Wrong turns worsened Semenya’s ordeal
By John Leicester, 20 Sep 2009 John Leicester is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Athletics, Caster Semenya, South Africa, world championships
It was, admittedly, a devilishly tough choice. As the world championships of track and field were getting underway this August, the governing body of athletics asked South Africa’s top administrators for the sport to consider withdrawing Caster Semenya.
This was an option that might have spared the runner some of the subsequent trauma of having her gender picked over so publicly after she won the 800 metres.
The South African officials’ response was emphatic: Not over our dead bodies. But disturbingly, they now also say that they did not tell Semenya about their decision.
“We felt that that was not necessary,” Attlee Maponyane, vice president of Athletics South Africa said.
The decision to field Semenya without telling her about the governing body’s concerns is one of several questionable calls, even outright bureaucratic botches, in this horrific case, where the most intimate details about the young woman’s gender have made headlines worldwide.
Why, for instance, was the International Association of Athletics Federations caught so off guard when doubts about Semenya had swirled in South Africa for months, even years? After the 18-year-old won the 800 gold in Berlin on August 19, IAAF general secretary Pierre Weiss said Semenya had only recently come to their attention – when she clocked 1:56.72 on July 31, then the fastest time by a woman this year.
“She was unknown three weeks ago,” Weiss said. “Nobody could anticipate this one. Sorry. We are fast but we are not a lion.”
And yet, in March, the IAAF’s own website asked this question – “Semenya new teen 800m sensation?” – after she shaved more than three seconds off her previous best to break Zola Budd’s 25-year-old South African junior record. Semenya’s time of 2:00.58 in Germiston, South Africa, made her the world’s top junior of 2009. In the previous five years, again according to the IAAF’s site, only five juniors ran faster.
Yet alarm bells only rang at the IAAF following her blistering run in July and because a South African blogger, a week before that, posted this comment: “Caster Semenya is an interesting revelation. Interesting because the 18-year-old was born as a hermaphrodite and, through a series of tests, has been classified as female.”
Emails started flying, with the IAAF asking Athletics South Africa for test results or, failing that, for gender tests on Semenya. But by then, time was running short. The world championships were just two weeks away. Whether the IAAF and ASA could and should have cleared up the questions about Semenya’s gender far earlier by being more alert remains one of the many unanswered doubts.
South Africa won no medals at the last two worlds in 2007 and 2005. In Berlin, Semenya was considered one of nation’s best hopes for breaking that losing streak – as long as she could run and be shielded from the rumours that quickly started circulating among the press corps gathered for the championships.
In mid-August, IAAF medical experts Gabriel Dolle and Juan Manuel Alonso met at Berlin’s Intercontinental Hotel with Maponyane, who headed South Africa’s delegation at the worlds, and with ASA’s president, Leonard Chuene.
“They gave us two options. The first one was to withdraw her, the second one was to allow her to compete while the IAAF’s process of gender verification would continue,” said Maponyane. “We took the second option.”
He and Chuene give several reasons why they did not discuss the possibility of withdrawing with Semenya.
Chuene said: “She was just going to run, I can’t just say (withdraw) and kill her spirit. I was not going to do that … You’re psychologically destroying her before the race.
“How do we withdraw her, on what basis?” he added. “You going to say to her ‘You’re are not a girl?’”
At 18, the two men also apparently figured, Semenya was too young for such a discussion – even though South Africans can marry, vote and enrol in the military at that age.
“At 18 in our country, you are still a child,” said Maponyane.
He also suggested that they were worried about fallout back home if Semenya did not run.
“It was a very difficult thing. If you withdraw, what do you say to the country?” he asked. “We used the taxpayers’ money.”
So Semenya ran – exposing her to the media storm that erupted when the IAAF announced just hours before her 800m triumph that it was investigating whether she met the requirements to compete as a woman.
Given the option, would Semenya have pulled out, figuring that at 18 she still had time to make her mark on world athletics once the gender questions were cleared up? Or would she have run anyway? After all, she’s proved remarkably composed throughout this ordeal – unlike IAAF critics in South Africa framing this as a case of racial discrimination.
Either way, surely, it should have been Semenya’s choice.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (4) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Athletics, Caster Semenya, South Africa, world championships

megatron said | September 20th 2009 @ 4:57am | Report comment
Tragic story made even worse by the fact it was played out in the media.
Eagle said | September 20th 2009 @ 6:47am | Report comment
The story has broken in SA that she was tested in SA before the going to Germany and found to fail the gender test. This was not disclosed to CS, and hidden from the IAAF.
After a disastrous Olympics in Athens with our athletes very poorly served by our administrators this is is now probably the low low point of SA sporting history.
What would be gained by the victory? Whose weird aims would be served?
Jameswm said | September 22nd 2009 @ 10:08am | Report comment
People who were stupid and naive enough to think they could get away with it wanted a gold medal for their country. They tried to sweep it all under a rug.
It’s that simple.
Greg Russell said | September 22nd 2009 @ 10:43am | Report comment
I am mystified by the above article’s line that the IAAF has been seriously at fault in all this. The more that comes to light about this, the more it seems that the IAAF probably did the best it could with a difficult situation (and this is not something I say every day of the week about organizations like the IAAF, FINA, etc.).
Firstly, the IAAF official is quoted “We are fast but we are not a lion.” Indeed – one has to accept that large, multinational organizations like the IAAF cannot be instantaneous with their decision making, especially in highly sensitive matters like this.
Second, it may be the case that “the IAAF’s own website asked this question – “Semenya new teen 800m sensation?””, but if “In the previous five years … five juniors ran faster”, why should the IAAF have been suspicious?
Third, it does seem that alarm bells did start ringing at exactly the moment they should have – when “a South African blogger … posted this comment: “Caster Semenya is an interesting revelation. Interesting because the 18-year-old was born as a hermaphrodite and, through a series of tests, has been classified as female.””
Fourth, I cannot be sure about this, but all impressions are that Semanya was purely an intra-South African phenomenon until the middle of this year. Even if the IAAF does have the jurisdiction to wade into affairs within a country (does it?), it would be politically dangerous to do so.
Finally, given that Semanya only came onto the IAAF’s radar very recently, what more could they do? They ordered the medical tests pre-Berlin, but without having the results, they were legally powerless to prevent her from running – imagine the outrage there would be if they forced her to sit out the WCs, and then the tests showed that she was 100% female? So they did the right thing and asked the ASA to withdraw her, but they declined.
Of course if the ASA had revealed its own medical results about Semanya’s gender to the IAAF, then things would have been different. But they didn’t. So really the ASA is the villain in this piece. But even there, the motivations are understandable, and the matter is not black and white.
As ever one has to marvel at the power of wishful thinking: the South Africans thought that Semanya could run on a stage like this but without spectators and media noticing the obvious and asking questions. Of course she’s not the first female athlete whose gender has been wondered about. But it’s very unusual for such questions to arise with 800-m runners, and also there is usually some medical evidence at hand with which to confront such questions.