Wallabies not backing themselves as All Blacks show faith
By Alan Nicolea, 1 Nov 2009 Alan Nicolea is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, David Pocock, Graham Henry, robbie deans, Rugby Union, tokyo, wallabies
Related coverage
The sweeping backline play the All Blacks produced nearly twenty minutes into the second half was the sole indicator of how dominant New Zealand have been over the Wallabies in this season’s Test matches.
Whilst a brilliant David Pocock cover tackle denied Graham Henry’s men their third try of the night, the way New Zealand spread the ball during that particular play showcased a team willing to back its skill and flair when the opportunity presented itself.
This aspect of the All Blacks game proved to be the difference in allowing New Zealand to secure their fourth consecutive victory against the Wallabies in Tokyo -something the Kiwis have not accomplished since 1962.
All Blacks no.15, Mils Muliaina, was a standout in a New Zealand backline that showcased far more willingness to spread the ball from their own half of the field and counter attack than their conservative opponents.
Indeed, the Wallabies were hesitant from start to finish and were never able to play at a consistent rhythm that would trouble the All Blacks.
Despite the great effort from forwards Wycliff Palu and Ben Robinson, the platform they laid upfront was, unfortunately, not taken advantage of by the Australian backs.
Wallaby centre Adam Ashley Cooper and fullback James O’Conner often kicked possession away when there was opportunities available to spread the ball, albeit in their own half of the field.
Players of their instinctive talents should welcome the chance to open up the field and create a try scoring raid, rather than go for the most obvious option which is to kick and hope one has made enough territory for the forwards to regroup.
Whilst the element of error is high when trying such plays, the lack of risk taking opportunities the Wallabies are producing is plaguing the side’s ability to score tries, let alone win Test matches.
Every time Robbie Dean’s men were presented with a try scoring chance close to the All Blacks line, the Wallabies either produced one offload too many, or simply ran out of room on the fringes against a New Zealand unit that constantly slid well in defence.
Matt Giteau’s constant decision to go for goal, even with the side trailing by ten points at one stage, just emphasised the lack of faith the Wallabies have in their ability to run the ball in enemy territory.
Henry’s men, however, always seemed to get in behind of the Wallabies defence, thanks to some clinical interchange of passing from key players Dan Carter, Mils Muliaina and captain Richie McCaw.
Conrad Smith’s try for New Zealand early in the second half was another demonstration of how much confidence New Zealand have in their ability to let the ball do the talking in a situation where the game is very much in the balance.
Despite a lackluster first half which saw the Kiwis trailing 16-13, the All Blacks knew the only way to reverse the trend was to play the free flowing Rugby they are renowned for.
The Wallabies themselves should have had more reason to play up tempo Rugby, considering another try would have put them in a prime position to achieve a maiden win against their Trans-Tasman rivals in 2009.
But, like the majority of the seven Tests they have led at half-time this year, Dean’s men simply went into their shell in the second half, and and once again found themselves out enthused and outplayed by an opponent that simply wanted the result more than they did.
One can tell the Wallaby camp is in a crisis as soon as the players start performing at their best when defeat is a formality.
It took the Wallabies 78 minutes to realise the positive effects when it comes to running a football from your own end of the field.
With the match over as a contest, Australia centre Ashley Cooper decided to take on the All Blacks defence, breaking the line in the process.
The final result saw Cooper go on a mesmerising run down field, which almost resulted in the Wallabies back scoring a remarkable try.
Unfortunately, Cooper’s effort meant little as the All Blacks had already managed to sow up victory long before Australia decided to play running Rugby.
Whilst the Spring tour has gotten off to the worst possible start for Dean’s men, he can rest in the knowledge that, for a second in Tokyo, the Wallabies actually had it within them to play the necessary Rugby that will hopefully reveal itself on a regular basis.
It will certainly need to if Australia hopes to attain success in the European Grand Slam, starting against England next week.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A (2)
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Chiefs continue to wait for SBW (7)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (202)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, David Pocock, Graham Henry, robbie deans, Rugby Union, tokyo, wallabies

Stash said | November 1st 2009 @ 12:30am | Report comment
Coopers run was good – as was the Will’s snipe from the Wallaby 22 breaching the defence – Cory Jane had a good burst and showed that vicious fend again. I can see why Ioane has a lot of support fron fans – he stood out.
The Wallabies had good moments in this game – but the ABs were the better performers all night and looked good and dangerous with ball in hand (and a pretty good effort at the lineouts?!!). Did the coaching rotation work? It looked like it, there was a feeling of newness in attack and set pieces.
jools-usa said | November 1st 2009 @ 1:10am | Report comment
Hey Roar Gun
The silky NZ backline moves are no surprise to anyone watching their Nat Prov Championships,
Week after week you see their free-flowing penetration and depth of players with skill.
Said it before, Deans or no Deans, the Bledisloe is moving out of W’s grasp.
Too bad!
Jools-USA
cookie said | November 1st 2009 @ 2:51am | Report comment
Why was George Smith brought on at No. 8? It all went tits up from there… He is not, never has been and never will be a No. 8!
As soon as the wallabies forwards stopped dominating the break down NZ were able to get a more free flowing game…
I was frustrated with NZ’s forwards tactics…. If they weren’t holding onto the ball in the breakdown they were laying over the back of the ruck and hardly got pinged for it!
