Battered Wallabies keen to bury demons
By Darren Walton, 31 Oct 2009 Darren Walton is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Berrick Barnes, Bledisloe Cup, robbie deans, Rugby Union, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- 2011 Wallabies squad news
- Wallabies v All Blacks news

Australia's Wallabies captain Rocky Elsom, cenetr, along with his teammates take a short break during the team's practice session at the National Stadium in Tokyo, Friday, Oct. 30, 2009, a day before the Bledisloe Cup rugby match against New Zealand's All Blacks. AP Photo/Shuji Kajiyama
Maligned as a meaningless dead-rubber, Saturday’s Bledisloe Cup clash in Tokyo is anything but for the Wallabies as they strive desperately to stop the rot against their oldest and fiercest rugby rivals.
The Wallabies’ alarming losing streak against the All Blacks now stands at six matches, Australia’s worst run in more than a decade, and injured vice-captain Berrick Barnes admits the constant batterings are starting to scar.
“It is a long time (since we won a Bledisloe Test) and something we’d definitely like to end because obviously it becomes a mental sort of thing,” Barnes said.
Some would say it has already, with the Wallabies having squandered second-half leads in four successive trans-Tasman encounters before capitulating 33-6 last time out in Wellington six weeks ago.
“It’s a belief thing, of things coming together,” Barnes added.
“(In Wellington), we didn’t help ourselves going across field in the backs and we got hurt at scrum time so we never got the ball other than at tap-off against them.
“It’s about it coming together at set piece and then us not wasting the ball at the backs. I know it’s simply said, but that’s what it comes down to.
“(All Blacks five-eighth Dan) Carter kicked a lot better than what we did in our own half as well. I don’t think mentally … we know we can do it.
“If we’d scored with eight minutes to go, we’re right back in it, within a few points. To their credit, the All Black defence was pretty staunch at that point. It’s a fine line.”
A big “if”, though, with the Wallabies having scored just one measly try in their past three Tests against the All Blacks.
That’s because the Kiwis have also been so utterly dominant in the physical stakes, smashing the Wallabies all over the park and monstering them at the breakdown.
“A big part of it on Saturday is going to be our mindset, but we’ve gone for blokes – to generalise – who are possibly a little more confrontational,” Wallabies coach Robbie Deans said after replacing his entire back three plus veteran flanker George Smith with the more physically imposing quartet of Adam Ashley-Cooper, Peter Hynes, Digby Ioane and David Pocock.
“It gives us a bit more presence.”
All Blacks coach Graham Henry believes the tinkering will give the Wallabies “extra edge”, saying selection changes tended to re-energise teams .
Not that that has worked too often for Deans with the Wallabies.
In his ongoing search for solutions, Deans has chopped and changed to the point that he now has eight players in his 22-man squad chasing their first win over the All Blacks.
Fullback James O’Connor, winger Ioane, halfback Will Genia, flanker Pocock, lock Mark Chisholm, prop Ben Alexander, reserve back Quade Cooper and replacement forward Dean Mumm are all craving for some long overdue trans-Tasman bragging rights.
“On the motivation side of things, me and a lot of guys in the squad haven’t tasted success over New Zealand,” Alexander said.
“We’ve all grown up and seen the great matches over the early part of this decade and the late 90s and seen a lot of Wallabies success and lived it through the TV.
“But being able to experience it ourselves is something that a lot of us are striving for, because of that rivalry and history and tradition between Australia and New Zealand that is the Bledisloe Cup.”
Alexander says it’s folly to think the fixture carries less meaning because of its so-called “dead rubber” status and the fact it’s being contested in the “surreal” setting of Tokyo’s National Stadium.
“It doesn’t matter whether it’s played here – in front of one or 100,000 people, or none – there’s still that motivating factor just to be able to get one up on New Zealand because they are our biggest rivals and one of the best sides in the world,” he said.
The passionate prop is adamant the All Blacks will be as tough as ever to crack as they look to sweep the Wallabies 4-0 for the first time in a trans-Tasman series since 1962.
“They’re a very proud side,” Alexander said.
“That’s probably from the decades and generations of great All Blacks before them and these guys are just trying to live up to the pressures they have as a country and a proud rugby team.
“They bring that pride and that respect they have for the jersey onto the field and they’re a very tough opposition any day you play them.
