So Robbie, when can we expect some silverware?
By Brett McKay, 15 Sep 2009 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- robbie deans, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup

Australia's Wallabies react after their 19-14 loss to New Zealand's All Blacks during their Bledisloe Cup match in Hong Kong Saturday, Nov. 1, 2008. AP Photo/Kin Cheung
Like a lot of Australian rugby fans, the recent breakthrough victory by the Wallabies in this year’s Tri-Nations tournament was exactly the sort of win I have been waiting to see under coach Robbie Deans.
The Wallabies that ran out last Saturday night against South Africa carried the weight of a nation’s expectations, but put on a display that can only come with the unbridled enthusiasm of youth.
Annoyingly, I didn’t think about hitting ‘record’ until well after half time.
Despite three disallowed tries, the Wallabies were outstanding in their two-tries-to-nil 21-6 win in Brisbane, while the South Africans were forced to suspend their seemingly inevitable march to the Tri-Nations title for another week.
South Africa resumed the inevitable on Saturday night just gone of course, wrapping up the Tri-Nations with a methodical 32-29 victory over New Zealand in Hamilton. It is South Africa’s first Tri-Nations series win since 2004.
Australia’s Tri-Nations drought, unfortunately, runs even longer.
2001 was the last time the Wallabies have held the trophy, while the Bledisloe Cup hasn’t been seen in our cabinet since 2002.
And it’s this drought that had me thinking while driving home from a weekend away.
Sure, we’ve got the chocolates against most or all of the European Six Nations over the last twelve months, but with the greatest respect to our northern hemisphere rivals, it’s the trophies that are won down this way that we yearn for the most.
So Robbie Deans, when can we expect some silverware again?
I ask this not as any form of criticism, of either the Wallabies recent history, or even of Deans’ ability as a coach (as has been questioned in recent months), but as a genuine question from a rugby follower who’s been happy to allow the Kiwi coach some time to mould his first international team.
I don’t think I’m being too harsh in describing the Wallabies’ progress this domestic season as “steady”.
While they started out reasonably well against the Barbarians, Italy and France, once the Tri-Nations started it was almost as if a different team was playing in the Gold jerseys.
Poor options, bad execution, and ill-discipline was the hallmark of the Wallabies first four outings in the tournament, and while some gems were discovered along the way (namely a solid scrum, and Berrick Barnes’ midfield organisation), this year’s Tri-Nations campaign was over not long after it began.
Fast forward to the Brisbane match against South Africa, and it was like all our prayers had been answered.
A scrum that could not be moved was once again the proverbial foundation for the win, and indeed has led to the South African front row been likened to breakfast cereal for the way they were snapped, crackled and popped out of the scrum engagement (true story, I could not make that up).
But just as importantly, the lineout functioned as a cohesive unit, rather than seven blokes loosely assembled while another one throws a ball to the opposition.
Further, after being outclassed by Springbok lineout general Victor Matfield in Perth, the Wallaby forwards were much more shrewd in their calls in Brisbane and Matfield’s presence was mostly nullified.
Thankfully, this was the night that the backline clicked, too.
The decision to give young Queensland scrumhalf Will Genia a debut start was well and truly justified with his outstanding service from scrum and ruck base, and Adam Ashley-Cooper has without a doubt provided a season highlight, with his cracking set-piece try finished off by hugging the first three rows of Suncorp Stadium’s Bay 311.
It’s at this point though that I need to turn around a well-worn cliché. Yes, the Wallabies are currently only as good as their last game.
But for me, the true test of this team comes this weekend against the All Blacks in windy Wellington.
For the Wallabies this week, the cliché needs to be “you’re only as good as your next game”.
Interestingly and ominously, New Zealand have never lost three Tests at home in a single season. A win this weekend for the Wallabies would a nice little piece of history, if nothing else.
And they’re good enough to do it.
Wallaby supporters can see the team is coming together.
There’s undoubted potential and promise on show every time the Wallabies take the field. I’m liking what I’m seeing in this focus on youth.
But by the same token how much longer do supporters have to survive on potential? When might this promise develop into series victories?
And on that note, what are were building towards currently? Is the 2011 Rugby World Cup the start or the end of this “rebuilding phase”? What about the 2010 and 2011 Tri-Nations and Bledisloe Cups before then?
