Wallabies find a reason to win
By Andrew Logan, 6 Sep 2009 Andrew Logan is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- South Africa Springboks news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news
On Friday night I tuned into the big league match of the round – the Dragons playing the Eels, with the winner to boast some serious claims to premiership favouritism.
The Eels have been running hotter than hot, whilst the Dragons have endured some tough weeks after a strong start to the season. Notwithstanding recent form, it was no contest. Despite many fans wondering if they still had their mojo working, the Dragons were never headed and on the few occasions they had the ball, the Parramatta attack was shut down in by a Dragons defence that could only be described as a brick wall.
What chance the Wallabies of turning in a similar performance, I wondered? Well, I soon found out. Like many of the non-St-George league fans who were deathriding the Dragons, I found that it just doesn’t pay to write a team off too early.
On Saturday night I tuned into the big rugby match of the weekend, the Springboks vs the Wallabies. The Springboks had been running hotter than hot, whilst the Wallabies had endured some tough weeks after an adequate start to the season. Despite many fans wondering if they even had any mojo left, the Wallabies were never headed.
How could this be? How does a team whose last couple of starts have been so error ridden that your head could explode just watching them, overnight become a clinical machine in control of a match from beginning to end?
To be fair to the Springboks, the turnaround is not as great as it might appear at first glance. The Tri-Nations is an inherently close competition. With only 3 teams who consistently sit at the top of the world rankings, how could it be otherwise?
Not only is the overall competition close, but the Springboks and the Wallabies historically don’t travel well to each other’s countries. The Springboks are better than the Wallabies in this regard, but not by much, and both teams have had shockers playing away in the last couple of years.
Although the Springboks are over-endowed with world XV players (Matfield, Botha, Habana, de Villiers, Fourie, du Preez, du Plessis would all press for selection), at the end of the day it is still also just fifteen on fifteen and when one fifteen fires, anything can happen.
The fans perhaps shouldn’t be surprised anyway. The Wallabies camp has consistently said that they were building to something, and Boks skipper John Smit presciently reminded anyone who’d listen that there wasn’t much between a 46-0 flogging at Suncorp in 2006 and the 2007 World Cup.
Of course, all of this only explains the opportunity that existed, the fact that circumstance would allow a win. It doesn’t explain the execution of the turnaround itself. So, how did it happen?
For a start, and for the first time in ages, the Wallabies showed clear and apparent desire in everything they did. The focus in their approach was obvious as was the urgency and the desire to set the pace of the match.
Desire isn’t something you can manufacture out of nothing. Within a rugby team, desire comes from wanting something for those around you as much as you want it for yourself. It comes from being down and realizing that you want to get up. It comes from self respect and the desire to show others, and show yourself that you are worthy.
These wounded Wallabies seemed to suddenly realize that the only way out of the hole they were in, was to play their way out. And so they did.
Like the Dragons on Friday night, the Wallabies muscled up in numbers and hit hard when they got there. Tatafu Polota-Nau tackled strongly and made two telling hits on Brussow and du Preez which jolted the ball free and turned the flow of the match. When Jacques Fourie was storming toward the Wallaby line after a de Villiers break, there were 5 or 6 Wallabies on hand to drag him down, immediately form up into a defensive line and force the turnover on the next phase.
These were the inches the Wallabies had struggled to find in previous matches, but their desire to earn respect from each other and from the fans pushed them to greater efforts. Rocky Elsom’s hands may not be the best, but his heart is without peer, and it was as though his teammates had finally followed his example.
The lineout redeemed itself, again through the reliability of Elsom jumping at 2. The throw was also largely predictable which ensured the Wallabies a regular flow of possession. At the other set piece, the scrum battle was even enough, although the Wallabies may have shaded the Boks towards the end of the match with the South African front row twice popping up like startled meerkats as the pressure came on.
The highball, which had also been an achilles heel for the Wallabies in recent weeks, was solid as you like with Lachie Turner particularly taking his own advice, and working hard to position well and take the ball on his chest.
Each of these facets – the defence, the set piece and the surety in fielding the kicked ball, invariably meant that halfback Will Genia had a stable platform from which to distribute ball and he was a joy to watch. Low to the ground, marshalling his troops, barking orders and sweeping the ball off the deck with a fluent and accurate pass, Genia’s decision making was also first rate, and he was unlucky to not score on debut with a swift and correct decision to take a quick tap from a penalty in front of the posts.
He was not the only Wallaby to be denied. Lachie Turner was prevented from scoring by an utterly brilliant piece of cover defence from Bryan Habana, and Matt Giteau narrowly missed capitalizing on Adi Jacobs brain-snap inside pass, when his foot slipped inches into touch as he grounded the ball.
