Springboks claim Tri-Nations glory
By Chris Foley, 13 Sep 2009 Chris Foley is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Frans Steyn, Graham Henry, Peter de Villiers, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations
293 Have your say
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
The dominant Springboks held off a late All Blacks charge for a 32-29 victory here Saturday to secure the Tri-Nations rugby crown for the first time in five years.
Both sides scored two tries, but the pertinent scoring difference for the world champions was the phenomenal boot of Francois Steyn who landed three penalties from inside his own half, the longest from 60 metres.
The Springboks went into the crucial Test knowing just one bonus point from a close loss should have been enough to secure the title, but said they would accept nothing less than victory.
In the end the final score flattered the All Blacks who fought back from a 17-point deficit early in the second half and were only a fingertip away from pulling off a surprise win at the end.
“At the end my heart was in my throat as we always knew the All Blacks would never give up,” said South Africa coach Peter de Villiers.
Despite the close finish, All Blacks coach Graham Henry had no argument with the result which ended the All Blacks four-year reign in the southern hemisphere championship.
“They deserved to win. They played very structured rugby and played it very well,” he said.
“We didn’t play well enough for the first 60 minutes. We needed to play for longer periods of time with a lot more consistency.”
The win not only gave the Springboks their third Tri-Nations title, but for the first time since 1970-1976 they have beaten the All Blacks in three successive Tests.
For nearly three-quarters of the game the Springbok were in a class of their own as they dominated across the field, forcing the All Blacks into repeated handling errors.
The first-half onslaught, in which they led 22-12 at half-time, was stretched to 29-12 early in the second spell, leaving the All Blacks searching for answers.
South Africa scored two tries, to Fourie de Preez and Jean de Villiers with Francois Steyn landing his three massive penalties while Morne Steyn added 13 points from a range of close range penalties, conversions and a drop goal.
For the All Blacks, Dan Carter landed five penalties and converted the tries of Sitiveni Sivivatu and Richie McCaw.
The All Blacks had points on the board from the opening whistle, gifted a penalty from the way the Springboks gathered and protected the kick-off and Carter secured the three points.
That was the cue for fullback Francois Steyn to step up and launch his kicking onslaught as he landed penalties from 60, 58 and 53 metres.
Du Preez scored South Africa’s first try when Bryan Habana knocked Joe Rokocoko out of the way going for a high ball close to the All Blacks line.
The second try, early in the second half came after Henry pulled inside centre Stephen Donald 10 minutes from the field and Carter’s first pass to his replacement Isaia Toeava was intercepted by de Villiers who raced away to score unopposed.
With the game almost out of reach, the All Blacks snapped into action and scored their first try when Sivivatu crossed in the corner.
In the dying minutes a Carter crosskick was fielded by Richie McCaw wide out to touch down, but a repeat of that move with time on the clock ended with the All Blacks tipping the ball into touch.
© AAP 2012Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Frans Steyn, Graham Henry, Peter de Villiers, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations

September 13th 2009 @ 8:40am
MM said | September 13th 2009 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Penalties contributing to points on the board – especially the non-substantive ones legally certainly do distort the final outcome.
Perhaps there’s a little harshness on the AB’s – let’s face it, despite the Boks employing various strategies besides the missiles Frans Steyn boots over the posts, few other teams could have put up both determination and resistance the AB’s did.
They, in my humble opinion have set the president for world rugby and have proved it through their Tri Nations score board. A great pity they lose it somewhere for the world cup – but they may surprise the world. Notice I said “may” before there are a host of attacking comments.
Great tribute and respect to the Boks!! Skipper, John Smit certainly punished the media more than the players per se. Insufficient recognition is given to du Preez who’s always there – continuously clearing the ball. De Villiers for his unique tries when least expected. Frans Steyn worthy of mentioning again, in a class of his own firing missiles over the posts – and well complimented by Morne Stein.
It was a game where all Boks aimed to win!!
Chris, it’s hard to agree that the final outcome was flattering to the AB’s…. one either wins or loses, and clearly they didn’t look or feel flattered. Nonetheless – they play a brilliant game! Ma’ Nano was fearsome – who can say he had an “off-night”?
The rugby world was again rewarded with the more exciting clash between the AB’s and Boks – more exciting, one won’t easily see.
September 13th 2009 @ 9:31am
True Tah said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Nonu kept losing the ball in contact, and it happened when the All Blacks were starting to get some momentum.