Test wins here and there are great, but they’re going to need to be strung together more now, preferably bringing home some trophies for the dusty, disused cabinet.
I know there’s been a lot of necessary change and experimentation, and I appreciate that a new coach needs time to put his stamp on proceedings.
But surely the time must be rapidly approaching where the Wallabies are no longer “in transition” and once again are just The Wallabies?
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- robbie deans, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup

Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 2:23am | Report comment
Devil’s advocate: What happens if Australia lose to NZ and thus post a 1-5 09 3N record, and don’t win more than 50% of the matches of their Grand Slam tour? After all, the gap between 2nd and 3rd in the IRB rankings is larger than the gap between 3rd and 4th.
LeftArmSpinner said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:54am | Report comment
what happens: nothing other than Deans spends more time looking at S14 and grade rugby to uncover players who can play the rugby that the coach and the country want and require that they play everytime they pull on the gold jersey. Simple.
1-3: The front row has shown that they can do it;
4-5: Horwill returned to some form last time out. Chisholm has shown in the past that he can drop intensity, so we need another 2 locks
6: Elsom is returning to his imposing best and can be relied on to perform consistently. Mumm is a possible at 4-5-6
7: Smith, is on the want but Pocock is on the rise.
8: Not sure
9: Genia has done very well, albeit behind strong packs. Burgess will return to form.
10-12-13: Barnes, Giteau and AAC are both play consistently at full capacity
11-14-15: Turner, hynes, Mitchell and O’Connor are learning to play with the necessary intensity for 80 minutes and get involved in the game.
16-22: the bench is a work in progress.
So, the analysis is that the Wallabies have found players capable of playing with the necessary intensity and determination for 80 minutes in 13 of 15 starting positions. (one lock and 8 are questionable). They need to come together as a unit and play clever, determined and intense rugby for 80 minutes every time…………………..
only time will tell……………..
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 8:01am | Report comment
Goodness, isn’t rugby wonderfully simple this side of the hemisphere.
LeftArmSpinner said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:04pm | Report comment
Knives, I am holding your predictions for the Nov games. Silly billy. Dont mistake analysis for simplicity, but if you are assessing a team, look first at its parts. then if they are okay, see what the team unit is doing to add to the collective sum…………
Rugby is simple, if you know what you are talking about…………….
So how is that running game going? Hmmm, been under construction longer than Wembley and with lots of promises but no delivery. just ask the Underwoods or Guscott…………
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 8:33pm | Report comment
Silly you yourself. I haven’t made any predictions, but I shall.. just for you:
NZ V Australia (NZ)
England v Australia (I hold judgement until England’s injury problems are clarified)
Wales v NZ (NZ)
Wales v Samoa (Wales)
England v Argentina (England)
France v SA (France)
Ireland v Australia (Ireland)
Italy v NZ (NZ)
Scotland v Fiji (Scotland)
England v NZ (NZ)
Ireland v Fiji (Ireland)
Italy v SA (SA)
Scotland v Australia (Australia)
Wales v Argentina (Wales)
France v NZ (NZ)
Ireland v SA (Ireland)
Scotland v Argentina (Scotland)
Wales v Australia (Wales)
N.B. All game picks are open to change following the public disclosure of the appropriate squads.
Justin said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:13pm | Report comment
Get the ball, advance the ball, retain the ball, score… piece of pi.ss
van der Merwe said | September 15th 2009 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Perhaps O’Niell might have to “discover” a breach in a certain contract…
In any case, rest assured that there will be at least one sad Kiwi when this match is through.
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 6:29pm | Report comment
‘In any case, rest assured that there will be at least one sad Kiwi when this match is through.’
Very good.
Tim said | September 15th 2009 @ 9:14am | Report comment
What happens if Australia beat NZ and thus come second in this years tri nations, and win 100% of their Grand Slam tour?
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 6:30pm | Report comment
Then good for them.
fox said | September 15th 2009 @ 9:26am | Report comment
“the gap between 2nd and 3rd in the IRB rankings is larger than the gap between 3rd and 4th.”
