Deans makes changes to Wallabies on principle
By Jim Morton, 2 Sep 2009
- Tagged:
- Adam Ashley-Cooper, Ben Alexander, Benn Robinson, Berrick Barnes, David Pocock, Drew Mitchell, George Smit, James Horwill, James OConnor, Lachie Turner, Mark Chisholm, Matt Giteau, robbie deans, Rocky Elsom, Rugby Union, Tatafu Polota-Nau, Tri Nations, wallabies, Will Genia
Robbie Deans has shown a surprise ruthless streak in banking on generation next opening the winless Wallabies’ Tri-Nations account.
In a further glimpse into the future, Deans wielded the axe for five changes to Australia’s starting XV and two more on the bench in a bid to “chase solutions” against South Africa on Saturday night.
While the injections of rookie halfback Will Genia and the return of Berrick Barnes to the No.12 jersey were expected in the backline, all were caught off guard by the promotions of Tatafu Polota-Nau and David Pocock to the starting pack.
Winger Peter Hynes also surprisingly paid the price along with Luke Burgess, Ryan Cross, Stephen Moore and Richard Brown from the 32-25 loss to the Springboks in Perth.
Veteran tighthead prop Al Baxter was cut from the squad completely and told to work his way back from clubland while second-row stalwart Nathan Sharpe was given extra time to recover from a shoulder problem all but fixed.
Coach Deans, searching for a first Tri-Nations win in 12 months after six straight losses, defended the changes, which also included punting on Western Force loosehead Pek Cowan to fill in at tighthead if Beast Mtawarira savages Ben Alexander.
“We tend to approach it from a squad perspective,” he said on Tuesday.
“This is by no means tokenism nor is it (wielding) a stick.
“Some of these blokes getting their first start have earned their right, it’s not something out of the ordinary, they have shown already (they are capable).
“It also shows there are no guarantees for the future.”
With the 2011 World Cup still more than two years away, Deans has shown extra faith now in the youngsters who are expected to feature prominently then.
After losing to the world’s two leading rugby nations twice each in the last five weeks, he admitted the selectors were looking for new “points of difference” to bring success at Suncorp Stadium.
“Because to go harder just doesn’t cover it,” Deans said. “We’ve chased some solutions and I guess the rest remains to be seen.”
One of the biggest “points of difference” appears to be Australia’s back-row composition with Pocock selected for his first Tri-Nations start and captain George Smith shifting to No.8 to replace the dumped Brown, who also missed out on the bench to Wycliff Palu.
The Western Force openside flanker grew up in Zimbabwe supporting South Africa and idolising Springbok No.8 Bob Skinstad before his family moved to Brisbane.
Deans described Pocock more as a blend of Smith and Phil Waugh and he’ll need to bring the best of both to help prevent the world champions getting the same quick phase ball they enjoyed at Subiaco Oval.
“We’ve got two blokes who are very good in that area so George can profit from the work of Poey,” the coach said. “If he drops a player, George will be on him quickly so there could be an opportunity there for us.”
Barnes (concussion) has returned in the No.12 jersey at inside centre despite calls for Matt Giteau to be moved from five-eighth to inside centre.
Deans, though, gave chuckling hints those wanting Giteau to run wider may be pleased come Saturday night.
“You will see them in both roles in the game,” he said. “We thought we’d keep the numbers the same so it doesn’t confuse them.”
In contrast, the unbeaten Springboks made just one injury-enforced change to their XV with winger Odwa Ndungane replacing JP Pietersen.
© AAP 2012WALLABIES:James O’Connor, Lachie Turner, Adam Ashley-Cooper, Berrick Barnes, Drew Mitchell, Matt Giteau, Will Genia, George Smith (capt), David Pocock, Rocky Elsom, Mark Chisholm, James Horwill, Ben Alexander, Tatafu Polota-Nau, Benn Robinson. Res: Stephen Moore, Pek Cowan, Dean Mumm, Wycliff Palu, Luke Burgess, Quade Cooper, Peter Hynes.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (42) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (1)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (1)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (9)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (18)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (75)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (110)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (21)
- Explore:
- Adam Ashley-Cooper, Ben Alexander, Benn Robinson, Berrick Barnes, David Pocock, Drew Mitchell, George Smit, James Horwill, James OConnor, Lachie Turner, Mark Chisholm, Matt Giteau, robbie deans, Rocky Elsom, Rugby Union, Tatafu Polota-Nau, Tri Nations, wallabies, Will Genia
September 3rd 2009 @ 8:38am
reds fan said | September 3rd 2009 @ 8:38am | Report comment
I’ve tipped every game correctly this year. Bok by 10. It will be a better Wallabies performance but they’ll fall short. just. followed by alot of talk about improvements. The game will be decided at the ruck.
