Wallabies thumped to finish last in Tri-Nations
By Jim Morton, 20 Sep 2009 Jim Morton is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Tri Nations, wallabies
159 Have your say
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news
Furious Wallabies coach Robbie Deans accused his outmuscled team of “rolling over” in Saturday night’s 33-6 capitulation to the desperate All Blacks.
In a Tri-Nations dead-rubber where Australia were outplayed right across the park, Deans was most upset they threw the towel in with eight minutes left at Westpac Stadium.
After New Zealand repelled wave after wave of Wallabies attack to make the game safe at 19-6 at the 72 minute mark, they ruthlessly finished off the visitors with easy tries to Ma’a Nonu and Joe Rokocoko.
Deans admitted the three-try rout — a sixth straight loss to NZ — was a sobering step backwards after his developing outfit’s last-start 21-6 upset of South Africa in Brisbane.
“The All Blacks were hugely desperate, played very well and the most disappointing thing from our perspective we essentially capitulated once the game was gone,” Deans said.
“At that point when we weren’t successful in scoring and the All Blacks did we rolled over and that was didsappointing becasue that was the one thing we didn’t want.
“We were competitive throughout but … when the game came out of our reach we actually departed the contest.
“I guess how damaging that is will depend on the response.”
The loss leaves Australia with their third Tri-Nations wooden-spoon in 14 tournaments and continued a recurring nightmare of losses on NZ soil.
It’s their 10th straight defeat across the Tasman dating back to 2001, a record that sorely needs to be rectified before the 2011 World Cup.
Many Australians will want to forget the unacceptable display, none more so than out-of-sorts back-three duo Drew Mitchell and James O’Connor who failed to cope with the Cake Tin’s pressure-cooker environment.
But they must stew on the result for six weeks until the end-of-season tour kicks off in Japan – against the All Blacks.
Deans lamented a distinct lack of intensity and urgency, especiially at the breakdown where Richie McCaw led a spirited performance by the NZ pack.
“The margins are small in Test rugby and you’ve got to earn your stripes in every outing,” he said.
“I think we possibly got a little bit ahead of ourselves and we were looking at our next job when the first job hadn’t been done and the breakdown was evidence of that.”
“The most obvious thing was a lack of volunteers.”
The Wallabies were very much in the tussle at 9-6 late in the first half and holding the advantage with Isaia Toeava in the sin bin but All Blacks winger Cory Jane’s first Test try swiftly swung the momentum.
Speedster Jane, an attacking stand-out in his hour on the field, leapt high over the top of fullback O’Connor to field a Mils Muliaina bomb and then slipped out of a poor Mitchell cover tackle to score.
It gave the All Blacks a 16-6 halftime lead and, while the Wallabies only conceded one more penalty goal until the 75th minute, they were completely outmuscled after the break.
The inconsistent NZ lineout redeemed itself while the scrums were a mess throughout.
Adding injury to insult, Australia’s world-class loosehead prop Benn Robinson finished with a neck injury after a collision with Nonu.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- All Blacks, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Tri Nations, wallabies

Ray said | September 20th 2009 @ 6:03am | Report comment
LOVE IT!!!!!
Gerrard said | September 20th 2009 @ 6:21am | Report comment
Now that puts things right.
CraigB said | September 20th 2009 @ 9:48am | Report comment
yeah an ordinary side beat a terrible side
fox said | September 20th 2009 @ 7:13am | Report comment
Woellabies. Terrible. Disgusting. Shaming our great nation. It wasn’t the result, but the lack of heart.
Mark said | September 20th 2009 @ 7:20am | Report comment
Not good for our code maybe we need to put teams in the air nz cup, create a trans Tasman cup, it would be great to have depth so we can sack tha whole team!!!
QC said | September 20th 2009 @ 10:15am | Report comment
So not gonna happen mate,
NZRU is dropping 4 NZ teams come end of the season, there would be an almighty rebellion should they then in turn replace them with Australian sides.