How so? Actual ranking points, or just because you say so? On the IRB rankings those gaps are 3.3 vs 2.4, so a 0.9 differential. Hardly much difference. I suppose one could argue Ireland are close to the Wallabies on form, but we’ll see how that plays out soon enough once they square up against some decent opposition.
I’d say on form there is currently South Africa, a fair gap to the AB’s and a narrow gap to Australia. That could change this weekend.
In the highly unlikely event that the Wallabies lose 50% of games across the equator, we’ll line them and deans up one by one and execute them. That’s what will happen. Satisfied?
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 6:36pm | Report comment
‘Actual ranking points’
Yes. 3.3 is a giant leap in points. Look what separates the 5th, 6th and 7th ranked teams.
‘In the highly unlikely event that the Wallabies lose 50% of games across the equator’
Last season has been the only season this decade that Australia has remained unbeaten on their end of season tour.
‘That’s what will happen. Satisfied?’
Not really, brother. I’m not too into the consequences of Australian failure, but it seems appropriate to at least suggest the potential for a loss and thereby counter balance unrealistic unbridled optimism.
Matt0931 said | September 15th 2009 @ 2:26am | Report comment
Nice one Brett. I was thinking a similar thing a week ago after our win against the boks.
Although I don’t expect us to suddenly become amazing overnight I do think that next year we need to see some silverware or we will not be ready for the world cup.
The Bledisloe trophy will be a great starting point as the AB will be our bench mark for 2011 and we need to prove we can win in NZ to have any chance of beating them in their own back yard for rugby’s most important trophy.
johno said | September 15th 2009 @ 2:55am | Report comment
The AB’s are gonna slaughter Aus in Wellington.
They just don’t have the firepower up front to cope with the other nations in the 3N
CraigB said | September 15th 2009 @ 8:11am | Report comment
well done johno – most ridiculous statement thus far… Your real name isn’t PdV is it?? Aust may get slaughtered (i doubt it but they may), but to suggest it will be because they have nothing up front after watching them monster SA in Brissy and at least hold there own for large parts vs NZ last game out is brilliant. Its good to see your local mental health facilities allow internet access!
Dingbat said | September 15th 2009 @ 3:04am | Report comment
This Bok supporter is firmly behind Aus this weekend – for no reason other than I loved they way they played against us in Bris. Some of the most entertaining rugby I have ever watched has been inter-varsity showdowns. Usually an open running game, with caution thrown to the wind. This young Aussie side will bring a different perspective to the international scene. Make no mistake, I’m very happy for the Boks to win playing a structured less reckless game – that’s in our psyche; that’s where our ability lies. But to see the passion; energy and enthusiasm of the Aus side in Bris wins over any objective observer. Besides, I’ve never seen Graham Henry smile + Hanson said Big Vic is human when we all know he’s from another planet, so screw ‘em.
limbocraft said | September 15th 2009 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
I’m a bok supporter too and echo your comments exactly!
Viscount Crouchback said | September 15th 2009 @ 5:47am | Report comment
I suspect that the performance in Brisbane was the bounce of a dead cat. Apparently the Boks stayed on South African time when they arrived in Australia, which worked well in Perth but caused their sleeping patterns to be completely haywire by the time Brisbane came around.
fox said | September 15th 2009 @ 9:28am | Report comment
Great excuse that.
Brett McKay said | September 15th 2009 @ 6:57am | Report comment
Knives, it’s a fair question you raise, and I guess that should be another point of motivation this Saturday for the Wallabies. Noting of course that New Zealand won’t just roll over. Imagine how they’ll be seen if they did happen to lose three at home this year?? It all points to crcacking contest in Wellington.
Matt, I tend to agree. We keep hearing that everything is heading toward the 2011 RWC but there’s two full international seasons to be contested between now and then. Surely we’re aiming for something in between too??
Viscount, if that’s true that they stayed on SA time while in Australia, well that would have to rank up there with Eddie Jones making the Wallabies wear sunglasses on the flight to the Republic, to apparently stave off the effects of jet lag!!
sheek said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:10am | Report comment
The Wallabies still have a long way to go. Frankly, the only way they’re going to beat the ABs this weekend, is if the ABs don’t turn up to play.
This is highly unlikely since the ABs will be “desperate” for a win, much more so than the Wallabies. The cynic in me also suggests that the Wallabies are not yet at the level where they can produce two high quality matches back-to-back.
