
Sydney, February 20, 2002. Cronulla Sharks rugby league new recruites Matthew Johns (centre) and Brett Kimmorley (right) share a joke with Jason Stevens (left) at team training at the Sutherland Police Citizen Youth Club. AAP Image/Dean Lewins
Rugby league has enjoyed a marvellous year, apart from all the stories of hotel defecating, public urinating, girlfriend glassing, mate blaming, woman bashing, gang banging, sponsor biffing, player slapping, coach punching, street fighting, binge drinking, drink driving, pill popping, sexual assault, racial abuse, stimulant use, party drugs and defections.
The game itself, the actual playing of it, has been outstanding.
Some rate it the best quality season for years, full of exceptional skill, excitement, unpredictability and physical courage, all capped by a pulsating Origin series.
But all of that may be forgotten in years to come by those recalling this season from hell.
Off the field, it has been an utter disaster, even by league’s well-plumbed standards of unacceptable behaviour.
There are three main reasons why 2009 stands out as the NRL’s “annus horribilus”.
The negative stories have been unrelenting, they have featured some of the biggest names in the game, including authority figures like coaches and chief executives, and the level of behaviour in some instances has been so low as to beggar belief.
And all of this at a time when league needs its most attractive PR image to fight off the threat from two rival codes – the cashed-up, all-powerful AFL and the ever-expanding world game of soccer.
All of league’s stakeholders may not fully realise it, but the code could right now be fighting for its very survival.
Unless it cleans up its act with astonishing speed, historians may see 2009 as the game’s nadir, the year it hit rock bottom, never to fully regain the pre-eminent position it has enjoyed for decades.
Many believe the full effects of this year of gross indecency may not be felt for perhaps another decade, or more, as parents begin to steer their kids towards other codes and sports.
It is those kids, and their kids, who may one day be shunning the turnstiles at rugby league grounds in favour of sports considered more savoury and exemplary.
The sorry facts do not support the pleadings of apologists who say league’s problems are reflective of society.
The game’s 2009 shame file contains no fewer than 38 names – close to 10 per cent of the approximately 400 first-grade NRL players.
The problems began even before a ball had been kicked, when Manly’s Brett Stewart was suspended by the NRL for being drunk at his club’s boozy season launch, and charged by police with sexually assaulting a teenage girl later the same day.
Until then Stewart, who is fighting the charge, had been the clean-skinned face of rugby league.
The NRL had to drop him like a hot potato from its pre-season publicity campaign.
By season’s end, his replacement as poster boy was in trouble, too.
Greg Inglis, the Melbourne and Queensland Origin star, was charged by police over an incident that reportedly left his girlfriend with a black eye. That case is also still before the courts.
In between these unfortunate season book-ends was a virtual conveyor belt of atrocities, almost all involving alcohol.
At least seven involved women, including highly publicised scandals involving Matthew Johns and Greg Bird.
Johns, the much-loved television commentator and humourist, and former NRL star, was stood down by Channel Nine.
He also lost his assistant coaching post with Melbourne Storm after ABC TV screened a program in May about group sex involving Cronulla Sharks players in New Zealand seven years ago.
Johns admitted his involvement in the incident with a 19-year-old woman, but insisted everything that happened was consensual.
A “thorough and conclusive” police investigation at the time cleared all players of wrongdoing, and New Zealand police have no intention of reopening the case.
But for two such prominent personalities, Stewart and Johns, to implode in the space of a couple of months caused grave concerns for the game’s administrators.
Former Sharks player Bird was sentenced to a minimum eight months jail for glassing his girlfriend and fined $5,000 for lying to police by blaming his flatmate. He has appealed.
A magistrate sentencing Roosters player Anthony Cherrington for domestic assault slammed NRL players for thinking they were above the law and that they could treat women with disrespect.
“You have created in your mind some belief that you are special,” said NSW chief magistrate Graeme Henson.
“You think you are a rugby league professional, some sort of titan on the slopes of Mount Olympus, that the law doesn’t have the application to you that it has for mere mortals.”
The Roosters had such an abysmal disciplinary record that the team’s coach Brad Fittler ended up in the almost risible position of having to fine himself $10,000 after trying to enter the wrong Townsville hotel room, shirtless and drunk, at 3am.
Jason Taylor was another coach in hot water.
He reportedly slapped his players at South Sydney’s “Sad Sunday” end of season drinks.
But one of his players, second-rower David Fa’alogo, didn’t share the joke, and allegedly decked Taylor in return.
Manly’s Anthony Watmough was fined $20,000 for slapping a sponsor. Now there’s a new way to drum up support.
Other players punched each other during drunken nights out.
