How powerful could American rugby be?
Roar Rookie
By klestical, 27 Oct 2009 klestical is a Roar Rookie
Related coverage
Enough of the negative Australian rugby stories, here’s something a bit more positive: the growth of American rugby. With High School rugby growing at 15 percent in the US (where it is currently the fastest growing school sport) and College Rugby now the largest club sport in the College program, the future is bright for rugby in the States
The advent of the Olympics Rugby 7s, US rugby now has money as well as the prestige to call itself a Olympic Sport. Bigger and better athletes will become more attracted to the game.
There is also the exposure the game is now getting over there.
The recent RWC Qualifier between USA and Canada was broadcast on ESPN HD (I think this might be the first rugby game ever to be on this channel), and there is a new movie called Invictus directed by Clint Eastwood with Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon coming out in December.
I found this link which discusses the potential 1st XV of NFL players. Whilst there’s the obvious problem that none of these guys have even touched a rugby ball, it does indicate the potential athletes that could become more involved.
My favourite has to be D’abrickshaw Ferguson, written as a Loosehead Prop. He is 141kg and has a vertical leap of 80cm (think of that power come scrum time).
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Chiefs continue to wait for SBW
- Nathan Sharpe to retire at end of 2012
- Queensland ready for Super challenge (2)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (41)
- Foley excited about Samoan rugby challenge
- Force rugby coach praises his pack
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (48)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (25)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (18)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
Nam Turk said | October 27th 2009 @ 1:29am | Report comment
College athletics cover tons of sports. That rugby is still at the club level says a lot. It’s an excuse for big kids to wear a tacky shirt and play in the mud. Also, few of these clubs play sevens, so that code is irrelevant.
ozxile said | October 27th 2009 @ 11:56am | Report comment
Nam Turk:
Knee jerk reaction/comment at best – actually ignorant and hopelessly ill-informed.
1. USA Rugby has historically resisted making rugby into a ‘varsity’ sport. Lots of regulations that do not promote the game to start with and the list goes on…
2. The perennial national collegiate champion is U. California Berkeley – hardly big kids looking for an excuse for anything
3. The big kids play football and mostly make poor rugby players
4. Virtually every rugby player in the US plays 7s at some point in the year
5.The Olympic’s announcement has already precipitated new, more organized 7s leagues
6. Tacky shirts?
What is irrelevant besides your comment?
Working Class Rugger said | October 27th 2009 @ 2:58am | Report comment
Klestical
There is momentum growing for the game in the States. No one is kidding themselves in terms of where it stands currently but the growth is there. Currently there are over 30,000 High School kids playing Rugby and some 800 College “Clubs”. And as you have alluded to the growth rate in the High School sector is 15%. Not to mention USARugby is beginning to make real yards with the introductory program “Rookie Rugby”. This school year 130,000 kids will participate in the program that pretty impressive. Plus USARugby just recently finished a workshop where over 100 PE teacher’s representing several large schools districts in Texas attended and learned the ins and outs of the game and the “Rookie Rugby” program. Could you imagine if it caught hold in Texas. One of the USA’s most populus states.
On the College front a brief prospectus USARugby released about two months ago indicated a push toward an Elite College Championship with proper programs from 2010. With Olympic inclusion the finances and resources will become available to really grow the game far beyond its current levels. The ESPN broadcast was the first time Rugby was broadcast on ESPN’s flagship channel. It has featured on ESPN360 and ESPNU for some time now.
The future could be very bright for USARugby. And the world of Rugby may never be the same once they begin to take it seriously.
Kurt said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:17am | Report comment
Not entirely sure about the optimism displayed here but I will say one thing in rugby’s favour in the US – while the ‘soccer mom’ terrified of her little boys being hurt playing sport is a factor here in the US as in Aust, there remains a large portion of the population – principally amongst African-Americans and poorer white folk – who see any sport that doesn’t involve significant risk of physical injury as not worth playing or watching. So if rugby does take off in the US I forsee a future where the sport is dominated internationally by Pacific Islanders, African Americans and not-so-clever white boys named Billy-Bob.
AndyRoo said | October 27th 2009 @ 9:06am | Report comment
I enjoyed this post way too much
Alex said | October 27th 2009 @ 6:50pm | Report comment
haha, so much like football in the UK then?