I think the Boks have shown that they are a great team. The Bulls won the Super 14, the Boks have claimed both the Lions and the Tri Nations, but most importantly, they won in NZ, and beating the All Blacks in NZ is a mighty achievement.
It was good to see John Smit get some revenge on Brad Thorn!!!
September 13th 2009 @ 9:43am
MM said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:43am | Report comment
As the saying goes, yes – the Boks will punish most weaknesses and in this case it was more the media who were ultimately being punished.
If they could leave the intricacies of the game to the players, rather than speculate and “punish” whether true or not, rugby and other sport for that matter may well retain the dignity they deserve.
September 13th 2009 @ 5:51pm
Ivan said | September 13th 2009 @ 5:51pm | Report comment
Smit couldnt have planned that tackle on Thorne better if he had scripted the game himself.
September 13th 2009 @ 9:13am
Marty said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:13am | Report comment
A classic game, watching replays over and over.
September 13th 2009 @ 9:51am
katzilla said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:51am | Report comment
Congratulations Boks, and also Bok fans. Thoroughly deserved win and championship clincher.
I’m happy with the progress the ABs had forced on them towards the end of the game.
With the return of our Centres for the end of year tour i’m a little less worried about what we may face in the north now (that and not playing Ireland this time round)
Good to see the Tron fans hang around and applaud the winning team, good for rugby and rugby in NZ.
The Atmosphere seemed good too for a small crowd.
What I don’t agree with is penalties when you have the ball in hand, 3 points for the other team is a bit much when you have the ball. It happened to both teams last night. They should change it to free kicks if you are putting the ball into the scrum and your team collapses it.
September 13th 2009 @ 9:01pm
Eagle said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:01pm | Report comment
The game was an absolute ad for rugby, a confirmation of why AB’s vs Boks are historically the great clashes. Anyone who wants to change the rules after this match is a sour apple.
September 13th 2009 @ 9:42pm
pothale said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:42pm | Report comment
“With the return of our Centres for the end of year tour i’m a little less worried about what we may face in the north now (that and not playing Ireland this time round)”
LOL, Katzilla. You mean Ireland might have had a chance of breaking their duck this year?
September 13th 2009 @ 11:50pm
katzilla said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:50pm | Report comment
I think it may have been the best chance Ireland get for quite awhile.
It will happen eventually, it has to. But I think this would have been a prime time for Ireland
September 14th 2009 @ 2:10am
pothale said | September 14th 2009 @ 2:10am | Report comment
Not so sure about that. Kidney hopefully will use the AI’s as a testing ground for some new players that have to come through for the future/next WC. Getting them blooded in advance of the 6N is more important than whether they win against Fiji, Aus or SA, in my view. Deans is looking to do the same with the squad he brings on the Grand Slam tour. P diddy V will do the same. If they were playing the ABs, the outcome would come marked with the usual SH asterisk if they lose – developing team/second string, etc, etc.
September 14th 2009 @ 2:37am
Knives Out said | September 14th 2009 @ 2:37am | Report comment
Who do you want Kidney to blood?
September 14th 2009 @ 3:41am
pothale said | September 14th 2009 @ 3:41am | Report comment
Well not all of them need blooding, some need more game time/caps/full games:
Buckley/Court/Cave/Ross/McLaughlin/Humphreys/Healy/Earls/McFadden/Sexton/Casey/Murphy/Cullen are a few. There’s also a saffa prop (loose) called Brett Wilkinson who’s played for Connacht for last few seasons, and has just earned residency status. He’s been added to the squad by Kidney. Maybe him and Ross?
Specifically, Hayes and Horan need to have guys pushing them for their places.
Hooker – we’re doing all right in – Flannery, Best and Jackman/Cronin
Locks – The O’Cs need serious competition – Cullen and Toner or Casey would be good
Backrow – Heaslip, Ferris, Leamy, Wallace & Jennings is so-so – Jennings needs caps
Scrum-halves – O’Leary, Reddan and Stringer is ok
Out-halves – O’Gara needs to be replaced by Sexton if he can make the grade with Humphrey’s as a back-up
Centres – as you pointed out previously Darcy is the only natural 12 – but hopefully McFadden can do something this season even though he’s 13 at Leinster at moment. Earls & Cave also. P Wallace should not be pursued.
Wings – Bowe, Trimble, Horgan, Fitzgerald, is plenty
FB – Kearney with Murphy as back-up is ok.
