score at least two tries against this Wallabies outfit at the moment.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:31am
reds fan said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:31am | Report comment
weeelllll…….. is it now OK to start asking questions of Deans? This team has now had all of its confidence belted out of it. I seriously felt like i was watching my hapless Reds. These are dark days. When I show up at Suncorp stadium next week I bloody well better see some different selections!
August 30th 2009 @ 8:41am
anopinion said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Can we agree Brown should drop out of the squad? Burgess to the bench. Ashley Cooper back to a position he can play. (There is no such thing as a utility player at this level, players have to have vast experience in the position they are playing)
August 30th 2009 @ 8:45am
reds fan said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:45am | Report comment
Yeah Brown must be dropped. Along with Burgess, Gits, Turner… even Rocky had a shocker. Horwill was dodgy.
I sat in stunned silence, mouth agape…. could not believe what I was seeing.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:54am
Harry said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:54am | Report comment
I sat with lots of bundy and coke RF.
August 30th 2009 @ 10:09am
Benny said | August 30th 2009 @ 10:09am | Report comment
Aac let in 3 tries – how was he not the worst on the field?
August 30th 2009 @ 11:00am
anopinion said | August 30th 2009 @ 11:00am | Report comment
Firstly did he let in those tries or did Giteau? Depends on what defense they were running on each occasion.
Secondly AAC playing out of position. Notice the scrum wheel and Smith getting taken out illegally, therefore Gits stays in to take his opposite and AAC slides. He is not used to reading the cues from that position. Had he played in his usual position he would not have leaked as many points.
August 30th 2009 @ 12:30pm
John allyne said | August 30th 2009 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
Why not Gits to 1/2, Barns 5/8, Carter 12, A.Cooper 13,Hynes 14 Turner, 11,
August 30th 2009 @ 8:50am
Harry said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Strongly agree RF – the parallels to the downward slide of the Reds are alarming in Deans behaviour.
Its clear morale and confidence is low in camp Wallaby. Yet the “playing group” are all still very focused on trousering 12 grand a week for performing at this sub-standard level.
There is nothing to lose Robbie, swing the axe … I’d drop Hynes, O’Conner, Burgess, Brown, Horwill and Moore from the starting lineup.
Assuming Barnes is back … Cooper, Turner, AAC, Barnes, Mitchell, Gits, Genia, Palu (is he carrying an injury? Anyway, its clear from the games against France that Brown does NOT belong at this level), Elsom, Waugh, Caldwell, Mumm, Alexander, TPN, Robinson. Smith, Horwill, Moore on the bench to the bench to hopefully show some impact/fire when they come on
Will still probably lose but this is essentially the NSW pack of 08 (minus big Al Baxter and more crucially, Vickerman) that was the best in the S14 that year and performed pretty well this year (won all 3 games in SA for instance).
Please don’t just go on playing the same team week after week, losing with insipid performances week after week … next week I will expect a loss, just so long as they go out and have a go, rather then the rubbish that was last night.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:57am
reds fan said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Harry I’d still go with Hynes. Turner has shown nothing, and Mitchell is a mistake waitning to happen. Hynes is still warming after injury interrupted his year.
But talking about wingers is missing the real issue. The real issue is the pack and leadership at the scrum base. I would love to have Caldwell but he is crook apparently. And I’m sorry but P.Waugh is not good enough at test level and it has been shown. I remember well a couple of incidents where he has been brushed of an thrown around like a small boy.
But I do agree that Smith is not at his best. None of the team are. Gits looked much better playing at 12. That try from Coopers pass was vintage Gits. I would love to see more of it next week.
August 30th 2009 @ 8:51am
joeb said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:51am | Report comment
What questions of Deans did you have in mind reds fan?
August 30th 2009 @ 8:57am
sheek said | August 30th 2009 @ 8:57am | Report comment
reds fans,
Firstly we praise the Wallas for scoring two late tries. Now we question the coach???