As for the NH grand slam, this will be a shoo-in (comments to come back & haunt me???) for the Wallabies. As Knives said, the difference between 3rd & 4th is greater than 2nd & 3rd. British & Irish rugby is off the pace.
I expect the Wallabies will appreciate the less intense opposition, & win all four NH tests reasonably comfortably. There, I said it….. now for the return bombardment!
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:26am | Report comment
‘As for the NH grand slam, this will be a shoo-in (comments to come back & haunt me???) for the Wallabies. As Knives said, the difference between 3rd & 4th is greater than 2nd & 3rd. British & Irish rugby is off the pace.’
Sheek, I said that the difference between 2 and 3 was greater than between 3 and 4, thus Australia is badly lagging behind SA and NZ, not that Ireland is lagging badly behind Australia. I admire your confidence but I would have to wholeheartedly disagree. I believe that Wales and Ireland are currently superior to Australia. The difference between Australia and Wales last year was far, far greater than the score suggested, and the one thing that the Lions tour showed the world is that the attacking talent no longer resides in the South. Now, for the return bombardment!
sheek said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:49am | Report comment
Knives,
Okay, I misread that.
However, the intensity of the 3N is such, for the Wallas playing in Europe will be a pushover by comparison.
I wouldn’t read too much into the Lions tour. Firstly, they still lost despite having the best resources of 4 countries.
Secondly, leading directly from the first, the individual sum of the 4 ‘home nations’ will be less than the total sum of the combined Lions side.
I would say that right now, being 3rd in the SH, is still better than first in the NH. And I say this with all the honest humility I can muster!
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:57am | Report comment
‘However, the intensity of the 3N is such, for the Wallas playing in Europe will be a pushover by comparison.’
If that is true then why did Australia look so woefully flat last year? Why did they look so mediocre against Italy, France and England, and why were they so convincingly beaten by Wales? Why does Australia have such an underwhelming European away record this decade?
‘I wouldn’t read too much into the Lions tour. Firstly, they still lost despite having the best resources of 4 countries.’
I would read a lot into it because the best performances thus year have come from an extended Barbarians side. As I have previously wasted my time explaining why being a Lion is a very difficult thing to do I won’t do it again. I imagine a SH side would find it hard to play 10 different games with 10 different teams in 6 weeks. To that extent, I would expect the NH teams who have spent that much more time together will be stronger than last year and rejuvenated by the fact that a host of their players looked so very good on such a big stage.
‘I would say that right now, being 3rd in the SH, is still better than first in the NH. And I say this with all the honest humility I can muster!’
According to the IRB rankings you are right, but I’m sure you thought that the last two times Australia got beaten by Ireland and by Wales. You may be proved right, you may not, but your glib assumptions are rather beguiling for an intelligent man. Frankly, I have no interest in Scotland, Wales or Ireland but I strongly suspect that Australia will struggle mightily to beat any of those teams.
fox said | September 15th 2009 @ 9:38am | Report comment
“If that is true then why did Australia look so woefully flat last year? Why did they look so mediocre against Italy, France and England, and why were they so convincingly beaten by Wales? Why does Australia have such an underwhelming European away record this decade?”
They looked mediocre last year because they were. For me the tide has turned a little. But this will play out one way or the other in the coming months. The tour will resolve whether we are actually righfully third. I suspect we are, and that it won’t be long before we climb a rung, but this is pure speculation. Just as I can’t extrapolate the Brisbane result into the future, neither can you take last season’s tour (more so, the years prior!) and use it as an accurate guide as to how this tour will end up. I think it is easy to recognise that there has been a big improvement in Wallaby land, even if we did lose 5 on the trot in the tri-nations. Now it’s a matter of going on with it.
If you ask me Ireland’s best years are definitely behind them, what with all those Munster guys heading very soon into retirement. Plus, that Leinster’s best player last season was Rocky Elsom (man of the match in the Heineken Cup final and up there as the best player in the whole tournament). That counts for something, IMO. Wales has a fair mix of youth, but still their better players are the older guard. By comparison I reckon Australia stacks up fairly well. There are some obvious gaps, as LAS highlighted (I tend to agree with those in the main) but there are also a lot of strengths there relative to teams like Wales and Ireland. As I said, we’ll see but at the moment I can;t help but be a little positive as to our chances. What would be the point of watching otherwise?!
pothale said | September 15th 2009 @ 10:24am | Report comment
I’ll only respond to this bit, cos you can say what you like about Wales.