Working Class Rugger said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:30am | Report comment
Kurt
The optimism comes from knowing the facts. Consider this, prior to 2000 Rugby in the USA stagnated rather significantly. Many may still say so at the senior club level. However, the change in admin lead to a re-focus of the game growth strategy. Since the early 2000′s USARugby have been placing more emphasis on getting more and more youth into the game. And it is working. Now with the Olympics the game will have the necessary funds to really get a move on Nationally. In American sports being an Olympic event brings legitimacy. With that the move to varsity is much easier. It is happening.
The same could be said for Russia. Rugby is currently growing at roughly a completely new club a week. Overall interest in the game is growing significantly on an annual basis. The Russian Govt is committed to installing Rugby as an official School sport in the coming 12-18 months. Last weekend from all account a large and vocal crowd watched the East Division Finals 7s Tournament.
If you are the same Kurt I am thinking of you’re an AFL man. So it maybe hard to believe that Rugby is growing more and more popular internationally. But let’s not forget. Your experience’s regarding Rugby would be very Aus centric. Which happens to be an enigma. And not a good example.
Kurt said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:42am | Report comment
I’m just being realistic – I happen to be living in the US at the moment (North Carolina) and thus while coming from an AFL perspective am not adverse to the idea of seeing rugby become more popular in the US.
So when I read the claim that rugby is now the biggest club sport in the college program and I happen to live in a college sport hotspot where the big three (UNC, NC State and Duke) seem to play pretty much every sport BUT rugby, I’m a little sceptical. But I’m certainly not anti-rugby so if all of this is happening then great.
On a related note I actually went to my first college football game (Duke) on the weekend. Poured with rain, absolutely no shelter, couldn’t buy beer inside the ground, cheerleaders wore head to toe outfits and the game seemed to last about 6 hours.
Working Class Rugger said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:56am | Report comment
North Carolina probably isn’t the best place to gauge Rugby’s presence at the moment. There a huge amount of work to be done. The NCAA has been reluctant to certify Rugby. But being an Olympic sport may force its hand.
As for your first American Football experience. My question is why?. Unlike many other sports, it doesn’t get any better or interesting live.
Kurt said | October 27th 2009 @ 5:40am | Report comment
I just had this idea about experiencing some local culture. As it was I experienced boredom, discomfort and sobriety so I’ll stick to the highlights packages from now on.
San Jorge said | October 27th 2009 @ 9:59am | Report comment
Hate to say it Kurt but the simplest of google searches shows that each of those schools you named all play rugby
Kurt said | October 27th 2009 @ 9:40pm | Report comment
Really? I looked at the Athletics programme websites and none of them mention rugby, and in my travels around the various campuses I’ve never seen nor heard of rugby teams or pitches. But I stand corrected.
Redb said | October 27th 2009 @ 10:22am | Report comment
Like with any sport you need to pick a team. IMO sitting back arms crossed with an impartial view does little to engage in my experience.
anopinion said | October 27th 2009 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Kurt if you are going to sports for the weather, beer and cheerleaders then perhaps you should ask someone for some game analysis. The college football crowds are incredible, they turn up every week (crowds of 80000 plus) to watch 18-22 year olds play for free. Can any games in Australia learn from this?
a
USA rugby is on the move with youth and high school sports, however the level of coaching is so poor that these kids will grow up to play with little skill and poor strategy.
Working Class Rugger said | October 27th 2009 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Ah yes the coaching situation. Well USARugby are also trying to rectify that situation running coaching clinics more regularly and more widespread. Again the funding from the USOC will help this greatly.
ozxile said | October 27th 2009 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
Kurt:
You need to get out more. Check out http://www.usarugby.org/
North Clubs has:
14 men’s college/university teams
8 women’s college/university teams (probably actually 14)
6 high school
2 U19
10 Men’s Clubs
3 Women’s Clubs
No guarantee of quality but hardly a barren wasteland for the game.
And yes, those schools you mentioned all have clubs for men and women.
Finally, it does not have to be raining for US football to be incredibly boring. It may be better with a few drinks and a bit of sun but my very limited experience you cannot drink enough to make it good enough to go back a second time.
