Selectors must choose attitude before ability
By LeftArmSpinner, 21 Sep 2009 LeftArmSpinner is a Roar Guru
170 Have your say
The Wallabies selectors have consistently chosen the most naturally gifted 22 players to pull on the Wallabies’ jersey and represent their country, including those with the biggest reputations.
This became apparent with the aging team that represented Australia in RWC 1995 and was best evidenced in the selection of Gregan and Larkham for the RWC 2007.
Since then, the Wallabies’ selectors have also ignored those players failings in the most critical department, attitude.
The Wallabies naive selection approach, choosing ability ahead of attitude, has been evident for many years and extended the playing careers of the chosen few. Messrs. Gregan, Larkham and Sharpe should count themselves lucky.
This approach completely ignores the fundamentals of selection and team building. It also disregards the reality of life. Success is 98% perspiration and 2% inspiration.
I define attitude to be the mental approach and strength of a player, in terms of things like desire, determination, motivation, fearlessness, selflessness for the team cause, competitiveness, ability to intimidate and not be intimidated by opponents.
A naturally gifted player, male or female, is easily seduced into believing the hype and becoming more selfish and less team orientated as they rise through the ranks. But, there comes a point, and in the Australian Rugby players’ case, it is usually at Test level, that everyone has the equivalent natural gifts and what makes a difference is attitude and the ability of the team as a unit at critical times.
Last Saturday, the Wallabies showed that, with a few exceptions, individually and collectively they do not have the necessary attitude to be selected as a Wallaby and represent Australia. This game was a crucial one.
The Wallabies had the chance to build more momentum and self belief after a good win against the World Champions, while also exerting massive pressure on their greatest rival, NZ, when the All Blacks were already vulnerable and after being savaged by their own angry media.
Matthew Hayden, in saying “give me attitude over ability any day,” argues that attitude is superior to natural ability at every level of competition.
The adage of a champion team always beating a team of champions is as valid today as ever. Champion teams triumph because they are greater than the sum of their parts at the critical times of the contest.
The Australian Rugby Union realised that there are cultural problems in the team and made this part of the brief for Robbie Deans. It is clear that he has underestimated, and been too patient with, both the selection process and the players selected.
I have assessed the Wallabies XV that was selected for the game in Wellington, reviewing their attitude across their whole careers:
Benn Robinson: He is brave at the set piece and works hard around the field: Acceptable attitude.
Tatafu Polota-Nau: His tackling against the Springboks in Brisbane told his teammates “come follow me” and the opposition “it will hurt when you try to run the ball”: Acceptable attitude.
Ben Alexander: Has been a revelation at tight head; has a very good work rate around the field and will get better: Acceptable attitude.
James Horwill: After an explosive first year as a Wallaby, Horwill has gone missing, but could be due to a serious injury earlier in the season, worth one more chance: Attitude Unacceptable.
Mark Chisholm: Inconsistent performer over a long period – Drop and never to return: Attitude unacceptable.
Rocky Elsom: Tireless worker in attack and defence, passionate about the job, but showed signs of fear against the AB’s in Wellington: Attitude acceptable.
David Pocock: Invisible against the AB’s, but worth one more chance because he is young: Attitude unacceptable.
George Smith: playing on reputation – Time to go: Attitude unacceptable.
Will Genia: Courageous throughout both his starting games: Attitude acceptable.
Matt Giteau: His effort cannot be faulted but he is mentally weak under pressure such as the yellow card in 3N this year, and hence not a 10 – not up to a decision making position: attitude acceptable.
Drew Mitchell: After one wake-up call earlier in his Wallabies career, he has failed to produce in the big games – Drop and never to return: Attitude unacceptable.
Berrick Barnes: Courageous in attack and defence and shows signs of a cool head under pressure in 3N when Mortlock was injured: Attitude acceptable.
Adam Ashley-Cooper: Courageous in attack and defence and has been a true team man as he struggled with 4 different positions in 3N this year: Attitude acceptable.
Lachie Turner: Inconsistent performer, but worth one more chance as he is young: Attitude unacceptable.
