Socceroos are now Australia’s premier national team
By Adrian Musolino, 6 Sep 2009 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
264 Have your say
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- Wallabies news
- Cricket news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news

The Australian Socceroos' Mark Viduka kicks the ball in the Australia v Japan opening Group F match at the Soccer World Cup in Kaiserslautern, Germany, Monday, June 12, 2006. This is Australia's first World Cup finals appearance in 32 years. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
Despite their reality check overnight, the Socceroos, for so long the underachievers and forgotten Australian national team, are making a strong case for being the countries premier sporting entity, the most marketable and the biggest drawcard.
Since their long awaited World Cup qualification in 2005, they have threatened the domination of the Wallabies and Australian cricketers as the team that can best unite the country and as a powerful marketing force.
When you remember back to the days of limited matches against weak opponents in suburban stadiums, the Socceroos rise has been a remarkable one – a rise we often forget to reflect on post-Germany 2006.
What’s remarkable about this rise to prominence is the limitations on the Socceroos. With their principal stars plying their trade on the other side of the world, they have also been hamstrung by their deal with Fox Sports that limits their mainstream reach.
Yet Harry Kewell, Tim Cahill, Lucas Neill and co are now marketable entities the equal of Ricky Ponting and Michael Clark, fronting cereal and soft drink advertising campaigns, areas once out of reach for the round ball folk.
If they have not past the Wallabies and Australian cricketers in terms of appeal and value, they are certainly mounting a fierce challenge.
Before 2005, the Australian cricket team held this mantle and were relatively unchallenged.
But the unsporting attitudes that were fostered in the years of ruthless domination under the captaincy of Ricky Ponting have left a bitter taste for many.
In the wake of the Ashes defeat, for every fan that bemoaned poor selections, there was someone who, whether publicly or privately, took some pleasure in the loss.
Like an unchallenged Goliath, Australia had its years of domination and developed an arrogant, graceless manner in which they played the game.
With the lack of a challenger from other codes in the summer months, Australian crickets popularity and that of the national team has been inflated.
It has taken the last two epic Ashes tours in England to reawaken interest in Test cricket and that of an Australian team in transition post one of its greatest periods.
At present, does the Australian cricket team have the ability to unite the nation in such a frenzy of enthusiasm and unwavering support in the way the Socceroos did in 2006?
Not of late.
As for the Wallabies, their recent struggles have typified that of the game itself.
When an AFL finals match can threaten to pull an equal crowd than a Tri-Nations clash against the world’s best Rugby side in Brisbane, of all places, then questions must be asked about the fortunes of the code in this country.
Overburdened with rule complications and debate about its future direction, they too are in a transitional phase heading into their own World Cup.
But the Wallabies have never been Australia’s premier national team.
Limiting them is their restricted national appeal. In the southern states, they just don’t rate.
Ask a South Australian to name three of the current Wallabies and you’ll hear three wild guesses.
The Socceroos appeal is not limited to a specific state.
The years of struggle and heartbreak have helped create a national team that is genuinely loved by A-League sympathisers, Euro snobs and non-football diehards alike.
It’s what made the ride to and during Germany 2006 so emotionally charged.
Playing a game we know we can’t dominate in, the Socceroos symbolise the ultimate underdog, a welcome change from the national teams whom we expect to dominate.
Now up to a new all-time high of 14th in the FIFA rankings, the Socceroos are making a case for being top of the pile when it comes to the hearts and minds of the Australian sporting public.
With the crescendo of publicity, excitement and marketing building up to South Africa, there’ll be no doubt of their rise to the top of the mountain when pubs across the nation are full of green and gold in June 2010.
Recommend this story.

September 6th 2009 @ 10:25am
megatron said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:25am | Report comment
It seems Adrian is brave – or stupid? – enough to write things most of us think, but wouldn’t dare say because we know the response it’ll get and emotions it raises.
This was bound to happen after the bigger than expected pull of the World Cup. No code has an event like that so the Socceroos have a huge advantage. Will be interesting to see though how the response next year compares to Germany.
September 6th 2009 @ 10:35am
MarkH said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Dont want to rain on your parade but Soccer just wont be the number one sport you want it to be here. I bet all you guys have a NRL side or AFL side you support other than an A-League team? if you turn that around you possibly wont find that many if any follow A-League.
Australia is the most competitive sports market in the world. Soccer just wont get there. Its just dosnt have the appeal like the others.
September 6th 2009 @ 11:55am
MVDave said | September 6th 2009 @ 11:55am | Report comment
My team Melbourne Victory have 19,000 members and counting.
“Soccer just wont get there. Its just dosnt have the appeal like the others.”
Where exactly are we going?? We have a new National League, a National team ranked 14 in the world and going to the biggest show on earth next year. Expansion teams, youth team going to the world cup this year etc etc. Seem to be doing okay and thanks for your concern about its appeal. l think the world has voted with its feet.