The Wallabies could have had 5 tries with a little luck, but more gratifying than that was the fact that they kept working and pressuring the Springboks even though things weren’t always going their way. Eventually the pressure worked in their favour and something did go their way, with Adam Ashley-Cooper running a transcendent unders line to slice through the Boks defence and swan dive over the chalk virtually untouched.
The try illustrated all that was good about the Wallaby backline on the night, with the players working together, Berrick Barnes taking the pressure off Matt Giteau and freeing him up to threaten the line from further out, and finally Ashley-Cooper hitting the gap with intent, speed and angle.
His post try celebration spoke volumes about the pressure the Wallabies have been under lately. It was almost as though Ashley-Cooper was apologizing to the fans for the recent run of horror rugby, and the players and fans embraced like lovers who had found each other again after a bad breakup and a year or so apart.
Are we all friends again? Well, Australian fans are not nasty or bloody minded, but they are very unforgiving of teams which don’t value the jersey, or who look like they are not really interested. On tonight’s form, the Wallabies probably would have played themselves back into favour even if they didn’t win, because it was clear that they were trying their guts out. More than that, they finally played some smart and composed rugby.
Unlike the Dragons in the NRL, the Wallabies chances to pick up some silverware in this year’s Tri Nations are long gone. They won’t want to help out the All Blacks either, because the only way for the All Blacks to win the Tri-Nations, is for them to beat both the Wallabies and Springboks in their remaining two games. From a trophy perspective, it’s all over.
There’s nothing for the Wallabies to play for now, except pride. And if Saturday night is any indication, that might be the best reason of all.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies

Dave said | September 6th 2009 @ 5:55am | Report comment
Talk about ticker, what a game of Rugby!
Rickety Knees said | September 6th 2009 @ 6:12am | Report comment
Best game of Rugby I have seen in a long while
Shahsan said | September 6th 2009 @ 7:26am | Report comment
Surely you watched the SA vs Lions series? Though last night was good, those the first two of that series was surely much better.
QC said | September 6th 2009 @ 7:12pm | Report comment
Does the fact the SA won those two matches make them better games in your eyes?
Shahsan said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:07pm | Report comment
Why, QC? What does it matter? I’m neither British nor South African, but just a true, rugby-loving neutral.
The first two were great contets with everything except perhaps the right result in the second, as the SA win unfortunately rendered the third game a dead rubber. That’s why I didnt consider the thrid test as good.
QC said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:11pm | Report comment
Interesting answer Shahsan,
I personally think they game last night was definately up there. the wallabies turned everything up on its head, a dramatic turnaround if ever I saw one. The game was up there and sadly South Africa had no answer for the intensity that the Aussies dished out. The defence from both teams was outstanding in the first 40. The second stanza the tempo lifted further and it was only a matter of time before one team cracked and it just happened to be the Springboks.
A very good game and I differ on your view I believe this is one of the best games I have seen this international season to date.
Shahsan said | September 6th 2009 @ 9:29pm | Report comment
We will have to agree to disagree. To me, the main difference is that last night’s game was more error strewn and the Boks had a slightly tired look about them. The Lions games had a bit more drama, with everthiing on show: great play, titanic scrum battles, swining tides of ascendancy, bad mistakes, close finishes, poor coaching decisions, brilliant tries, all played in brilliant aftrenoon sunshine.
While I agree that last night was also very good, i think it was more a case of us having had our expectations lowered to the point that as long as it was half decent, we would have been happy. The lions games promised much — and delivered spades more.
QC said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:24pm | Report comment
I disagree with just about everything you have to say. The Lions series wasn’t all you are making it out to be.
Viscount Crouchback said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:37pm | Report comment
The Lions series was the first time since circa 2003 that a set of matches involving a northern hemisphere team has been of indubitably higher quality than those involving southern teams.
The South Africans won’t say it publicly, but I suspect that privately they think the Lions series was a class above this Tri Nations in terms of intensity, pace and quality. This intra-south competition is a step down from what they faced earlier in the summer. It was also interesting to read the New Zealand forwards claiming that their games against France were more physically intense and demanding than their first game against the Wallabies.
All the signs are that the north is on the way back – and not before time.
QC said | September 6th 2009 @ 11:03pm | Report comment
Viscount, First I heard that the ABs thought the french were tougher up front and I live in New Zealand. The ABs that played the French are also not the same ABs who have played the majority of the Tri-Nations there are some major changes from that team.
