Socceroos are now Australia’s premier national team
By Adrian Musolino, 6 Sep 2009 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
264 Have your say
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- Wallabies news
- Cricket news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news

The Australian Socceroos' Mark Viduka kicks the ball in the Australia v Japan opening Group F match at the Soccer World Cup in Kaiserslautern, Germany, Monday, June 12, 2006. This is Australia's first World Cup finals appearance in 32 years. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
Despite their reality check overnight, the Socceroos, for so long the underachievers and forgotten Australian national team, are making a strong case for being the countries premier sporting entity, the most marketable and the biggest drawcard.
Since their long awaited World Cup qualification in 2005, they have threatened the domination of the Wallabies and Australian cricketers as the team that can best unite the country and as a powerful marketing force.
When you remember back to the days of limited matches against weak opponents in suburban stadiums, the Socceroos rise has been a remarkable one – a rise we often forget to reflect on post-Germany 2006.
What’s remarkable about this rise to prominence is the limitations on the Socceroos. With their principal stars plying their trade on the other side of the world, they have also been hamstrung by their deal with Fox Sports that limits their mainstream reach.
Yet Harry Kewell, Tim Cahill, Lucas Neill and co are now marketable entities the equal of Ricky Ponting and Michael Clark, fronting cereal and soft drink advertising campaigns, areas once out of reach for the round ball folk.
If they have not past the Wallabies and Australian cricketers in terms of appeal and value, they are certainly mounting a fierce challenge.
Before 2005, the Australian cricket team held this mantle and were relatively unchallenged.
But the unsporting attitudes that were fostered in the years of ruthless domination under the captaincy of Ricky Ponting have left a bitter taste for many.
In the wake of the Ashes defeat, for every fan that bemoaned poor selections, there was someone who, whether publicly or privately, took some pleasure in the loss.
Like an unchallenged Goliath, Australia had its years of domination and developed an arrogant, graceless manner in which they played the game.
With the lack of a challenger from other codes in the summer months, Australian crickets popularity and that of the national team has been inflated.
It has taken the last two epic Ashes tours in England to reawaken interest in Test cricket and that of an Australian team in transition post one of its greatest periods.
At present, does the Australian cricket team have the ability to unite the nation in such a frenzy of enthusiasm and unwavering support in the way the Socceroos did in 2006?
Not of late.
As for the Wallabies, their recent struggles have typified that of the game itself.
When an AFL finals match can threaten to pull an equal crowd than a Tri-Nations clash against the world’s best Rugby side in Brisbane, of all places, then questions must be asked about the fortunes of the code in this country.
Overburdened with rule complications and debate about its future direction, they too are in a transitional phase heading into their own World Cup.
But the Wallabies have never been Australia’s premier national team.
Limiting them is their restricted national appeal. In the southern states, they just don’t rate.
Ask a South Australian to name three of the current Wallabies and you’ll hear three wild guesses.
The Socceroos appeal is not limited to a specific state.
The years of struggle and heartbreak have helped create a national team that is genuinely loved by A-League sympathisers, Euro snobs and non-football diehards alike.
It’s what made the ride to and during Germany 2006 so emotionally charged.
Playing a game we know we can’t dominate in, the Socceroos symbolise the ultimate underdog, a welcome change from the national teams whom we expect to dominate.
Now up to a new all-time high of 14th in the FIFA rankings, the Socceroos are making a case for being top of the pile when it comes to the hearts and minds of the Australian sporting public.
With the crescendo of publicity, excitement and marketing building up to South Africa, there’ll be no doubt of their rise to the top of the mountain when pubs across the nation are full of green and gold in June 2010.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Amy91 said | September 6th 2009 @ 7:58am | Report comment
I hate soccer! I don’t mean to offend the millions of soccer fans out there but hey. It is a dull sport which has only one thing to do Kick…. sorry but union might be going so well and the Aussie’s may be lossing the cricket but I’d take te wallabies and the cricket lossing over the socceroos winning.
Also i’d like to point out that the Wallabies crowd did really well at suncorp getting in over 47 thousand fans whilst an ALF final was on in the same city. Also that the game was great and far more interesting than soccer will ever be (In my opinion).