September 6th 2009 @ 2:30pm
melbvictory87 said | September 6th 2009 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
ye but you forget it has double the amount of participants of afl and 4 times that of nrl. no disrespect to those sports as i like afl too but i can c where these claims come from. it wont happen for a long time tho, but you cant resist the pull of the worlds most loved game
September 6th 2009 @ 10:56am
Robbo said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:56am | Report comment
You MIGHT have a point about Socceroos v. Wallabies (allthough only in the Southern states) but to even suggest that the Socceroos are anywhere near the popularity of the Australian cricket team is lunacy. Ask any Australian to name five Socceroos and you will hear: “Viduka, Kewell and that guy who has the same name as the expressway”. By contrast any Australian (even my 79 year old grandmother) could name a competitive Australian Test XI.
September 6th 2009 @ 11:05am
megatron said | September 6th 2009 @ 11:05am | Report comment
I don’t necessarily agree. I struggled to recognize many of the current team during the Ashes and with the different players that come in for each discipline, 20/20 etc, it’s hard to name them all.
I guess it’s the same with the huge amount of rotations in the socceroos team, but there are equal big stars
Ie Id say Ponting Hussey Clark are the only really well known while socceroos have Cahill, Neill, Kewell.
September 6th 2009 @ 12:02pm
MVDave said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
How many watched the last Cricket WC vs the Football WC? Football won easily and their games were in the middle of the night in Winter and tens of thousands actually watched on public screens around the cities, didnt see that for the Cricket …think you’ll find the Socceroos are gaining at a rapid pace and will overtake within a WC or 2 especially if we host the 2018/2022 WC.
September 6th 2009 @ 3:05pm
Robbo said | September 6th 2009 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Perhaps that has something to do with the fact the Socceroos hadn’t been in said tournament for 30 odd years. It’s hard to be enthusiastic about a World Cup which Australia hasn’t lost in almost a generation. If you honestly expect similar hype this time round then good on you – but don’t be disappointed if you get a reality check. Even I – a die hard cricket fan – watched every Australian game in the Soccer World Cup and just the second innings of the final for the Cricket (mainly because ODI’s are a joke). Do you think I have watched a Socceroos game since?
September 6th 2009 @ 6:46pm
mahony said | September 6th 2009 @ 6:46pm | Report comment
I can’t name the Australian 11? Beyond Ponting and Lea you have lost me…… I have not followed cricket at any level for about 6 years.
September 6th 2009 @ 10:59am
David V. said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:59am | Report comment
But the Socceroos have the capacity to unite and include everyone, not exclude anybody.
September 6th 2009 @ 11:34am
Luke W said | September 6th 2009 @ 11:34am | Report comment
This whole argument goes to show how fickle Australian sports fans are. The cricket and rugby teams have a rough patch over the last year or so and people are quick to abandon them. I agree that right now the Socceroos are the premier national team, but sooner or later we will miss out on a WC and people will abandon them too.
September 6th 2009 @ 12:05pm
JF said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
To say the socceroos are the premier national team is crazy. I am a rugby supporter but I don’t think the wallabies are the premier national team either, the wallabies, socceroos, kangaroos, kookaburras, boomers, all mean different things to different parts of australian society. Our truely national team is the cricket team, cricket is the great leveller that has the ability to bring australian society together and best represent us.
The national cricket team bridges socioeconomic and geopgraphical gaps like no other, it facillitates our multi-culturalism (Hauritz, Hilfenhaus, Krejza don’t sound to anglo to me) while identifying our individuality by being part of the exclusive group of british colonial test playing nations.
I love the fact that we can all enjoy our respective football codes during the winter, then come together during the summer and indulge in our national game. I love the fact that I could watch last years Australia v India test series in sports bar in Belgrade while onlookers become bemused at the perculiar game they are watching for the first time.
The cricket team is our national team.
September 6th 2009 @ 12:24pm
Tifosi said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
Facilitates our multi-culturalism?
Cricket in australia is as white Anglo-saxon sport as you can get.
At least in england they are using players from sub-continent backgrounds.
September 6th 2009 @ 12:50pm
JF said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
Cricket doesn’t discriminate. The socceroos look at our overseas based players for the national team due to the quality of overseas competition. The ARU gives more consideration to kids that go to a select band of Syd and Bris ‘rugby nursury’ private schools. All of the contact football codes have issues with excluding smaller kids, this is an issue for many asian kids who are built smaller than european and islander kids.
Cricket has none of these problems, yes it is very Anglo-Saxon, but so are we. We also have large ethnic populations, cricket does not descriminate against these populations.
Cricket will never appeal to these populations like football can, but then again cricket does not have that ever-present ‘ethnic game’ baggage.