I’m miffed as to why the ABs didn’t play like that all season. Then again it’s pretty obvious everyone had something to play for they had to prove to the Nation that they deserved there places in the team. I believe some were taking the jersey for granted and they got a rude wake up call from the knowledgeable rugby public in New Zealand last week. The ABs had to win and they had to win comfortably or there would most certainly have been major repercussions come today.
An AB outfit withthis mindset is always going to be hard to beat and if they had only half of the enthusiam last week in Hamilton as they did last night in Wellington it could’ve been a whole different story.
I stand by my assumptions weeks ago, this has been a very poor Tri-Nations. I don’t think we have a seen a test todate where both teams were firing on all cylinders. I’m not taking anything away from the Boks and their deserved title. I just don’t believe it was a hard fought title considering the standard of play that the ABs have delievered for 90% of this tournament and the Wallabies last night says it all.
stillmissit said | September 20th 2009 @ 10:37am | Report comment
Agree – totally agree a poor tri nations.
johno said | September 20th 2009 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
They didn’t play that way, cause they weren’t allowed to. Don’t take anything away from this series just because you didn’t see the usual free weeling flashy style prevalent over the past couple of seasons we’ve become accustomed to from the AB’s.
Aus didn’t even compete in the line outs this last saturday, which has been the week end of the spectrum for the AB’s and then they got bent double come scrum time. From there on in NZ had front foot ball which they never got against SA.
If the structures of the game starts to disintegrate NZ is the best in the world. Play structure against the AB’s and cut down their space and they become decidedly ordinary.
Your assumption is based on the wrong conclusions, which comes from arrogance built up over the past two or three decades where the AB’s could chuck the ball around since their forwards could hold their own and win their own ball and had excellent backs from the islands who could then run around and create havoc. This is however also key to their demise in all of the World Cup tournaments.
This style of play is not conducive to high pressure situations as seen in Durban especially, or in any world cup. Ask the ’95 squad. The real reason they lost the game wasn’r because some dud was hooting in front of their hotel, or they food poisoning, or whatever else. The reason is they got outmuscled and put under a huge ammount of pressure, which hadn’t happened previously in the tournament.
The following World Cup’s followed the same script. The AB’s turn to water as soon as you start to apply the pressure.
The Springbok coaches have been to a certain degree enamoured by this free weeling style in the past, but to Div’s credit he quickly found out that our players are not and have never been too comfortable with this type of game.
So, SA is playing to their strenghts which makes it impossible for NZ to play the way they want to since they find it hard to compete in the first phases (except come scrummage time, where John got bent double at every scrum again over the weekend in the Currie Cup) This means that they haven’t got good quality ball to start with and once it goes into phase play, well the stats say that on average you turn the ball over by some or the other means after every third ruck.
Before the on set of the proffesional era SA alway held the sway over NZ, because of the way the Boks play. It’s based on respect for the structures of the game and the application of pressure. These tennents have however been forgotten over the past two decades and are only seemingly now being rediscovered. If SA keep to these structures and do not give in to the media hype and pressure the 3N will in future follow a similar script as in this last one.
Argentina coming into the fray in 2012 will also make it much more interesting, since they play a game that is much more comparable to how the Boks play than to the type of game and philosophy prevalent in the Antipides. Then there would also be the travelling factor which will level the playing feilds even further, since all teams will have to spend the same relative time away from home.
fred said | September 20th 2009 @ 7:37am | Report comment
LEFTIE;deans complaining of capitulation is merely a smokescreen ;the real issue is the NONPERFORMANCE expected at test level,effective on the basics.this is a copout by deans and a disgrace to australian rugby
saying the wallies were effective throughout 72 mins is less than honest and does him no service at all.
deans should stop reading his own spin and the journos all jockeying for his favour should commence a thorough analisation and forego the childish escapades into the kindy kids backgrounds.
