Liverpool lose fight with beach ball
By Freud of Football, 19 Oct 2009 Freud of Football is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- beach ball, beach ball goal, benitez, EPL, football, Liverpool, mike jones, rafa, referee mistake, Sunderland
Mike Jones is not a name many people will recognise and after his blunder gifted Sunderland an unexpected 1-0 win over Liverpool, it’s a name we will probably no longer hear in top flight football.
For those of you who haven’t seen the incident, watch the video below and you’ll see what I mean.
I recently defended Sir Alex’s “outburst” which was at best a comment regarding the referees whom I normally praise and I’ll say it again, they have a very tough job enforcing some, oftentimes, very silly rules.
But surely if a bright red beach ball is sitting on the six yard line as a team breaks on the counter, a professional EPL referee would have to notice it?
Even if he doesn’t see it initially and his two assistants are also blind to the ball, then surely a volley which smacks into the ball and deflects in for a goal couldn’t stand?
The laws of the game indicate that such an incident, where a referee should have stopped play for outside interference (eg. A bright red beach ball on the six yard box), should result in a dropped ball. Instead it was a game winning goal for Sunderland which has seen Liverpool slip to 8th in the table, ironically one spot behind Steve Bruce’s Sunderland.
When a former referee comes out and blasts a current official’s performance then you know it was bad. Normally they stick together and show solidarity but this surely is one mistake too big to just condone or ignore.
So what now?
Benitez kept his cool regarding the incident although the fourth official had to step in later on when some heated words were exchanged between managers, however just because he didn’t comment on the issue and risk receiving a fine doesn’t right this wrong.
Football fans the world over accept refereeing mistakes as in the grand scheme of it, the football gods generally level them up. A penalty not awarded is evened out by a hand ball in the box going unnoticed or a goal kick that should have been a corner is compensated by a touch-and-go free kick.
But how is Liverpool to be compensated for this freak goal which – by the laws of the game which are in this case, not open to interpretation – should never have been counted?
The simple answer is, they won’t be.
Benitez was already struggling without Talisman Gerrard and the red-hot Torres. To then lose a game in this manner is a kick in the guts but it’s something he’ll have to accept.
Will Jones come out and apologise? Will the FA, the body in charge of these mistakes being upheld order a rematch? Both scenarios look unlikely, instead the incident will be played down, players and managers will refrain from commenting to avoid hefty fines and the FA will deal with this very quietly.
Expect the idiotic fan who hit the ball on to the pitch – after it appears a steward or a ball boy handed it back to him – to be banned and Mr Jones to be relegated down to a lower league, whether he returns to the top flight in a few weeks or ever again is open to debate.
I personally don’t think he should lose his career for this error, it was a huge mistake which changed a game, that is undeniable but he has two assistants and a fourth official on the sidelines who all could have raised the matter and failed to do so. Surely they are there as a team?
It seems to me that only a rematch will suffice as fair but don’t expect Steve Bruce to be a champion of fair play this week, three points against Liverpool are golden and he won’t be relinquishing them unless he has to and even then, you can expect resistance.
You won’t hear this often from a Man United supporter but after yesterday, I do feel sorry for Liverpool.
Beach Ball goal video
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Phoenix need more than flash in the pan crowds (133)
- ‘New football’ fans may help save the game in Australia (124)
- Does Tasmania have a case for A-League inclusion? (119)
- What happened in Port Said was not a football riot (118)
- Magilton struggling to make a mark (68)
- Socceroos screwed over by FIFA, again (41)
- Gulf influence cripples the FFA again (40)
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (95)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (8)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (6)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (44)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Redknapp tight-lipped over England job
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (95)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (8)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (6)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Melbourne derby reveals tale of two journeys (3)
- O’ so close for John: How JON almost landed the biggest job in sport (16)
- Explore:
- beach ball, beach ball goal, benitez, EPL, football, Liverpool, mike jones, rafa, referee mistake, Sunderland

Luke W said | October 19th 2009 @ 7:26am | Report comment
Ok, the goal shouldn’t have stood, and Liverpool have every right to be upset, but all that bright red beach ball did was mask the fact Liverpool were second best all day. The goal was harsh, but they didn’t deserve to win. A team who considers themselves title hopefuls finds a way to win or at least draw that game.
Robb said | October 19th 2009 @ 7:45am | Report comment
Given it was a Liverpool Beach ball they deserve what they got!
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 7:49am | Report comment
Agreed!!
I should add that it was one of the funniet things I’ve ever seen in professional sport.
I’ve heard of cricket balls and footies hitting seagulls – but I’ve never seen anything like this before.
Robb said | October 19th 2009 @ 8:02am | Report comment
Of course – objects on the field don’t always help. A few years back I had a pretty easy put to sink just about the only birdie in my life (I’m a pretty horrendous golfer). I putted the ball and hit a birdie (except the birdie in question was a duck walking across the green). I somehow ended up with a Bogey.
Mattay said | October 19th 2009 @ 7:55am | Report comment
When I first heard the goal was deflected from an over-inflated inanimate object on the field, I naturally assumed it had deflected off Jamie Carragher.
Luke W said | October 19th 2009 @ 3:17pm | Report comment
Hahaha! The best laugh I’ve had all day!
