Is Formula 1 rotten to its very core?
By Adrian Musolino, 21 Sep 2009 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- crashgate, eddie irvine, F1, Fernando Alonso, fia, Flavio Briatore, Formula One, jackie stewart, jean todt, nelson piquet, renault
They say Formula 1 is a sport between 2pm and 4pm on a Sunday afternoon, the rest of the time it’s just business. The race-fixing saga involving the Renault team has simply confirmed that even the racing isn’t sacred and has been corrupted.
The ins and outs of the events that unfolded last season in Singapore have been well discussed, but what of the impact on Formula 1 in a year that has taken the sport’s ability to generate controversy to a new high.
Many feel it is simply confirmation of the extent that the culture of the sport has been corrupted by greed.
“There is something fundamentally rotten and wrong at the heart of Formula One,” said Sir Jackie Stewart, who raced in an era when crashing had grave and sometimes fatal consequences.
“Never in my experience has F1 been in such a mood of self-destruction.
“Millions of fans are amazed, if not disgusted, at a sport which now goes from crisis to crisis with everyone blaming everyone else,” he was quoted as saying in the British press.
Meanwhile Eddie Irvine, who raced at a time when F1 transformed itself into the multinational conglomerate it is today, suggested in an interview with the BBC that the public and media have overreacted to the race-fixing saga.
“Formula One has always been a war and in war all is fair,” he told Radio 5 live.
“This is probably slightly on the wrong side of the cheating thing but in days past every team have done whatever they could to win – cheat, bend the rules, break the rules, sabotage opponents. This is just the FIA going on a crusade,” he said.
But will this latest saga condemn the sport?
“There needs to be a fundamental reform of all the structures of governance and management of F1, from both a regulatory and commercial standpoint,” warned Stewart.
“Unless proper leadership is established soon within F1 at every level, the commercial sponsors will walk away and the sport will be seriously damaged for years to come,” he said.
However, despite another year of endless controversy and worldwide negative headlines, F1 seems to just role with the punches.
Sponsors aren’t exactly walking away from the sport.
Brawn GP, which has run most of the season with minimal sponsorship decals, has reportedly signed a title sponsor and numerous other backers for next season.
The Virgin Group, headed by the charismatic Sir Richard Branson, is set to have a controlling interest in one of the four new teams entering F1 next season.
Two manufacturers may have walked away from the sport in the past twelve months, but considering how severely the automotive industry was hit by the global financial crisis, it’s not exactly F1’s doing.
Fans won’t necessarily switch off when Formula 1 returns to the scene of the crime in Singapore next weekend.
Rather the controversy will only fuel interest in the sport.
F1 is able to sustain these blows because people are accepting that it is polluted, like a wrestling showcase on wheels.
It is a soap opera.
It may only be a sport on every second Sunday evening – and the term sport is debatable, but the rest of the time there is enough drama, controversy, intrigue and personality clashes to keeps its fans guessing.
But if F1 does suffer a backlash and needs to undertake fundamental change, can it?
Unlikely.
F1 has isolated itself from the real world to such an extent that only when it can no longer sustain itself will it have to face reality.
Existing in an isolated world so corrupted by money, greed and politics, should we really be surprised by ‘crashgate’?
Consider this: The expected future leader of the governing body that will pass judgment on Renault on Monday will be Jean Todt who, as Ferrari team boss, manufactured a number of results through blatant team orders, disrespecting the very notion of a fair sporting contest.
It only strengthens the point made by Sir Jackie Stewart; that F1 is corrupted to its core.
Stewart argues that “there is no respect or trust for the individuals, or the institutions that are meant to regulate and govern the sport.”
How can there be when they themselves are corruptible and duplicitous?
