Qatar dream alive, but much to do ahead of South Africa
By Tony Tannous, 15 Oct 2009 Tony Tannous is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- football, Hassan Rabea, Mark Schwarzer, Oman football, Socceroos, World Football
154 Have your say
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- World Football - EPL, Champions League & Europe news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news

Harry Kewell of Australia is challenged by Mohammed Addullah of Oman and team-mate Mohamed Rabia Jamaan Al Noobi during a FIFA Asian Cup qualifying match, played at Docklands Stadium in Melbourne, Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2009. Australia is leading 1-0 deep into the second half. AAP Image/Joe Castro
Losing may not have been an option according to the marketers, but for much of the first half last night, Omani attacking midfielder Fawzi Basheer threatened to shift Australia’s planning post-South Africa from Qatar to Brazil.
Had Hassan Rabea taken the chance that Basheer delightfully teed up for him midway through the half, and had Mark Schwarzer not got his gloves to Basheer’s effort from the byline a couple of minutes earlier, losing may well have been the only option.
As it was, the Socceroos survived the first period, upped the tempo in the second, and ultimately did enough to deliver the killer blow, which came from the usual source.
It was an intriguing match, right from the start, with the Socceroos delivering on their promise to get at Oman and try and grab an early goal that would settle a nervous and expectant nation.
Kewell did some lovely early one-on-one work down the left, but the route to goal was more obvious; get it wide, especially to Brett Emerton and Luke Wilkshire down the right, and get it in to Josh Kennedy and Tim Cahill.
A direct header, knock-down or some second-ball-scraps, whatever it would took, that would be the mode. It is the Pim Verbeek attacking template.
Despite some good aerial outlet from Kennedy and Cahill, the ball just didn’t drop. That and some excellent aerial work from giant goalkeeper Ali Al Habsi.
Early the Socceroos defence, which has had many question raised about its age and subsequent lack of toe, kept a high line, even trapping Oman offside on one occasion.
But then, on 20 minutes, Basheer released the quick Amad Al Hossani down the right. He sped past Lucas Neill, drew Craig Moore across, only to miss his target in the middle.
That warning, the pace of Rabea and Al Hossani, and the trickery of Basheer forced the Socceroos back. For the next 25 minutes, the Socceroos were in retreat mode, a common trait under Verbeek.
The centre backs dropped off, the holding midfielders started treading on their toes, and the gap between defence and attack grew wider.
There was the odd bit of encouragement in attack, but, generally, heads were being shaken and quizzical looks were being exchanged, on the field and off it.
It is at times like this where eye-brows are raised about just whether there are enough legs in the starting 11 to compete at the top level. Whether Verbeek has refreshed the starting 11 enough since Germany?
Certainly there remains an air of predictability not only about the start 11, but much of Verbeek’s tactics.
Refreshingly, Dario Vidosic offered a little bit off the bench, but even Verbeek will admit there is still much to do to get this team ticking in the front third.
There were better signs in the second period as Jason Culina lifted his game and lifted himself higher up the pitch, and the Socceroos started to get a little more joy down the flanks.
Scott Chipperfield and Neill were battered in the first period, but showed they are made of stern stuff by bouncing back to influence late on, while Cahill and Kennedy kept offering themselves, eventually jagging a winner.
Surviving what looked a fair shout for a penalty, it finally looked like Australia’s night. Suddenly, job down, pressure released, the football came out.
On one occasion they even knocked a delightful 20 or so passes.
But it was a tense up until then, confirming Verbeek has much work to do.
Commercially, Cahill’s rescue-acts are priceless, for they allows the FFA to sign their Hugo Boss deals, crucial to the ongoing development of the game, but between now and June 2010, the focus should primarily be on ensuring the team suits-up on the field.
A reality check against the Dutch and a nervous night at Etihad should at least ensure that heads remain level ahead of South Africa, and that mightn’t be the worse thing.