So ideally for 6N, but Kidney won’t push his luck:
Ross
Flannery
Wilkinson
Toner
O’Connell
Ferris
Wallace
Heaslip
Reddan (if O’Leary still out)
Sexton
McFadden
O’Driscoll
Bowe
Fitzgerald
Kearney
Replacements:
Jennings
Healy
Buckley
Best
Casey
Wallace
Earls
Stringer or else Reddan if O’Leary back
September 13th 2009 @ 10:01am
Dingbat said | September 13th 2009 @ 10:01am | Report comment
…and now MyGeneration wants to ban 60m kicks….!? – gotta luv it: Graham Henry – rugby should be a spectacle, we champion running rugby (why, cause the Boks hammer you by playing the kick ‘n charge game); Steyn has a rare skill, it benefits the Boks – so ban it! one-eyed, so one-eyed.
September 13th 2009 @ 11:42am
MM said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:42am | Report comment
A great laugh in good spirit at the way you came out with that Dingbat….
September 13th 2009 @ 1:19pm
MyGeneration said | September 13th 2009 @ 1:19pm | Report comment
I’m not a Kiwi, Dingbat, I just like a bit of Rugby with my Rugby. I got plenty of 60m kicks watching the end of the Aussie Rules last night.
September 13th 2009 @ 9:03pm
Eagle said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:03pm | Report comment
What absolute nonsense MG. Anyone who has been around rugby long enough knows we had rugby and plenty of it yesterday.
September 14th 2009 @ 8:01am
MyGeneration said | September 14th 2009 @ 8:01am | Report comment
For the last time, I’m not knocking the whole game! I’m just not comfortable with 60m penalty goals, people! It’s a worthwhile discussion point. Get some perspective. I liked a lot of what I saw, but not all of it, OK? I believe it’s called a point-of-view. No, I don’t like being accused of absolute nonsense. Relative nonsense, maybe…
September 14th 2009 @ 6:51pm
Eagle said | September 14th 2009 @ 6:51pm | Report comment
Ok, i’ll settle for relative nonsense.
September 13th 2009 @ 10:01am
Terry Kidd said | September 13th 2009 @ 10:01am | Report comment
I couldn’t see the game and am going off reports only. Is it correct to say that for the first 60 minutes the Boks pressured the ABs and fed off their mistakes?
I’ve read that the AB set piece was not good. How did the line outs go? What was the scrumming like? Did Smit hold his own in the scrums?
Well done to the Boks. A good win in NZ no less is nothing to denigrate. They have been the form team this year and deserve No 1 at this stage. But a question or two ….. have the Boks now reached their pinnacle? Where can they improve further? Serious question guys, not trying to run them down.
I asked this last week …. where do the ABs go from here? How does Henry remould this squad into a winnig team? Does the squad need some new blood? If so, who?
Finally, what sort of soul searching will occur in NZ rugby if the Wallabies win in Wellington next week? Did the Boks play better than Brisbane or did they perform about the same and the ABs were not quite up to it?
September 13th 2009 @ 11:20am
ohtani's jacket said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:20am | Report comment
Terry,
The game started off with SA being penalised from the kick-off, but after that the Boks were clinical.
Their kicking game was flawless and they looked to attack with ball in hand within the All Blacks’ half. NZ made a number of strong runners and arguably played against the rush defence better than they have done this season, but there were a number of penalty turnovers while they were on attack which Steyn nailed from his own half. That lifted the Boks, and they pressured the All Blacks into making mistakes.
The All Black lineout suffered from a breakdown in communication between the jumpers, though they did manage to disrupt a lot of South Africa’s own lineout ball. The breakdown was fairly even and towards the end there was some strong breakdown play from the All Blacks. The scrums weren’t really a talking point. NZ won a few penalties from memory.
I’m not sure where the Boks will go from here, but the All Blacks just have to work at improving. They were fighting against a brick wall and they’ve got to start imposing themselves on the game more.
The Boks were much better in Brisbane. Australia wouldn’t have beaten them in last night’s Test.
September 13th 2009 @ 11:46am
fred said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:46am | Report comment
OJ,SO WHAT YOUR SAYING IN ESSENCE IS ABS MORE OF SAME.
similar pattern to previous tri nations games .unconvincing in wins in auckland/sydney ,games that could have gone either way;and two losses in africa.and wallies beat boks well in brissy.
hope your optimistic spin stands up to scrutiny agst wallies , but with respect i take more out of performance patterns than your opinion.
September 13th 2009 @ 1:20pm
Spencer said | September 13th 2009 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
OJ – Sorry to be so blunt, but your summary is nonsense. Please watch it again. As a neutral I was bored sensless for the fist 60 minutes. The Boks were clinical (read simple) and the ABs were dreadfull!