Three were fined for drink driving.
Four were fined for urinating in public.
But that looked tasteful alongside the effort of Queensland Origin star Nate Myles, who was suspended for six games for defecating on the floor of a Central Coast hotel in a drunken stupor.
Myles insisted later he had no problem with alcohol.
Like Julian O’Neill, who once emptied his bowels in a Souths teammate’s boot, and John Hopoate, who drilled his finger into the anuses of opposing players to put them off their game, Myles feared he would forever be remembered for a single act of stupidity rather than his football.
NRL boss David Gallop believes sponsors will stick by the code provided the governing body is seen to be doing its best to clean up the game’s image.
But diarrhoea in a hotel corridor doesn’t help.
Just as worringly, the number of repeat offenders continually handed fresh chances indicates the game, and many who play it, are learning nothing.
Arana Taumata, for example, has been sacked by four clubs – Broncos, Roosters, Bulldogs and Storm, the latter over a nightclub fight this year, but will line up for a fifth club, Wests Tigers, next year.
Brett Seymour, sacked first by the Broncos and then by Cronulla for repeated alcohol-related incidents, has been signed for next year by the Warriors.
Jake Friend was fined $10,000 for driving three times over the legal limit, then charged with assault three months later, but has been re-signed by the Roosters.
Even Jarryd Hayne’s elevation as Dally M player of the year carried overtones of the game’s seedy side.
Less than two years ago the Parramatta star was being shot at in Kings Cross.
“I could have seen my son in the morgue,” said his mother Jodie.
She believes her son has turned the corner in his life, and that’s the fervent hope of every supporter of the game worried that carrying the poster boy image has become a poisoned chalice.
Hayne says he owes a lot to rugby league, but doesn’t rule out crossing codes later in his football career.
That’s something that Karmichael Hunt has already done, shocking league’s hierarchy in the process.
The Australian and Queensland Origin star delivered the NRL a body blow it could ill afford when he announced his defection to the the new Gold Coast AFL franchise in 2011.
He was the first high profile NRL player to jump ship to the AFL, and others are now expected to follow suit.
Small wonder the NRL is considering renaming itself after this litany of off-field scandals.
“There is a feeling that the NRL brand has been tarnished,” said Newcastle director Paul Harragon.
“The smartest thing the game’s administration can do is to reinvent themselves and do it fast.”
© AAP 2012Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Brett Stewart, Greg Inglis, Matthew Johns, NRL, Rugby League

September 17th 2009 @ 10:33am
AndyRoo said | September 17th 2009 @ 10:33am | Report comment
It’s a bit unfair to say only 400 players because whenever an U20 player does something wrong that also make the news as “NRL”
Changing the name is window dressing and wouldn’t work in NSW and QLD. People hate such cynical marketing.
It’s the guys that get continual “last chances” that annoy me. It’s a bit hard to make a blanket rule and there is some case for offering redemption, but I think they do have to draw the line somewhere.
Perhaps a zero tolerance (life ban for playing) for people convicted of a serious offence and a two strikes and your out policy for minor convictions. Don’t know how legal such a rule would be but basically if there not fit to get a blue card to deal with kids they shouldn’t be in the NRL.
Those incidents not worthy of police attention are the ones the clubs should be handling with fines or sackings. Really the NRL has to stand up for itself a bit in those regards because some of those stories are more media beat up than something that really upsets fans. In fact because these incidents get blown up so much (like Matt Johns consensual bun) the fans end up feeling a little sorry for him (I know I did by the end of it).
And something proactive like changing the salary cap rules to favor keeping veterens for one year too long rather than cutting them one year early would be a good idea too.
If your going to choose a face for the game (would prefer they market the league as a whole ah lah “Simply the Best”) then choose guys that have been around the block and you can rely on like Kimmorley, Price, Tate and Civoniceva.
September 17th 2009 @ 10:44am
Invictus said | September 17th 2009 @ 10:44am | Report comment
This is a comment from a disinterested observer (I have no interest in League or AFL) and pertains to high performance sports in general.
How do high performance athletes think that they can perform at their best and still hit the booze, or worse, during the playing season? Why would they take the chance of being dropped from the run on side, or the team, for poor performance for the sake of getting a skinfull??
I, for one, just can’t understand this attitude.
September 17th 2009 @ 10:50am
oikee said | September 17th 2009 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Andyroo, Mate your too sensitive, lets face some facts about league, its the toughest most hardcore game to play. Yes you can be a road scholar and have a degree as some players do, or you might have just received a “get of of jail free” card.
Coming from all walks of life is why rugby league produces the best players. A game where you might not have a penny to your name , at least you can make a name for yourself, the drama is part and parcel of the game.