“They’ll always give their all and that’s what it is to be an All Black, as it is to be a Wallaby.
“We’ve just got to go out there and give it our all and just match them and hopefully we’ll be right.”
If not, Deans’s rebuilding Wallabies will anxiously enter 2010 – one year out from the next Rugby World Cup in New Zealand – just two defeats from equalling Australia’s worst-ever run of nine straight losses to the All Blacks between 1936 and 1947.
Tokyo or Timbuktu, this Test is anything but a warm-up for the Wallabies’ grand slam attempt of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales.
“Last game of the year. I know both teams would have to have the last laugh,” Barnes said.
“We certainly would, so we’d like to right a few wrongs.”
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Chiefs continue to wait for SBW (2)
- Nathan Sharpe to retire at end of 2012 (2)
- Queensland ready for Super challenge (2)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (49)
- Foley excited about Samoan rugby challenge
- Force rugby coach praises his pack
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (54)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (26)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (18)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Berrick Barnes, Bledisloe Cup, robbie deans, Rugby Union, wallabies

andy shearer said | October 31st 2009 @ 6:48am | Report comment
does anyone know where an Aussie, living in the USA can watch this game ? Doesn’t look like setanta is going to cover it.
katzilla said | October 31st 2009 @ 11:23am | Report comment
myp2p.eu
kingplaymaker said | October 31st 2009 @ 7:15am | Report comment
Palu-Elsom-Pocock that’s where it will be won or lost.
Those three are powerful players who if they can impose themselves physically on the All Blacks will allow the team to execute its gameplan.
If they are bashed around like last time however it will be a short evening.
The signs in this area should be good. All three of those players have serious motivation to perform. Palu because his whole future may rest on this game, Elsom because it’s his first game as captain, and Pocock because he is replacing George Smith. They also have the ability to pull it off.
The most worrying element in Australia’s losses this year was the extent to which they were physically crushed: Palu, Elsom and Pocock up front, and Ioane, Cross and Ashley-Cooper behind may be able to remedy this.
Knives Out said | October 31st 2009 @ 7:18am | Report comment
You don’t think the impact of the tight five at the ruck contest is more important?
kingplaymaker said | October 31st 2009 @ 7:22am | Report comment
No, because I think the Wallabies were dominated more in the back row recently, especially physically. However, Brad Thorn did play a big part it’s true.
Knives Out said | October 31st 2009 @ 7:28am | Report comment
So.. do you or do you not think that the tight five set the tone for the ruck contest, and that the Australian back row was dominated because their tight five was constantly playing behind the gainline?
kingplaymaker said | October 31st 2009 @ 7:31am | Report comment
No, I think although the tight five contest is important, it was in the back row that the ruck contest was lost recently. Palu and Brown were unable to provide real force clearing out or running the ball, nor very potent tackling, and George Smith perhaps lacked some physical presence, which is one thing Pocock does have.
Mitch O said | October 31st 2009 @ 8:15am | Report comment
Smith is a very physical 7 and at least twice the player Pocock will ever be.
Pocock v McCaw isn’t even a contest. In addition this Wallaby loose forward trio looks very unbalanced and slow to me, against an athletic and fast AB trio.
From whichever angle I look at it it looks like a mismatch of mammoth proportions – there’s a decent whiff of dingo deans desperation in the air.
Knives Out said | October 31st 2009 @ 8:29am | Report comment
I think you miss my point, kingplaymaker. The tight five hit rucks. One unit comes before the other. You see?
OldManEmu said | October 31st 2009 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
Sorry KingPM – I think KO is on the money here.
Chisholm and Whorewell (geez I make myself laugh) went badly missing last time – the impact of the backrow at the breakdown over 80 minutes is neither here nor there when compared to what can be achieved with your big locks and front three smashing in at the contest for possession.
Sam Taulelei said | October 31st 2009 @ 8:22am | Report comment
Knives, I agree with you while the Wallabies were dominated at the breakdown in Wellington it wasn’t solely by the play of the All Black loose forwards. Collectively the forward pack were more aggressive, accurate and consistent than their Wallaby counterparts. The All Black loosies were only able to shine because they weren’t tied up in the tight exchanges unlike the Wallaby loosies.
