From the penthouse to the basement, and back again?
By Tony Tannous, 25 Sep 2009 Tony Tannous is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, Adelaide United, Aurelio Vidmar, football, newcastle united
In any other A-League season, the end of the most recent round, the seventh, would have marked the end of the first third of the season.
But with two more teams and six more rounds, Chris Beath’s final whistle in Brisbane last Sunday took us just over a quarter of the way into the season.
By track standards, we’ve gone from a sprint event like the 400 metres, where it’s basically flat-out the whole way, to a middle distance event, like the 1500 metres, where there’s scope for a few breaths and some pacing.
It’s not the European style 38 rounds, which is more akin to the 10,000 metre, but it’s a season in keeping with the two established local codes, the NRL (26 rounds) and the AFL (22 rounds).
Rugby’s Super 14s, with its 14 rounds, is undoubtedly the equivalent of the 100 metre sprint.
But back to the round ball and its current season of 27 rounds.
For a team like the defending champions, Melbourne, it means they have plenty of time to make up for a terrible start that saw them win only one from their opening six games.
In past seasons, such a start may have resulted in a bit of panic and a permanent spot in the bottom half of the draw.
Indeed, in the opening four seasons, few teams have recovered from such a poor beginning to fly home and give the title a shake.
Newcastle comes to mind in season two, and that was after Nick Theodorakopoulos was replaced by Gary van Egmond a third of the way in.
The other example that springs to mind is the Roar, who won only two of their opening eight games last season and flew home to miss the premiership by a whisker.
After the Victory’s impressive performance in Adelaide last week, it is tempting to think they have they turned the corner, and with three-quarters of the season left, little separating all the teams (only seven points from top to bottom) and teams like Gold Coast and Sydney coming back to the field of late, they’re as good as chance as anyone for the much sought after top-two.
Indeed, if Melbourne can knock off Gold Coast on Saturday night, in one of the most enticing games of the season, they will be only one point behind Miron Bleiberg’s pace-setters and Sydney FC (and Perth if they beat Newcastle tonight).
On the evidence of last week and what we have seen from Jason Culina and his men of late, Melbourne go into the game as favourites and should give van den Brink and Rees plenty of trouble, if Bleiberg is mad enough to play them both.
With no Smeltz, Robson unsighted, Caravella still injured and Bleiberg struggling to find a solution over the past few weeks, Gold Coast suddenly look very vulnerable and must show if they are mentally tough enough when the going gets tough.
So much for Melbourne’s annus horribilis and Gold Coast romping away with the title.
While the Victory have to prove they can produce the type of performance they did against Adelaide on a consistent basis, and not just against their bogey side, the trend looks upwards.
The next three weeks, against Gold Coast, Brisbane and Sydney, in that order, will tell much.
Undoubtedly the difference last week was the return of Muscat, who made a shuddering challenge early, set the tempo, and immediately brought intensity and confidence.
While the pity for Melbourne and Ernie Merrick is that the rest of the squad weren’t able to respond while their leader was absent, at least Muscat’s injury, and Allsopp’s departure, came at the right end of the season. Melbourne had time enough to even sign an import for Celeski.
While Muscat and the sight of the red jerseys provided the psychological edge, there was also much to like about the game-plan.
Recognising that Adelaide would be playing three big men at the back, Merrick went for a mobile front-line, pushing Pondeljak and Ward up close to Thompson.
Melbourne got the ball on the ground and the front three, with Hernandez lending support, terrorised Rudan, Cornthwaite and Fyfe. Jamieson wasn’t much better. (Take note Bleiberg; don’t pair van den Brink with Rees, it’ll be a carve up for Thompson).
Fyfe proved he is not a right back, his distribution appalling at times, while Rudan is really struggling with the increase in quality of the league since he was last around.
Melbourne’s defence looked far more aggressive, getting to everything first. Meanwhile, going to a back three meant there was only room for one holder, and Broxham had his best game, perhaps ever.