Recommend this story.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
- Explore:
- football, Hassan Rabea, Mark Schwarzer, Oman football, Socceroos, World Football

October 15th 2009 @ 9:26am
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:26am | Report comment
This game was great entertainment largely thanks to Oman
Pim getting us to South Africa is a great achievement and I wish him well for his next appointment once the World Cup is finished. But I am looking forward to a team that possibly doesn’t play two screeners and can play through the middle on occasions.
It’s a shame that Harry’s career wasn’t the other way around (in regards to his physical decline), Pim would get great use out of his pace while Farina or Venables would be happy to play the now slower version of Kewell in the center and take advantage of his touch.
Our domination in the second half I think was largely due to the edge we get from a largley European based squad (i.e. what Robbos said).
Only then was Cullina and Chipperfield prepared to go forward.
When Kewell and Emerton started running at the tired Omanis that’s when we actually looked all right. It created a lot more space and finally allowed Kennedy a bit of room.
October 15th 2009 @ 9:30am
FIsher Price said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:30am | Report comment
Kennedy. Pah!
October 15th 2009 @ 9:33am
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:33am | Report comment
Kennedy is a good player.
His performances at Nagoya show he is at his best when not playing a hold up role or a constant target for high crosses.
A victim of the system and tactics.
October 15th 2009 @ 10:35am
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:35am | Report comment
100% agree.
October 15th 2009 @ 1:05pm
Realfootball said | October 15th 2009 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
Add me to that. Verbeek trashes strikers the way The Who used to trash hotel rooms.
October 16th 2009 @ 4:12pm
Simmo said | October 16th 2009 @ 4:12pm | Report comment
He certainly does well with the ball at his feet. For some reason he was just lobbed lots of long crosses. Not a lot of variety and not hard for the defence to read.
I’m a fully paid member of the “Pim Verbeek has no imagination” club.
October 15th 2009 @ 9:30am
Luke W said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:30am | Report comment
If Moore and Chipperfield are part of our first choice defence at the WC, we will not last long. They are class players, but their bodies are not up to international standard anymore. They are too slow, and make up for it by committing fouls by simply blocking the attacking runs. Also, we cannot afford to play Kennedy as the lone striker. The temptation to become one-dimensional is too much. It is no coincidence that our best performance this year was in Ireland when we were forced to keep the ball on the ground with McDonald up front (who to his credit really held it well and had his best game in the green and gold). I think we will struggle to get out of our group at the WC, but with our solid defensive structure and a bit of luck, who knows?
October 15th 2009 @ 9:33am
Lmacca said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:33am | Report comment
I think we’re going to see two screeners from here on in – it’s just the way Verbeek plays. It’s more how THEY play that’s important – Culina has been at his most effective when he’s been linking the defence and the attack, rather than sitting in the middle on top of the CBs. I was happy Wilkshire got shifted into the central role, I think he’s played that role well recently. Valeri, Grella and Jedinak don’t seem to have the ability to play the ball as effectively as we’d like from that screening position. Or get forward enough to close that space between them and Cahill.
I think maybe Grella to the bench, Wilkshire and Culina in the middle and Rhys Williams as RB. Bit of a bolter, but he has pace and importantly, youth!
I would have liked to have seen Bresciano and McDonald get a run last night had they been fit. Just to see what kind of impact they would have had. Agree that with McDonald we play the ball on the floor a great deal more, which is a good thing!
October 15th 2009 @ 9:42am
John Smith said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Why was Pim in a private box behind glass when he should of been on the pitch talking to the players? Is Pim the real deal, does he care about Australian football, if he did he would be on the pitch instructing the players to push forward and control the ball. Just because we have qualified for the 2010 World Cup doesn’t mean our road to cementing football in Australia is over – in my eyes is has only just began.
We should of comfortably won last nights game, we can’t rely on draws and luck in the World Cup.
Over the last couple of weeks I have read on The Roar about the A-League crowds and I am sorry to say that so far I have not yet attended an A-League game this year but I assure you I will before the end of the year. Last nights crowd of 20k was very average considering we had all the big names on the pitch and it was a must win for the Socceroos.