Knives Out said | October 31st 2009 @ 11:47am | Report comment
Tom Donnelly. Big, solid and uncompromising. He made a difference.
stuff happens said | October 31st 2009 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
Agreed and the other guy who has been an underrated asset for the AB’s at the b’down is Andrew Hore.He’s had a great season.
Knives Out said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:55pm | Report comment
Yeah, Hore and Du Plessis are excellent at the breakdown.
MM Fike said | October 31st 2009 @ 11:25am | Report comment
I think the All Blacks will win in a canter. I wished it were otherwise and I’ll be doing handstands if the Wallabies cause a boilover.
If I was Deans I’d be very desperate. The locks and No. 8 are a huge weakness and the stocks are incredibly thin.
I hope the opposition pack is off their game.
OldManEmu said | October 31st 2009 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
I see legendary Horse rainer Bart Cummings was riddled by some hack as to the secret of his success having just trained his fourth Cox Plate winner. To overseas and non horse racing Roarers, the Cox Plate is regarded by those in the know as THE race the trainers and jockeys want to win – a weight for age race over 2040 metres run on a unique track that attracts the best horses in Australasia.
Anyway in true Bart Cummings style he answered “Good Horses.”
Hmmmmn. If Deans was capable of such plain speaking I think he would say the same sort of thing if asked, “Robbie, what do the Wallabies need to improve?”
Bruiser said | October 31st 2009 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
I was considering the Team of the Century captained by Eels yesterday along with a few mates, trying to work out of the current crop who’d get a game. It struck me that when you look at the Team each was pretty much a specialist in their position. With the current team you’ve got players almost playing a different position each game and those that are considered a Flanker/2nd Rower or in Giteus case perhaps a good Half or even winger. A good case in point – AAC. How can we expect these guys to play at their best in a very unforgiving environment when this happens. AAC & Cross were terrible playing together last time, so how can they step up tonight and make it alright? I for one hope they can but i worry. I also hope that the 2nd Rowers don’t go missing adn provide some mongrel & go forward. I won’t hold my breath with Chisholm that’s for sure who simply shouldn’t be there. Finally i think that the loss of Barnes is Huge given it would have been his 1st game VC and again its now all up to Giteau. Fingers crossed by given i am one of the many battered supporters that have always gone into recent tests excited and confident, i am simply hoping they can punch above their weight and get some fruitful combinations going.
OldManEmu said | October 31st 2009 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
Gosh that is good insight Bruiser.
John Connolly started this folly that the props needed to be able to play both sides of the scrum – what poppycock. Loosehead is that different to Tighthead as to be unrecognisable. Same with Inside Centre to Outside Centre, certainly in defense.
We have Smith playing Number 8, Chisholm playing Second row when he is as plain as day a number 6, Brown playing 6 when he is number 8, Mumm playing Second Row when he is a number 6, Alexander playing Tighthead when he is a Loosehead, AAC playing – what is the poor bastard playing this week? -, Cross playing a test match in the most difficult defensive position on the field when he does not even know the game – faaaarck me, is it any wonder these wretched buggers cant compete.
I say again, in different terms, we just dont have the cattle!!
Bruiser said | October 31st 2009 @ 1:25pm | Report comment
OEM, i was just about to reply your post and say too right! You don’t get a steeple chaser to switch to harness racing and back again…followed by running in the Melbourne Cup.
adam said | October 31st 2009 @ 1:25pm | Report comment
“(In Wellington), we didn’t help ourselves going across field in the backs and we got hurt at scrum time so we never got the ball other than at tap-off against them.
thats all matt giteau does anyway drop him for someone who goes forward not sideways the try line is straight ahead
Bruiser said | October 31st 2009 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
That’s why Barnes should by No. 10 and why his injury will really bite us i think. I definitely agree with the running across field but also thought they were way too deep. My 3 year old son could 1. see the move coming as they were so far behind the advantage line and 2. tackle the ball carrier as it was all telegraphed. It was only very late in the game when Gits attacked the line straight and hard that you could see the defense wondering what was going on…i think then we coughed the ball up from memory!
Bruiser said | October 31st 2009 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
Its interesting to see the Giteau is now VC! Does anyone think he might stop feeling sorry for himself, play some good rugby and lead the team well? Its almost laughable given all the commentary leading up to the Game … and then suddenly he’s gone from a leadership position to VC. I hope he steps up.