Kurt said | October 27th 2009 @ 9:53pm | Report comment
I was referring to sports that are official parts of the schools’ athletics programmes. But I take your point that these schools have clubs – mind you I also discovered that somewhat surprisingly NC State and UNC both have Aussie Rules clubs too, although they don’t appear to have active fixture lists.
Ian Noble said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:35am | Report comment
WCR
I see ESPN have the rights to the French Top 14 and are currently thinking about taking some of the GP games and of course they sponsor http://www.scrum.com
The more involvement they have the better as they will understand the game and sell it more widely. Certainly if you look at the take up of the game in the universities and colleges then that is a good platform as it has the future potential of access to potential future leaders of industry and politics, in addition to the very pertinant comments made by Kurt. I read that Nigel Melville is aiming to create a professional game which if it ever took off with it’s worldwide exposure could attract some interest from other social classes as mentioned by Kurt, my only concern is that they would have more than concrete between the earlobes to play.
Klestical said | October 27th 2009 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
What happens if Rugby League’s so called Professional game gets underway?
Working Class Rugger said | October 27th 2009 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
There hasn’t been any word from the USA Rugby League authorities about the propsed USNRL for quite a long time. So long that many League fans are beginning to concede that it may come to nothing.
ozxile said | October 27th 2009 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
K,
Nothing. They have been trying for years.
therealalekid said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:41am | Report comment
“On the College front a brief prospectus USARugby released about two months ago indicated a push toward an Elite College Championship with proper programs from 2010″
This is the most important development of all and it should be a priority of USARUGby. Good to here about ESPN they’ve been showing alot of interest in Rugby recently, they broadcasted college games last season and hopefully they will be involved if the new Super College League comes into fruitition.
Working Class Rugger said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:51am | Report comment
Therealalekid
From my understanding the College Super League is one of the priorities of USARugby. Which is good. Achieving success at the College level in the States directly translates to success at the professional level. Just look at both the NFL and NBA. The College game for both of these comps are huge dwarfing there professional alternative. Supposedly ESPN has been showing interest of broadcasting it. On the 7s front. There’s alot of hype at the moment around the US leg’s move to Las Vegas. And ABC are looking to broadcast another highlights show with the possibiliy of broadcasting the entire event.
Working Class Rugger said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:45am | Report comment
Ian
I am aware of a potential move toward a Professional league in the States. Not a bad move but haven’t seen anything concrete yet. Supposedly more will be revealed when USARugby release’s the vision statement in either late Nov or early Dec. If it does show up I’d like to see a few Canadian teams in that mix. It would be a good start. Thanks to the IOC’s decision the possibility of it getting up has probably improved greatly.
ESPN has the rights to the Top 14 do they. Great. Hopefully they show the games at an reasonable hour. If they could get some GP games onboard that would be great too. All they need now is Super 14 and the American public will get some real exposure to the game. I will try to find the ratings for the Eagles v Canada game on ESPN. I watched it online and although no tries were scored it was impressively physical which lead to alot of positive response’s from American poster’s on that particular site.
Ian Noble said | October 27th 2009 @ 3:57am | Report comment
WCR
I am not sure whether they have the rights for OZ but you should be able to pick it up on the internet try http://www.my2p2.eu
I read that part of Melville’s strategy is to pick up some of the college players who miss out on the draft to the NFL, the fall out is enormous and most are obviously serious athletes who might enjoy the physicality of rugby. It was interesting recently one of the Cleveland Browns came over in the close season and played for Blackheath Rugby Club for a month and according to a press article not only really enjoyed the game but also the culture surrounding the game.
Working Class Rugger said | October 27th 2009 @ 4:10am | Report comment
Ian
In terms of GP and Magner’s League Setanta Sports broadcast those League in Aus. More ML than GP. But you still get something. Supposedly Setanta Ireland has the rights to the Top 14 aswell. So hopefully they show some of those games down here aswell.
I actually watched the story about the NFL player on Youtube. Yeah he really enjoyed it. And found the whole game very interesting and really loved the culture that surrounds it. Did okay from memory. Good to see.
Robbo said | October 27th 2009 @ 7:35am | Report comment
I think the biggest thing holding rugby back in the US is the NFL “bigger is better” mentality. While in the NFL every player is 6 ft and has a BMI of 30 as a minimum this isn’t the case in rugby. A 140 kg player simply isn’t going to last on a rugby field without 20 minute breaks after every single play.