There comes a time when the broad brush of life paints a truth that cannot be denied. For a father and son, that occurred at an AFL match.
Sydney born and bred, both of the rough western suburbs, they had ventured into alien territory, sullen and confused at the injustice of the Superleague war that had ruined their beloved game of rugby league.
More than a game.
The son was the third generation to have striven, shed blood, rejoiced and despaired over the simple folly of trying to place a pigskin across an opponent’s line. And in that sometimes brutal process, he learned more of himself: some of it good, much of it sobering.
He was not to know it then, but he would beget a new generation that would follow in his footsteps. It is a story that mirrors the experience of countless Australians.
But on this day, the pair made up the numbers on an unfamiliar, windswept hill.
They tried to set compass bearings among strange colours, meaningless placards, inexplicable chants. The match began, the cheers went up.
They were initially captivated.
There was a lot of running, the ball spilled everywhere, the long kicking drew a whistle of appreciation from the old man. There was plenty of scoring. A bit like basketball. They waited for a soaring catch like the song promised.
And then one – the father or the son, it is forgotten now – glanced at the clock.
Want a beer?
Yeah, I’ll get it. Stay here, you don’t want to miss anything.
It had cost a bit to get in..
They sipped bravely on their grog trying hard to maintain interest as an icy breeze played about exposed ears and noses.
That was a nice bit of skill, that bloke that punched the ball to his mate.
Yep.
They kick pretty good don’t they.
Yep.
An uncomfortable pause.
Had enough?
Yep.
They’d only made it to half time. In fact, it was their second game of AFL. They’d lasted to three quarter time at their first.
It was a dud game, they thought, you get that in all sports. They’d give it another go.
With sadness, they trudged from the ground a second time. They exchanged looks with mystified AFL expats. Football followers all, separated by an unbridgeable chasm.
The father and son had tried hard to understand the game from the south. But to the men of the west, it might as well have come from Mars.
You see it wasn’t the game’s fault.
It was The Indigenous Game, wasn’t it? The pair felt inadequate because they could not embrace The Australian Game, as they were told they should.
But battle cries learned in backyards and in playgrounds were absent. Loyalties driven home at the dinner table were banished. Old enmities that were never forgotten, let alone forgiven, fell on barren ground.
The thin threads that bridge generation gaps fluttered in the breeze. Sights, sounds and smells that are forever bound up in that mysterious process of memory had no place. Irrational, blind passions handed down through the generations like a valuable heirloom counted for nought.
Above all, the blood and thunder were missing.
What is the indigenous game?
It certainly should not be a label to be bandied about thoughtlessly in a propaganda war.
Indigenous is where the heart is. And as a father and son headed home that day, they came to realise what belonged and what did not. What was native and what was not.
A lesson they would not forget again.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- Rugby league’s new era: where to now? (16)
- New dawn for rugby league gets underway (11)
- Rugby league commission ushers in new era (3)
- Ennis confident about his NRL fitness
- Why sporting seasons should never cross paths (35)
- Independent Commission four years in the making, but worth the wait (26)
- Kearney still to choose Eels kicker
- Rugby league’s new era: where to now? (16)
- Federal Court has it wrong on sports broadcast copyright (48)
- An open letter to Channel Nine (107)
- The NRL’s scariest players (56)
- Is the All Stars match increasing the divide? (25)
- Channel Nine needs NRL-cricket ODI compromise (36)
- The NRL needs a vision (52)
- Explore:
- AFL

Billo said | October 16th 2009 @ 3:21am | Report comment
Interesting article that reflects the experience that some of us have had in trying to come to terms with sports we are not familiar with.
If you are not already part of the culture of a sport you find it hard to appreciate its excitement.
I also take the point you make about labelling games.
Whether it’s the indigenous game (AFL), the beautiful game (soccer), the greatest game (league) or the game they play in heaven (rugby), I suspect that those labels generate at least as much antipathy as support.
Ken said | October 16th 2009 @ 8:44am | Report comment
I quite enjoyed the imagery of that piece. I have been through a very similar scenario where I had a mate from SA who had moved to Sydney and we went to a couple of AFL games here. I’m a born and bred league supporter, but I’m also just a sports fan so I was keen to see what the fuss was about. I didn’t get it, it all felt foreign to me.
That’s not intended as another shot in the code wars that go on here, I’m sure people could swap the codes and have otherwise the same story. Though I must say that it was this reason that those ads a year or 2 ago that implied AFL was the main thread in the history of Australia (though humourously intended) bombed out in this half of the country – football took an evolutionary branch in this country more than a century ago
Of course, I also have a friend who came across from the UK who was an absolute soccer nut – we had plenty of good natured arguments about ‘football’ and the relative merits of the games. Funnily enough, after 10 years here he’s been converted and gets to more RL games than I do! While we all like to think we follow the ‘best’ game, for most of us what you’ve been brought up with is more important than the relative merits or skills of the game.