I’m not saying the Tri-Nations is anything special this year but Australia were in a different class last night and had that team who turned up at Suncorp last night come up against the Lions I think they would easily have put them away. The Wallabies forwards were on another level than any team has put up so far in the Tri-Nations. The way Genia and Barnes were directing their lads around the park was delightful to watch, I don’t say this lightly being a Kiwi. South Africa didn’t know what to do under pressure they imploded they were off because Australia were so dominant there wasn’t anything they could do to counter it. On the otherhand I have said it many times already I believe the ineptness of the Wallabies and All Blacks and the many schoolyard mistakes they made, have in turn made the Boks to look alot better than what the really are.
I’m looking forward to Hamilton.
P.s I’ll believe the North are back on top when the individual nations actually occupy all top three spots in the IRB rankings.
Actually in saying that has their ever been a time when the NH teams have occupied positions 1 through 3?
How do we go about finding out?
Ray said | September 7th 2009 @ 7:41am | Report comment
QC, me again =) Mate why is it that you are so adamant that somebody can’t express their opinion? I have watched your comments closely, invariably bloggers tend to give credit where credit is due and leave people to their devices. Let Shahsan have his opinion, if he feels the Lions series was better, who cares??
GPR-SA said | September 6th 2009 @ 6:14am | Report comment
Well done Wallabies. I really thoughthatthe Springboks were up to taking this one. Instead they were up aginst a better team who were deserved winners.
It was a great game and wonderful to see both teams playing adventuous running rugby. Rugby was the biggest winner on the night.
I think the boks will play a much more structured game next week. I don’t think that we’ll too much running from the 22 as the boks will want to prevengt the AB’s from getting the 4 tries needed for the bonus point.
To all of those despaing Wallaby supporters of the last few week, as I said previously – have more faith in your team, don’t write them off so easily. I would have loved to see the Boks win and wrap up the cup lastnight, but it was wonderful to see the turnaound of the team and the younger players making the difference. Ginea and Poccock were brilliant!
Now Wallabies, all I ask in return for not allowing us a bonus point, please win in NZ. As last night showed, on this form that you are indeed world beaters. Looking very promising for 2011
gekko said | September 6th 2009 @ 6:38am | Report comment
It has been a while, but it was worth the wait … 2011, bring it on. All we need is … we got it already.
Thanks All for the night.
Matt0931 said | September 6th 2009 @ 7:14am | Report comment
Wallabies had a crakcer didn’t they? I think the fact that Barnes was back in the team made a clear difference to the backs performance tonight. They were much more structured and looked much more comfortable with the guy next to them.
I still think Barnes and Giteau need to swap places and I think by the time the next world cup comes around Barnes should be our captain.
Speaking of captains, Mortlock must be wetting his pants after seeing how well Ashley-Cooper performed at outside-centre! I will be surprised if Mortlock will be around after the November tours – if he even makes it into the November touring squad.
minchi said | September 6th 2009 @ 10:40am | Report comment
Adding to the fact that Ioane will probably be back from injury, I’ll be very surprised to see Sterlo back in the gold jumper.
Shahsan said | September 6th 2009 @ 7:31am | Report comment
Stirring performance by Australia. As some of us have ben saying, once Australia cuts out its mistakies, perform the basics well, and inject some passion into their play, then the laws of the game and the ref’s calls will all cease to matter. Good job, Wallabies. The pressure is now on the Boks. Will they choke again in Hamilton?
Dingbat said | September 6th 2009 @ 7:55am | Report comment
I’ve got a horrible feeling in my bones about the eventual outcome of this tri-nations…
Aus were very good. Their newcomers threw caution to the wind and played with passion; conviction and determination. The Boks could not handle the pressure and looked deflated for most of the game. Well done to Aus, very well deserved victory!
Harry Callahan said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:02am | Report comment
Fantastic game !!! Exciting from go to whoa! Wallabies now need to show this wasn’t a fluke by doing the same thing to the ABs.
ExpatSin said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:24am | Report comment
Great win by Oz. SA looked tired and not interested. No heart. I guess travelling does not agree with the Bok.
JustinB said | September 6th 2009 @ 3:58pm | Report comment
Come again? Didn’t SA just win away from home last week?
I agree SA looked tired, but I would say that traveling does not agree with every rugby team in the world except the All Blacks
sheek said | September 6th 2009 @ 8:46am | Report comment
Yep,
I try to give constructive ctiticism, & I also give constructive praise.
Haven’t seen a copy of the game yet, but an awesome win apparently.
Not that it means we can suddenly forget about the other problems bedeviling Australian rugby.