Can Olympic 7s bring union and league players together?
By Angus Boyle, 10 Oct 2009 Angus Boyle is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- NRL, Olympic Games, rugby 7s, Rugby League, Rugby Union
151 Have your say
Related coverage
106 IOC members voted yesterday to include rugby 7s into the Olympic programme for Rio 2016. With the lure of an Olympic gold medal and the desire to see Australia succeed in the spotlight of the Summer Games, the ARU and Australia’s governing league body should make the best players from both sports available.
Imagine the excitement generated from a 7s tournament in the weeks leading up to the cut-off date to finalise Australia’s Olympic team.
Only one weekend every four years would have to be set aside from the NRL and rugby union calendar in Australia.
24 teams could easily be fielded, playing out of a packed SFS, Homebush or Lang Park.
Teams could be entered from the five Australian Super 15 provinces, the 16 (or more by 2016) Australian NRL clubs, an Aboriginal select, and two more from the Australian club rugby scene or other special select teams.
Players from the already established 7s squad playing in the IRB’s World 7s Series could bolster the squads of the Super 15 teams.
The tournament would be a smash-hit with the public.
The ARU may not play ball over a Kangaroos-Wallabies exhibition, but the added playing strength of a combined union/league 7s squad for the Olympics would be a great incentive for the ARU and NRL equivalent to make this happen.
There’s no reason why league players cannot make an immediate successful transition to union 7s.
Three man scrums and two man lineouts would not be a problem for the league boys.
Concerns over rucks and mauls would not be a serious impediment as history has shown that English rugby league sides such as Bradford and Wigan have triumphed in the Middlesex Sevens since union went professional.
Cast a thought to the power, speed and skill of such a side if picked from players today.
Inglis and Folau; Hayne, Giteau and Slater; George Smith and David Pocock against Nathan Hindmarsh and Anthony Watmough; and steppers like the ageless Preston Campbell, Quade Cooper and Kurtley Beale.
But let’s not get picky. Each team would have star power.
The match-ups would provide countless talking points for fans of both codes as their heroes matched each other one-on-one.
Furthermore, a tournament showcasing the pace, skill and action of 7s would bring to the fore skillful players from outside present representative teams.
In the quest for an elusive and iconic Olympic gold medal, the tournament would provide selectors a magnificent platform from which to choose a truly unified Australian 7s squad.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (252)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (243)
- I was dead-set wrong about Folau (237)
- What gives with Israel Folau? (184)
- Deans promises ball in hand rugby for Wallabies against Lions (183)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (182)
- My Lion tamers for 2013 (167)
- NZRU show the height of sporting arrogance (42)
- O’Connor to relish Wallabies’ No.10 role (38)
- Ioane ruled out for Reds with injury (3)
- Folau shocked by Wallabies selection (7)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (230)
- Finals talk taboo for NSW Waratahs (19)
- McKenzie defends omitted Quade Cooper (61)
- NZRU show the height of sporting arrogance (42)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (181)
- Wallabies 2013 Lions Tour squad announcement: Live blog (193)
- Picking Quade and Izzy is a no brainer (40)
- Cheetahs vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (186)
- Michael Hooper in box the seat for Wallabies start (2)
- Can Robbie Deans win me back, and the rugby public? (2)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- NRL, Olympic Games, rugby 7s, Rugby League, Rugby Union




October 10th 2009 @ 6:57am
Firestarter Bob said | October 10th 2009 @ 6:57am | Report comment
Yes, great. Why not let the soccer and AFL boys in too? How about Karmichael Hunt? How about our Aussie cricketers? I see them playing touch footy in their training warm-ups all the time. Andrew Symonds anyone?
October 10th 2009 @ 7:41am
sheek said | October 10th 2009 @ 7:41am | Report comment
The world doesn’t work like this.
As if rugby union would invite rugby league players to participate in their team/sport. Also, Australia is the only place where this might be an issue.
October 10th 2009 @ 1:50pm
Pippinu said | October 10th 2009 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
Having just read the article, I was full of unbridled optimism, thiniking to myself: yes, why not?
Until I read the first two responses!!! (with more to come).
October 10th 2009 @ 7:51am
oikee said | October 10th 2009 @ 7:51am | Report comment
Sorry mate, not interested, i just found out richie macaw won a commonweath medal for rugby, i had no idea they played rugby at the games. So as far as i am concerned, i could not care less about rugby at the olmypics. League has other mountains to climb. As far as i am concerned, playing sport at the olmypics is a backward step for league. Its to intense for a gimmac type sport.