You last point is also nonsense…a team only plays as well as the opposition allows. The ABS applied no pressure or threat. This enabled the Boks to play their favoured conservative game.
Horribly disappointing match!
September 13th 2009 @ 5:37pm
ohtani's jacket said | September 13th 2009 @ 5:37pm | Report comment
Since when was there such a thing as a neutral Aussie?
The All Blacks were pn the backfoot for 60 minutes, but they didn’t play as badly as they did in Durban. It was clear from the get-go that the All Blacks weren’t going to blow the Springboks away for a four try bonus point and a big winning margin.
Once the Boks put points on the board it was going to be a Test that we either won or lost. If we’d won, we would’ve won the battle but lost the war.
This point of pride that the Aussies beat the Boks in Brisbane is grating. The Boks were crap in Brisbane and good in Hamilton. You can get all pumped up and say the Wallabies forced the Boks to play like crap but I don’t think that was the case.
They clearly regrouped and rallied around Smit. All credit to them. Articles like the above that say the scoreline flattered the All Blacks are filled with more nonsense than what I wrote.
September 13th 2009 @ 6:33pm
Shahsan said | September 13th 2009 @ 6:33pm | Report comment
Spencer, I don’t think you understand rugby. Go watch Aussie rules or league. OJ was spot on.
September 13th 2009 @ 9:07pm
Eagle said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:07pm | Report comment
Spencer OJ is far more accurate in his analysis than you. You just reflect that you watched with a view to satisfy a personal hope and not to appreciate rugby.
September 14th 2009 @ 6:16pm
Ben J said | September 14th 2009 @ 6:16pm | Report comment
Spencer,I thought OJ offered a correct summary on a action filled test. Why do you rail so much against the Boks anyway? It seems that you are quite emotional for a “neutral” observer…
September 13th 2009 @ 5:56pm
Ivan said | September 13th 2009 @ 5:56pm | Report comment
Is it fair to say that the boks prob. had this NZ game in their minds last weekend in Brisbane?
I still think that the boks can improve from here. Their game has some very strong attributes, but is not complete.
September 13th 2009 @ 10:19am
Peter K said | September 13th 2009 @ 10:19am | Report comment
I truly hope that there will be a kicker in each team that kick penalty goals from their 22, say all 70-80 metre plus kickers. Then they may change the laws and only allow kicks for goal for serious infringements, and kick for the line for technical infringements.
It has to be remembered in the old old days of the heavy leather ball and small sweet spot when these laws came into being kicking a goal was hard and 40 metres was a long way. Times have changed, and so has the equipment so maybe the laws should catch up.
September 13th 2009 @ 9:09pm
Eagle said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:09pm | Report comment
Both Gerald Bosch and Naas Botha averaged above 80%. And then there is the small matter of a certain Don Clarke.
September 13th 2009 @ 11:08am
ohtani's jacket said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:08am | Report comment
Well, there was night and day between the Boks that showed up in Hamilton and the team that lost in Brisbane.
They were structured, well organised and efficient. They bothered NZ with their rush defence and were completely on song with their kicking game. It was always going to be a rough night for the All Blacks when Steyn started kicking monster penalties from his own side of halfway.
What can you say? They played their style of rugby and were worthy winners. Even if the All Blacks had won, the Boks would’ve claimed the Tri-Nations. They worked hard for it, they deserve it, and I’ve got no problems with them winning. The All Blacks simply have to get better.
I don’t think it’s worth singling out the mistakes the All Blacks made because for every mistake there were instances where they got it right. The final 20 minutes or however long it was is the best they’ve played all year.
September 13th 2009 @ 2:04pm
cookee said | September 13th 2009 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
OHTANIIS JACKET,,
THEREFORE THE ABS PLAYED SAME CRAP FOR 60 MINS started getting better for final 20 and lost and you say “they simply have got to get better”brilliant summation.
and they lose3 in row agst bok and you say “its not worth singling out the mistakes cos there were instances when they got it right” but by your assessment it logically was on a ratio of 60:20;3 to 1.
mate its this ramification surely that determines results and yes must be singled out and sorted
September 13th 2009 @ 5:51pm
ohtani's jacket said | September 13th 2009 @ 5:51pm | Report comment
I think it’s a gross exaggeration to say they played like crap for 60 minutes.