I work in Marketing and I am shocked at the lack of advertising the A-League is doing to promote the game on the eve of a World Cup year, the FFA should look outside the box and promote the game at schools or in shopping centres, teams should train at public ovals so people can see them and get to know them and more importantly so teams can develop a relationship with the fans.
October 15th 2009 @ 9:55am
Lmacca said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Verbeek was in the stands as a result of a touchline ban stemming from his time as South Korea coach in the Asian Cup when he lost his bottle during a match there. Verbeek’s eyes are on the WC2010, though I can’t say he has the same intensity when thinking about the entirety of Australian football, that’s Han Berger’s job, not his.
October 15th 2009 @ 9:57am
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Pim was banned from the sidelines stemming back from when he was coaching the Sth Koreans. The ban is only for the Asian championship.
October 15th 2009 @ 10:04am
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:04am | Report comment
But once up there he might have thought: gee, it’s not a bad view from up here, I can actually see the game unfold – those aussie rules coaches are on to something.
October 15th 2009 @ 10:33am
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:33am | Report comment
He didn’t seem to have the white telephone though.
Would have loved too see a few shots of him slamming down the phone after talking to Arnold AFL style
October 15th 2009 @ 11:46am
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:46am | Report comment
Yes!!
October 15th 2009 @ 12:15pm
BigAl said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
It’s ‘should have’ NOT ‘should of’ !
October 15th 2009 @ 12:43pm
mahony said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
Oh dear…..
October 15th 2009 @ 10:17am
keeper11 said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:17am | Report comment
Crowd was so-so but no surprise but this was Qatar..oops Kuwait?…umm sorry Oman….
well some nameless average team from middle East..
this was no Holland, Argentina, France….no WC qualifier against Japan- 70000 than you very much…
Ofcourse..the usual mob will rush to trumpet the ..sockah crisis/ problem etc..
These games should bve going to regional cities..
socceroo average crowds still prove they are up there with Wallabies as THE only true National Football side….
October 15th 2009 @ 10:48am
Art Sapphire said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:48am | Report comment
keeper some perspective please – the Socceroos are way beyond the Wallabies as our National football side,
3.5 million watched the Socceroos play the Italians at 3AM at the last WC. No other national sporting team can attract those figures at that hour.
As reported in The Age yesterday – “The Socceroos have a pulling power that is socially broader, more reflective of 21st-century Australia. As the Sydney social commentator Tanveer Ahmed observed during the last World Cup: ”It’s safe to say that one sport has never before crossed social groups and ethnic communities, uniting the elderly immigrant man from Asia to the toddler from Alice Springs”
The Wallabies will never be able to do that.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:06am
JF said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:06am | Report comment
We don’t have A national football side, each team excludes wide sections of the community so no football team can be considered THE national team.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:17am
Art Sapphire said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:17am | Report comment
Yes JF – but football excludes fewer sections than the other national teams. The demographic makeup of Australia is much different to the Australia of the 1950′s. This is a reality.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:22am
JF said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:22am | Report comment
That is a matter of subjectivity, the point is, the sections of the community that each team excludes are so large that no team can claim to be the national team. This is a reality.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:36am
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:36am | Report comment
JF if you your position is we don’t have a national team at all then fair enough.
There was an interesting article just recently about wether the Cricket team is still our national team or wether it is the Socceroos. The feeling I got from the article was it is still the cricket team because it’s a constant high level of interest where as the Socceroos interest is in spikes of interest that overtake the Cricket team but not consistently. Probably something to revisit in 10 years time.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:49am
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:49am | Report comment
I think there can be little doubt that the Socceroos are now our national football side – that’s not to denigrate the Wallabies in any way.
October 15th 2009 @ 1:02pm
mahony said | October 15th 2009 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
Who does footbal “exclude” JF. I know there are a lot of people who don’t follow football – but who does it “exclude”. Does it exclude men? No. Women? No. Young boys? No. Young girls? No. Muslims? No. Refugees? no. Migrant communities? No.
October 15th 2009 @ 7:06pm
danny said | October 15th 2009 @ 7:06pm | Report comment
the poll from the age website:
Different ball games : Which Australian sporting team is your favourite?