“If you ask me Ireland’s best years are definitely behind them, what with all those Munster guys heading very soon into retirement. Plus, that Leinster’s best player last season was Rocky Elsom (man of the match in the Heineken Cup final and up there as the best player in the whole tournament). That counts for something, IMO. ”
I would disagree with some of your assumptions about players, and your overall assumption about Ireland. Ireland has had a good decade for the noughties. Top ranked with France with most games won, and accumulated points since 2000. However, they’ve only got a few Triple Crowns and a Grand Slam to show for it. Declan Kidney does not do sloppy seconds. O’Sullivan has one of the most successful win ratios of an Irish coach, but Kidney wants trophies. He’s got the pedigree. Two Heineken Cups with Munster and Grand Slam with Ireland ain’t bad over the last 3-4 years. But he won’t be happy with that lot. OK – winning a WC may be a step too far, but certainly a semi-final spot will be his target for 2011, along with at least another 6N championship on the way there.
So has he got the talent to achieve it?
Of the current team, as I’ve said elsewhere, we need to find a 1, 3 & 10 in the coming 12 months, and a 12 possibly. The stock is there, it just needs development and game time. Horan and Hayes are Munster and heading for the hills – Hayes more so with Buckley looking to replace him.
In Leinster, Mike Ross, Cian Healy and young registered saffa, Wilkinson are waiting for their turn. Flannery and Best have still got a good few years in them as hookers. O’Connell will last until next World Cup. Cullen or a much younger Toner could fill the other berth. He’s developing nicely in Leinster. Ferris at 6 is young and Ulster, Heaslip at 8 is young and Leinster, and Wallace of Munster fills the 7 berth. They’ll be a powerhouse over the next 2-3 years. O’Leary of Munster is only on his 6th/7th cap at 9. Sexton needs to fill O’Gara’s boots. He led the line for Leinster in last year’s H Cup final and could develop nicely – his impetuous 40m drop goal was a sign of that. Darcy and O’Driscoll did okay this season by all accounts and will last the next two, though there’s a couple of young guys who should be snapping at Darcy’s heels this year.
Earls, Kearney, Bowe, Fitzgerald, McFadden, Cave, Humphreys and Trimble are all in their early to mid 20′s. The backline has plenty of youth on its side. And talent.
Rocky was my player of the NH last season – but he was a one-season player. O’Driscoll did as much, if not more than him in landing the twin trophies. And Munster took the other in the Magners League.
I wouldn’t write them off just yet.
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 6:56pm | Report comment
‘I think it is easy to recognise that there has been a big improvement in Wallaby land, even if we did lose 5 on the trot in the tri-nations. Now it’s a matter of going on with it.’
That is very debatable. Australia has had one good performance in 8 tests this season. I’m not sure how you’d qualify that statement? Anyhow, following that line of thinking most rugby fans would be hard pressed to suggest that England and Ireland haven’t improved since last season, and whilst Wales perhaps regressed Gethin Jenkins, Matthew Rees, Adam Jones, Martyn Williams, Mike Phillips, Stephen Jones, Jamie Roberts and Lee Byrne all showed their true star quality. Fortunately for Australia a few of those players will be absent.
TBC..
True Tah said | September 15th 2009 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Sheek
I wouldnt be saying that just yet.
We got done by Wales last year, and I can guarantee that Ireland will be wanting build on from winning the Six Nations.
Im not sure the Lions are the best example of Northern Hemisphere Rugby, the Lions lost in 2001 with the nucleaus of the side being English, but individually England were the best nation from 2001-03.
sheek said | September 15th 2009 @ 10:33am | Report comment
TT,
No, I shouldn’t be saying that, but I did!
It wasn’t bragging, just an honest assessment of how I think the remaining season will pan out.
The ABs will beat us, but the changes Deans has made, will begin to bite effectively on the NH tour.