Perhaps people just need to accept F1 as a war on all fronts; corrupted and anything but a fair sporting contest.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (13) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- crashgate, eddie irvine, F1, Fernando Alonso, fia, Flavio Briatore, Formula One, jackie stewart, jean todt, nelson piquet, renault


September 21st 2009 @ 8:38am
Brett McKay said | September 21st 2009 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Adrian, it’s an unbelievably messy situation that Renault has got itself into, and F1 has found itself in. I don’t imagine too many people would be overly surprised by the comments of Eddie Irvine, or Jackie Stewart for that matter. If F1 is a suscriber to the “all publicity is good publicity” theory, then they’ve certainly got the world’s attention, but heaven help the next driver or team involved in an incident with the even the slightest doubt of its authenticity..
September 21st 2009 @ 9:57am
megatron said | September 21st 2009 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Also this year with a team that was nowhere in recent seasons all of a sudden dominating it shows how crucial the technical package is to the end result.
I think people realise what F1 is and like Irvine I’m surprised to a certain extent how the media and co have reacted.
September 21st 2009 @ 3:23pm
steve johnson said | September 21st 2009 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
THE LAST LINE SAYS IT ALL…….EDDIE,S RIGHT AS USUAL…LETS JUST WATCH AND ENJOY
September 21st 2009 @ 4:09pm
megatron said | September 21st 2009 @ 4:09pm | Report comment
On that last line that’s how I’m seeing f1 for the first time. I liked Briatore and thought he was different from the rest. Appears not to be.
September 21st 2009 @ 4:17pm
Gudfala said | September 21st 2009 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
It amazes me that people are surprised that teams manipulate results. I still remember Prost and Senna crashing into each other on purpose in order to win their championships. I don’t recall many people complaining back then and it was far more blatant than what Renault did.
September 21st 2009 @ 10:56pm
Adrian Musolino said | September 21st 2009 @ 10:56pm | Report comment
Renault have been given a 2-year suspended ban – ie will only be enforced if found guilty of a comparable breach during that time.
Lifetime ban for Flavio Briatore, including ban on driver management. Five-year ban for Pat Symonds.
Nelson Piquet had immunity and Fernando Alonso is cleared of having any knowledge of the incident.
Renault statement: “We fully accept the decision and apologise unreservedly to the F1 community for this unacceptable behaviour.” They are expected to stay in F1 but will need to find new management.
September 22nd 2009 @ 12:17am
megatron said | September 22nd 2009 @ 12:17am | Report comment
Not surprised that Renault effectively got off as they made the right call getting rid of Briatore. But the lifetime ban for Briatore is huge!!!!! Amazing how confessing only gets 5 years while denying gets life
September 22nd 2009 @ 9:52pm
Hansie said | September 22nd 2009 @ 9:52pm | Report comment
How can Jean Todt possibly sit in judgement for a case of cheating?!
September 22nd 2009 @ 10:55pm
Adrian Musolino said | September 22nd 2009 @ 10:55pm | Report comment
I agree Hansie. Todt appears favourite to land the FIA leadership next month, but I fear his leadership style and rule won’t be far removed from what Mosley has offered. It’s not what the FIA needs.
September 23rd 2009 @ 1:29am
megatron said | September 23rd 2009 @ 1:29am | Report comment
Todt would be a disaster and he would surely favour Ferrari. If the Fia wants a clean slate and to show it’s willingness to change it can’t vote him in.
September 25th 2009 @ 1:13pm
Chris Beck said | September 25th 2009 @ 1:13pm | Report comment
Piquet should have been nailed big time. As the guy behind the wheel, he had the most to do with crashing, or not crashing, the car.
September 25th 2009 @ 1:23pm
megatron said | September 25th 2009 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Agreed. Also the fact he only dobbed after he was sacked showed that it was a case of sour grapes. He should have not given in, kept the car in a straightline and gone public with their demands right away.
October 29th 2009 @ 1:36pm
Michael said | October 29th 2009 @ 1:36pm | Report comment
Is F1 rotten to it’s very core? Yes, and that’s why we love it.
It’s no fun watching cars go around and around a track, that’s why we need all these off-track drama to keep it interesting.
It’s not an F1 season without rumors, innuendo, the threat of a breakaway league, and scandal.