Can’t remember who scored the try when Ryan Cross left his man and went in to tackle an inside player already marked and tackledd for that matter, gifting a try to NZ. Basic schoolboy error in an otherwise ok game for him.
Will looks to be a player of the future, his passing and running game was superb.
Hat’s off to the Kiwi’s they came back into the game and were able to play the ball wide and were rewarded appropriately; even if they got away with murder at the breakdown…
Are Australia that dumb, they can’t take a page out of NZ’s book?
kingplaymaker said | November 1st 2009 @ 3:38am | Report comment
Alan I think it’s called having better players. A backline with Cross and O’Connor out of position is always going to have problems in attack.
Colin N said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:06am | Report comment
“A backline with Cross and O’Connor out of position is always going to have problems in attack.”
What’s Cross’s best position then? I thought he played 13 today? I’ve always seen him as a 13. He’s certainly not a winger or full-back and he doesn’t seem right as an inside centre.
Knives Out said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:08am | Report comment
I think KPM meant a backline WITH Cross, and with JOC out of position. I think that’s what he meant.
Colin N said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Oh, I see, fair do’s.
kingplaymaker said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Colin I think would be best as far away from the match 22 as possible. It’s amazing that Australia, who have produced some of the best backlines in recent history, are now resorting to such an average player. At least the likes of O’Connor, Cooper, Beale, while young, are talented. Cross is not and never was.
mcxd said | November 1st 2009 @ 3:42am | Report comment
Smiths try was was a result of some good ab passing and support but also thanks to some diabolical tackling (or lack of) from O’Connor. Please send him back to s14 preseason training, he’s not international class (at least yet). Why do we have so many so called boy wonders and elevate them so high so quickly ? Give them time to develop their skills in more appropriate games to match their current abilities.
kingplaymaker said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:43am | Report comment
MCXD agreed. It’s really sentimental. Besides, if anything he’s an inside centre and NOT a full-back.
Mick Gold Coast QLD said | November 1st 2009 @ 2:38pm | Report comment
“send him back to s14 preseason training’
What’s wrong with a season or two in Club rugby (or three or four). Is that so irrelevant in providing experience and practice? Do these blokes have a Medicare Mat clause that says “I’m too good for those local losers, and way too special.”
Did anyone see the not-way-too-famous NZ players going around in the Canterbury v Hawkes Bay match yesterday (not Club, I know, but not everyone there is a superstar-in-my-own-mirror) or in the weeks leading up to it?
Alan Nicolea said | November 1st 2009 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Kingplaymaker
You make a valid point but it should not be all bad. I really rate Adam Ashley Cooper as a player due to his incredible strength and speed. Peter Hynes is another that can finish off a try when given the chance. It all comes down to confidence though and the Wallabies just don’t have it at this stage. Maybe things will turn around during the Spring Tour.
kingplaymaker said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Alan firstly sorry for the slow reply.
The problem is that while it’s not all bad, it’s not all good either.
So whereas Digby Ioane, AAC are good, there is still Cross and O’Connor (out of position). Hynes is fine, but not special (like Ioane).
Whereas every player in the All Black backline is special, and that’s why they can pull off things the Wallabies can’t.
There is a solution in my opinion, which is to bolster the backs with some league imports, but otherwise it won’t be able to do as well as others.
Knives Out said | November 1st 2009 @ 8:56am | Report comment
‘Peter Hynes is another that can finish off a try when given the chance.’
Like today, Alan?
AAC is potentially a wonderful 13. His dynamism is startling.
Alan Nicolea said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:07am | Report comment
KO
At his best he certainly can, but like i said, confidence is down and hopefully for the Wallabies, it only takes the next month for them to see the best in what Hynes has to offer on the flanks. He didn’t have the best game last night but i have seen enough of him to know what he can produce on his day.
Jack Petro said | November 1st 2009 @ 9:59am | Report comment
“Wallabies not backing themselves as All Blacks show faith” … how true … and it was glaring obvious last night: O’Connor with a 4 on 2 option kicks the ball into touch. Where is the faith? The ability to challenge? I hope for his sake it wasn’t his call because he has potential (maybe not the potential to start Tests anymore); maybe it was one of the players outside of him.
Then there was the lineout. I can understand the confusion that occurs when the starting hooker has to move to the bench because of injury BUT … Hookers that can’t hit the mark, defensive jumpers out jumping our jumpers, lineout throws to 1!!!! Come on boys, we ARE better than this!
I thought last night would have been the perfect opportunity to throw the pill around – from goal-line to goal-line; counter-attack and back yourself. Maybe because we were out-enthused meant we couldn’t play this way; maybe it’s because the ABs are a much better team?
Oh well, let’s hope the rest of the Spring tour is a success
Knives Out said | November 1st 2009 @ 10:04am | Report comment
‘I thought last night would have been the perfect opportunity to throw the pill around – from goal-line to goal-line; counter-attack and back yourself. Maybe because we were out-enthused meant we couldn’t play this way; maybe it’s because the ABs are a much better team?’
When has Australia played like this during the past five years, especially under Deans.
Jack Petro said | November 1st 2009 @ 10:12am | Report comment
KO … under any of the last 3 Wallaby coaches? Then you look at S14 and see the same thing … “ugly” wins keep you in a job but they stop player development – we are the best example of this at the moment.
Knives Out said | November 1st 2009 @ 10:14am | Report comment
Hang on… are you suggesting that Australia wants to throw the ball around, or that they have long been inherently conservative?