Soccer – 63%
Cricket – 37%
Total Votes: 1224 Poll date: 13/10/09
didn’t even include the wallabies as an option, for what it’s worth.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:19am
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:19am | Report comment
How do the Wallabies go (crowdwise) with Tonga, or Fiji or Georgia outside of the WC?
Oh that’s right they don’t play these teams outside the WC, they’d rather play New Zealand 7 times a year (ho hum) & I’ve been to many Wallabies games.
Talking about supporting the smaller nations.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:37am
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Just wanted to say that Vidosic having shirt number 101 looked stupid.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:48am
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:48am | Report comment
Agreed.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:55am
Michael C said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:55am | Report comment
They gave him a good bake on SEN this morning over the notion of an Australian national football team rep wearing 101 just was not a good look.
then after 9AM Patrick Smith and KB were having a go at Timmy Cahill brushing aside team mates to go off on his solo celebratory run rather than celebrating with team mates who helped set it up……
At any rate on the crowd front – - it does illustrate that the ‘flavour of the month’ Socceroos are only worth so much stand alone – - i.e. the Asian Cup ain’t the World Cup, and Oman ain’t Greece. The odd thing is the fervour in the past has drawn large crowds to Friendlies, whereas this was a ‘live’ game in a tournament qualification process……so, apparently context wasn’t such a big deal. MVFC just about did better on a school night than the Socceroos??
October 15th 2009 @ 12:26pm
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
It was a tribute to those in Samoa.
That only speaks badly of Patrick Smith I say.
October 15th 2009 @ 12:30pm
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
Personally – I don’t like seeing players brush off team mates after scoring a goal – even if the motives are noble.
You see it sometimes in the A-League – it doesn’t sit comfortably with me.
October 15th 2009 @ 12:32pm
BigAl said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
If the ‘KB’ referred to is Kevin Bartlett – I can’t imagine anyone in the world more likely to do what Cahill did, if they were in the same position ! – again and again and again . . .
October 15th 2009 @ 12:45pm
Michael C said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
BigAl – yes, and yes, exactly…..the irony no doubt lost on most the readers here!!!
(KB,……Did you ever lay a tackle in your career. Answer : No, because I always had the ball)
same answer for ‘shepherd’.
October 15th 2009 @ 12:52pm
mahony said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
Gee – Timmy scored a goal and did not celebrate with his team mates. He is so un-Australian. They don’t understand the Asia Cup regulations on shirt numbering, they clearly don’t watch enough football to understand how goal scorers often celebrate, and apart from the marketing / ticket costs issues (which I agree need re-evaluation for the Asia Cup) – I saw nothing in last nights football game I have not seen a million times before. SEN are about as relevant to football’s future as Frank Farina. ‘Buffoons’ – the lot of them.
October 15th 2009 @ 12:56pm
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
Fair enough on most points.
But that was only the third game of the campaign, sure we used an A league squad for the other two matches but even if all 3 teams were different thats 23 plus 23 plus 23 = 69 players
The number 101 looks like someone wanted number 10 and couldn’t get it.
October 15th 2009 @ 1:01pm
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
And a it happens – Elrich has no. 69!
October 15th 2009 @ 5:10pm
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 5:10pm | Report comment
I don’t need to know about the players personal lives Pip.
October 15th 2009 @ 1:06pm
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
Mahony
people can have their own reactions to what the players do on the field – but it’s a team game, and I don’t really like to see the me me me, look at me, type of stuff.
In particular, I didn’t like seeing Timmy pushing a 3 gamer away, as if to say: piss off mate – do you know who I am? Take a ticket and get in line.
October 15th 2009 @ 2:27pm
The Bear said | October 15th 2009 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
Woah. He’s probably thinking “Out of my way mate, i am paying tribute to tens of thousands of Pacific islanders messed up by the tsunami”. Yeah, he’s selfish ; /
October 15th 2009 @ 2:32pm
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 2:32pm | Report comment
A bit of social awareness mixed in with a healthy dose of narcissism.