Hello……….
The problems of the Wallas go far beyond the coach. We’re not very smart in our analysis, we keep looking in the wrong places, which is bound to ensure we remain mediocre.
August 30th 2009 @ 9:00am
reds fan said | August 30th 2009 @ 9:00am | Report comment
I agree. It is but one part of the problem.
The question I would ask, is what the F*** are you doing on the training paddock??? What strategy are you setting for the boys?? Why do you insist in selecting guys that fail to perform???
It yes it so much about what is going on between the ears. The Wallabies are playing very dumb… thats why they remind me so much of the Reds!
August 30th 2009 @ 9:07am
sheek said | August 30th 2009 @ 9:07am | Report comment
Now you might have an appreciation of the world occupied by Irish & Scottish rugby fans. They have a very small pool to select from, & have little option but to often continue selecting the same under-performing players.
Ask Deans all the questions you want. The sad truth is, he doesn’t have a great deal to work with at present. His alternate options are severely limited.
August 30th 2009 @ 9:11am
reds fan said | August 30th 2009 @ 9:11am | Report comment
and i can cope with that sheek. However I would like to see him trial some other players so we are sure that the underperforming bunch we are selecting are the best underperforming bunch.
some guys who have been ok at super rugby level might just lift on bigger stage. Its a chance we have to take!
August 30th 2009 @ 11:40am
Dean Pantio said | August 30th 2009 @ 11:40am | Report comment
You don’t think that Deans is well aware of the capabilities of those outside of the squad? The gap between club and S14 is huge. The gap between S14 and Test is massive. Many, many players can shine at club or S14 level and not make the step up.
The problem is cattle – Robbie Deans doesn’t have the depth.
No doubt if he started taking to the squad with the chainsaw after every match, people would whine and bitch about the lack of time players get to develop familiarity and playing time together. They’d cry about the effect it had on morale.
August 30th 2009 @ 2:30pm
Jolly Jupes said | August 30th 2009 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
Why are the options limited? Vickerman let go, Al Campbell, Hugh McMennimen and others allowed early releases from their contracts (other words not required – who decides this ARU?); In the histroy of Australian rugby we have always lost players to league and this has been replaced in the last 25 years by Europe/Japan. That said we have 4 professional provinces to choose from (Traditionally we used to only have QLD and NSW). Ireland only has 4 and so does Wales and they have both won the six nations in last 2 years, Scotland has only 2 and this season Italy will have 2. Were we offering the small player pool excuse for Eddie in 2005? If it is smaller now why? The ARU is forcing the provinces to reduce their squad size to help the 5th team – again who makes these decisions? The answer is always the same
August 30th 2009 @ 6:23pm
fred said | August 30th 2009 @ 6:23pm | Report comment
2 late tries botha and smit having showers planning their evening.
please——–
August 30th 2009 @ 9:06am
Harry said | August 30th 2009 @ 9:06am | Report comment
Shame about Caldwell … and am I right in thinking the young Brumbies bloke, Kimlin, is crook as well? We need someone, anyone, who at least is going to show some fire up front as we are just been smashed week after week in this years 3N. Accept P. Waugh’s limitations but as a one off selection I think its worth it, he has a good record against SA as well and will go out and play with fire.
RF my real objection to Hynes is he was guilty of “lacking commitment” a few times last night – watch the tape – so for that alone has to go.
But shake it up! If Barnes is fit he starts at 10, if not Barnes then Cooper. Gits to 12.
August 30th 2009 @ 9:07am
reds fan said | August 30th 2009 @ 9:07am | Report comment
I’ll have to find a replay and watch what Hynes got up to… probably had my head buried in my hands…
August 30th 2009 @ 9:52am
Hansie said | August 30th 2009 @ 9:52am | Report comment
Deans’ performance as coach has to come into question. Two of the Bok tries were due to poor defensive alignment and confusion in the Australian backs. If the team is confused as to its defensive pattern then there must be problems with the coaching. Burgess and Brown must be dropped, and Barnes and Giteau have to swap jumpers.