James O’Connor: Tough and courageous and his effort cannot be faulted, but makes silly mistakes that he needs to eliminate from his game: Attitude acceptable.
In summary:
Acceptable attitude: Robinson, Polota-Nau, Alexander, Elsom, Genia, Barnes, Ashley Cooper, O’Connor (8)
Acceptable attitude, but not in a decision making position: Giteau; (1)
Unacceptable attitude, One more chance: Horwill, Pocock, Turner; (3)
Unacceptable attitude, Drop and never to return: Chisholm, Smith, Mitchell; (3)
I have used the term “Acceptable Attitude” to emphasise that there is only one standard acceptable when a person represents their country in anything: 100% physical, emotional and mental commitment at all times, on and off the field.
To emphasise the essential point of this article, O’Connor has been assessed as having an acceptable attitude, despite a poor game last weekend. It is not that you won’t have a bad game, its how you react to a bad game. He kept trying.
Deans and his selectors can simplify their selection criteria for the future Wallabies’ squads: identify players with the necessary attitude and develop the skills and abilities they need.
Get this attitude to take hold in the Super 14 teams also. Look at players like Tom Carter, Tim Davidson, Stephen Hoiles, Brett Sheehan or Dave Harvey.
Apologies for not including more non Sydney based players. I just don’t know them well enough to comment.
Recommend this story.
The Crowd Says (170) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (1)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (2)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (14)
- Road to the 2015 World Cup starts in June (18)
- Six lessons Robbie Deans must learn (Part 2) (75)
- Who will be the Wallabies’ centres? (110)
- Are Roarers picking the Wallabies for the wrong reasons? (21)
- Explore:
- Australian rugby, Australian Rugby Union, Rugby Union, wallabies

September 21st 2009 @ 3:00pm
Whaler said | September 21st 2009 @ 3:00pm | Report comment
Tom Carter ? Hope he isn’t our best option at 12 ?
September 21st 2009 @ 3:16pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 3:16pm | Report comment
you want attitude, he’s got attitude. he gets to lots of contests and wins most of them and never gives up. Selfless team man. you could do worse. here’s a thought, turn him into a flanker or, even better, a No 8.
September 21st 2009 @ 3:30pm
fox said | September 21st 2009 @ 3:30pm | Report comment
Carter’s like a volvo. You know it’s safe, but you nkow it won’t go as fast as everyone else’s car and you know you’d be a bit sheepish about taking it out for a spin.
September 21st 2009 @ 3:48pm
Who Needs Melon said | September 21st 2009 @ 3:48pm | Report comment
fox, I think that’s exactly LASs point. At the moment we have some mercurial wannabeheroes in the team who are capable of putting in great performances and have all the skills and speed, etc… but not the right attitude and are liable to go missing when the heat is turned up. I agree that we need a few more people like Carter and Waugh in the team now – they may not be technically the best/fastest/whatever but you KNOW they are not going to go missing.
September 21st 2009 @ 4:17pm
fox said | September 21st 2009 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
I agree with you on Waugh, but with Carter at 12 no world class defense is going to have any concerns with the inside channels. They don;t currently either, but that might be solved by moving Gits to 12 and Barnes to 10. Or by Giteau taking on the line more.
September 21st 2009 @ 7:24pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 7:24pm | Report comment
spot on. The original melon was also one of those. Not only did he not ever go missing, he waws smashing them all 80 minutes long, in defence and attack.
September 21st 2009 @ 7:23pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 7:23pm | Report comment
fox, ever driven a T5 volvo with the turbo. goes like the clappers.
September 21st 2009 @ 3:23pm
Ben said | September 21st 2009 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
George Smith – man of the match almost every game and he gets dropped – ridiculous. He is No.7 with no interference. WRT to the rest 1/2 go to Europe, rest left out and take best XV players from Club rugby i.e Stephen Hoiles (esp as captaincy candidate).
September 21st 2009 @ 7:29pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 7:29pm | Report comment
WRT means?????