Also the majority of the players in the socceroos aren’t really even Australian, they all have european accents and don’t even play in the country year round … at least with Cricket and Union we know where our players actually come from. And we know they are playing the elite level here in our country.
Anyways my rant may seem biased and that is probably because it is… in I won’t jump on the band wagon I’ll stick with the games Australia know and love … Union, Cricket, League. I’ll maintain patriotism by cheering only Australian players and I will still insist Soccer is boring (They run and kick the ball for 90mins … score like three times and roll around on the ground for like 45mins… not my idea of a good game).
And if soccer was going so well …. why are te QLD roar now at Ballymore (which by the way is a rugby stadium) which holds little crowd capacity… the Reds don’t even play there.
midfield general said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:42am | Report comment
Gee, `the majority of the players in the socceroos aren’t really even even Australian’ Amy you’re either young and naive or just a bogan. You’re allowed to follow whatever sport you like, but you shouldn’t do a Pauline Hanson on us.
Pippinu said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:53am | Report comment
I think you’re a bit confused Amy – you mention sticking to Australian games, but you fail to mentoin Australian Football.
Chris said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:12am | Report comment
I thought the same, but in defence of Amy I think they are referring to Australian sports with National representation
Amy91 said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:30pm | Report comment
Sorry about the AFL but I was referring to national teams.
Realfootball said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:26am | Report comment
What a remarkably unintelligent post, Amy. Further comment would be a waste of time.
David said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
Amy i dont mean to offend you but i h8 cricket it’s boring and nothing happens, I h8 Union cuz every player doesnt have half a brain you just need to be big and strong, AFL whilst is a good sport no one else in the world seems to think so. Soccer can be played by all you don have to be a 90Kg meat meat head all you need is 4 jumpers and a ball. Like it or not Soccer is the best sport in the world it doesnt accept sexual assults like union does, drugys like AFL does and isnt completlely boring lyk Cricket seriously its so bad 8 hours of nothing happning. Australia is starting to see that soccer unites a nation and if we do well in the next world cup it will continue to rise to levels it has never been before
JF said | September 6th 2009 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
Did you see what happened in East London the other week – It appeared to be a group of gentlemen from West Ham who were trying to engage in an an intellectual discussion with the scolars from Milwall over the merits of their respective football teams.
David, you are a goose.
melbvictory87 said | September 6th 2009 @ 2:15pm | Report comment
ye but how does that impact on us in australia?????
Chop said | September 7th 2009 @ 9:16am | Report comment
David, Blinkers off mate, you’re not in Kansas anymore……
Like it or not Soccer is the best sport in the world it doesnt accept sexual assults like union does, drugys
Are you serious? Maybe in Australia it doesn’t get in this sort of controversy but world wide?
———————-
Apart from that I think the Socceroo’s are probably Australia’s second favourite team. I don’t think they could be put ahead of the cricketers and perhaps even the swim team when an Olympics or Commonwealth games are on.
True Tah said | September 7th 2009 @ 9:27am | Report comment
forgive me if Im wrong, but isnt there an HAL who has been charged with having sex with a minor?
Chop said | September 7th 2009 @ 9:46am | Report comment
Exactly right, he was a youth level socceroo who was withdrawn from the squad because of the charges.
If you look at the international behaviour of any elite sport there’s bound to be controversy which is the point I was trying to put to David.
drew777 said | September 7th 2009 @ 7:51pm | Report comment
David – I support you one hundred percent.
as for the post from JF – The Millwall and Aston Villa fights are much more desirable than group rape of women, such as league players partake in. Most of the fights were just people facing off, throwing objects. Not that bad if you think about what could have happened. Plenty of league players and fans alike brawl. On the field it is supported. Off the field the fans of their respective teams fight all the time. A one off event in football is nothing compared to the repeated illegalities of the NRL.
berton said | September 11th 2009 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
David Rules Football is the worlds fastest growing sport http://www.worldfootynews.com/
melbvictory87 said | September 6th 2009 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
theres no point even commenting on this, you have no idea about football. i love you say cricket league and union are the sports australia know and love. cricket is the most bagged sport in australia. union and league are nsw and qld only and most ppl in vic dont even know they exist.
i also dont understand how can some1 call football boring, but they watch cricket!!!!!!!!