October 10th 2009 @ 8:27am
Shahsan said | October 10th 2009 @ 8:27am | Report comment
Angus, it’s a good idea if it could ever come to fruition.
As for the players you suggested, I don’t think Hindmarsh and Wartnough could play sevens. Ideally you need to find very skiilful, mobile forwards (such as George Smith) or backs who could play as forwards.
If a composite Australian team were to be picked today, players such as Inglis and Mortlock might be the props, with George Smith as hooker, and the backs would consist of two playmaker types and two outright speedsters, so maybe Giteau and O’Connor/Thurston, and two fast men, of which Australia has many: Slater, Turner, Hayne etc etc.
All must be good tacklers, although Campo managed to be the best sevens players for years without this particualr skill.
Ps Oikee. Mccaw has never won gold at the Commonwealth Games; you’re thinking of Mils Muliaina.
October 10th 2009 @ 8:41am
Dale said | October 10th 2009 @ 8:41am | Report comment
The idea had occured to me as well.
Australia needs to pick the top 15 Rugby players to win Gold.
Choosing from 33 percent of tthe rugby gene pool means we are always behind NZ, England, and South Africa.
October 10th 2009 @ 9:22am
Dogs Of War said | October 10th 2009 @ 9:22am | Report comment
The NRL wouldn’t want to participate just because it draws attention to the talent they may have and they could see some players being lured away with a big paycheck. Doesn’t mean they will go well in the other code, just that money is hard to resist.
October 10th 2009 @ 9:54am
Chris said | October 10th 2009 @ 9:54am | Report comment
I love the idea. If the ARU is serious about winning gold then bringing in a couple of gun league players is essential.
As a person who loves both codes I think this would be great (allthough I can see the NSWRU Old Boys getting their knickers in a knot over it).
Imagine a Hayne/Inglis/Slater on a Sevens field. With that kind of space they would tear any other team to threads. Ideally I guess the ARU should look at picking all Union forwards and all League backs.
October 10th 2009 @ 10:02am
Shahsan said | October 10th 2009 @ 10:02am | Report comment
No, most union forwards would be lousy at sevens. the exceptions would be good handlers such as George Smith. The trick is to pick 1-2 loosies and 1-2 backs who can play as forwards eg Inglis and Mortlock, who are good in the air and big enough for forward play. Jonah Lomu, remember, played as a forward in sevens, as did Eric Rush, who was a winger in 15s..
October 10th 2009 @ 10:07am
Shahsan said | October 10th 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
As did Tana Umaga (at club level, he never played for NZ in 7s), and flormer All Blacks centre Alama Ieremia, when Samoa won in HK in 1993.
October 10th 2009 @ 10:03am
therealalekid said | October 10th 2009 @ 10:03am | Report comment
No, simple as that.
It was the IRB that has spent millions forming a world series, it was the IRB that tendered the bid for entry in the olympics at the cost of thousands, it is the IRB that is recognised by the IOC, like FIFA runs the football comp, FIBA runs the Basketball comp etc….And this was all done for the benefit of the game of Rugby Union.
It will be up the the ARU who they want to select, although I’m not sure whether NRL clubs would want to release players mid season or whether the IRB will be keen on Rugby League players being used.
If Rugby League folk want to expand their game they have to look towars their own tournaments, this has squat to do with them.
October 10th 2009 @ 10:08am
Shahsan said | October 10th 2009 @ 10:08am | Report comment
Very good point too.
October 10th 2009 @ 10:11am
therealalekid said | October 10th 2009 @ 10:11am | Report comment
“Concerns over rucks and mauls would not be a serious impediment as history has shown that English rugby league sides such as Bradford and Wigan have triumphed in the Middlesex Sevens since union went professional.”
this has a tendancy to sometimes come up. The Middlesex sevens is a preseason tournament with squads that largely consist of academy players and reserves, it does not consist of the best sevens players that would play on the IRB tournament. As an example the year before Bradford contested it the tournament was won by the British Army and the year before that the ‘Penguins’ representative side. Therefore no Gollings, Ryder, Serevi were involved.
Even then though the Bradford side that won consisted of three Wakefield RUFC players, one of which was an ex Englands Sevens captain.