September 6th 2009 @ 3:10pm
Robbo said | September 6th 2009 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
Hauritz, Krejza, Hilfenhaus and Nannes sure don’t sound “Anglo Saxon”. Andrew Symonds doesn’t exactly look Anglo Saxon either. The reason we are yet to see an Australian cricketeer from the subcontinent is two-fold. 1) There are a lot, lot more people from the subcontinent in England than Australia and 2) Australia is much better at producing cricketers than England – and hence a Ravi Bopara for example can easily brake into the English team but wouldn’t even make a NSW state team here.
September 6th 2009 @ 2:33pm
melbvictory87 said | September 6th 2009 @ 2:33pm | Report comment
you must be joking. i dont know if its just melbourne but the amount of ppl that cant stand cricket is staggering. no disrespect to the sport but its hard to get into something as slow paced and that takes 5 days to play 1 game. i think thats how long it takes, i wouldnt know because ive never met any1 that has said a positive thing about cricket
September 6th 2009 @ 2:57pm
JF said | September 6th 2009 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
When England came over in 2006-07 and we regained the ashes 5-0, 813,316 people attended these test matches, with the MCG test attracting 244, 351.
Taking 5-days to play one game is what it makes it great, such a display of tactics, concentration and tradition is very refreshing in world of instant gratification and convenience-above-all-else.
You either “get it” or you don’t.
September 6th 2009 @ 10:32pm
Pete said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:32pm | Report comment
“ive never met any1 that has said a positive thing about cricket”, whatever you reckon mate.
September 6th 2009 @ 11:58am
whiskeymac said | September 6th 2009 @ 11:58am | Report comment
north was a liability – just goes to show you need gametime at club level to play at this level. korea were good. do they ‘travel’ as well?
September 6th 2009 @ 3:26pm
AndyRoo said | September 6th 2009 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
there unbeaten in there last 24 games so probably yes.
September 6th 2009 @ 12:03pm
Marty said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
I’m not quite sure about that David V.
September 6th 2009 @ 12:25pm
David V. said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
Why not? Because football has always been an inclusive sport, not an exclusionist one.
September 6th 2009 @ 3:39pm
Chris said | September 6th 2009 @ 3:39pm | Report comment
Yes its definitely inclusive, its was the sport that took all the boys who’s mum wouldn’t let them play AFL, League or Union. Glad they found a place.
September 6th 2009 @ 6:16pm
True Tah said | September 6th 2009 @ 6:16pm | Report comment
David V
futbol has not always been an inclusive sport in Australia. When you had the NSL with sides based on ethnic origins, it certainly limited the appeal of those sides. Not surprisingly, many Anglo-Australians preferred rugby league and Australian football, and plenty of immigrants also took to these codes, maybe they wanted to associate with people outside their own ethnic group??? In Sydney, rugby league has always been the most inclusive of sports.
Not to mention the fact that rugby league is the only football code to have had an openly homosexual man playing professionally..something which futbol cannot say, anywhere in the world.
September 6th 2009 @ 8:34pm
AndyRoo said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:34pm | Report comment
Fair point. I am a lifetime futbal fan and have supported the socceroos since I was 8 years old and Charlie Yankos scored a cracker in Australia’s 4-1 victory over then World Champions Argentina.
But ask me what my favorite club team is and I would say Parramatta Eels because in those NSL days meant the local semi professional futbal team was for a community I wasn’t a part of. And you don’t replace something you grow up with for a 4 year old franchise
September 6th 2009 @ 12:10pm
bever fever said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
Cricket team by a street or two.
I personally find soccer usually fairly dull but hope they do OK at the world cup.
I reckon soccer is great for kids who if taught properly can make the transition to australian football fairly easily in their teens when a bit more testosterone kicks in and can kick nicely on both sides of their body.
September 6th 2009 @ 12:23pm
MVDave said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
As we are talking about national teams where do you rank the AFL national team? It is our national game right?
September 6th 2009 @ 12:22pm
roarer101 said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:22pm | Report comment
Adrian, what you said is frankly, bull. I am actually quite interested in all sports and was completely unaware the socceroos were playing last night. It just did not register. This goes for most of my mates as well (some of who are die hard soccer/football (whatever) fans). None of them care about them outside of world cup qualifiers and the world cup itself. I don’t either.
That doesn’t apply for the national rugby (both) teams and the cricket. Soccer has a long way to go before their national side is the premier “football” side in the country.
September 6th 2009 @ 12:27pm
Realfootball said | September 6th 2009 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
Really, who cares. There seem to be a lot of dog chasing its tale arguments going on at the moment. Sport as the opiate of the masses, anyone?
September 6th 2009 @ 2:27pm
Chris said | September 6th 2009 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
I agree its just good to have choice. If one national team falls over another if bound to do well. Nice not having all ours ‘eggs in one basket’