John said | October 16th 2009 @ 9:58am | Report comment
Great article. I’ve had a go at enjoying every code, and have played them all save for gaelic football, but in the end I only really have a love for rugby league. Union has potential, but it’s a great game only when played at its best, which under its current rules is impossible. AFL is a game that I can enjoy, but these days is becoming a limited contact code, not unlike basketball, only played with a football. I also find the mindset of its missionaries, in their open hatred and determination to kill off rival codes to be severely off-putting. Soccer is a game full of skill, and I appreciate the passion of its fans, but more often than not it appears that people drawn to it are because they like full stadiums and “atmosphere”, and national pride means a great deal to them, rather than the beauty of the game itself.
Gaelic football intrigues me. As does Florentine football. Both I wish were played at a greater level in Australia, or at all in the Calcio Historio case.
Also, regarding the “Indigenous game”, none are that really. The Victorian game that was invented here took all of its rules from variants of English public school games, including Rugby. It may have had some details in common with Koori games played in Victoria at the time, but it certainly didn’t spring from Aboriginal Australia. If anything, whilst the organisational grounding of rugby league was born in Northern England, the code that developed in Australia has traditionally implemented rules at its own whims, and with the English and French following suit. There are more rules devised in Australia for Rugby League than there are for Australian Rules. Neither however is truly an Indigenous code as they both are heavily influenced by alien games. Rugby league by the original rules of Rugby school, the RFU and American football, with Aussie Rules taking from Gaelic, Cambridge, Association football and village games.
Redb said | October 16th 2009 @ 10:19am | Report comment
“There are more rules devised in Australia for Rugby League than there are for Australian Rules. ”
I’d challenge that as absolute rubbish.
I have no problem with people sticking to their own football code and not ‘getting it’ about others, but at least dont post propaganda. This whole article is written in thinly veiled code war rhetoric.
The first ten rules of Australian football were laid down in 1859, yes 150 years ago in Australia. Many were quite different to anything in rugby or soccer or English school football at the time.
Every rule change in fact the entire list or rules for Australian football and AFL ever since is Australian in origin.
Read away:
http://www.afl.com.au/portals/0/afl_docs/development/afl_explained/laws_of_football_2009.pdf
There is no way Australian variant rules for rugby league exceed this list.
Pippinu said | October 16th 2009 @ 10:25am | Report comment
Yes – it was an idiotic statement.
There is a constant pattern here of detractors wanting to make Australian Football somehow appear less Australian, despite a documented history going back 150+ years.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 5:08pm | Report comment
We all appreciate rules began in Melbourne.
But we do not appreciate being required to embrace it as an important part of all Australians ‘ heritage/culture/ traditions.
In significant parts of our great country, that special honour is reserved for another game.
Freud of Football said | October 16th 2009 @ 5:25pm | Report comment
“In significant parts of our great country, that special honour is reserved for another game.” – Our great country consists of 6 states and 2 territories. 4 of those states and a territory are AFL dominated, the other 3 (why we have to bother counting the ACT beats me) are spread across 4 codes including AFL.
If you want to talk about significant parts of the country, 2/3rds of it by area is dominated by AFL, 1/2 by population and as I said, the other 1/3rd of the area and 1/2 the population is split 4 ways.
Whether the redneck bogans up in Innisfail even know what AFL is irrelevant, it is Australia’s sport and if you embrace Australia’s heritage,culture and traditions a significant part of it is based up on this sport, not the english games that are played in Aus.
That’s half the point of Aussie Rules, its our game, its not something that was bought along with colonization, it is quintessentially Australian. Just look at the “All-Italian” and “All-German” teams in AFL, some of the very best are in these squads. These ethnic groups lean more towards Aussie Rules than either rugby code and football sent a long time in the shadows as it was for far too long known as Wogball.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 5:34pm | Report comment
“why we have to bother counting the ACT beats me”
Yet you’re more than happy to count the NT in the grand sweep of Rules across our country.
As I said, the hyprocisy among some of the AFL cheerleaders on this site is breathtaking.
Freud of Football said | October 16th 2009 @ 6:23pm | Report comment
Yes I would consider the NT, a territory that is bigger than a lot of countries but not the ACT which is only there for Canberra, no other purpose.