August 30th 2009 @ 11:02am
anopinion said | August 30th 2009 @ 11:02am | Report comment
Give Gits some time with a number 9 who can pass and an in centre who is an in centre. Then we can tell if he can play ten. Until then it is pointless to move him.
August 30th 2009 @ 2:12pm
Dexter William said | August 30th 2009 @ 2:12pm | Report comment
The reason to move Gits is simply:
1) He is probably the best 12 we will have in the next few years.
2) He is now playing out of position and can only hope to be a competent 10.
3) We have other players such as Barnes and Cooper (and even Beal) who can with some effort be made a competent 10.
Let’s not waste Gits talent at 12 to be playing 10 is the short answer. He is best thing since Tim Horan.
August 30th 2009 @ 9:54am
blinq said | August 30th 2009 @ 9:54am | Report comment
Why am I no surprise though Wallabies did show great fighting spirit but they could have done better by keeping up with the game’s passion once. Over all it was a great game to watch, we have a lot of fun watching it. Don’t worry guys there are always next time, good game Wallabies.
August 30th 2009 @ 10:00am
ExpatSin said | August 30th 2009 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Hey! all you armchair coaches. You’re all missing the important first question. You are all suggesting changes, many for very valid reasons. Didn’t you (the Aussie rugby public) pay a huge amount to get the “best” coach in the world? Should he not have realized all of what all your wannbe coaches are seeing, long before you did?????????????????? How can Deans expect any body to continue to accept “we are improving and are coming right”. Oz rugby is not getting better, in fact it’s descending into chaos. Not good for the sport.
August 30th 2009 @ 6:19pm
fred said | August 30th 2009 @ 6:19pm | Report comment
ageed getting worse
August 31st 2009 @ 7:31am
Ray said | August 31st 2009 @ 7:31am | Report comment
The answer, my dear union following comrades. is quite simple. The Kiwi’s have recently realised it, and hopefully the Aussies will too – it is imperative to have a stable, solid and dependable domestic competition. Taking into consideration that the Currie Cup is the life blood of Saffa rugby, and the Air New Zealand Cup feeds the S14 and AB’s, the Wallabies are actually an amazing success. You guys are consistently number 2 or 3 in the world and you have no domestic game worth mentioning. I say bravo for just being where you are on the world stage.
If the Aussies were to invest as heavily in Union as they do in league or rules, I think that they would be a force like no other. Sort out the grass roots stuff first, then reap the rewards that flow up. Like somebody mentioned above, who does Deans replace these players with?? What options does that man really have?/
August 30th 2009 @ 10:12am
Shahsan said | August 30th 2009 @ 10:12am | Report comment
So which game was better: last night’s try-fest, or the previous week’s one-try penalty-fest?
Are we still going to blame the laws of the game and the ref? Or just admit that this Wallabies team and the All Blacks are the worst they have ever been at the same time, and give South Africa the credit they are due?
Australia blinked first and played the first up and under. South Africa kept it in hand and kicked only for clearance, the conventional way.
As I’ve said before, this is a pretty good Spirngboks team, one of the ir best and they showed they can play it any way they want to and still win. Stop bleating on about changing the laws.
There are many ways to win a rugby game. Don’t change the laws of teh game to the point that there is really only one and a half (like some other copycat game i know).
August 30th 2009 @ 10:16am
AussieWallaby said | August 30th 2009 @ 10:16am | Report comment
I have no further comments….. Richard Brown OFF OFF OFF
August 30th 2009 @ 11:05am
anopinion said | August 30th 2009 @ 11:05am | Report comment
He should go back to his Quokka farm and practice catching not kicking them.
August 30th 2009 @ 2:32pm
Jolly Jupes said | August 30th 2009 @ 2:32pm | Report comment
Some humour at last – Love it