Amy92 said | September 7th 2009 @ 11:15am | Report comment
I hate union! I don’t mean to offend the millions of union fans out there but hey. It is a dull sport which has only one thing to do Kick…. sorry but Hockey might be going so well and the Aussie’s may be lossing the basketball but I’d take the hockeyroos and the basketball lossing over the wallabies winning.
Also i’d like to point out that international soccah matches reguarly fill stadiums, and big time international matches played overseas rank amongst the highest viewers in TV coverage of all time. Also that the game was great and far more interesting than union will ever be (In my opinion).
Also the majority of the players in the socceroos are Australian citizens (all of them infact), and I celebrate diversity by accepting other peoples ethnic backgrounds. I also love how they have paved the way for stars from other sports to choose careers overseas and not just stay at home (IPL, French Rugby, English League) at least with SOCAHHHHHHHHH we get a large player base by appealling to people from a vareity of ethnic backgrounds (Bresciano, Macdonald, Cahill, Strejovski) And we know they are playing the elite level on an international scale
Anyway my rant may seem biased because it is. I won’t just on the bandwagon and stuck (?) with the game Australia knows and loves. I’ll maintain my patriotism by cheering on the Socceros and I will still insist Union is boring (They run and kick the ball for 90s minutes. Score alot of kicked goals, and roll around in rucks and scrums for like 45 mins… like whatever!)
And if the socceroos were going so well, why are QLD roar now at Ballymore? I have no idea. Its either a non-sequiter or an ad hominem.???
drew777 said | September 7th 2009 @ 7:49pm | Report comment
You don’t have to like football (soccer), no one really cares if you do, but don’t parade about in your blind arrogance. You just make yourself sound stupid with comments like “roll around on the ground for like 45mins”, when every tackle in union and league ends up with someone “rolling around on the ground”.
Unfortunately, it is that sort of arrogance amongst the Neanderthal league supporters who make this country…well…Americanized.
Most Socceroos play overseas because that is where the best competitions are. Your ignorance is laughable. Try living overseas for 10 years and see if you pick up an accent, ay love?
Let’s let the facts speak for themselves;
– Worldwide, football is the most played sport, therefore it is the most popular.
Is there any need to continue?
I think not.
Corey said | February 4th 2010 @ 10:25pm | Report comment
Can I just say the point of this article is to point out that Socceroos are the national team that our nation watches with greatest unity, obviously these comments offer the differ. But I do say that I am not a soccer fan and may be biased, but cricket offers more score. But I still understand why people could find test matches boring- its like watching golf, only those who understand the art love it (and I don’t understand golf at all).
But it must be offered that soccer isn’t very well supported in our country in the competition front, albeit there are more soccer participants than any other sport. I love my physical sports, and don’t say soccer is one of those because by Australian insurance laws all schools are allowed to play soccer where only the top insured schools can play what they call “contact” sport. But when you say that in union and league they end up “rolling around on the ground”, it must be remembered that both of those sports aim as a defender is to tackle the player and bring them to the ground. I don’t believe that is the aim in soccer- so nice try PR drew777, but you cannot compare these sports. Remember Rugby and Soccer split in one meeting as some wanted physical contact and the others did not.
Can we please stop the code wars. Soccer is the most popular sport in the world, but is not the most followed sport in Australia, even though we are saturated with contact sports.
Bryan said | September 8th 2009 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
Make that billions Amy91, and of course union and cricket only have managed to become viable in about 4% of the world.
Its unfortunate that the people who think Cricket, Rugby union, Rugby league are important in other countries are so uneducted in sport and Netball’s ” world ” importance is not even worth taking about.
Actually I don’t mind the saturation coverage AFL gets in the southern states because it’s such a piddly game that in 151 years it hasn’t even managed to capture any market outside of 4 states of Australia.
Clocker said | September 24th 2009 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
Cricket in 4% of the world? Sure it might be only played seriously in about 10 countries – but 3 of those countries are India, Bangladesh and Pakistan – which alone account for more than 20% of the worlds population. If you think cricket is small now then just wait until 25 years time when India is the worlds superpower.