Further, Canberra for all of it’s size and population is still split amongst 4 codes, in the NT Aussie Rules dominates. So what is the point of splitting up the couple of people that live there?
mushi said | October 23rd 2009 @ 9:43am | Report comment
coming from a league penis measurer that’s rich
John Ryan said | October 16th 2009 @ 8:18pm | Report comment
Rubbish,like the 150yrs they were playing a bastardized version of the Wall game,the first Australian thing was the bounce which occurred 7 years later,I wish you people would stop believing the AFL version of the world.
They can lie as well as the next man
Redb said | October 17th 2009 @ 4:40am | Report comment
Australian football is a foundation sport in New South Wales played well before the rugby league version of rugby was played in that state.
M1tch said | October 26th 2009 @ 9:28am | Report comment
thats more an embarrassment for the indigneous game then eh?
Redb said | October 26th 2009 @ 9:33am | Report comment
just reality.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 5:04pm | Report comment
“This whole article is written in thinly veiled code war rhetoric.” This from the author of National Survey Says AFL Most Popular sport.
The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
James said | October 16th 2009 @ 8:43pm | Report comment
What Redb wrote was based on fact. What you wrote was based on all the space inside you head…
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 9:15pm | Report comment
Nuh…what I wrote was based on what it’s like to live in rugby league territory.
mushi said | October 23rd 2009 @ 9:44am | Report comment
I live in rabbitohs heart land, this article is a poor peice of fiction
Redb said | October 17th 2009 @ 4:42am | Report comment
That’s right James and the title was the editors choice.
Mick from Giralang said | October 17th 2009 @ 11:44am | Report comment
Well if you want to hang your credibility on a dubious survey done by a company that makes telephone books, that’s up to you.
Redb said | October 17th 2009 @ 8:33pm | Report comment
The only thing I would correct from first post on this thread was to call “There are more rules devised in Australia for Rugby League than there are for Australian Rules”, propaganda, it wasn’t it’s just a blatant lie.
Mick from Giralang said | October 18th 2009 @ 5:52pm | Report comment
Whew! Someone needs a Bex and a good lie down…
Redb said | October 18th 2009 @ 9:28pm | Report comment
Do you?, not surprised.
bever fever said | October 16th 2009 @ 5:54pm | Report comment
Mick from Giralang said
We all appreciate rules began in Melbourne
I think you would appreciate rules more if the game was from Sydney.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 6:43pm | Report comment
“As I said, it’s Australia’s game, neither rugby code is.”
It’s a game made up on the back of an envelope by a bloke in Melbourne. The Moomba Festival was also made up in Melbourne.
Doesn’t make it Australia’s festival…
bever fever said | October 16th 2009 @ 6:54pm | Report comment
Mick , you really have to get past this, we know you love league, thats OK, i also like league but its not born and bred here, aussie rules is, its an Australian game.
Its our invention like the Ikara (surface to air missile), hills hoist, stump jump plough and vegemite.
The labour party was formed in QLD, but its not just a QLD party its the Australian Labour party.
Moomba festival is melbournes festival, just like the mardi gras is Sydneys or Canberra has summer nats etc.
Its also OK that you dont like aussie rules, it doesn’t make you less Australian, but it is our national game.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:01pm | Report comment
Where did I say the game wasn’t invented in Melbourne?
It’s the insidious — almost taking on the aura of poltiical correctness — propaganda that somehow rules is the game that connects all Australians to a touchstone of shared culture, heritage, tradition === whatever you want to call it.
It simply ain’t so…
bever fever said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:15pm | Report comment
Aussie rules is the game that connects many Australians to a touchstone of shared culture, heritage, traditione etc etc etc.
It is a game that might not do it for you but it certainly does for many people – the most of all the codes (by a fair margin)therefore it is our defining game, and whatsmore it is a game made right here. It is also a sizable minority in NSW and QLD
Its marketing, is rugby league really simply the best, i am sure you believe that it is.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:30pm | Report comment
I don’t think you understand where I’m coming from though I do appreciate your lucid attempts to engage in debate on this subject. I do not dislike/hate Rules My arcticle is a primaeval scream against the propaganda that insists that rules is a game that should be embraced by all Australians, simply because it was dreamt up in Melbourne by someone who thought rugby was far too tough a game.
I know this is suprising fact for most AFL cheerleaders, but Rules simply has no part in the psyche of countless Australians. To describe is as the national game is an insult to the the ties that bind many, many Australian families.
bever fever said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:41pm | Report comment
It may be an insult to many people but to a sizable majority it isn’t and thats where it becomes the national game, you are just going to have to wear it.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:46pm | Report comment
Majority? That’s the population of NSW, QLD, ACT — of course, all rugby league jusridictions.
bever fever said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:51pm | Report comment
Come on Mick, just going back over old ground, aussie rules is the most popular across all states and territories combined, big pockets of support in NSW/QLD.
