The difference between good and bad coaching
By David V., 10 Oct 2009 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
Related coverage
- Sydney FC news
- Melbourne Victory news
- Adelaide United news
- Perth Glory news
- Football news
- A-League news
Last night we saw two A-League games, Melbourne Victory Vs Sydney FC and Perth Glory Vs Adelaide United, where the differences between good coaching and bad coaching have come to light. More specifically, the difference between good, flexible tactics and bad, inflexible ones.
It’s taken time for Vitezslav Lavicka to get it right at Sydney FC.
They’ve done the business this season without playing brilliantly, or playing the sort of slick football a coach of his type is expected to deliver. But on the night, he finally managed to deliver by deploying Alex Brosque and Mark Bridge in a system that gets the best out of these two undeniably able strikers.
Sydney’s passing game, last night, was the best they’ve ever had and as good as anyone in this league has delivered to date. And it worked a treat as they were very much in control in cruising to a 3-0 win in Melbourne.
Contrast with Adelaide United.
Aurelio Vidmar, a master of anti-football, stubbornly persists with a system guaranteed to bore into submission, failing to get the best out of strikers like Lloyd Owusu.
Indeed, Vidmar is demonstrating the same arrogance and inflexibility that proved the downfall of Newcastle’s Gary Van Egmond in the last year – though Con Constantine’s mismanagement of the Jets has hurt, Gary Van Egmond’s inflexibility and poor man management played its part.
In fact, it does prove that playing slavishly to a system – any system – is a sure way to get found out. Witness the downfall of many teams whose success came by playing a predictable style, and then struggling once other teams figure them out, or once good players are not replaced.
Once more, the need for a coaching revolution becomes more obvious, and the difference between good coaching and bad coaching was evident in two A-League games. Lavicka demonstrates professionalism and flexibility.
Many more have demonstrated anything but.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Phoenix need more than flash in the pan crowds (133)
- ‘New football’ fans may help save the game in Australia (124)
- Does Tasmania have a case for A-League inclusion? (119)
- What happened in Port Said was not a football riot (118)
- Magilton struggling to make a mark (68)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (44)
- Socceroos screwed over by FIFA, again (41)
- Sydney and Perth eye A-League crunch game
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (97)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (9)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (7)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (46)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (97)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (9)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (7)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Melbourne derby reveals tale of two journeys (3)
- O’ so close for John: How JON almost landed the biggest job in sport (16)
- Explore:
- A-League, Adelaide United, Aurelio Vidmar, football, Melbourne Victory, Perth Glory, Sydney FC

whiskeymac said | October 10th 2009 @ 10:09am | Report comment
interesting point(s). good result for the SFC. Reasonable crowd, by any leagues standards, and a good game.
Do you think Pim is inflexibile? i s’pose tonight we’ll see if the dutch (who have to be favourites) have worked out his formation.
AndyRoo said | October 10th 2009 @ 10:41am | Report comment
Pim tends to stick to his prefered formation but the formation itself is fairly flexible. Those 3 AM’s behind the lone striker can play deep or forward or a mix and the team looks totally different with just those adjustments.
Luke W said | October 10th 2009 @ 11:02am | Report comment
It goes to show how important flexibility is. Both Newcastle and Adelaide had amazing success with the 4-2-3-1 formation, but like any other formation, it can be outcoached, and in such a short season (although it is a big longer now) there is no time to stick with a formation hoping that it can be turned around. Coaches need to be flexible and adapt game by game, and the best coaches will be able to do that mid-game (and not just after injuries or the 60th minute substitution). As a Jets fan, our results haven’t been impressive, but I am absolutely ecstatic with the tactical nous he has brought to the team, and the football we are playing.
AndyRoo said | October 10th 2009 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Jets have some exciting young players and Cullina lets them play. They can be frustrating at times but also very exciting.
cab711 said | October 10th 2009 @ 11:39am | Report comment
I was thinking the same thing. I find that the Jets players are far more technically skilled than those player at Sydney FC and wonder what they could achieve under a European coach. It was interesting in Kosminas comments in that alot of the Australian players are unfamiliar with club behaviour.
David V. said | October 10th 2009 @ 11:41am | Report comment
A 4-2-3-1 formation can be very attractive and attacking with the right players and mindset. This is what Javier Irureta’s Deportivo La Coruña side did, and why it was so devastating.
cab711 said | October 10th 2009 @ 11:34am | Report comment
I wonder what John van ‘t Schip thought of the match? Be interesting to see if he takes the job and what he could add to the A-League as Lavicka has done. Perhaps Sydney were correct in firing all those coaches. Still to early to tell. One thing that Lavicka has drummed into his many interviews is consistency of players. Sydney FC have now set a new standard for themselves and what will win them the dunny seat is maintaining that form ala Gold Coast Uniteds recent turn of form has presented an alarming downward trend.
Eddie said | October 10th 2009 @ 11:51am | Report comment
Time for Ernie Merrick to go.
mahony said | October 11th 2009 @ 10:24pm | Report comment
People need to stop confusing strategic formations with tactical flexibility. The way to achieve both is with excellent players AS WELL as excellent coaching. Coaches can only work with the ‘cattle’ they have at their disposal. I am not defending Adelaide, but I understand the situation the Pissants (an Pimm) face.
cab711 said | October 12th 2009 @ 8:40pm | Report comment
Maradonna is an enigma for ya. I dont care about his tactical choices because I love his passion. That dive he did after Argentina scored an injury time goal was awesome. Maybe they will still lose against Uruguay and then Socceroos get seeded with Uruguay?