Shahsan said | September 24th 2009 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
India the world’s superpower? In cricket? surely theyre already that now?
Dave1 said | October 16th 2009 @ 6:24pm | Report comment
India is already one of the most important countries in the world.
JTM said | June 17th 2010 @ 11:11am | Report comment
Rugby Union may not be as big worldwide as soccer but it still has the third biggest sporting event in the world – the Rugby World Cup behind the Olympics and then FIFA WC. The RWC final is watched by a worldwide audience of billions too, believe it or not.
But I agree with Corey, let’s just move on from all this bickering over “my sport is the coolest”. It’s beginning to look ridiculous as people who are bagging out other ‘ignorant’ comments, are beginning to look very ignorant themselves.
Shahsan said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:11am | Report comment
Phew! Based on last night’s result, thank god we weren’t in the other Asian qualifying group, which would have meant the two Koreas and Saudi and Iran away.
Rabbitz said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Adrian, mate, who is your dealer? ‘coz I want to buy a K of whatever it is you are on. Based on qualifying for a couple or tournaments, you reckon they are the new draw cards – just wait until they hit a bit of a slump – you know they get flogged a couple of times then see just how popular and long lived they are. I think that soccer is “Doing a Bradbury” right now, the international names, in this case Rugby, Cricket and to some extent League are doing their best to fall over in front and soccer is riding a free passage to the line. If I was the soccer admin I would not be taking out any mortgages out on this basis.
Chris said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Adrian, you wrote this article before last nights games didn’t you… and then had to add the point ‘despite their reality check ovenight’ it took a bit gloss off the article… Damn those ‘lazyroos’… and the Wallabies weren’t suppose to play entertaining winning rugby…
I like the Socceroos and I enjoy it when they do well. Loved the World Cup. For me they won’t displace the Cricketers or the Wallabies, but I have grown up with those sports so that’s a tall ask.
In reference to the comment that those in the Southern States would have difficulty naming a current Wallaby, I’m certain that Harry Kewell and Tim Cahill aside most Australians would have difficulty naming current Socceroo players. I’ll have to go and look at the box of Weet-bix…
… Ricky Ponting is on the box. Which A-league team does he play for?
midfield general said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:00am | Report comment
But you can’t deny the decline of Cricket despite the dominance of the Australian team in the past decade. I suppose the biggest indication is that there might not have been any FTA coverage if it wasn’t for, ironically, SBS. And I can’t remember the last time I saw any union on any of the FTA networks.
Rabbitz said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:03am | Report comment
Try ABC TV on Saturday arvo a 3pm – Well in Sydney at least… for Wallabies games try the Seven network.
midfield general said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Not in Melbourne, mate
Spencer said | September 6th 2009 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
I watched the Wallabies V South Africa last saturday on 7..in Melbourne.
Jonathan said | September 6th 2009 @ 6:15pm | Report comment
… at 1 in the morning.
But that’s another post in itself.
Pippinu said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:59am | Report comment
This sort of triumphalism is always a dangerous thing.
1. Better sides than Australia have failed in the preliminary rounds of a WC, failing to score a goal etc. At a minimum, let’s hold off to see what happens there first.
2. There was a bit of a hint of the future in last night’s game. South Korea had as many players as Australia out on the field playing in the EPL, and in fact, they had the only player playing for a top 4 club (who ripped us apart). Those in the team from their K-League were much better than our fringe players.
midfield general said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Yes even if we had our best 11 we would have struggled. Koreans were impressive, playing with speed, energy with no little skill. Socceroos did ok in patches, but tactically and technically they looked a little agricultural compared to Koreans. But I suppose playing Korea in Seoul is tough for anyone these days I wonder if it’s worth flying these Euroroos half way around the world in the WC year for friendlies, sapping them of unnecessary energy.
The Bear said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:18am | Report comment
Hint of the future…? Are you suggesting Pip, that Pim and the lads do not have the mettle to match it against South Korea, at home, in a competitive game?? A team that hasn’t lost for 24 or so games?? What are you hinting at???
Pippinu said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:30am | Report comment
Bear
No – I wasn’t saying anything about anyone’s mettle.