Nam Turk said | October 19th 2009 @ 7:59am | Report comment
Awww, plastic tears for a plastic team…
Colin N said | October 19th 2009 @ 8:08am | Report comment
The same thing happend in an FA cup tie between Sheffield United and Manchester City a couple of years ago. Sheffield United were the ones who benefited from this, when Man City fans threw a whole raft of balloons onto the pitch.
A cross was put into the box, where Michael Ball was ready, or so he thought, to clear the danger. However, the ball hit the balloon and Ball completely missed kicked it, and it eventually went to a Sheffield player, who then tapped it into the net.
Brett McKay said | October 19th 2009 @ 8:13am | Report comment
It was pretty ironic (in a sick kind of way) that it was a Liverpool FC beach ball though
My question about whether the goal should stand or not comes from a different angle/scenario: what would the refs have done if Bent’s shot had clearly wrongfooted Reina (I’m assuming it was Reina in goal) and was obviously heading for the back of the net, only to hit “a bright red beach ball on the six yard box” and deflect away from goal??
How would Sunderland have reacted??
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 9:00am | Report comment
This is what the official line is: “The beach ball was an inanimate object, so the referee should have stopped the game as soon as he was aware it was on the field of play.
“The difficulty would be if he didn’t see it until it was struck by the match ball.”
That makes some sense to me.
However, Graham Poll has come straight out and said it just should have been a drop ball.
Yes – that Graham Poll.
On a side note, I have a very vague recollection that the rules of Australian Football actually allow the game to continue as normal if the ball hits something that is not meant to be on the field. For example, if the ball were to hit a bird on the way through the goals, the goal umpire would still have to call that a goal, because it fits the definition of a goal, i.e. it wasn’t touched by a player, nor did it hit the post.
I suspect that in part this might stem from the very earliest days of the game when games would be played anywhere where sufficient space was to be found, and it was common to have overhanging branches from trees, or even tree trunks within the playing field itself.
Robb said | October 19th 2009 @ 9:07am | Report comment
I don’t follow a lot of soccer – but I know that name. I don’t think he is in a position to lecture anyone!
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 9:09am | Report comment
Reminds me a bit of backyard cricket – where it’s usually one hand off a tree or garage roof, etc.
Firestarter Bob said | October 19th 2009 @ 11:05am | Report comment
If an AFL kick of the football resulted in a bird being hurt or fatatally injured we would immediately see Alex D issuing a public apology, changing the rules to make it illegal, suspending the offending player, and setting aside one entire AFL round to honour the tireless and unpaid work of pigeon fanciers.
Timmuh said | October 20th 2009 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Not true. Magpies and Swans are the only protected birds in the AFL.
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
Our feathered friends have rights too!!
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Also, I suspect that with backyard soccer, it’s ok to score off a ricochet.
David V. said | October 19th 2009 @ 11:35am | Report comment
Naturally I found this incident highly amusing. The beach ball even made a team of the week!
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 11:40am | Report comment
That’s quite funny.
I also note that the SMH has referred to the “sand of God”.
Freud of Football said | October 19th 2009 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
Ok “the sand of god” is pathetic. Didn’t see that one myself but that’s obviously someone who got fired from The Sun for having no imagination
dasilva said | October 19th 2009 @ 11:55am | Report comment
http://i37.tinypic.com/2cf89aq.jpg
Art Sapphire said | October 19th 2009 @ 12:22pm | Report comment
It seems to me that Pepe Reina had ample time to remove the ball from the playing area.
He chose not to and he paid the price.
Freud of Football said | October 19th 2009 @ 3:11pm | Report comment
And when was he supposed to do that? While the Sunderland player was sprinting down the right wing, just hold up his hand and yell out “hang on a tick, there’s a bloody beach ball in my six yard box”
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
NO matter which way one views this whole episode – it’s impossible not to laugh!!
Freud of Football said | October 19th 2009 @ 4:32pm | Report comment
Sorry Pip but I don’t find it that funny. This wasn’t a “freak” occurence, it was some little git smacking the ball on to the field of play after it had already left the crowd, see the start of this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4mhpKH4QoM
Given it was a Scouser but that doesn’t mean Liverpool should suffer, the ball was clearly interfering with play and it should have been removed, if I thought Liverpool had any hope at the title this year I’d feel for them a little more but this sort of thing shouldn’t just be left as is, a rematch is the only thing that seems right as it was a pretty unfair thing to happen
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 4:47pm | Report comment
You don’t find it funny????
Freud of Football said | October 19th 2009 @ 4:58pm | Report comment
Pip, I’m a Man United fan. If they were in Liverpools place I’d be fuming as it would affect their title chances but no matter who it is, it isn’t funny to lose a game to a stuff up like that, I probably would have found it funny if the goal had of been disallowed and they dragged the little git out by his ear but they lost because of this = not funny.
Mattay said | October 20th 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
Incorrect. Liverpool had 89 or so minutes to rectify the problem. They didn’t and never looked like it. That lost them the game and any title aspirations, not a beach ball.
Pippinu said | October 19th 2009 @ 6:25pm | Report comment
Freud
but we’re not ‘pool fans – that’s why we can afford to have a chortle!!
I think it could be many decades before we see a beach ball decide the championship.
(this will keep comics employed for many years!!)