Anyway, I’ve struck my colours to the mast, & live with them I must!!
pothale said | September 15th 2009 @ 10:40am | Report comment
It’s okay, Sheek, we’ll let you change your mind over the next few weeks, particularly after the squads on both sides are announced.
pothale said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:45am | Report comment
SH teams only lost one game last year. This year they’ll be lucky to win one.
That kind of thing?
Knives Out said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:51am | Report comment
Oh no, you won’t hear that from me. I think that France, Ireland and Wales will collect a very solid set of results. I wouldn’t underestimate Scotland either.
Rusty said | September 15th 2009 @ 10:20am | Report comment
I would say it all depends on the team compositions heading North this year but I dont expect any of the NH teams to be easy beats. There is a definite resurgence occuring Norh of the equator. Looking at the schedules
Boks
6 Nov – Leicester
13 Nov – France
21 Nov – Italy
28 Nov – Ireland
A warm up game against what will probably be a toughish Leicester team. Then forgetting the gimme that it Italy games againsthe 2 teams whom have had the wood over SA away of late. It wont be easy, on the plus for the France game as usual they will only have 6 days to prepare and the Lievermont factor. Ireland will be very tough but depending on the week before will either be bouyed by a win or setback by a loss to the Wallabies. Its also good to see a shortend tour this year. Finally the warnings of burnout etc are being listened to
Wallabies
31 Oct – NZ
8 Nov – England
16 Nov – Ireland
22 Nov – Scotland
19 Nov – Wales
A very tough go for the men in gold. It will be interesting to see how England are going but I would say the Ozzies are favourites. Ireland again will be tough. Scotland I think will get monstered as the gold pack should draw parity but the Wallaby backs are light years ahead. Wales will be very interesting and in recent time have had good results – calling 50/50 for this.
NZ
31 Oct – Oz
8 Nov – Wales
15 Nov – Italy
22 Nov – England
29 Nov – France
The Tokyo money spinner which could go anyway. Wales could be interesting but I think the ABs have the menal wood on the Tafs. Italy for a game of cricket. England I also only see an AB result. France 50/50 and will depend on the SA game, they will have had a bit longer to gel and should be a good challenge.
Again, as said it depends on injuries to all teams etc but I reckon we will be in for a pretty well contested Autumn. Just watch out for the “blood” replacements
pothale said | September 15th 2009 @ 10:32am | Report comment
You’ve left out the other games that the NH teams will be playing in your assessment, though – which serve as useful playing time/good opposition/potential for injuries.
Fiji and Argentina won’t be pushovers for any of the teams. Ireland play Australia, then Fiji, then SA.
England play Argentina in the second match I think before NZ.
Rusty said | September 15th 2009 @ 10:36am | Report comment
thats because I was sure some knowledgable fellow from up North would fill in the gaps. Although if I was england i would be worrying about the Argies who are starting to develop a pretty decent record against the english
pothale said | September 15th 2009 @ 10:43am | Report comment
Yeah, but we dislike the Argies the most. Pity we’re not playing them again this year – that would be the match I’d want to go most to see. And us winning again obviously.
NickSA said | September 15th 2009 @ 7:52am | Report comment
Next week will determine where aus is. If they win, it will prove they played well last week and that they have the right combos! If they lose, i think it will show SA played poorly and maybe underestimated aus a tad. For the boks sake, i hope the wallabies lose because if they win i can tell you in the next 2 years the aussies are gonna be on fire. Personally i think the all blacks will win, aus are to young and have not had enough games with the right combos to find their feet. Imo by next year this time, the aussies will be no 2 in the world!! The aussies are just getting better and the all blacks seem to be on the decline.
LeftArmSpinner said | September 15th 2009 @ 8:04am | Report comment
NH boys, dont get ahead of yourself. There will be plenty of time for your bullish projections and predictions for the Spring tours.
We have a game on this weekend. it is against the second and third best teams in the world currently. Its a big one, and as you know, we like to take it one game at a time.
But, I will “bookmark” this article so later reference and quotes. But for now, we have two teams who have lots to play for as they struggle with their own demons: AB’s are out of form and off their traditional high levels of performance. The Wallabies have gone for youth in a necessary move to build a dynasty for the next few years. The youths delivered after 4 “modest” performances (losses).