Hansie said | September 20th 2009 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Deans also neglected to mention that this is his team. He has spent two years developing this team, and the horrible display last night says that his efforts are not good enough. The Wallabies are less competitive than they were two years ago.
mother teresa said | September 20th 2009 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
correct hansie
TommyM said | September 20th 2009 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
‘commence a thorough analisation’
That sounds painful!! and potentially very smelly….
mother teresa said | September 20th 2009 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
correct;but its not the prostrate friend its something wrong with the state of denmark
Yikes said | September 20th 2009 @ 8:20am | Report comment
Breakdown, breakdown, breakdown, breakdown, breakdown, breakdown.
Do the Wallabies even train for it?
mother teresa said | September 20th 2009 @ 8:42am | Report comment
exactly yikes;asst coach williams looks a bright spark
put that alongside deans persceptive choice at fullback====worse
peteez said | September 20th 2009 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Yikes
your right.!!
Have a look at the picture that Spiro used for his article ” Windy Wellington a real test for the Wallabies”.
This doesn’t look like a training session….looks more like the actual game. Forwards all standing around with worried looks on their faces and not contesting for the ball.
mother teresa said | September 20th 2009 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
PETEEZ, the most revealing picture is deans seated with his kids and oconnor holding the mascot and cooper with his cant believe his luck look on;
and we wonder about the mental approach ;give me strength
Wally James said | September 20th 2009 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
Yikes
I agree with you completely. The breakdown was the essence of the Wallaby loss. As always, the forwards win the game and the backs determine by how much. The Blacks contested the tackle in numbers and Gold did not. It was quite pitiful Australian play and fabulous from NZ.
It is difficult to think anything other than a lack of ticker or maybe awestruck boys against a team of men. Aussie Robbie said the Wallabies were competitive throughout until near the end? Good Lord! What game was he watching? The most asinine comment I’ve ever heard him utter. Normally he is quite a reasonable blole but that takes the cake
stillmissit said | September 20th 2009 @ 9:00am | Report comment
Give these Wallabies an excuse and they will slip through the work net.
Some lessons learnt:
George Smith – Never wanted to be and is not a captain.
O’Connor – Is not the next Christ he has serious work to do.
Rocky Elsom, Horwill and Polatu Nau could have played the AB’s at the breakdown on their own and we would not have noticed any difference.
Giteau – Is not and never will be a 5/8th.
Deans – Can’t ‘read’ a game as it unfolds and is not good at using the bench.
Mitchell – Can make a mess of his pants.
Apart from this let’s forget about it, all is well, onwards to Europe and the tightrope of potential abdication to the Northerners.
mother teresa said | September 20th 2009 @ 9:10am | Report comment
so deans is a poor selector and coach and “cant read a game or use the bench intelligently “apart from that LETS FORGET ABOUT IT.?
THAT IS ABOUT RIGHT from where im sitting,but now the players will realise that deans is not the messiah and in fact has a lot of shortcomings which have sunk the ship as much as anyone.can you hear the whispers?
I BLAME LOTE
tarpo said | September 20th 2009 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Stillmissit, you are on form today, I would have enjoyed playing along side you.
Absolutely correct in your assessment.
Marty said | September 20th 2009 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Wakekekekeke that was fun
johnno42 said | September 20th 2009 @ 9:06am | Report comment
well look on the bright side guys… at least the okkers have got something to put in the trophey cabinet, the tri nations wooden spoon
one wise man said | September 20th 2009 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Is this the worst Wallabies team since the 1970′s?
We played the worst AB team is 30 years and got smashed?
They need to stop TALKING and start doing.
Deans has the worst record of any Australian coach? Even a brain effected Greg Smith had a better record.
John Connolly is the only coach that comes close to Dean’s record.
Wonder coach? Cow Manure no idea
Play what is in front of you why? because you have no idea what to advise them? or devise a plan.
It seems that he was only good because he had the best players in the world playing for him. Merhtens, carter, Mccaw etc.