Adelaide, meanwhile, did their best impersonation of, dare I say it, Wimbledon.
When David Mitchell made the comment early in the season I thought he’d been watching another team, for the Adelaide I’d seen for much of last season transitioned the ball neatly and always had some creative spark from the likes of Barbiero, Diego, Cassio, Jamieson, Cristiano and Mullen.
If Mitchell made the comment now, he’d be bang on the money.
With no Barbiero, Diego gone, and Hughes anchoring the midfield, Adelaide resorted to pumping the ball long to Owusu, at the start and at the end. They had no plan B or C.
It was ghastly.
Fortunately, for Aurelio Vidmar, the season is still young, and like Melbourne, they may be in a position to turn things around.
Barbiero is yet to be sighted and will be like a new signing when he eventually gets on. Pairing him with Reid looks the only central midfield solution at this stage. Hughes has been underwhelming.
Playing Owusu makes Adelaide go long, so, if he’s not prepared to go to two up front, Vidmar should start Cristiano and insist his team keep the ball on the deck.
Fyfe and Cornthwaite should assume their pairing in central defence.
Vidmar, like all the managers, has more time to get things right this season, and, if he does, some late momentum could be crucial leading into the finals.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- A-League, Adelaide United, Aurelio Vidmar, football, newcastle united

Kazama said | September 25th 2009 @ 8:52am | Report comment
Agree with you on Adelaide, Tony. Given that we have little guys like Pantelis and Cassio running around for us you’d think Viddie would want to keep the ball at feet. I think we have to go back to two centre backs, and Rudan is too slow (as Archie & co exposed on Friday night) so you are right it has to be Cornthwaite and Fyfe.
Agree we need two up front. I was under the impression that Owusu was signed so that Cristiano would have someone to play off of, not have his spot pinched by. And the long balls we pumped up to Owusu were not pretty to watch. It was a dull game to watch as an AU fan because we seemingly couldn’t keep the ball. A friend went with me to her first A-League game Fri nite and frankly I wouldn’t be surprised if she never wants to go again after that display.
I had high hopes for Hughes but I agree so far he has been unimpressive.
It came as no surprise to read in last round’s program that AU have created the least opportunities of any team. Something to think about Viddie.
AndyRoo said | September 25th 2009 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Adelaide have to get it right soon, they have had a good draw so far and the MV game is their 5th home game and their two away games were SFS (tough) and Pheonix (fair) .
Pippinu said | September 25th 2009 @ 9:59am | Report comment
(Take note Bleiberg; don’t pair van den Brink with Rees, it’ll be a carve up for Thompson).
Very true – if Melbourne can keep the ball on the carpet, we’re certainly in with a shout (but to call MV favourites is a bit over the top).
Pippinu said | September 25th 2009 @ 10:16am | Report comment
Just read that we have a few injury concerns in the front half – might be a tougher assignment than we first envisaged.
Tony Tannous said | September 25th 2009 @ 11:25am | Report comment
Pippinu, read about Ward, Archie, Kruse and Pondeljak struggling after I’d filed my piece, and while Wards absence makes it more of a leveler, I think that if the others play and the Victory can demonstrate the mental attitude and aggression they showed against Adelaide, then the Coast can’t live with them…few can, in fact. They were very upbeat.
As much could be told from the post match celebrations. It was a vital 3 pts.
I’ve found the Coast to have been shirking the tough stuff of late, and Miron looks a concerned/puzzled man.
Maybe having Thwaite and Pantelidis play against their old club will add some steel, but the others will all need to lift. I’m even talking about the experienced guys like Culina and Anderson.
Not having Smeltz and Caravella won’t help. Porter back will.
For some reason, I’m expecting Muscat to rule over this game the way he does, but it will be interesting to see if Culina can stand up for his mob.
From a technical perspective, he needs to get up higher up the pitch, working closely with Porter. If the Coast are to win, Porter will need to engage Muscat and get the better of him, and he showed in the first few rounds he is capable.
