Springboks claim Tri-Nations glory
By Chris Foley, 13 Sep 2009 Chris Foley is a Roar Pro
293 Have your say
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
The dominant Springboks held off a late All Blacks charge for a 32-29 victory here Saturday to secure the Tri-Nations rugby crown for the first time in five years.
Both sides scored two tries, but the pertinent scoring difference for the world champions was the phenomenal boot of Francois Steyn who landed three penalties from inside his own half, the longest from 60 metres.
The Springboks went into the crucial Test knowing just one bonus point from a close loss should have been enough to secure the title, but said they would accept nothing less than victory.
In the end the final score flattered the All Blacks who fought back from a 17-point deficit early in the second half and were only a fingertip away from pulling off a surprise win at the end.
“At the end my heart was in my throat as we always knew the All Blacks would never give up,” said South Africa coach Peter de Villiers.
Despite the close finish, All Blacks coach Graham Henry had no argument with the result which ended the All Blacks four-year reign in the southern hemisphere championship.
“They deserved to win. They played very structured rugby and played it very well,” he said.
“We didn’t play well enough for the first 60 minutes. We needed to play for longer periods of time with a lot more consistency.”
The win not only gave the Springboks their third Tri-Nations title, but for the first time since 1970-1976 they have beaten the All Blacks in three successive Tests.
For nearly three-quarters of the game the Springbok were in a class of their own as they dominated across the field, forcing the All Blacks into repeated handling errors.
The first-half onslaught, in which they led 22-12 at half-time, was stretched to 29-12 early in the second spell, leaving the All Blacks searching for answers.
South Africa scored two tries, to Fourie de Preez and Jean de Villiers with Francois Steyn landing his three massive penalties while Morne Steyn added 13 points from a range of close range penalties, conversions and a drop goal.
For the All Blacks, Dan Carter landed five penalties and converted the tries of Sitiveni Sivivatu and Richie McCaw.
The All Blacks had points on the board from the opening whistle, gifted a penalty from the way the Springboks gathered and protected the kick-off and Carter secured the three points.
That was the cue for fullback Francois Steyn to step up and launch his kicking onslaught as he landed penalties from 60, 58 and 53 metres.
Du Preez scored South Africa’s first try when Bryan Habana knocked Joe Rokocoko out of the way going for a high ball close to the All Blacks line.
The second try, early in the second half came after Henry pulled inside centre Stephen Donald 10 minutes from the field and Carter’s first pass to his replacement Isaia Toeava was intercepted by de Villiers who raced away to score unopposed.
With the game almost out of reach, the All Blacks snapped into action and scored their first try when Sivivatu crossed in the corner.
In the dying minutes a Carter crosskick was fielded by Richie McCaw wide out to touch down, but a repeat of that move with time on the clock ended with the All Blacks tipping the ball into touch.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Frans Steyn, Graham Henry, Peter de Villiers, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations

Mitch O said | September 13th 2009 @ 7:25am | Report comment
Congrats to the Boks. Thoroughly deserving winners of this years 3N’s.
From an AB’s perspective, extremely dissapointing first half and exhilirating final 1/4. I’ve been waiting for that last 20 minutes all season!
stillmissit said | September 13th 2009 @ 7:41am | Report comment
One of the poorer displays by the All Blacks I have seen. Who decided that they shouldn’t commit to the breakdown?
The forwards were very poor, the centres dreadful, if it wasn’t for another great display by Carter this game would have been lost by a quadrillion.
Toeavu sp. played well when he came on but Henry kept Nonu out there although he was clearly not having a good night.
I’m starting to wonder if Henry can pick a player or read a game.
Interested in what you Kiwi’s thought of the game though.
cookee said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:02am | Report comment
exciting finish but agree the abs were crap .the backline a joke ;henry will need to teach the pollies some vision and how to use the ball .how many times does nonu spill the ball and roko must be running out of time as is donald who is a club player.so henry must drop a couple starting with the back coach.
the abs again went into the game knowing they needed parity in lineouts and be able to catch the bombs;not a great mark out of ten there for schoolmaster henry.it seems his assistants are the original dumb and dumber.
JK said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Congrats to the Boks, should put all debates to bed now.I don’t like Penalties deciding games but whoa! if you can get em from 60 mtrs that a different story. For a team that has arguably had discipline issues over the years, they are now becoming the headmasters, because if your naughty they will punish you from anywhere!