They made some mistakes. Some of them they managed to rectify with turnover ball, two of them led to tries, but on the scoreboard SA were in front with the nine point margin they gained from kicks no other side would attempt. The ABs were crap because they were penalised 60m out and Steyn nailed the kick? That’s harsh.
It’s hardly as if they fell on their sword like in Durban. The only thing that really disappointed me was when they had good attacking position at the end of the first half and Carter tried that stupid grubber.
Donald was weak aside from that one run where he wasn’t held, and Nonu had a rough night, but there was always the chance that the midfield combo wouldn’t work. That was a risk going into the match. The style the All Blacks play requires precision and carries a fair degree of risk. We were running up hill all night against an organised Boks outfit.
Maybe it’s flippant, but I just don’t think it was that big a deal. Henry needs to make changes, but we were always going to lose the Tri-Nations to some opponent at some point and at least we went out in style.
We’re thin in the backs, thin in the forwards and will probably remain that way until the next generation push their way through. We had it good for a few years there. There’s no point getting upset because we’re back to where we were in 2001 or 2002.
September 13th 2009 @ 6:37pm
fred said | September 13th 2009 @ 6:37pm | Report comment
OJ,you put a positive spin on mediocrity,why would you bother.
yes carter kicked well but his generalship/combo/passing certainly didnt compensate for others;very average.
your personal view its no big deal is fine but your posts suggest a different attitude and i find this selective.
clearly the performance pattern is subpar and requires the same tweaking you criticised(quite rightly) deans for
not only therefore are we weak(thin)in backs,forwards we are similarly weak in change mgt and thus the selections and tactics have as much to do for slow performance as players imo.
what is glaringly obvious is the staff not addressing the abs ineptitude in basic areas eg,catching of bombs and lineout incompetence etc .i dont think im being unreasonable in requesting the basics.
finally, the garden needs weeding and those players are again obvious
September 13th 2009 @ 7:23pm
ohtani's jacket said | September 13th 2009 @ 7:23pm | Report comment
Well, All Blacks fans have to accept that we weren’t good enough to win the Tri-Nations this year. We didn’t look good enough in June and we weren’t good enough last night.
It’s not that bitter a pill to swallow. You mention the catching under the high ball but there were a number of excellent takes. One take — that was extremely well challenged, btw — led to a South African try, but in actual fact it was the culmination of several errors.
You can’t expect a side to play perfectly for 80 minutes. They’re going to make mistakes and some of them will be costly. The important thing is how they respond. The All Blacks stole games from the Boks in 2004, 2005 and 2007. They couldn’t do it this time. I’m not about to begrudge the Springboks their victory anymore than I did last year in Dunedin.
What Henry does next will be interesting, but it’s a bit immaterial on Sunday. It’s something for Tuesday, I suppose. Certainly, I’d like to see some changes. I’ve been lobbying for new blood since the Grand Slam tour. If you ask me, all the signs were there last year that the ride was over.
Whether Henry can come back from this or turns out to be another John Hart, I’m not sure when we’ll learn the answer to that.
Who do you want in the team?
September 13th 2009 @ 9:12pm
Eagle said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:12pm | Report comment
The Boks have a lineout that is clearly the greatest lineout since John eales. It is obvious teams will struggle. To say the All Blacks was poor is to assume they played against an average team. You’re smokin stuff and I am starting to hope the AB correct your perspective in Wellington. In spite of liking the allaby team I am starting to worry about their fans. Do they even understand rugby union?
September 13th 2009 @ 9:18pm
Knives Out said | September 13th 2009 @ 9:18pm | Report comment
‘To say the All Blacks was poor is to assume they played against an average team.’
Or it means that they were poor by their own standards.
September 14th 2009 @ 3:21am
Eagle said | September 14th 2009 @ 3:21am | Report comment
There is something fundamentally wrong with saying a team was poor because they lost. If they had scored on that last move and won and went on to win I am sure a lot of their detractors would’ve been quite happy.
September 14th 2009 @ 7:29pm
Spencer said | September 14th 2009 @ 7:29pm | Report comment
The ABs were poor by any definition.
My memories (which I am trying to forget):
1. Donald being smashed everytime he tried to run (did he think he was Lomu against Catt)
2. Nonu dropping the ball 4 times in contact
3. Carter kicking out on the full from a restart (essentially twice..or was it 3 times)
4. Losing the first 4 throws on own lineout
How could anyone think the ABs were anything but dreadful. OJ has been in Japan for far too long!
September 15th 2009 @ 4:17am
Eagle said | September 15th 2009 @ 4:17am | Report comment
Spencer I guess you only like rugby when the opposition cooperate so that your team looks good. The All Blacks looked good to me. The Boks looked better.