About six or seven years ago, it would have been the Socceroos with more players in the EPL than South Korea, and indeed we had a player in the top 4.
But South Korea is on the verge of turning the tables there, and may do so in the next few years.
It’s happening gradually, but it’s definitely happening.
mahony said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:02am | Report comment
Adrian – you have a few ‘live ones’ today. The substance of your article is correct and this is a problem for some people. I look forward to teh South Africa build up – it is going to be a media and marketing tsunami and the above interlocutors know it.
Chris said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:29am | Report comment
It certainly will be a tsunami and great for Soccer in this country, but “interlocutors” shouldn’t be concerned about their favourite code losing out. As long as top sporting events (World Cups, Ashes, Champions trophy, State of Origin, Grand Finals etc) are spaced out and we don’t have to choose we’ll be blessed with a plethora of top sport to watch… and those that don’t want to watch a particular code… don’t have to.
Even at club level where you do have to chose between watching an A-League game, a game of AFL, League and Super14/15, it great to have choice. If one game finishes you can watch another or if one is dreary you can switch to another one… “when too much sport is never enough”
MarkH said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:23am | Report comment
Sorry Adrian, Nobody even knew the Soccer was on. As for being the premier side..what by your reckoning? Australians (the majority) prefer contact sports. All the socceroos play are friendlies …what the hell is a friendly?
Tifosi said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:46am | Report comment
MarkH you are confused.
The socceroos will play 12 games in 2009.
Of those
5 are games were World Cup Qualifiers
4 games are Asian Cup Qualifiers
3 games are friendlies.
The majority of games the socceroos now play are meaningful. Thats what makes them so appealing.
AndyRoo said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:47am | Report comment
A friendly is the name of a match before the marketing gus get involved. After the get their hands on it, you end up with a “test match”
Pete said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
I dont think there were marketing gurus in sport in the late 19/early 20th centuries when the term test match was coined
Tifosi said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Remember even Steve Waugh said that the socceroos can become the number one sporting team in this country.
It will all depend on the results though, the socceroos must be competitive to keep the bandwagon jumpers still on.
I know plenty of people who wouldnt watch the A-league but will watch the socceroos now, which goes to show how far its come.
The problem for rugby is that they play the same teams over and over again, in what a basically friendlies, which becomes a bit boring. They need more teams to play against.
The socceroos will mostly be playing games that mean something, either world cup or asian cup qualifying. Thats important as it makes you more concerned about the results.
Cricket has a similar problem to rugby but the real issue for cricket is the rise of 20/20 and what that will do for international games in the future.
Chris said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:00am | Report comment
.. that’s what is great about Rugby (League and Union), Playing against the same teams, its about building rivalry. All Blacks vs. Wallabies and the Marroons vs. the Blues. It brings office banter to fever pitch. The Poms/ Welsh/Irish lay into us during the Northern Spring tour, the Queenslanders give us heaps during SOS.
Soccer in Australia needs the same rivalry. Its blessing, international appeal, is its curse in this country (at the moment). In Europe, England must beat Germany, we don’t have that kind of passion yet. The Asian Qualifying rivalry is soulless. We want to beat Japan, but the Japanese or the Uzbekistanis don’t sit behind you at the pub or at work or write on sport websites giving it to you if you lose, and culturally they never will. We played England in a friendly years ago… and we beat them… that was fantastic, we need that. If we met them in a World Cup and knock them out…
mahony said | September 6th 2009 @ 7:12pm | Report comment
I disagree in the polite spirit in which you made your opinion.
I love watching the national football team play Japan. I see the response from the Japanese people in my community (Melbourne) – but more importantly I see the responses from the Japanese people in Japan to their national team’s performance. Each time we beat them it near causes a national crisis. I love any game against Uruguay. Any game against the All Whites. Any game against Croatia. Any game against China and any game against Italy. Each of these rivalries have different (and developing) causes and some are more mature than others. Having teams to get ‘fired up’ about will not be a problem for football as ‘familiarity breads contempt’ in the other codes as our influence declines along with the games themselves. As I have argued before – this is a somewhat sad – but inevitable outcome of globalization.