Culina will need to engage Broxham.
Either way, looking forward to it.
Bit of the pity it comes on this weekend where the attention in Melbourne is on the AFL GF and the Storms game at Etihad same time, while here and up north the focus is very much on the Dogs-Eeels clash and Brisbane Broncos.
Listening to Peter Lomgman’s weekend sports review on 2BL this morning, no mention of this game or the Brisbane-Sydney game.
AndyRoo said | September 25th 2009 @ 11:54am | Report comment
In Brisbane the Roar have being doing a lot of promotions on the Nova Breakfast show
They are running a few ads, they had an outside broadcast at Roar training at Ballymore and they ran a comp for one week.
The name was “Sergios dutch oven” he say the name of a food in Dutch and then you have to call up to win roar tickets.
Art Sapphire said | September 25th 2009 @ 11:45am | Report comment
Tony – I hope Bleiberg does not read your advice.
You forgot to mention that Melbourne did not start with the dreaded Brebner/Broxham combination against Adelaide.
But with Ward out and Tommy P doubtful, Merrick will resort to using the Brebner/Broxham combination again and probably revert to the long ball with Ney Fab and Archie up front.
Likely starting XI if Tommy P does not come up
—————-Moss————
—Vargas, Muscat, Leijer
Sukha, Broxham, Brebner, Berger
———-Hernandez———–
——-Archie, Ney Fab——-
FYI – the A-League delayed kickoff of this game by 2 hours to accommodate the AFL GF.
Good move as many of the specators goong to the game would want to watch the GF before heading to the ground.
Gaz said | September 25th 2009 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Meh. Now I am hoping Miron plays Rees and VDB together (and why wouldn’t he?) just to annoy Tony and Pip!
This game is going to be all about psychology. Hopefully both camps come out pumped up and firing for the full 90 minutes. Both teams can afford a loss, but not a humiliating one. It’s time to put the extra-hot chilli sauce into the tacos! Vamonos!!!
Tony Tannous said | September 25th 2009 @ 1:19pm | Report comment
Art, yes, Miron does take some puzzling options.
As for Broxham/Brebner, I acknowledged in my piece that going to a back three meant there was no room for two screeners, and I thought Broxham benefitted from that. You looked much better without both of them together.
I’d like to think Merrick will keep the 3-4-3, with only Broxham holding.
It’s far less mobile with Ney in a two man forward line, and that would benefit Rees or van den Brink, who would rather be defending him.
The other beauty of playing 3 up front is that you pin back the GC fullbacks. Play Pondi one side, Archie the other, both close to Ney who is through the middle.
If Pondi isn’t available, but Kruse is, use him, or even push Suhka, Berger or Kemp into the front third…more mobile.
Art Sapphire said | September 25th 2009 @ 1:39pm | Report comment
Tony – In my haste I forgot Kempy and put Berger in.
But nevertheless, I can’t see Merrick using a front 3 on Saturday due to the absences.
Word is that Kruse is not completely fit either.
Tony Tannous said | September 25th 2009 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Hopefully they pull a crowd Andy, Suncorp looks and sounds terrible on TV when empty. Syd is generally a big game for Brissy, so hopefully a goodish crowd…
Midfielder said | September 25th 2009 @ 10:56pm | Report comment
Tont
Shame Shame shame … no mention of weeMac or Travis … you know my throughts they will tear the A-League to shrids … just waiting for when you are prepared to admit …. weeMac ruled the center of Bluetounge last week Jason was a bystander …
Come grand final day …. weeMac & Travis + Crowell , Cahill, Huke … thats leaving out Hutch, Kwasie, & Pedj… the best midfield in the country … come on Tony … you must have been at Bluey….
Go the Mariners this weekend … Hope the Scum go down to Perth & the Choppers go down as well .. Beach Worms could loose for us as well…
Come on Tony .. weeMac & Travis the beating heart of the A-League best midfield …