September 13th 2009 @ 11:16am
Dingbat said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Check the AB try from 4min 8sec on the clip: did he ground the ball, or did Burger hold him up?
Check Richie’s try at the end, was he in front of the kicker?
http://www.rugbydump.com/
September 13th 2009 @ 11:24am
ohtani's jacket said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:24am | Report comment
He wasn’t held-up, that’s just inane. I doubt McCaw was behind the kicker.
September 13th 2009 @ 2:59pm
Jerry said | September 13th 2009 @ 2:59pm | Report comment
Sivivatu grounded it fine. Couldn’t see if McCaw was onside, but he may not have been as he didn’t look to be running hard when the cameras caught up to him.
The AB’s got a fair few marginal calls from Owens – one penalty in particular (for either Beast or Broussow falling on the ball) was baffling and the first penalty was pretty harmless (thought I know the IRB has instructed refs to crack down on that). The Boks only got one big call their way which was the turnover that lead to their last penalty – Du Plessis wasn’t a tackler, then entered the ruck, fell over and got to his feet to claim the ball. Overall, the Boks probably got the sharp end though,
I didn’t think they outplayed the AB’s that badly – when you consider they got 9 points from penalties in their own half. They’re very efficient in taking any points on offer, but they don’t really dominate for long periods. Still, if Steyn can put those long bombs over and the other Steyn can take any points on offer in the other half, they’ll be hard to beat.
September 13th 2009 @ 10:07pm
Dingbat said | September 13th 2009 @ 10:07pm | Report comment
Ok give you Sivivatu (although don’t see where he grounds it). 2 or the 4 gifted penalties all in SA’s half were very dodgy; take away another 7 points for Richie’s offside. Game was hardly close. As for banning kicks for pole from your own half, just sour grapes. You pick your team and develop your strategy based on the rules. You telling me the AB’s – if they had a Steyn – would not take the 60m kick for poles because they are “purists” and want to please the crowds? Henry wld take a 3nil win right now courtesy of a single 75m penalty!!
September 13th 2009 @ 10:13pm
ohtani's jacket said | September 13th 2009 @ 10:13pm | Report comment
You don’t even have to see the replay to see where he grounded it. Stop being annoying.
September 13th 2009 @ 11:30am
Terry Kidd said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:30am | Report comment
Thanks OJ. So we should expect a close game and result then Saturday night if both teams play well. From your report the Wallabies will have to be as committed as they were in Brisbane or they will lose again.
September 13th 2009 @ 12:08pm
fred said | September 13th 2009 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
terry,the wallies lost twice to abs but dont bet your house on either team this week.the home ground and psychological advantage i would suggest is less significant than the wellington weather.
the result of this game is huge in the future of both teams imo and you would worry about the combos of the abs structure as witnessed last night.
September 13th 2009 @ 6:01pm
ohtani's jacket said | September 13th 2009 @ 6:01pm | Report comment
I’m not sure what Saturday will bring. It’s going to be a long week for the All Blacks. Hopefully, they’ll be up for it, but it’s not difficult to imagine the wind being taken out of their sails.
The All Blacks play the Wallabies a little differently. There’s a slower pace to the way they try to control the game. If the Wallabies can get the All Blacks out of that comfort zone, they stand a good chance. I imagine the Wallabies are hungrier at this point and the All Blacks more than a little frustrated, but we’ll see what selections Henry makes during the week and how the team practice.
I thought they made a genuine effort in the Test and their loss wasn’t for want of trying. The Boks were just good. Better than I’ve been giving them credit for anyway. There was one part where Smit made a huge tackle on Thorn forcing him to knock it on and a bunch of Smit’s teammates came over to the applaud him. They’re obviously a pretty tight knit group.
So, yeah, the All Blacks won’t be all that confident heading into Wellington and the Wallabies could take it. Back it up in Tokyo and things will look a little bleaker for the All Blacks.
September 13th 2009 @ 11:59am
I like donuts! said | September 13th 2009 @ 11:59am | Report comment
Good Grief!! The Boks win a classic and people are talikng about banning long kicks! Geez Louise! We got beaten fair and square by a better side…we have plenty of work to do…but at least we have 2 years to do it.
The Boks didn’t win because of Steyn…they won because they were better. WE CANNOT WIN if we cannot win our own lineouts. End of story.
OK…has anyone had a Kripey Kreme donut from the States? Marvelous!