MyGeneration said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:27am | Report comment
This is not a knock on the Boks (deserved the win for sure), but if Rugby is heading towards teams trading penalties from 60m out, yikes!!!! Maybe they should consider a rule saying no penalty kicks from your own half of the field. Seriously, we need more of the last 20 minutes, not the previous 60.
Knives Out said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:29am | Report comment
I don’t think there is any evidence to suggest that anybody except Frans Steyn could have kicked those penalties.
MyGeneration said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Hmmmm, wouldn’t like to see a World Cup Final decided that way.
Knives Out said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:58am | Report comment
That’s life though. Sometimes his kicking is horrible, this morning it wasn’t. However, no other kicker can kick the distances he can, so I don’t think rugby is approaching an excessively problematic scenario.
MyGeneration said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:10am | Report comment
I didn’t really want to go on about this, but a simple rule tweak would make it impossible, not just unlikely.
MM said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:37am | Report comment
Oh Yes???
And the four unsubstantiated penalties against the Boks in the beginning?? Mate you either see the entire game or don’t bother
MW said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:40am | Report comment
MyGen, surely exceptional skills should be recognised
MyGeneration said | September 13th 2009 @ 10:00am | Report comment
I’d prefer recognising the skills of a team moving the ball 100m up the field, or even just 50m up the field, rather than 40m and “Great, now we’re in scoring range, hand it to the kicker!” Just my preference, not knocking Steyn or the Boks.
Ben J said | September 14th 2009 @ 4:31pm | Report comment
You are a troll, stop bleating about stupid rule changes. Ironic that you want more of the last 20 when the AB’s staged a comeback and not the first 60 when the Boks scored 2 tries, you must be a AB supporter.
MyGeneration said | September 14th 2009 @ 4:58pm | Report comment
I didn’t care about the result one way or the other, so please don’t call me an AB supporter (otherwise you are entitled to your opinion). Still wondering how you found an anti-Saffa conspiracy in my stating a preference for one style of rugby over another.
Glen said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:45pm | Report comment
Agree 100%
As to the arguments that only Steyn could do it… I’ll bet every national coach in the world has someone coaching 65 metre kicks from tomorrow.
David said | September 14th 2009 @ 2:02am | Report comment
You guys want a rule to counter ONE player? You flatter Francois Steyn!
matt said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:11am | Report comment
How was Smit’s post match comment that he was knocking them over from the 10m line!
Rick said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:13am | Report comment
Well deserved win by the Springboks (game and 3N). Really thought the AB’s would come out gunning this time but they didn’t until the last 20. Totally couldn’t believe they took a scrum at min 61 instead of the sure 3 points, once again shows the lack of killer/winner instinct. Similar to the France/AB game in the RWC ’07 where the AB’s could have taken a droppie and won the game but didn’t.
The lineouts were beyond embarrassing, you wouldn’t expect to see these sort of lineouts at schoolboy rugby.
Henry has to start picking players based on their passion and desire to win. Toeva and Jane made a huge difference when they came on. Sivivatu and Rockocoko have to go and Nonu has to wash the butter off his hands before each game.
We’re less than 2 yrs out from the world cup, at least “this” team we aren’t peaking too early…!!
Ivan said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:22am | Report comment
He said that Frans was knocking the kicks over from 60m during hte warmup. In perspective, thats at sea level too.
Which means that at the altitude of JHB, he could prob put over 70m kicks…. which is close to the opp. 22 !
I am very proud of the boks. Fantastic achievement this year. Now just go to Europe, and whack France and Ireland for us.
Ivan said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:24am | Report comment
Would anyone still argue that the boks are not number 1 in the world this year?
I imagine that the europeans might beg to differ, although… they need to remember that the boks got 30% better since they met the Lions. In perspective, the Aussies and blacks would prob. have beaten the Lions too this year.
Either way, We saw good aerial attacks, and when they wanted to they gave us running rugby.
I dont think any european nations would have lived with us this year.
Knives Out said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:26am | Report comment
I love the objective perspective you bring to the table, Ivan, not to mention the accurate mathemiatical analysis (30%.. That must have taken some working out?!). It’s so refreshing.
Ivan said | September 13th 2009 @ 5:47pm | Report comment
Dont act sour KO. Its just my opinion. That is after all what this blog is about? opinions.
10%, 30% whats the difference. The boks got better in the 3N, and individually, none of the 6N teams would have matched them. How i got to this opinion is by thinking that the combined Brittish teams were as good, if not better than the boks earlier in the year, now the boks are better and the Brittish teams are back to their own jumpers.