I am also very pleased whenever we beat one of the leading European nations (although only in a football development sense). Once the English get here for a game at ‘The G’ – the Ashes will be put in their place in the grand scheme of things also. The Australian response to the Ashes is a strongly nostalgic one with every passing year. It was not too dissimilar around Tennis in the 50′s and swimming in the 90′s. I suspect The Ashes will go the same way. I look forward to the Australia / England football rivalry adding a new dimension to our long, close and proud sporting and cultural rivalry. In saying this I am reminded of a competition running in one of the British papers two Ashes series ago when the prize was a football signed by the victorious Ashes team. Now that sums it up nicely IMO.
MVDave said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Adrian essentially agree with your sentiment but would say the Cricketers are still ahead in terms of popularity…however if the Socceroos made the last 8 or even 4 of the WC this could change. The Rugby national teams dont rate in the southern states…
Rabbitz
can smell the fear mate. Guess you will be looking forward to one of those tournaments coming up next year! Oh wait we may even be hosting the biggest sporting event in the world in a decade…dont forget to get your tickets early!
Amy91
Everyone is entitled to an opinion and to express that…however expressing it in a xenophobic, derogatory and racist manner about another sport is perhaps going too far…as l will demonstrate in what COULD be said about the Rugbies;
Dont like either Rugby (dont know why they have 2) its such a yawn. You have neanderthals with necks wider than their heads, smashed in faces and boof heads who spend their time running into other such guys on the field. They spend half their time with their boof head stuck up one of their team mates ar$%s, fall on top of each other and run into one another all over again and they do this for 80 minutes!!!…Yaaaawn! Aussies are good at the Rugbies because people in most other countries are not stupid enough to play it.
You see we can all do what you did…doesnt take much thought or effort. Dont like Sokkah fine… but be careful in how you express the hatred.
Re The Korea game wouldnt read too much into it…new 2nd string back 4 were shaky in the 1st 30 minutes but after that the Socceroos should have at least drawn and didnt deserve to lose. Exquisite skill from Park setting up the 3rd goal was a joy to behold!
melbvictory87 said | September 6th 2009 @ 2:28pm | Report comment
i do have to agree, her comment is just obsurd, bizarre and extremely offensive. socceroos represent the multicultural nature of australia, something which i take extreme pride in. in terms of rugby, if she thinks that our socceroos are multicultural you seem to forget how many islanders are present in our rugby setup.
this is the difference btw our national teams. in melbourne nobody knows the kangaroo’s even exist, in fact i only discovered they exist last year, nodody has a clue about rugby union either. sa and wa are exactly the same.
in terms of cricket i cant really comment because i have never met some1 that actually likes cricket (yes this is honest), i know you get ppl that bag football but im almost certain ive met more ppl that give it to cricket. btw this is not biased in anyway, ive never watched cricket so i cant give my thoughts on it, but i find it funny how many ppl will berate the sport.
now we have football. like it or not their were 11.5m ppl watching the 2005 qualifier, like it or not the wc united an entire nation.
considering how few ppl i know that are aware of what the ashes is or what is the difference btw league and union i think that the socceroos do have an advantage.
their not limited to a few states or to certain demographics in australia. in relation to amy’s comment, have you considered that 50% of the australian population is not australian anglo-saxon. wallabies, kangaroo’s and socceroos reflect this, as per the cricket team i dont think their is a single person of a non anglo background.
Spencer said | September 6th 2009 @ 5:13pm | Report comment
You’ve never watched cricket???…that’s just un-Australian!
BTW I think Amy was alluding to the fact that many of the socceroos live in Europe and some of them since they were 15. Hence they are not part of the Australian community.
The Bear said | September 6th 2009 @ 7:11pm | Report comment
Tell Tim Cahill he is un-Australian from following his Football around the world. And as far as the “we know where our players actually come from” line. Care to defend that??
AndyRoo said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:44am | Report comment
We dominated play from kisnorbo’s goal onwards but Korea were allready leading and were quality on the counter attack. The 3rd goal that park set up was class.
1st time outside of the Jet’s I have seen Nicky Carle really show such class and justify the fuss. Holmino, Kennedy, Macdonlad and Milligan were all great.