September 21st 2009 @ 3:26pm
Rugby 1 said | September 21st 2009 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
I’ve been reading comments for about a week now, and most of you lot understand aust doesn’t have enough talent. For those who think Robbie deans is a problem or the selectors wake up and smell the coffee…stop crying and wait for aust to perform again Robbie deans said it will be a (LONG) time to rebuild!!
September 21st 2009 @ 7:30pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 7:30pm | Report comment
but he didnt say that they would just not turn up. no one could expect that when the culprits are wearing their national colours.
September 21st 2009 @ 7:45pm
fred said | September 21st 2009 @ 7:45pm | Report comment
RUG,
ROBBIE DEANS SAID IT WILL TAKE A LONG TIME TO REBUILD.well rug mate he sure as eggs got that right but will he be the one to finally achieve this feat because he is the same guy who lost to aust in 2003 rwc and aiming at distinction for lowest winning % amongst wallaby coaches(last)
well if its going to take a long time isnt it great we are so gullible;cant wait for rugby2,hope its not a flop too
September 21st 2009 @ 8:00pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 8:00pm | Report comment
Fred, he has done what he can. he cant go out and contest at the breakdown, run straight, jump in the lineout blah, blah. He has got rid of the obvious tired, dead wood, sorted the scrum, blooded some youngsters and beaten the world champions. so we know that they can do it, but they didnt want to.
September 21st 2009 @ 8:14pm
fred said | September 21st 2009 @ 8:14pm | Report comment
you would wonder then how previous wallaby coaches managed so well with so little preferential treatment.
deans took the job eyes wide open SPINNER and underwhelms me with his performance 52% mate.he has probably tried his best but we are going backwards,
explain to me SPINNER how we won rwcs without deans;did we make as many mistakes as this year?
September 21st 2009 @ 9:12pm
Invictus said | September 21st 2009 @ 9:12pm | Report comment
My statistical knowledge isn’t fantastic but as best I can recall the lead up to both the 91 and 99 RWC’s contained some nasty touch ups. Same for 2003.
So yes, mistakes were made.
September 21st 2009 @ 3:32pm
fox said | September 21st 2009 @ 3:32pm | Report comment
I agree Rugby 1. All this talk about selections is rubbish. The current crop are good enough. They just need leadership to steer them towards better attitudes and winning decisions. I again cry out for a real captain (how many times have I asked for G Smith to be freed from the captaincy and for it to be given to Rocky?!)
September 21st 2009 @ 4:15pm
Rugby 1 said | September 21st 2009 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
Yes aust has over performed for 20 years we are now a distant 3rd in the battle of the codes, no 1st grade, no free to air, and now starting to show it on the field!!
September 21st 2009 @ 4:25pm
Rugby 1 said | September 21st 2009 @ 4:25pm | Report comment
And another thing if it wasn’t for one million kiwis living here our sport would be up shit creek, I’ve been to alot of reds games and bleds and I’ve been surrounded by kiwis!!! Aussie supporters are becoming smaller
September 21st 2009 @ 4:39pm
Worlds Biggest said | September 21st 2009 @ 4:39pm | Report comment
Ben Alexander a revelation at tight head ??. Leftie did you not see Woodcock smoke Alexander into the next stratosphere ?.
Alexander might be good around the field, great attitude etc…but a revelation he is not. The AB’s have blown us out of the water at the scrum this year and Alexander like Baxter has gone down like a house of cards in most scrums. I hope he proves me wrong and becomes a revelation however he is just another Wallaby tight head that isn’t cutting the mustard at scrum time. It’s time to give Sekope Kepu a run and I would start him in Tokyo.
September 21st 2009 @ 7:35pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 7:35pm | Report comment
revelation in aust context. he arrived, young, untried in the run on team and at supposedly the most demanding position, and the penalties stopped and they out-scrummed the Boks. that is a revelation, not that he is the best 3 in the world. I’m not sure that Woodcock smoked Alexander. frankly, the whole front thing is overrated. put in, get it out fast to the backs.
Kepu would also be my choice. I think Alexander held his own, and that is fine for the timebeing. he was trying all the time and again, that is all i ask or expect.