September 3rd 2009 @ 9:44am
LeftArmSpinner said | September 3rd 2009 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Re Burgess, Deans has done the best thing for all concerned. The equation for Deans was probably: at teh start of the season and as the kitchen hotted up, Burgess is the incumbent, Genia, the next most likely, was injured and then given accimatisation time on the bench and in the meantime, Burgess’s given a chance to hold the fort and if possible, turn around his form/confidence. Deans has recognised that Burgess is made of stern stuff, even if he is struggling at the moment.
It would be short sighted to put genia on to start without some bench starts. it could damage him for good.
Added to this, let me quote Bob Dwyer, a very very experienced coach, who says that the fault in a passer-catcher partnership is with the catcher. They are not under the pressure (particularly a half back behind a beaten ruck) and needs to position himself taking all factors into account. the lazy wallabies forwards arriving late didnt help either.
Anyway, so all of this takes time and was probably postponed a week by Barnes untimely injury. Now, genia is fit, bench blooded and deserves his chance. Burgess gets some time out of the spot light and hopefully giteau is now at 12 and barnes has taken some lessons from larkham in how to run a back line. there is also the prospect that Burgess and barnes will link at the 9 and 10 for the tahs and form that understanding that could benefit wallabies for years to come. at the same time, genia and cooper will do the same for the Koalas.
put simply, it is a wholesale change at the core of the team, 9 and 10.
now, lets get serious and confrontational. The back row is not settled and worries me. So, radically, put Elsom at 8, for the long haul, put pocock at 7 and put mumm at 6. Captain will be anyone but Smith, Elsom, Barnes, Horwill, Giteau. Smith is tired and has many miles on the clock. he has been outplayed by both McCaw and Brussouw. His body language is that he doesnt want it that much any more. Drop him to the bench, for a game or two, and then see if the pips don’t squeak!!!!
September 3rd 2009 @ 10:04am
Justin said | September 3rd 2009 @ 10:04am | Report comment
LAS – Mumm and confrontational are like Superman and kryptonite!
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:11pm
Ben J said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:11pm | Report comment
LAS, like they say a mean big one will always beat a mean small one, Mumm at 6 will provide height and bulk, the Boks are capable of fielding a backrow which averages 1.94 cm if they select Burger, Smith and Spies. Brussow will obviously start but the backrow is a crucial area where the Wallabies have to get hard nuts in to counter the Bok rucking game. The scrum is not a major concern for the Boks as their 2 tries of first phase shows but they pride themselves on having the best backrow around at this stage and that combined with the lineouts is their heavy artillery. The fact that Deans has not learnt that a very tall backrow is crucial against the Boks defies belief.
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:17pm
Armchair-critic said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:17pm | Report comment
Mumm may be tall but that is about the extent of his contribution.
Pocock adds far more to the team than Mumm does IMO
September 3rd 2009 @ 10:13am
Sam Taulelei said | September 3rd 2009 @ 10:13am | Report comment
I agree with Reds Fan, SA will win and have now shown the Wallabies they can play a variety of styles. Looking at the Wallaby lineup it’s a team designed to keep the ball in hand rather than getting into an armwrestle and all of these changes have just created new combinations in too many areas as opposed to the one change enforced by injury on the Boks. The Wallabies will probably come out all guns firing and take an early lead. The Wallabies unresolved problem in the Tri Nations this year is maintaining a lead. When they’re under pressure they crack, their basic skills desert them, the error rate and indiscipline increases, they tire leaving holes in their defence and allow the opposition to chip away at their lead and pass them by. These problems unfortunately aren’t cured by just making personnel changes, as it’s a combination of technical, mental and cultural flaws because losing becomes as much a habit as winning. I saw the same thing happen with the All Blacks in 1998, no matter what they tried or who they brought in to shore up one area of their play that pressure of knowing that the opposition would always come back at you was their biggest handicap.
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:16pm
Ben J said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:16pm | Report comment
Sam, the Wallabies can’t maintain a lead because their backrow is unbalanced, an area which the Boks target with their rucking game. Pocock and Smith is too busy clearing the rucks against much bigger players thus Brussow is allowed to wreak havoc. If Smith is eigthman there will be a 14 cm difference between him and Pierre Spies. Guess where the linout ball is going? The Wallas have at most 3 lineout options, the Boks always have at least 4, with Burger on it is 5. The Wallabies are taking a knife to a gunfight.
September 3rd 2009 @ 11:52pm
Mick Gold Coast QLD said | September 3rd 2009 @ 11:52pm | Report comment
A good point well made, Ben J.