End of story … aussie rules is our national game.
James said | October 16th 2009 @ 8:47pm | Report comment
“Rugby League Juristictions”? I think as pointed out in an earlier post…support in NSW/QLD is split 4 ways, with Rugby League on top, and the other 3 codes not far behind. For goodness sake, your Grand Final, despite being showed in near prime time, and involving a Melbourne team, still got outrated by our all Victorian Saturday afternoon game…
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 9:12pm | Report comment
“…and the other three codes not far behind.”
Please tell me this is a gee-up?
B.C. said | October 17th 2009 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
I know this is suprising fact for most AFL cheerleaders, but Rules simply has no part in the psyche of countless Australians.
If it has no part in the psyche of countless Australians, including yourself I assume, then why do you spend so much of your time on the AFL post?
Unless it does play a significant part in your psyche and you can’t admit it to yourself.
Robbos said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:39pm | Report comment
Dribbling again Bever.
prowling panther said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:16pm | Report comment
afl is a victorian game not an indigenous game. It holds little significance to NSW/QLD people compared to other codes so it can’t be Australia’s game the whole indigenous game thing is just a concept dreamt up by the AFLs marketing people as they try to expand into northern states. Which is fine but there is not much substance behind such a claim.
nice article btw -you have a way with words
bever fever said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:20pm | Report comment
prowling panther said
afl is a victorian game not an indigenous game
Aussie rules is our indigenous game.
Rugby league is just a northern english game.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:36pm | Report comment
I am afraid you let yourself down here. Rugby league is intrinsic to the sporting story of literally millions of Australians.
bever fever said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:45pm | Report comment
Never said it wasn’t, but its a northern English game, how is that letting myself down.
Freud of Football said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:46pm | Report comment
Back up the mouth with some numbers Mick. Anyone who isn’t a one-eyed League supporter knows they do not dominate the country.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:48pm | Report comment
Lsst time I checked the Australian Bureau of Statistics website, NSW, QLD and ACT comprised 54 percent of the population..
I’ll be kind and leave out the legions of Victorians who have converted to our game since the Storm showed them the light…
bever fever said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:53pm | Report comment
You had a few to many after work at Giralang tavern – Kaleen sports club?.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:55pm | Report comment
When rational argument fails, resort to putting the boot in…
I’ve been belted by experts…you don’t rate.
Freud of Football said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:55pm | Report comment
Yes, the “legions” of victorians..please. Have you checked up what percentages of NSW, QLD and ACT support which code? How about you come back here with that as I think I’ve mentioned this IMPORTANT fact 3 times by now.
WA, SA, Vic, Tas and the NT are dominated by Aussie rules with football coming in second. NSW, QLD and the ACT are split between League, Union, Football and AFL. Come back with some stats supporting your theory and don’t use population. Try participation, revenues, audience etc.
Pippinu said | October 16th 2009 @ 7:58pm | Report comment
Mate – next time you visit the Cutting Crew – tell ‘em not to give you the number one – I think it’s cutting into your brain cells!
redb put up an article only today showing that the Swans are the most popular sporting team in NSW.
That’s not a recent result – these sorts of surveys have been showing that result for about 14 years.
So to point to a map – and say: well half the population lives here – therefore this or that game is the most popular, makes zero sense.
Mick from Giralang said | October 16th 2009 @ 8:12pm | Report comment
Pippinu, please I gave you more credit than this. Of course all the expats are going to vote for theSwans in this sort of survey…it’s irrelevent to what’s the most popular sporting code in NSW. That’s rugby league by any any measure.
James said | October 16th 2009 @ 8:51pm | Report comment
“Of course all the expats are going to vote for theSwans in this sort of survey” Hardly…Aussie Rules is nothing if not the most tribal of games, and I think you will find that most expats in NSW actually hold on to their original Victorian teams. Hence the massive crowds when the Collingwoods, Carltons and Essendons come up north.
Where do you think the Melbourne storm rates in Melbourne? Didn’t even register as a favoutie sporting team in the report….
Redb said | October 17th 2009 @ 4:48am | Report comment
Simply untrue.
NSW, QLD and ACT populations also like Australian football in varying degrees and cannot be owned by RL.
Acording to a Sensis survey, the Swans are more popular than any RL club in their own right and have easily the highest crowds in NSW.
Your scared of Australian football expanding again in New South Wales or else you would not write such a piece.
This whole article is driven by fear.
prowling panther said | October 16th 2009 @ 10:23pm | Report comment
prowling panther should have said afl is a victorian game not a national game. but i guess thats not whats being debated. I will now go to sleep pondering on the differences between ‘indigenous’ and ‘national’…