Is that a fair summation?
Eagle said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:55pm | Report comment
Sorry Ivan but this those British teams are in for a hiding from Oz, NZ and SA in November
And if you think the Lions where better than the Boks you are smokin stuff.
Knives Out said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:03pm | Report comment
I don’t think that’s a fair summation, in fact I think you are way, way off, and I’m not sure how you could think your analysis is a fair summation given a summation involves inherent subjectivity which, of course, means that it cannot be fair. My opinion is that SA played far better against the Lions in tests 1 and 2 than they did against any of the other nations. The Lions tested SA to the absolute brink which left a lot of people thinking that the Lions should have won the series. It is my opinion, and not a fair summation, therefore, that the Lions would have taken Australia and perhaps NZ to the cleaners. It is also my opinion that it is illogical to be making claims like this: ‘I dont think any european nations would have lived with us this year.’ when the Lions team showed a group of far more talented individuals and also given the poor display that SA offered last Autumn, and also simply because you will find out in the Autumn.
MM said | September 16th 2009 @ 11:58am | Report comment
Knives Out,
You could have done better than this…. You assert yourself into a position of authority through your linguistic skills – which you do have.
Yet, in your quest, you fail miserably in that you often do not give substantive evidence backing up your statements!
One response was dead on saying that the Boks do what they have to and move on, not caring what the media says because of their confidence and why waste time and energy just to keep critics happy? The score-boards show it and that’s what counts at the end of the day.
An All Blacks fan, it’s fair to reflect the truth.
Did you lose your head re: Bil’s ??? Not a bad bunch – they proved overtly clearly they were unable – full stop – much to their mortified horror and stupidly attempted to capitalize on the 3rd test by which time the Boks had no further point to prove, their minds on the next feat. What the hell is so special about the Bil’s?? They failed sunshine and also operated on the “Ifs and buts”. Ifs and buts don’t count on the score-board.
No ways did we think you’d stoop to the proverbial “ifs” and “buts”. But you did. And you dolloped yourself down there, sad to say because many of your statements have been value adding.
MM said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Ivan,
Where are you trying to come from???
Ivan said | September 13th 2009 @ 5:48pm | Report comment
What are you trying to ask?
Colin N said | September 13th 2009 @ 10:34am | Report comment
“Would anyone still argue that the boks are not number 1 in the world this year?”
I don’t think anyone’s argued with that.
“they need to remember that the boks got 30% better since they met the Lions. In perspective, the Aussies and blacks would prob. have beaten the Lions too this year.”
Again, another ludicrous prediction that is impossible to work out. Should I expect anything less?
“I dont think any european nations would have lived with us this year.”
We’ll find out in the Autumn, although, I would consider the Lions European, who seemed to ‘live’ with South Africa pretty well.
Ivan said | September 13th 2009 @ 5:43pm | Report comment
Thats like saying the Saffas kiwis and wallabies combined are southern? Would the Lions beat hte Southerns?
I meant individual 6N teams.
Knives Out said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:05pm | Report comment
Obviously it’s not as simple as that. The Lions was an extended Barbarians side with 10 different 22s in 10 different games. I would imagine that a midfield of Carter-Giteau-Smith, for example, would struggle to blend, as would a backrow of Elsom, McCaw, Spies.
Colin N said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:29pm | Report comment
Then we’ll find out in the Autumn.
johnny-boy said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:32am | Report comment
The Boks are number one – but the Wallabies are steaming up behind them – hopefully …
fred said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:36am | Report comment
the skill level of the all blacks was appalling .carters kicking was sound but even his passing was below par which is disappointing.the backs are playing deans whats in front of them and have absolutely no idea or vision.henry must get out of wesley college mode cos this style aint working .the set piece is a disgrace and i agree with cookee that heads should roll if the basics cannot be performed.the allblacks past successes have camouflaged the growing problem of technical development.if something doesnt work plan b becomes a neuron too far so we have the same thing again faster and harder with the same results.the admiral taking of a scrum instead of a certain 3 pts supports my case on the need for basics esp set piece .i dont enjoy a penalty kicking game but when would you sacrifice points for the hope that this team would score tries from set piece when havent done so under wayne smith for season;irrational and a sign of stress not strategy.
in short,the writing is on the wall the all blacks are deluding themselves if they think this outfit is developing lets hope the wallabies dont win by too much next week