Smith is not a No 8 and 14 cm (5+ inches) height is too much to give away, particularly now when the tall blokes are also athletic and quick. Spies will also have the protection, and the distraction to the opposition, of the energetic Burger.
Our back row blokes don’t hunt together, nor do the locks. Watch the Springboks arrive and compare their old style, conventional “1 in, 2 in, 3 in” technique, the initial impact and the following momentum that gives them.
September 3rd 2009 @ 1:45pm
Rah Rah Rasputin said | September 3rd 2009 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
Sam,
I doubt the new combination will have a negative impact on the Wallabies. Smtih and Genia atleast have some form compared to Burgess and Brown who were drastically out of form and needed to be replaced; as much for the team as for the for themselves. I think the selections Deans have made really go to strengthening the spine of the team; 2, 8, 9, 10 and 15, being the players who touch the ball the most. Yes, TPN does tend to struggle come lineout and I think he will benefit from starting the game and not coming on in a pressure position. He is also powerful and dynamic ballcarriers, something I think the packs been missed with the exclusion of Palu. Barnes, whether he is first or second receiver, just makes Giteaus job that much easier.
As for Micthells selection, I think it is a little rough on Hynes.
September 3rd 2009 @ 4:35pm
Sam Taulelei said | September 3rd 2009 @ 4:35pm | Report comment
Rah
We won’t know until they play on Saturday if the changes work or don’t work. However when you have someone like Matfield jumping at 2 when TPN is throwing the ball in to one of three recognised jumpers, Horwill, Mumm and Elsom you realise the pressure and scrutiny that will be on the Wallaby lineout. SA can afford to double team Mumm in the middle and Elsom at the back and TPN’s accuracy regardless of whether he starts or not has been a work in progress since the dawn of time. When Anton Oliver started his career for the All Blacks he had the same flaws, great scrummager, mobile runner, strong defender but couldn’t hit the same target twice throwing in. SA will be sure to target that weakness and mess up the ball for Genia which in turn causes a ripple effect for the rest of the backline. Australia will try not to kick the ball out and keep the ball in hand more backing their increased mobility and speed to the loose ball with Pocock and Smith. I’m not convinced and Deans is gambling again by playing people out of their specialist postiions in order to fit someone else in.
September 3rd 2009 @ 2:05pm
reds fan said | September 3rd 2009 @ 2:05pm | Report comment
I wrote elsewhere that I think Gits is getting a big say in selections. He is continuing to say publicly that he wants to be the 10, and his mate from the Force is somehow displacing Hynes…
I will be watching with great interest exactly who runs the backline Saturday night… if its still Gits, then Deans probably feels obliged to give the “star” what he wants, and this might continue for sometime… if Barnes runs the game from 10, then we could be seeing the start of a long term shift. I’m just wondering which one of them Cooper will replace. Probably Judas Barnes, he’ll cop a hip knock, or a shoulder tweak, or head bump…. he needs to look after himself that one.
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:04pm
Ben J said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:04pm | Report comment
I think the Wallabies are just asking for trouble, According to Wikipedia Pocock is 1.83 m, Smith 1.80 and Elsom is the tall timber at 1.97. That is only an average of 1.86m.
Brussouw 1.81
Juan Smith 1.96
Pierre Spies 1.94
Average is 1.90m
If Burger comes on for Brussow the average height goes to 1.94. The Boks will either kick for lineouts the whole day or Australia must keep ball in hand for as long as possible.
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:12pm
Armchair-critic said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:12pm | Report comment
I think 3 jumpers is ample – front, middle, back
It does after all take 2 people to lift each jumper so there is not really much point in having too many
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:20pm
Ben J said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:20pm | Report comment
I agree in theory but against the Boks ample is not enough. 5 jumpers against 3 is just a mismatch. You have to be the world’s most accurate thrower to even have a 75% success rate. And that TPN is not.
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:34pm
Armchair-critic said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:34pm | Report comment
Haha yes that is true – will be a baptism of fire for him.
I fear that if his first throw goes wrong it could be a very very long night for him
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:41pm
AndyS said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:41pm | Report comment
Even worst when you are throwing against one great tall sod lifting another, which the ‘Boks can afford to do!
September 3rd 2009 @ 7:49pm
TommyM said | September 3rd 2009 @ 7:49pm | Report comment
If it really gets that bad, why don’t the Wallabies just have only 2 people in the lineout? The 2 fastest runners. Start one at the back and one halfway. Then they both sprint forward and TPN throws to either the middle or the front. Can’t work out any worse than in South Africa…