October 15th 2009 @ 2:47pm
The Bear said | October 15th 2009 @ 2:47pm | Report comment
It’s not just social awareness, Pip. It’s family ties.
October 15th 2009 @ 2:50pm
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
I understand that.
Many wouldn’t know it.
It still wasn’t a good look to brush off the youngster so you can go can and do your own thing – but it’s not just Timmy on this occasion, it’s something that happens often which gets up my goat at times.
October 15th 2009 @ 3:03pm
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 3:03pm | Report comment
yeah abit like Sydney Swans playing Collingwood is a big thing & the theatre goers come out, when it’s Nth Melb or Western bulldogs Ho hum.
October 15th 2009 @ 3:11pm
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 3:11pm | Report comment
huh???
October 15th 2009 @ 6:41pm
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 6:41pm | Report comment
Answering your mate above comparing world Cup & Greece to Asian cup & Oman as far as crowds go.
October 15th 2009 @ 11:57am
JF said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Disagree Pip – there is no national football team.
October 15th 2009 @ 12:32pm
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
Sorry JF – I just can’t see how you can argue that. As others have pointed out, 3.5 million Australians getting up in the middle of the night to see a 2nd round game – that’s a big, big number.
October 15th 2009 @ 12:48pm
Michael C said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
Like any ratings number, it’s an extrapolation based on 14,000 5 capital city individuals and 2000 regionals……..the best validation of such figures is the repeated ‘score’ to look for trending. As an absolute number – - it is of course false……proportionally/statistically significant as it is.
October 15th 2009 @ 1:06pm
JF said | October 15th 2009 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
My point is, the number of people who dispute the point, makes the title null and void. If they truly were the national football team – there would not be any dispute.
October 15th 2009 @ 1:31pm
Art Sapphire said | October 15th 2009 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
Using your logic JF – if a minority of people still believed the earth was flat and refused to believe that the world was round – then the Earth must not be round
October 15th 2009 @ 12:56pm
mahony said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
Wrong – it is the Australian National Football team in more than just name. I notice even a few AFL and Rugby writers are saying so these days through gritted teeth (and sentimental eyes in the case of Rugby).
October 15th 2009 @ 12:19pm
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
In case people haven’t heard:
“MONTEVIDEO, Oct 15 AP – Argentina ended an embarrassing campaign
by qualifying for the World Cup with a 1-0 win over Uruguay on
Wednesday. “
October 15th 2009 @ 12:25pm
True Tah said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
So Maradonna gets to keep his job then?
October 15th 2009 @ 12:28pm
Eamonn said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
No Andyroo.you missed the point.
Vidosic might have shown us something last night. A player with pace who can dribble. Crucial beyond 2010 be nice in 2010 but probably to late.
If he is a real Premier/Bundesliga attacking player…time will tell…who cares what shirt he wears.
JF: Socceroos is the national football team. tv audiences clearly show it, the sponsors are reading this one better than you it seems, and especially come World Cup time. Team is supported across all States…makes it the national football team bar non..or you got some other measure.
October 15th 2009 @ 12:36pm
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
I like Vidosic the player (just not the 3 figured shirt number).
I doubt he would be as good in the Kennedy role which involves spending a large amount of time with his back to goal. Assuming we have to play Pim’s formation I would play him as the Right Sided AM. Emerton back to Fullback.
Macdonald held the ball up ok when we played Ireland but it frustrates me that they have to actually drop Kennedy in order to stop playing predictable high balls. Is his noggin that tempting they can’t control themselves?
October 15th 2009 @ 1:01pm
JF said | October 15th 2009 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
No doubting the socceroos popularity – but there is still far too many in australia who don’t feel any connection to the team at all for them to be called THE national football team. Our country’s diversity does not allow for such a claim to be made by any football team.
October 15th 2009 @ 2:08pm
Brian said | October 15th 2009 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
Well using that logic given the amount of people across the world who are apathetic towards sport most countries dont have a national team. Australians are much more fanatical about sports than nearly anywhere else on the planet. So per your definition Japan and France can’t have a national team