‘Rage against the machine’ is the best overture for league. No i think rugby league should always percevere with bad behaviour, anything short of murder their is still hope for you, how many times do you see a murderer only getting 20 years, out after 12 for good behaviour.? At least league does give every opportunity for players to eventually come good. Which in real life, some kids need longer than others. Todd Carney, classic case study.?
September 17th 2009 @ 11:00am
oikee said | September 17th 2009 @ 11:00am | Report comment
Yes i know this is not a code war blog, but i have just got to tell M.C about a point he mentioned the other day, i think he said that league semi finals are not played outside sydney, well we have one coming up in Melbourne and the other in Brisbane.
Just thought i would point that out to him. Only the final is being played in Sydney this year.
September 17th 2009 @ 11:08am
AndyRoo said | September 17th 2009 @ 11:08am | Report comment
Well I guess it’s easier to say sack em all when you don’t know them that’s for sure Oikee. It does mean though that we will foever cop the “superior culture” garbage from the north shore though but maybe we should just do what we can to minimise it (keep the veterens at the club I say).
There are heaps of tales of redmption, Sailor has been a good example, he has been brilliant for the game since coming back.
You see a lot of sports where they have rules like you must have x amount of players under 21/23 we should go the reverse. You have to have x players over 30 in your team
Bulldogs will have a home semi thanks to their win over the Knights. The Brisbane game is this week…. should be sold out by now.
September 17th 2009 @ 11:26am
Woody Warambel said | September 17th 2009 @ 11:26am | Report comment
What offence did Jarrod Hayne commit by being shot at?
September 17th 2009 @ 11:46am
Kurt said | September 17th 2009 @ 11:46am | Report comment
I’ve often wondered that as well! Shooting at someone – sure, that’s bad, but being in the firing line when some nutter goes chik chik boom?
September 17th 2009 @ 11:56am
TammyS said | September 17th 2009 @ 11:56am | Report comment
I agree. I keep hearing how Jarryd Hayne has turned his life around….from what exactly? He was in the wrong place at the wrong time. That could’ve been anyone
September 17th 2009 @ 11:50am
oikee said | September 17th 2009 @ 11:50am | Report comment
He was a NRL target for the other codes woody.
Yes the almighty AFL, that is yet to concer Sydney and Brisbane after 150 years. And of course the world game, soccer, yet to breach the australian fortress we call footy. At least rugby league has created the largest rugby comp in the world!!! Bar none.
Just repairing my push-bike tyre.
September 17th 2009 @ 12:11pm
JimC said | September 17th 2009 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Matt S
That’s a great point., The attitude of the media is key. AFL media are basically there to promote the game. RL has no such luck. Honesty is better though in my opinion.
In UK football off-field behaviour is gradually improving, partly because of the media scrutiny and subsequent public disgust. AFL and rugby union are just storing up problems with their whitewash approach.
September 17th 2009 @ 10:51pm
Kurt said | September 17th 2009 @ 10:51pm | Report comment
You have got to be kidding me – whitewash approach? Have you ever heard of a newspaper called the Herald Sun? It’s biggest ever selling edition was when it devoted about half the paper to Wayne Carey and his various shenanigans.
September 17th 2009 @ 12:56pm
Matt S said | September 17th 2009 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
JimC, totally agree. I am all for transparancy and if thought the media had an altruistic reason for doing the NRL badstuff then I wouldn’t mind so much but they ain’t because league is the only game they are concerned about hanging out to dry.
For all this though rugby league will face the issues and put better steps in place for a better comp in the future and these things are being put into place with the Toyota Cup for example.
The nuffty who wrote this in the Telegraph should realise that people want to read about what’s happening on the field as ratings & crowds indicate. If one wants to read all the negative stuff about rugby league then join all the other yuppies who like less league in their paper when reading the Sydney Morning Herald and the ‘now i feel good I’m not a league supporter’ stories that rag jumps on.
September 17th 2009 @ 1:00pm
Matt S said | September 17th 2009 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
JimC, so correct. Where does this journo come from writing this rubbish in the Telegraph. If we wanted to read ‘now I know why i’m not a rugby league fan’ stories we could go to that other rag the SMH with their penchant for jumping on any negative league story.
The Daily Telerag should realise people want to read about the onfield stuff as suggested by record attendances & TV ratings. Dragging out an AFL journo is not the way.
September 17th 2009 @ 10:53pm
Kurt said | September 17th 2009 @ 10:53pm | Report comment
Again with the assumption that this is an AFL plot! Show me the evidence that the author or this article is an ‘AFL journo’? I’ve never heard of the guy, and never seen him write about the AFL on this site.