September 21st 2009 @ 8:43pm
Bonza said | September 21st 2009 @ 8:43pm | Report comment
Dan Palmer – hands down the best tighthead prospect in the country
September 21st 2009 @ 9:02pm
Invictus said | September 21st 2009 @ 9:02pm | Report comment
What do you base this on?
September 23rd 2009 @ 8:57pm
Losing Hope said | September 23rd 2009 @ 8:57pm | Report comment
Laurie Weeks is the best tighthead prospect in the country.. Super 14 rookie of the year no less…
September 21st 2009 @ 5:04pm
Ben J said | September 21st 2009 @ 5:04pm | Report comment
One of the telling differences between the 3 Tri Nations team captains is the inability of George Smith to get a working relationship going with the referee. Time and again he was berated by the ref and this obviously robbed him of confidence which was telling in his play. Looking at the match as a neutral I had the feeling that the Wallabies could steal the game when they were only 16-6 behind and attacking the AB goal line and remembered that Robbie Deans said on a few occasions that the Aussies finished stronger than other teams in the last 20. There was no evidence of this on Saturday.
To be honest, I am a little bit tired of Robbie Deans’s pseudo philosophical babble, there is too much “Art of War” about his sayings and not enough tough love. One win out of 6 played is a bad result, it should be enough to get a coach fired who has been in the saddle for the same amount of time as his Bok counterpart who many see as a loon but has taken simplicity and man management to another level. As an example, and not trying to be precious, Peter de Villiers has to manage a team that has players whose first languages are English, Afrikaans, Xhosa, players from posh private schools and roughouse country digs, even a Zimbabwean for good measure!
From where I sit there is absolutely no reason on earth why the Wallabies cannot be successful but Deans’s Art of War handbook should look at the chapter about what happens if your troops do not see enough battle (no ARC) and on cushy contracts ( again, what do they do when NZ and SA slog it out in the provinces?)
September 21st 2009 @ 7:38pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 7:38pm | Report comment
I agree. the babble is challenging. understatement. give me Paul roos any day. clear and to the point. Sure they need more battle but you need to go through dempsey first. they are capped in terms of games they can play.
another approach is to work around dempsey by organising more games and see if the incumbent players step aside and allow the pretenders a chance to strut their stuff.
September 21st 2009 @ 5:38pm
sheek said | September 21st 2009 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
An observation of attitude.
David Hookes & Allan Border were born within two months of each other in 1955.
Hookes was a naturally gifted, attacking batsman with all the strokes, & a pleasing to the eye batting style. He was blond-haired & handsome, & gregarious & aggressive by nature.
Border was more circumspect. He was a shorter, stockier build, with an equally solid, less flamboyant batting style. Compared to Hookes, Border appeared serious on the pitch, but was good company off it.
Hookes beat Border to both his Sheffield Shield debut & test debut. But Hookes had a fatal flaw in his batting style against quality spin bowling, & a mental recklessness that prevented him from either adapting his batting technique, or restraining his cavalier approach when required at times.
Border on the other hand, progressed more slowly but more surely. He went from a dependable batsman to an UTTERLY dependable batsman. He wasn’t pretty to watch, but pretty effective. And when his country needed him, he went from the reluctant captain to a national treasure.
Hookes may have started out as the more naturally gifted of the two, but it was Border who ended with the glittering career.
September 21st 2009 @ 9:08pm
Invictus said | September 21st 2009 @ 9:08pm | Report comment
Sheek,
One of my all time personal favourites – Allan Border. One of the most courageous sportsmen I’ve ever seen. Took on a job that had become a poisoned chalice and over time turned it into a priceless heirloom.
We should not forget the influence of Simpson as coach, either. A good example of coach and captain working as a team.
September 21st 2009 @ 7:39pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 21st 2009 @ 7:39pm | Report comment
Sheek, I could not have put it better myself. Attitude. Nothing was ever going to stop Border, or Rick McCosker. that is attitude.
Where were you when I needed a quote.? thanks Sheek. once again, we are on the same page…………….